Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparative performance of new hybrid ANFIS models in landslide susceptibility mapping

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many landslides occur in the Karun watershed in the Zagros Mountains. In the present study, we employed a novel comparative approach for spatial modeling of landslides given the high potential of landslides in the region. The aim of the study was to combine adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) with grey wolf optimizer (GWO) and particle swarm optimizer (PSO) algorithms using the outputs of qualitative stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA) and quantitative certainty factor (CF) models. To this end, 264 landslide positions and twelve conditioning factors including slope, aspect, altitude, distance to faults, distance to rivers, distance to roads, land use, lithology, rainfall, plan and profile curvature and TWI were then extracted considering regional characteristics, literature review and available data. In the next step, the multi-criteria SWARA decision-making model and CF probability model were used to evaluate a correlation between landslide distribution and conditioning factors. Ultimately, landslide susceptibility maps were generated by ANFIS-GWO and ANFIS-PSO hybrid models and the accuracy of models was assessed by ROC curve. According to the results, the area under the curve (AUC) for the hybrid models \({\text{ANFIS - GWO}}_{{\text{SWARA}}}\), \({\text{ANFIS - PSO}}_{{\text{SWARA}}}\), \({\text{ANFIS - GWO}}_{{\text{CF}}}\) and \({\text{ANFIS - PSO}}_{{\text{CF}}}\) was 0.789, 0.838, 0.850 and 0.879, respectively. The hybrid models \({\text{ANFIS - PSO}}_{{\text{CF}}}\) and \({\text{ANFIS - GWO}}_{{\text{SWARA}}}\) showed the highest and lowest prediction rate, respectively. Moreover, CF outperformed the SWARA method in terms of evaluating correlation between conditioning factors and landslides. The map produced in this study can be used by regional authorities to manage landslide risk.

Graphic abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aghdam IN, Pradhan B, Panahi M (2017) Landslide susceptibility assessment using a novel hybrid model of statistical bivariate methods (FR and WOE) and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) at southern Zagros Mountains in Iran. Environ Earth Sci 76:237

    Google Scholar 

  • Althuwaynee OF, Pradhan B, Park HJ, Lee JH (2014) A novel ensemble bivariate statistical evidential belief function with knowledge-based analytical hierarchy process and multivariate statistical logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping. CATENA 114:21–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Althuwaynee OF, Pradhan B, Lee S (2016) A novel integrated model for assessing landslide susceptibility mapping using CHAID and AHP pair-wise comparison. Int J Remote Sens 37:1190–1209

    Google Scholar 

  • Arabameri A, Pradhan B, Rezaei K (2019) Gully erosion zonation mapping using integrated geographically weighted regression with certainty factor and random forest models in GIS. J Environ Manage 232:928–942

    Google Scholar 

  • Assareh E, Behrang MA, Assari MR, Ghanbarzadeh A (2010) Application of PSO (particle swarm optimization) and GA (genetic algorithm) techniques on demand estimation of oil in Iran. Energy 35:5223–5229

    Google Scholar 

  • Baena JAP, Scifoni S, Marsella M, De Astis G, Fernández CI (2019) Landslide susceptibility mapping on the islands of Vulcano and Lipari (Aeolian Archipelago, Italy), using a multi-classification approach on conditioning factors and a modified GIS matrix method for areas lacking in a landslide inventory. Landslides 16:969–982

    Google Scholar 

  • Basharat M, Shah HR, Hameed N (2016) Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS and weighted overlay method: a case study from NW Himalayas, Pakistan. Arab J Geosci 9:292

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan BG, Shortliffe EH (1984) Rule based expert systems: The MYCIN experiments of the Stanford heuristic programming project. Addison-Wesley, Reading

