Skip to main content

Using a generic approach to support the construction of methods

  • Software Engineering and Reusable Software
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA 1997)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1308))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The new emerging field of Method Engineering acknowledges the need for rapid construction of methods. In this paper, we propose to define a method as a set of method chunks which contains guidelines for supporting the development process. There are two types of guidelines. One type supports decisions leading to a transformation of schema elements, whereas the second one helps in controlling the flow of decisions. In order to improve efficiency in the construction of methods, we propose to derive the method chunks from a set of generic patterns, obtained by abstracting out the commonalties from a set of current methods. This paper presents the approach we propose to build a method. It focuses on the generic knowledge first and then presents an example of method construction based on the approach. Finally we exemplify the use of a method to model an elevator control system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Batini C., Ceri S. Navathe S. B., “Conceptual Database Design, An entity-relationship approach”, Benjamin/cummings Eds., 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brunet, J., “Analyse Conceptuelle orientée-objet”, PhD thesis, University of Paris 6, France, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chen P. P. S., The Entity-Relationship Model: Towards an unified view of data”, ACM Transactions on Database Systems, Vol 1, N° 1, March 76.

    Google Scholar 

  4. [Deneckere96]: Deneckere R., Souveyet C., Rolland C., “Hanbook for the OO methods”, Internal Report, TOOBIS Project, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  5. [Grosz94]: Grosz G., Rolland C., “The case study of the elevator system with O*”,deliverable 2 Andersen Consulting, June 1994, (38 pages).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Grundy J. C., Venable J. R., “Towards an integrated environment for method engineering”, Proceedings of the IFIP TC8, WG8.1/8.2 Working Conference on Method Engineering, Atlanta, USA, 2628 August 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Harmsen F et al, “Situational method engineering for informational system project approaches”, in Method and Associated Tools for the Information Systems Life Cycle, Verijn-Stuart and Olle (eds.), North Holland, pp169–194, Maastrischt, The netherlands, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hidding G.J., “Methodology information: who uses it and why not?” Proc. WITS-94, Vancouver, Canada, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lyytinen K., Smolander K., Tahvainen V-P., “Modelling CASE Environments in sytems Work”, CAISE'89 conference papers, Kista, Sweden, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Martin J., Odell J. J., “Object-oriented Analysis and Design”, Prentice-Hall, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Plihon V., ”Un environnement pour l'ngénierie des méthodes”, PhD thesis, University Paris ISorbonne, January 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. Rolland, O. Foucault, G. Benci “Conception des systémes d'information: La méthode REMORA”, Eyrolles, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rolland C., Grosz G., “A General Framework for Describing the Requirements Engineering Process”, C. IEEE Conference an Systems Man and Cybernetics, CSMC94, San Antonio, Texas, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  14. : Rolland C., Prakash N., “A proposal for context-specific method engineering]”, Proceedings of the IFIP TC8, WG8.1/8.2 Working Conference on Method Engineering, Atlanta, USA, 26–28 August 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rolland C., Plihon V.: Using Generic Method Chunks to Generate Process Models Fragments, Proc of the Third International Conference on Requirement Engineering (ICRE'96) Conference, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Rumbaugh, M. Blahs, W. Premerlani, F. Eddy, W. Loresen: “Object-oriented modeling and design”, Prentice Hall international, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Saeki M., Wenyin K., “PCTE based Tool for Supporting Collaborative Specification Development”, Conference PCTE'94, San Francisco, Dec. 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  18. van Slooten K., Hodes B.; “Characterizing. IS Development Projects”; Proceedings of the IFIP TC8, WG8.1/8.2 Working Conference on Method Engineering, Atlanta, USA; 26–28 August 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Souveyet S., “Méthode orientée objet dédiée aux aspects temporels dans les systémes d'information (TOOM)”, Submitted paper, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Welke R, and Kumar K., “Method engineering: a proposal for situation-spec methodology construction”, in Systems Analysis and Design: A Research Agenda, Cotterman and Senn(eds), Wiley, 91.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Abdelkader Hameurlain A Min Tjoa

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Plihon, V., Rolland, C. (1997). Using a generic approach to support the construction of methods. In: Hameurlain, A., Tjoa, A.M. (eds) Database and Expert Systems Applications. DEXA 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1308. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0022074

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0022074

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-63478-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69580-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics