Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Tenure alone is not sufficient: monitoring is essential

  • Article
  • Published:
Environmental Economics and Policy Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many scholars call for the establishment of one kind of formal tenure—government ownership, privatization, or community control—as the way to solve problems associated with high levels of deforestation. This will not work without extensive and consistent monitoring of forest use. In this article, we draw on analyses of time-series remote images, on-the-ground social-ecological surveys of local stakeholders and their forests, and experimental laboratory studies to show that “protected” forests may not be protected in practice when tenure alone is deemed to be the “solution.” When users themselves consider the rules in place to be legitimate, they are frequently willing to engage themselves in monitoring and sanctioning of uses considered illegal, even when related to government-owned property. When users are genuinely engaged in decisions about rules affecting their use, the likelihood of users to follow the rules and monitor others is much greater than when an external authority simply imposes rules. Simple formulas focusing on formal ownership, particularly ones based solely on public ownership of forested lands, will not solve the problems of resource overuse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acheson JM (2003) Capturing the commons: devising institutions to manage the Maine lobster industry. versity Press of New England, New Haven, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal A (2005) Environmentality: technologies of government and the making of subjects. Duke University Press, Durham, NC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal A, Ostrom E (2001) Collective action, property rights, and decentralization in resource use in India and Nepal. Politics and Society 29:485–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson C, Putterman L (2005) Do non-strategic sanctions obey the law of demand? The demand for punishment in the voluntary contribution mechanism. Games and Economic Behavior 54:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson K (2004) Who talks with whom? The role of repeated interactions in decentralized forest governance. World Development 32:233–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banana AY, Gombya-Ssembajjwe W (2000) Successful forest management: the importance of security of tenure and rule enforcement in Ugandan forests. In: Gibson CC, McKean MA, Ostrom E (eds) People and forests: communities, institutions, and governance. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 87–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber C, Miller K, Boness M (eds) (2004) Securing protected areas in the face of global change: issues and strategies. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Gland, Switzerland

  • Batistella M, Robeson S, Moran EF (2003) Settlement design, forest fragmentation, and landscape change in Rondônia, Amazônia. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 69:805–812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F (2004) Rethinking community-based conservation. Conservation Biology 18:621–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F (2007) Community-based conservation in a globalized world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) (in press)

  • Berkes F, Folke C (1998) Linking social and ecological systems: management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Bochet O, Page T, Putterman L (2006) Communication and punishment in voluntary contribution experiments. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 60:11–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bray DB, Kiepeis P (2005) Deforestation, forest transitions, and institutions for sustainability in southeastern Mexico, 1900–2000. Environment and History 11:195–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bray DB, Merino-Pérez L, Barry D (eds) (2005) The community forests of Mexico: managing for sustainable landscapes. University of Texas Press, Austin

  • Bruner AG, Gullison RE, Rice RE, da Fonseca GAB (2001) Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity. Science 291:125–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camerer CF (2003) Behavioral game theory: experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerer CF, Fehr E (2006) When does “economic man” dominate social behavior? Science 311:47–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell BM, Gordon IJ, Luckert MK, Petheram L, Vetter S (2006) In search of optimal stocking regimes in semi-arid grazing lands: one size does not fit all. Ecological Economics 60:75–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardenas J-C (2000) How do groups solve local commons dilemmas? Lessons from experimental economics in the field. Environment, Development and Sustainability 2:305–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardenas J-C (2003) Real wealth and experimental cooperation: evidence from field experiments. Journal of Development Economics 70:263–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardenas J-C, Ostrom E (2006) How norms help reduce the tragedy of the commons: a multi-layer framework for analyzing field experiments. In: Drobak JN (ed) Norms and the law. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 105–136

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cardenas J-C, Stranlund JK, Willis CE (2000) Local environmental control and institutional crowding-out. World Development 28:1719–1733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter JP (2007) The demand for punishment. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization (in press)

  • Casari M, Plott CM (2003) Decentralized management of common property resources: experiments with a centuries-old institution. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 51: 217–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz T, Ostrom E, Stern PC (2003) The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302:1907-1912. Article available at http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/reprint/302/5652/1907.pdf and CIPEC Supporting Online Material available at http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/data/302/5652/1907/DC1/1 (subscription required)

  • Ervin J (2003) Rapid assessment of protected area management effectiveness in four countries. Bioscience 53:833–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr E, Gächter S (2000) Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. American Economic Review 90:980–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr E, Rockenbach B (2003) Detrimental effects of sanctions on human altruism. Nature 422:137–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2003) State of the World’s Forests, 2003. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox J, Rindfuss RR, Walsh SJ, Mishra V (2003) People and the environment: approaches for linking household and community surveys to remote sensing and GIS. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frey BS (1997) A constitution for knaves crowds out civic virtues. Economic Journal 107:1043–1053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geist HJ, Lambin EF (2002) Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation. Bioscience 52:143–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghate R (2005) Tadoba-Andhari Tiger Reserve: relocation versus wildlife preservation. Economic and Political Weekly 40:4807–4809

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghate R, Nagendra H (2005) Role of monitoring in institutional performance: forest management in Maharashtra, India. Conservation and Society 3:509–532

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghimire KB, Pimbert MP (eds) (1997) Social change and conservation: environmental politics and impacts of national parks and protected areas. Earthscan, London

  • Gibson CC, McKean MA, Ostrom E (eds) (2000) People and forests: communities, institutions, and governance. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

  • Gibson CC, Williams JT, Ostrom E (2005) Local enforcement and better forests. World Development 33:273–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon HS (1954) The economic theory of a common-property resource: the fishery. Journal of Political Economy 62:124–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gürerk Ő, Irlenbusch B, Rockenbach B (2006) The competitive advantage of sanctioning institutions. Science 312:108–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackett S, Schlager E, Walker JM (1994) The role of communication in resolving commons dilemmas: experimental evidence with heterogeneous appropriators. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 27:99–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes TM (2006) Parks, people, and forest protection: an institutional assessment of the effectiveness of protected areas. World Development 34:2064–2075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes TM, Ostrom E (2005) Conserving the world’s forests: are protected areas the only way? Indiana Law Review 38:595–617

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrich J, Boyd R, Bowles S, Camerer C, Fehr E, Gintis H (2004) Foundations of human sociality: economic experiments and ethnographic evidence from fifteen small-scale societies. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Henrich J, McElreath R, Barr A, Ensminger J, Barrett C, Bolyanatz A, Cardenas JC, Gurven M, Gwako E, Henrich N, Lesorogol C, Marlowe F, Tracer D, Ziker J (2006) Costly punishment across human societies. Science 312:1767–1770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilborn R, Arcese P, Borner M, Hando J, Hopcraft G, Loibooki M, Mduma M, Sinclair ARE (2006) Effective enforcement in a conservation area. Science 314:1266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hockings M (2003) Systems for assessing the effectiveness of management in protected areas. Bioscience 53:823–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) (1999) Threats to forest protected areas: summary of a survey of 10 countries carried out in association with the World Commission on Protected Areas IUCN

  • IUCN (2003) Building support for protected areas: workshop stream 2. World Parks Congress Workshops, September 8–17. http://www.iucn.org/themes/wcpa/wpc2003/english/programme/workshops/broader.htm. Cited

  • Kaimowitz D, Angelsen A (1998) Economic models of tropical deforestation. A review. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlan D (2005) Using experimental economics to measure social capital and predict financial decisions. American Economic Review 95:1688–1699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauppi PE, Ausubel JH, Fang J, Mather AS, Sedjo RA, Waggoner PE (2006) Returning forests analyzed with the forest identity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 103: 17574–17579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb D, Erskine PD, Parrotta JA (2005) Restoration of degraded tropical forest landscapes. Science 310:1628–1632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy TE (2006) Protected areas: a prism for a changing world. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21:329–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall GR (2005) Economics for collaborative environmental management. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell W, Sweeney S (2005) Challenges of forest governance in Madagascar. The Geographic Journal 171:223–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran EF, Ostrom E (eds) (2005) Seeing the forest and the trees: human-environment interactions in forest ecosystems. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