  • Bui DT, Pradhan B, Lofman O, Revhaug I, Dick OB (2012) Landslide susceptibility assessment in the Hoa Binh province of Vietnam: a comparison of the Levenberg–Marquardt and Bayesian regularized neural networks. Geomorphology 171:12–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Bui DT, Pradhan B, Nampak H, Bui QT, Tran QA, Nguyen QP (2016) Hybrid artificial intelligence approach based on neural fuzzy inference model and metaheuristic optimization for flood susceptibility modeling in a high-frequency tropical cyclone area using GIS. J Hydrol 540:317–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Can A, Dagdelenler G, Ercanoglu M, Sonmez H (2019) Landslide susceptibility mapping at Ovacık-Karabük (Turkey) using different artificial neural network models: comparison of training algorithms. B Eng Geol Environ 78:89–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Liang S, Ke Y, Yang Z, Zhao H (2019a) Landslide susceptibility assessment using evidential belief function, certainty factor and frequency ratio model at Baxie River basin, NW China. Geocarto Int 34:348–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Panahi M, Tsangaratos P, Shahabi H, Ilia I, Panahi S, Li S, Jaafari A, Ahmad BB (2019b) Applying population-based evolutionary algorithms and a neuro-fuzzy system for modeling landslide susceptibility. CATENA 172:212–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi J, Oh HJ, Lee HJ, Lee C, Lee S (2012) Combining landslide susceptibility maps obtained from frequency ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models using ASTER images and GIS. Eng Geol 124:12–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciurleo M, Cascini L, Calvello M (2017) A comparison of statistical and deterministic methods for shallow landslide susceptibility zoning in clayey soils. Eng Geol 223:71–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Conforti M, Pascale S, Robustelli G, Sdao F (2014) Evaluation of prediction capability of the artificial neural networks for mapping landslide susceptibility in the Turbolo River catchment (northern Calabria, Italy). CATENA 113:236–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehnavi A, Aghdam IN, Pradhan B, Varzandeh MHM (2015) A new hybrid model using step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA) technique and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) for regional landslide hazard assessment in Iran. CATENA 135:122–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Devkota KC, Regmi AD, Pourghasemi HR, Yoshida K, Pradhan B, Ryu IC, Dhital MR, Althuwaynee OF (2013) Landslide susceptibility mapping using certainty factor, index of entropy and logistic regression models in GIS and their comparison at Mugling-Narayanghat road section in Nepal Himalaya. Nat Hazards 65:135–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Đurić U, Marjanović M, Radić Z, Abolmasov B (2019) Machine learning based landslide assessment of the Belgrade metropolitan area: pixel resolution effects and a cross-scaling concept. Eng Geol 256:23–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhart R, Kennedy J (1995) A new optimizer using particle swarm theory. In: Proceedings of the sixth international symposium on micro machine and human science IEEE, MHS’95, pp 39–43

  • Erener A, Mutlu A, Düzgün HS (2016) A comparative study for landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA), logistic regression (LR) and association rule mining (ARM). Eng Geol 203:45–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan W, Wei XS, Cao YB, Zheng B (2017) Landslide susceptibility assessment using the certainty factor and analytic hierarchy process. J Mt Sci 14:906–925

    Google Scholar 

  • Feizizadeh B, Roodposhti MS, Jankowski P, Blaschke T (2014) A GIS-based extended fuzzy multi-criteria evaluation for landslide susceptibility mapping. Comput Geosci 73:208–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetz JN, Guthrie RH, Brenning A (2011) Integrating physical and empirical landslide susceptibility models using generalized additive models. Geomorphology 129:376–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez H, Kavzoglu T (2005) Assessment of shallow landslide susceptibility using artificial neural networks in Jabonosa River Basin, Venezuela. Eng Geol 78:11–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmouzi H, Nefeslioglu HA, Rouai M, Sezer EA, Dekayir A, Gokceoglu C (2019) Landslide susceptibility mapping of the Mediterranean coastal zone of Morocco between Oued Laou and El Jebha using artificial neural networks (ANN). Arab J Geosci 12:696

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashemkhani Zolfani S, Bahrami M (2014) Investment prioritizing in high tech industries based on SWARA-COPRAS approach. Technol Econ Dev Econ 20:534–553

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckerman D (1985) A probabilistic interpretation for MYCIN's certainty factors. In: Proceedings of AAAI Workshop on Uncertainty and Probability in AI, Los Angeles, CA, pp. 9–20

  • Jaafari A, Panahi M, Pham BT, Shahabi H, Bui DT, Rezaie F, Lee S (2019) Meta optimization of an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system with grey wolf optimizer and biogeography-based optimization algorithms for spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility. CATENA 175:430–445

    Google Scholar 

  • Juliev M, Mergili M, Mondal I, Nurtaev B, Pulatov A, Hübl J (2019) Comparative analysis of statistical methods for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Bostanlik District, Uzbekistan. Sci Total Environ 653:801–814

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadavi PR, Lee CW, Lee S (2018) Application of ensemble-based machine learning models to landslide susceptibility mapping. Remote Sens 10:1252

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavzoglu T, Sahin EK, Colkesen I (2015) Selecting optimal conditioning factors in shallow translational landslide susceptibility mapping using genetic algorithm. Eng Geol 192:101–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Keršulienė V, Turskis Z (2011) Integrated fuzzy multiple criteria decision making model for architect selection. Technol Econ Dev Econ 17:645–666

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjekstad O, Highland L (2009) Economic and social impacts of landslides. In: Sassa K, Canuti P (eds) Landslides–disaster risk reduction. Springer, Berlin, pp 573–587

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Hwang J, Park I (2013) Application of data-driven evidential belief functions to landslide susceptibility mapping in Jinbu, Korea. CATENA 100:15–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin L, Lin Q (2017) Landslide susceptibility mapping on a global scale using the method of logistic regression. Nat Hazard Earth Syst 17(8):1411–1424

