Abstract
The behavior of 12 preschool children was examined for the emergence of superstitious behavior under response-independent, fixed-time (FT) schedules of reinforcement. Three experimental phases were conducted: (a) two 8-min baseline sessions, (b) six 10-min experimental sessions of FT 15- or 30-sec marble delivery, and (c) two final 8-min baseline sessions. Sessions were videotaped and scored; mean interobserver agreement ranged from 80.0 to 98.6%. Results showed that responding emerged on the FT schedules for seven of the children, increasing in probability towards the end of the intervals; five children either displayed responses having no discernible temporal pattern or they had no specifiable dominant response. A test of the reinforcing function of the marbles showed that they generally functioned as reinforcers. Discussion focused on the fixed-time length, the behavioral processes involved, methodological qualifications, and the nature of the responding engendered.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ANDERSON, M. C, & SHETTLEWORTH, S. J. (1977). Behavioral adaptation to fixed-interval and fixed-time food delivery in golden hamsters. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 28, 33–50.
ANDERSON, V. J., BUSKIST, W. F., & MILLER, J. R. (1981). The effects of autoshaping and automaintenance schedules of responding in children. The Psychological Record, 31, 519–528.
BLACKMAN, D. (1973). Operant conditioning: An experimental analysis. London: Methuen.
BRUNER, A., & REVUSKY, S. H. (1961). Collateral behavior in humans. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4, 349–350.
CATANIA, A. C, & CUTTS, D. (1963). Experimental control of superstitious responding in humans. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 6, 203–208.
DAVIS, H., & HUBBARD, J. (1972). An analysis of superstitious behavior in the rat. Behavior, 51, 1–12.
DAVIS, H., HUBBARD, J., & REBERG, D. (1973). A methodological critique of research on “superstitious” behavior. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1, 447–449.
FENNER, D. F. (1980). The role of contingencies and “principles of behavioral variation” in pigeons’ pecking. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 34, 1–12.
FERSTER, C. B., CULBERSTON, S., & BOREN, M. C. P. (1975). Behavior principles. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
FERSTER, C. B., & SKINNER, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
FOSTER, W. S. (1978). Adjunctive behavior: An under-reported phenomenon in applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 545–546.
HERRNSTEIN, R. J. (1966). Superstition: A corollary of the principles of operant conditioning. In W. K. Honig (Ed.), Operant behavior: Areas of research and application (pp. 33–51). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
HIGGINS, S. T., & MORRIS, E. K. (1984). A review of the generality of free-operant avoidance conditioning to human behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 247–272.
HOLLIS, J. H. (1973). “Superstition”: The effects of independent and contingent events on free operant responses in retarded children. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 77, 585–596.
IVERSON, I. H. (1976). Interactions between reinforced responses and collateral responses. The Psychological Record, 26, 399–413.
KELLER, F. S., & SCHOENFELD, W. S. (1950). Principles of psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
KRAMER, T. J., & RILLING, M. (1970). Differential reinforcement of low rates: A selective critique. Psychological Bulletin, 74, 225–254.
LATTAL, K. A., & POLING, A. D. (1981). Describing response-event relations: Babel revisited. The Behavior Analyst, 4, 143–152.
LOWE, C. F. (1979). Determinants of human operant behavior. In M. D. Zeiler & P. Harzem (Eds.), Reinforcement and the organization of behavior (pp. 159–192). New York: Wiley.
LYON, D. O. (1982). Concurrent behavior: Are the interpretations mutually exclusive? The Behavior Analyst, 5, 175–187.
MICHAEL, J. T. (1982). Distinguishing between discriminative and motivational functions of stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 149–155.
MULLER, P. G., CROW, R. E., & CHENEY, C. D. (1979). Schedule-induced locomotor activity in humans. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 31, 83–90.
POLING, A. (1985). Reporting interobserver agreement: Another difference in applied and basic behavioral psychology. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 3, 5–6.
REBERG, D., INNIS, N. K., MANN, B., & EIZINGA, C. (1978). “Superstitious” behavior resulting from periodic response-independent presentations of food or water. Animal Behavior, 26, 507–519.
RESCORLA, R. A., & SKUCY, J. C. (1969). Effect of response-independent reinforcers during extinction. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 67, 381–389.
SCHWARTZ, B. (1974). On going back to nature: A review of Seligman and Hagar’s Biological boundaries of learning. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 21, 183–198.
SCHWARTZ, B., & GAMZU, E. (1977). Pavlovian control of operant behavior. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior (pp. 53–97). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
SKINNER, B. F. (1948). Superstition in the pigeon. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 168–172.
SKINNER, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.
SKINNER, B. F. (1966). What is the experimental analysis of human behavior? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 9, 213–218.
SKINNER, B. F. (1977). The force of coincidence. In B. C. Etzel, J. M. LeBlanc, & D. M. Baer (Eds.), New developments in behavioral psychology: Theory, methods, and applications (pp. 3–6). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
SKINNER, B. F. (1984). Response/Skinner: Phylogeny and ontogeny. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 701–707.
STADDON, J. E. R. (1977). Schedule-induced behavior. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior (pp. 125–152). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
STADDON, J. E. R., & AYRES, S. L. (1975). Sequential and temporal properties of behavior induced by a schedule of periodic food delivery. Behavior, 54, 26–49.
STADDON, J. E. R., & SIMMELHAG, V. L. (1971). The “superstition” experiment: A reexamination of its implications for the principles of adaptive behavior. Psychological Review, 78, 3–40.
WEISBERG, P., & KENNEDY, D. B. (1969). Maintenance of children’s behavior by accidental schedules of reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 8, 222–233.
ZEILER, M. D. (1970). Other behavior: Consequences of reinforcing and responding. Journal of Psychology, 74, 149–155.
ZEILER, M. D. (1972). Superstitious behavior in children: An experimental analysis. In H. W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol 7, pp. 1–29). New York: Academic Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This article is based on a portion of a dissertation submitted by Gregory A. Wagner to the Department of Human Development at the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the PhD degree. The research was supported by an HEW USPHS Traineeship (#07173-02) to Gregory A. Wagner and by a University of Kansas Biomedical Sciences Support Grant (#4888-x706-3) to Edward K. Morris. Support was also made available through the John T. Stewart Children’s Center and the Bureau of Child Research through Nichhd (#HD-02528). We extend our appreciation to Michael Zeiler for his encouragement to pursue this project; to Dave Born, Lisa Johnson, Dave Rider, and Jim Todd for their helpful comments on earlier versions of the manuscript; to Mark Eboch and Karen Carleton for their assistance in conducting the study; and to the staff and children of the Edna A. Hill Child Development Preschool.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wagner, G.A., Morris, E.K. “Superstitious” Behavior in Children. Psychol Rec 37, 471–488 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394994
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394994