Abstract
Most robot designers make the mechanical interface between an actuator and its load as stiff as possible[9][10]. This makes sense in traditional position-controlled systems, because high interface stiffness maximizes bandwidth and, for non-collocated control, reduces instability. However, lower interface stiffness has advantages as well, including greater shock tolerance, lower reflected inertia, more accurate and stable force control, less damage during inadvertent contact, and the potential for energy storage. The ability of series elasticity (usually in the form of a compliant coating on an end-effector) to stabilize force control during intermittent contact with hard surfaces is well known. This paper proposes that for natural tasks where small-motion bandwidth is not of paramount concern, actuator to load interfaces should be significantly less stiff than in most present designs. Furthermore, by purposefully placing the majority of interface elasticity inside of an actuator package, a new type of actuator is created with performance characteristics more suited to the natural world. Despite common intuition, such a series-elastic actuator is not difficult to control.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alexander, R. McNeill, “Elastic Mechanisms in Animal Movement”, Cambridge University Press, 1988.
Angle, C.M. and Brooks, R.A., “Small Planetary Rovers”, IEEE International Workshop on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Tsuchiura, Japan, July 1990 pp. 383–388.
Asada, H. and Kanade, T. “Design of Direct-Drive Mechanical Arms”, ASME J. of Vibration, Acoustics, Stress, and Reliability in Design 105(3), pp. 312–316.
Balas, Mark J., “Active Control of Flexible Systems”, Proc. of the 1977 Symposium on Dynamics and Control of Large Flexible Spacecraft, June 13–15, 1977, Blacksburg, VA pp 217–236.
Brooks, R.A. and Stein, L.A., “Building Brains for Bodies”, to appear in Autonomous Robots, (1:1), 1994.
Brooks, R.A., “The L Manual”, MIT AI Lab Internal, 1994.
Cannon, Robert H. Jr., and Rosenthal, Dan E., “Experiments in the Control of Flexible Structures with Noncolocated Sensors and Actuators”, J. Guidance, Vol. 7 No. 5 pp. 546–553, Sept.–Oct. 1984.
Cannon, Robert H. Jr., and Schmitz, E., “Initial Experiments on the End-Point Control of a Flexible One-Link Robot”, Int. J. of Robotics Research, Vol. 3 No. 3 (1984) pp 62–75.
Eppinger, Steven D., and Seering, Warren P., “Three Dynamic Problems in Robot Force Control”, IEEE Intl. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, 1989, pp 392–397.
Eppinger, Steven D., and Seering, Warren P., “Understanding Bandwidth Limitation in Robot Force Control”, IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, April 1987.
Hashimoto, Minoru, and Imamura, Yuichi, “An Instrumented Compliant Wrist Using a Parallel Mechanism”, Japan/USA Symp. on Flexible Automation, V. 1 ASME 1992, pp 741–744.
Hogan, N., “Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation: Part I — Theory, Part II — Implementation, Part III — Applications”, J. of Dyn. Syst., Measurement Contr., 107:1–24 (1985)
Hogan, Neville, “On the Stability of Manipulators Performing Contact Tasks”, IEEE J. of Robotics and Automation, V4 N6, Dec. 1988, pp 677–686.
Hogan, Neville, and Colgate, Ed, “An Analysis of Contact Instability in term of Passive Physical Equivalents”, IEEE Intl. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, 1989, pp 404–409.
Hunter, Ian W., Hollerbach, John M., and Ballantyne, John, “A comparative analysis of actuator technologies for robotics”, Robotics Review 2, MIT Press, 1991.
Khatib, O., “Real Time Obstacle Avoidance for Manipulators and Mobile Robots”, Int. J. of Robotics Res. V5 N1 (1986).
Morrell, John B., and Salisbury, J. K., “Parallel Coupled Actuators for High Performance Force Control: A Micro-Macro Concept”, Submitted to IROS 95.
Raibert, M. H., “Legged Robots That Balance.” Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press (1986).
Readman, Mark C., “Flexible Joint Robots”, CRC Press, 1994.
Salisbury, K., Eberman, B., Levin, M., and Townsend, W., “The Design and Control of an Experimental Whole-Arm Manipulator”, Proc. 5th Int. Symp. on Robotics Research. (1989)
Spong, M. W., “Modeling and Control of Elastic Joint Robots”, Trans. of the ASME, Vol 109, Dec. 1987, pp 310–319.
Sugano, S., Tsuto, S., and Kato, I., “Force Control of the Robot Finger Joint equipped with Mechanical Compliance Adjuster”, Proc. of the 1992 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 1992, pp 2005–2013.
Whitney, Daniel E., “Force Feedback Control of Manipulator Fine Motions”, J. Dyn. Syst. Measurement Contr. 98:91–97 (1977)
Whitney, Daniel E., “Historical Perspective and State of the Art in Robot Force Control”, Int. J. of Robotics Research, V6, N1, Spring 1987 pp 3–14.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pratt, G.A., Williamson, M.M., Dillworth, P., Pratt, J., Wright, A. (1997). Stiffness isn't everything. In: Khatib, O., Salisbury, J.K. (eds) Experimental Robotics IV. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, vol 223. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0035216
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0035216
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-76133-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-40942-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive