Skip to main content
Log in

Investigating culture-related aspects of behavior for virtual characters

  • Published:
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, culture-related behaviors are investigated on several channels of communication for virtual characters. Prototypical behaviors were formalized in computational models based on a literature review as well as a corpus analysis, exemplifying the German and Japanese cultures. Therefore, aspects of verbal behavior, communication management and nonverbal behavior were taken into account. In evaluation studies conducted in the targeted cultures, each aspect’s impact on human observers was tested. With it, we investigated for which of the aspects, observers prefer agent behavior that was designed to resemble their own cultural background.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. André, E., Klesen, M., Gebhard, P., Allen, S., & Rist, T. (2000). Integrating models of personality and emotions into lifelike characters. In A. Paiva (Ed.), Affective interactions (pp. 150–165). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Aylett, R., Paiva, A., Vannini, N., Enz, S., André, E., & Hall, L. (2009). But that was in another country: agents and intercultural empathy. In C. Sierra, C. Castelfranchi, K. S. Decker, & J. S. Sichman (Eds.), Proc. of 8th int. conf. on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (AAMAS 2009). Budapest: AAMAS.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bergmann, K., & Kopp, S. (2009). Bayesian decision networks for iconic gesture generation. In Z. Ruttkay, M. Kipp, A. Nijholt, & H. H. Vilhjálmsson (Eds.), Proc. of 9th int. conf. on intelligent virtual agents (IVA 2009) (pp. 76–89). Amsterdam: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Bull, P. (1987). Posture and gesture. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cassell, J. (2007). Body language: Lessons from the near-human. In J. Riskin (Ed.), Genesis redux: Essays in the history and philosophy of artificial intelligence (pp. 346–374). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Damian, I., Endrass, B., Huber, P., Bee, N., & André, E. (2011). Individualized agent interactions. In Proc. of 4th int. conf. on motion in games (MIG 2011), Edinburgh.

  8. Decision Systems Laboratory. (2005–2007). GeNIe and SMILE. http://genie.sis.pitt.edu/. Last viewed: 03.12.2012

  9. eCute Project. (2012). eCute: Education in cultural understanding, technologically-enhanced. http://ecute.eu/. Last viewed: 03.12.2012

  10. Ekman, P. (1992). Telling lies—clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics, and marriage (3rd ed.). New York: Norton and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Endrass, B., Huang, L., André, E., & Gratch, J. (2010). A data-driven approach to model culture-specific communication management styles for virtual agents. In W. van der Hoek, G. A. Kaminka, Y. Lespérance, M. Luck, & S. Sen (Eds.), Proc. of 9th int. conf. on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (AAMAS 2010) (pp. 99–108). Toronto: AAMAS.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Endrass, B., Nakano, Y., Lipi, A., Rehm, M., & André, E. (2011). Culture-related topic selection in SmallTalk conversations across Germany and Japan. In H. H. Vilhjálmsson, S. Koop, S. Marsella, & K. R. Thórisson (Eds.), Proc. of 11th int. conf. on intelligent virtual agents (IVA 2011) (pp. 1–13). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Endrass, B., Rehm, M., & André, E. (2009). Culture-specific communication management for virtual agents. In K. S. Decker, J. S. Sichman, C. Sierra, & C. Castelfranchi (Eds.), Proc. of 8th int. conf. on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (AAMAS 2009). Budapest: AAMAS.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Endrass, B., Rehm, M., & André, E. (2011). Planning small talk behavior with cultural influences for multiagent systems. Computer Speech and Language, 25(2), 158–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Endrass, B., Rehm, M., Lipi, A. A., Nakano, Y., & André, E. (2011). ulture-related differences in aspects of behavior for virtual characters across Germany and Japan. In L. Sonenberg, P. Stone, K. Tumer, & P. Yolum (Eds.), Proc. of 10th int. conf. on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (AAMAS 2011) (pp. 441–448). Richland: AAMAS.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gallaher, P. E. (1992). Individual differences in nonverbal behavior: Dimensions of style. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(1), 133–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hall, E. T. (1959). The silent language. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hall, E. T. (1966). The hidden dimension. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hall, E. T. (1983). The dance of life. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hartmann, B., Mancini, M., & Pelachaud, C. (2006). Implementing expressive gesture synthesis for embodied conversational agents. In S. Gibet, N. Courty, & J. F. Kamp (Eds.), Gesture workshop (GW 2005). LNAI (Vol. 3881, pp. 188–199). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organisations. Software of the mind. Intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hofstede, G. J. (2005). Role playing with synthetic cultures: the evasive rules of the game. In 9th International workshop of the IFIP Wg 5.7 SIG on experimental learning in industrial management, Helsinki.

