Skip to main content
Log in

“Superstitious” Behavior in Children

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The behavior of 12 preschool children was examined for the emergence of superstitious behavior under response-independent, fixed-time (FT) schedules of reinforcement. Three experimental phases were conducted: (a) two 8-min baseline sessions, (b) six 10-min experimental sessions of FT 15- or 30-sec marble delivery, and (c) two final 8-min baseline sessions. Sessions were videotaped and scored; mean interobserver agreement ranged from 80.0 to 98.6%. Results showed that responding emerged on the FT schedules for seven of the children, increasing in probability towards the end of the intervals; five children either displayed responses having no discernible temporal pattern or they had no specifiable dominant response. A test of the reinforcing function of the marbles showed that they generally functioned as reinforcers. Discussion focused on the fixed-time length, the behavioral processes involved, methodological qualifications, and the nature of the responding engendered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ANDERSON, M. C, & SHETTLEWORTH, S. J. (1977). Behavioral adaptation to fixed-interval and fixed-time food delivery in golden hamsters. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 28, 33–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ANDERSON, V. J., BUSKIST, W. F., & MILLER, J. R. (1981). The effects of autoshaping and automaintenance schedules of responding in children. The Psychological Record, 31, 519–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • BLACKMAN, D. (1973). Operant conditioning: An experimental analysis. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • BRUNER, A., & REVUSKY, S. H. (1961). Collateral behavior in humans. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4, 349–350.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • CATANIA, A. C, & CUTTS, D. (1963). Experimental control of superstitious responding in humans. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 6, 203–208.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • DAVIS, H., & HUBBARD, J. (1972). An analysis of superstitious behavior in the rat. Behavior, 51, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • DAVIS, H., HUBBARD, J., & REBERG, D. (1973). A methodological critique of research on “superstitious” behavior. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1, 447–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FENNER, D. F. (1980). The role of contingencies and “principles of behavioral variation” in pigeons’ pecking. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 34, 1–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • FERSTER, C. B., CULBERSTON, S., & BOREN, M. C. P. (1975). Behavior principles. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • FERSTER, C. B., & SKINNER, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • FOSTER, W. S. (1978). Adjunctive behavior: An under-reported phenomenon in applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 545–546.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • HERRNSTEIN, R. J. (1966). Superstition: A corollary of the principles of operant conditioning. In W. K. Honig (Ed.), Operant behavior: Areas of research and application (pp. 33–51). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • HIGGINS, S. T., & MORRIS, E. K. (1984). A review of the generality of free-operant avoidance conditioning to human behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 247–272.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • HOLLIS, J. H. (1973). “Superstition”: The effects of independent and contingent events on free operant responses in retarded children. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 77, 585–596.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • IVERSON, I. H. (1976). Interactions between reinforced responses and collateral responses. The Psychological Record, 26, 399–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KELLER, F. S., & SCHOENFELD, W. S. (1950). Principles of psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • KRAMER, T. J., & RILLING, M. (1970). Differential reinforcement of low rates: A selective critique. Psychological Bulletin, 74, 225–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LATTAL, K. A., & POLING, A. D. (1981). Describing response-event relations: Babel revisited. The Behavior Analyst, 4, 143–152.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • LOWE, C. F. (1979). Determinants of human operant behavior. In M. D. Zeiler & P. Harzem (Eds.), Reinforcement and the organization of behavior (pp. 159–192). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • LYON, D. O. (1982). Concurrent behavior: Are the interpretations mutually exclusive? The Behavior Analyst, 5, 175–187.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • MICHAEL, J. T. (1982). Distinguishing between discriminative and motivational functions of stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 149–155.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • MULLER, P. G., CROW, R. E., & CHENEY, C. D. (1979). Schedule-induced locomotor activity in humans. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 31, 83–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • POLING, A. (1985). Reporting interobserver agreement: Another difference in applied and basic behavioral psychology. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 3, 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • REBERG, D., INNIS, N. K., MANN, B., & EIZINGA, C. (1978). “Superstitious” behavior resulting from periodic response-independent presentations of food or water. Animal Behavior, 26, 507–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RESCORLA, R. A., & SKUCY, J. C. (1969). Effect of response-independent reinforcers during extinction. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 67, 381–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SCHWARTZ, B. (1974). On going back to nature: A review of Seligman and Hagar’s Biological boundaries of learning. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 21, 183–198.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • SCHWARTZ, B., & GAMZU, E. (1977). Pavlovian control of operant behavior. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior (pp. 53–97). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • SKINNER, B. F. (1948). Superstition in the pigeon. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 168–172.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SKINNER, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • SKINNER, B. F. (1966). What is the experimental analysis of human behavior? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 9, 213–218.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • SKINNER, B. F. (1977). The force of coincidence. In B. C. Etzel, J. M. LeBlanc, & D. M. Baer (Eds.), New developments in behavioral psychology: Theory, methods, and applications (pp. 3–6). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • SKINNER, B. F. (1984). Response/Skinner: Phylogeny and ontogeny. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 701–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • STADDON, J. E. R. (1977). Schedule-induced behavior. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior (pp. 125–152). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • STADDON, J. E. R., & AYRES, S. L. (1975). Sequential and temporal properties of behavior induced by a schedule of periodic food delivery. Behavior, 54, 26–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • STADDON, J. E. R., & SIMMELHAG, V. L. (1971). The “superstition” experiment: A reexamination of its implications for the principles of adaptive behavior. Psychological Review, 78, 3–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WEISBERG, P., & KENNEDY, D. B. (1969). Maintenance of children’s behavior by accidental schedules of reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 8, 222–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ZEILER, M. D. (1970). Other behavior: Consequences of reinforcing and responding. Journal of Psychology, 74, 149–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ZEILER, M. D. (1972). Superstitious behavior in children: An experimental analysis. In H. W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol 7, pp. 1–29). New York: Academic Press.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This article is based on a portion of a dissertation submitted by Gregory A. Wagner to the Department of Human Development at the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the PhD degree. The research was supported by an HEW USPHS Traineeship (#07173-02) to Gregory A. Wagner and by a University of Kansas Biomedical Sciences Support Grant (#4888-x706-3) to Edward K. Morris. Support was also made available through the John T. Stewart Children’s Center and the Bureau of Child Research through Nichhd (#HD-02528). We extend our appreciation to Michael Zeiler for his encouragement to pursue this project; to Dave Born, Lisa Johnson, Dave Rider, and Jim Todd for their helpful comments on earlier versions of the manuscript; to Mark Eboch and Karen Carleton for their assistance in conducting the study; and to the staff and children of the Edna A. Hill Child Development Preschool.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wagner, G.A., Morris, E.K. “Superstitious” Behavior in Children. Psychol Rec 37, 471–488 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394994

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394994

Navigation