  • Moran EF, Brondizio ES, Tucker JM, da Silva-Forsberg MC, McCracken S, Falesi I (2000) Effects of soil fertility and land-use on forest succession in Amazônia. Forest Ecology and Management 139:93–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagendra H, Southworth J, Tucker CM (2003) Accessibility as a determinant of landscape transformation in western Honduras: linking pattern and process. Landscape Ecology 18:141–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagendra H, Southworth J, Tucker CM, Karmacharya M, Karna B, Carlson LA (2004) Remote sensing for policy evaluation: monitoring parks in Nepal and Honduras. Environmental Management 34:748–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagendra H, Karmacharya M, Karna B (2005) Evaluating forest management in Nepal: views across space and time. Ecology and Society 10:art24 [online]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagendra H, Pareeth S, Ghate R (2006) People within parks—forests villages, land-cover change and landscape fragmentation in the Tadoba Andhari Tiger Reserve, India. Applied Geography 26:96–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC) (2002) The drama of the commons. Committee on the Human Dimensions of Global Change. National Academy, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Naughton-Treves L, Holland MB, Brandon K (2005) The role of protected areas in conserving biodiversity and sustaining local livelihoods. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30:219–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nepstad D, Schwartzman S, Bamberger B, Santilli M, Ray D, Schlesinger P, Lefebvre P, Alencar A, Prinz E, Fiske G, Rolla A (2006) Inhibition of Amazon deforestation and fire by parks and indigenous lands. Conservation Biology 20:65–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2005) Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2006) The value-added of laboratory experiments for the study of institutions and common-pool resources. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 61:149–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E, Walker J, Gardner R (1992) Covenants with and without a sword: self-governance is possible. American Political Science Review 86:404–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E, Gardner R, Walker J (1994) Rules, games, and common-pool resources. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pagdee A, Kim Y-S, Daugherty PJ (2006) What makes community forest management successful: a meta-study from community forests throughout the world. Society and Natural Resources 19:33–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perz SG, Skole DL (2003) Secondary forest expansion in the Brazilian Amazon and the refinement of forest transition theory. Society and Natural Resources 16:277–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Platteau J-P (2004) Monitoring elite capture in community-driven development. Development and Change 35:223–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchett L, Woolcock M (2003) Solutions when the solution is the problem: arraying the disarray in development. World Development 35:435–461

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice RE, Sugal CA, Ratay SM, da Fonseca GAB (2001) Sustainable forest management: a review of conventional wisdom. Center for Applied Biodiversity Science, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Rindfuss RR, Walsh SJ, Turner BL II, Fox J, Mishra V (2004) Developing a science of land change: challenges and methodological issues. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 101:13976–13981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudel TK, Coomes OT, Moran E, Achard F, Angelsen A, Xu J, Lambin E (2005) Forest transitions: toward a global understanding of land-use change. Global Environmental Change 15:23–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sally D (1995) Conversation and cooperation in social dilemmas. A meta-analysis of experiments from 1958 to 1992. Rationality and Society 7:58–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayer J, Wells MP (2004) The pathology of projects. In: McShane TO, Wells MP (eds) Getting biodiversity projects to work: towards more effective conservation and development. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 35–48

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schweik C, Nagendra H, Sinha DR (2003) Using satellites to search for forest management innovations in Nepal. Ambio 32:312–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sikor T (2006) Analyzing community-based forestry: local, political and agrarian perspectives. Forest Policy and Economics 8:339–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terborgh J (1999) Requiem for nature. Island, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Tran NT (2005) From legal acts to village institutions and forest use practices: effects of devolution in the central highlands of Vietnam. Shaker, Aachen, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker CM, Ostrom E (2005) Multidisciplinary research relating institutions and forest transformations. In: Moran EF, Ostrom E (eds) Seeing the forest and the trees. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 81–104

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vanclay JK (2001) The effectiveness of parks. Science 293:1007a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogt ND, Banana AY, Gombya-Ssembajjwe W, Bahati J (2006) Understanding the stability of forest reserve boundaries in the West Mengo region of Uganda. Ecology and Society 11:38 [online]. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/issl/art38/. Cited

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker JM, Halloran MA (2004) Rewards and sanctions and the provision of public goods in one-shot settings. Experimental Economics 7:235–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker JM, Gardner R, Ostrom E (1990) Rent dissipation in a limited-access common-pool resource: experimental evidence. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 19:203–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb EL, Shivakoti GP (2006) Community adaptations under changing forest policy. Sage, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells M, Brandon K (1992) People and parks: linking protected area management with local communities. World Bank, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Western D, Wright RM (1994) The background to community-based conservation. In: Western D, Wright RM, Strum SC (eds) Natural connections: perspectives on community-based conservation. Island, Washington DC, pp 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • World Wildlife Fund International (WWF) (2004) Are protected areas working? An analysis of forest protected areas by WWF. WWF, Gland, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for the Study of Institutions, Population, and Environmental Change (CIPEC), Indiana University, 408 North Indiana Avenue, Bloomington, IN, 47408, USA

    Elinor Ostrom & Harini Nagendra

  2. Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Indiana University, 513 North Park Street, Bloomington, IN, 47408, USA

    Elinor Ostrom

  3. Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE), 659 5th A Main, Hebbal, Bangalore, 560024, India

    Harini Nagendra

Authors
  1. Elinor Ostrom
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Harini Nagendra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

About this article

Cite this article

Ostrom, E., Nagendra, H. Tenure alone is not sufficient: monitoring is essential. Environ Econ Policy Stud 8, 175–199 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03353956

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03353956

Key words

Search

Navigation