  23. Hofstede, G. J., Pedersen, P. B., & Hofstede, G. (2002). Exploring culture—exercises, stories and synthetic cultures. Yarmouth: Intercultural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Isbister, K., Nakanishi, H., Ishida, T., & Nass, C. (2000). Helper agent: Designing an assistant for human–human interaction in a virtual meeting space. In Proceedings of CHI 2000 (pp. 57–64). New York: ACM Press.

  25. Johnson, W. J., Marsella, S., & Vilhjálmsson, H. (2004). The DARWARS tactical language training system. In Interservice/industry training, simulation, and education conference, Orlando.

  26. Kim, J., Hill, R. W., Durlach, P., Lane, H. C., Forbell, E., Core, M., Marsella, S., Pynadath, D., & Hart, J. (2009). BiLAT: A game-based environment for practicing negotiation in a cultural context. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 19, 289–308. IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Koda, T., Rehm, M., & André, E. (2008). Cross-cultural evaluations of avatar facial expressions designed by western designers. In H. Prendinger, J. Lester, & M. Ishizuka (Eds.), Proc. of 8th int. conf. on intelligent virtual agents (IVA 2008) (pp. 245–252). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind—what gestures reveal about thought. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Nau, D., Cao, Y., Lotem, A., & Munoz-Avila, H. (1999). SHOP: Simple hierarchical ordered planner. In Proc. of 16th int. joint conf. on artificial intelligence (IJCAI 1999) (pp. 968–973). Stockholm: IJCAI

  30. Rehm, M., André, E., Bee, N., Endrass, B., Wissner, M., Nakano, Y., et al. (2009). Creating standardized video recordings of multimodal interactions across cultures. In M. Kipp, J. C. Martin, P. Paggio, & D. Heylen (Eds.), Multimodal Corpora. LNAI (Vol. 5509, pp. 138–159). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Rehm, M., André, E., Nakano, Y., Nishida, T., Bee, N., Endrass, B., et al. (2007). The CUBE-G approach—coaching culture-specific nonverbal behavior by virtual agents. In I. Mayer & H. Mastik (Eds.), ISAGA 2007: Organizing and learning through gaming and, simulation. Delft: Eburon.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rehm, M., Nakano, Y., Koda, T., & Winschiers-Theophilus, H. (2012). Culturally aware agent communication. In M. Zacarias & J. de Oliveira (Eds.), Human–computer interaction. SCI (Vol. 396, pp. 411–436). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Schneider, K. P. (1988). Small talk: analysing phatic discourse. Marburg: Hitzeroth.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ting-Toomey, S. (1999). Communicating across cultures. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Trompenaars, F., & Hampden-Turner, C. (1997). Riding the waves of culture—understanding cultural diversity in business. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Yin, L., Bickmore, T., & Cortés, D. E. (2010). The impact of linguistic and cultural congruity on persuasion by conversational agents. In J. M. Allbeck, N. I. Badler, T. W. Bickmore, C. Pelachaud, & A. Safonova (Eds.), Proc. of 10th int. conf. on intelligent virtual agents (IVA 2010) (pp. 343–349). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partly funded by the European Commission within the 7th Framework Program under Grant agreement eCute. This paper constitutes a summary of a PhD thesis which was partly covered by a Grant from the Elitenetzwerk Bayern (Elite Network Bavaria). Earlier parts of the work were done in scope of the Cube-G project funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Birgit Endrass.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Endrass, B., André, E., Rehm, M. et al. Investigating culture-related aspects of behavior for virtual characters. Auton Agent Multi-Agent Syst 27, 277–304 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-012-9218-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-012-9218-5

Keywords

Navigation