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorentz JF, Calijuri ML, Marques EG, Baptista AC (2016) Multicriteria analysis applied to landslide susceptibility mapping. Nat Hazards 83:41–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabi M, Pradhan B, Moayedi H, Alamri A (2020) Optimizing an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility using four state-of-the-art metaheuristic techniques. Sensors 20:1723

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirjalili S, Mirjalili SM, Lewis A (2014) Grey wolf optimizer. Adv Eng Softw 69:46–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Moayedi H, Mehrabi M, Mosallanezhad M, Rashid ASA, Pradhan B (2018) Modification of landslide susceptibility mapping using optimized PSO-ANN technique. Eng Comput 35:967–984

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammady M, Pourghasemi HR, Pradhan B (2012) Landslide susceptibility mapping at Golestan Province, Iran: a comparison between frequency ratio, Dempster-Shafer, and weights-of-evidence models. J Asian Earth Sci 61:221–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadim F, Kjekstad O, Peduzzi P, Herold C, Jaedicke C (2006) Global landslide and avalanche hotspots. Landslides 3:159–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicu IC (2018) Application of analytic hierarchy process, frequency ratio, and statistical index to landslide susceptibility: an approach to endangered cultural heritage. Environ Earth Sci 77:79

    Google Scholar 

  • Oh HJ, Pradhan B (2011) Application of a neuro-fuzzy model to landslide-susceptibility mapping for shallow landslides in a tropical hilly area. Comput Geosci 37:1264–1276

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozioko OH, Igwe O (2020) GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using heuristic and bivariate statistical methods for Iva Valley and environs Southeast Nigeria. Environ Monit Assess 192:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Persichillo MG, Bordoni M, Meisina C (2017) The role of land use changes in the distribution of shallow landslides. Sci Total Environ 574:924–937

    Google Scholar 

  • Pourghasemi HR, Mohammady M, Pradhan B (2012a) Landslide susceptibility mapping using index of entropy and conditional probability models in GIS: safarood Basin, Iran. CATENA 97:71–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Pourghasemi HR, Pradhan B, Gokceoglu C (2012b) Application of fuzzy logic and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz watershed, Iran. Nat Hazards 63:965–996

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B (2013) A comparative study on the predictive ability of the decision tree, support vector machine and neuro-fuzzy models in landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS. Comput Geosci 51:350–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Lee S (2010) Delineation of landslide hazard areas using frequency ratio, logistic regression and artificial neural network model at Penang Island, Malaysia. Environ Earth Sci 60:1037–1054

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Sameen MI (2017) Landslide susceptibility modeling: optimization and factor effect analysis. In: Pradhan B (ed) Laser scanning applications in landslide assessment. Springer, Berlin, pp 115–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Raja NB, Çiçek I, Türkoğlu N, Aydin O, Kawasaki A (2017) Landslide susceptibility mapping of the Sera River Basin using logistic regression model. Nat Hazards 85:1323–1346

    Google Scholar 

  • Regmi AD, Devkota KC, Yoshida K, Pradhan B, Pourghasemi HR, Kumamoto T (2014) Akgun A (2014) Application of frequency ratio, statistical index, and weights-of-evidence models and their comparison in landslide susceptibility mapping in Central Nepal Himalaya. Arab J Geosci 7:725–742

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozos D, Bathrellos GD, Skillodimou HD (2011) Comparison of the implementation of rock engineering system and analytic hierarchy process methods, upon landslide susceptibility mapping, using GIS: a case study from the Eastern Achaia County of Peloponnesus, Greece. Environ Earth Sci 63:49–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Sameen MI, Sarkar R, Pradhan B, Drukpa D, Alamri AM, Park HJ (2020) Landslide spatial modelling using unsupervised factor optimisation and regularised greedy forests. Comput Geosci 134:104336

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlögel R, Doubre C, Malet JP, Masson F (2015) Landslide deformation monitoring with ALOS/PALSAR imagery: a D-InSAR geomorphological interpretation method. Geomorphology 231:314–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Su C, Wang L, Wang X, Huang Z, Zhang X (2015) Mapping of rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility in Wencheng, China, using support vector machine. Nat Hazards 76:1759–1779

    Google Scholar 

  • Sujatha ER, Rajamanickam V, Kumaravel P, Saranathan E (2013) Landslide susceptibility analysis using probabilistic likelihood ratio model—a geospatial-based study. Arab J Geosci 6:429–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Tehrany MS, Pradhan B, Mansor S, Ahmad N (2015) Flood susceptibility assessment using GIS-based support vector machine model with different kernel types. CATENA 125:91–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Termeh SVR, Kornejady A, Pourghasemi HR, Keesstra S (2018) Flood susceptibility mapping using novel ensembles of adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system and metaheuristic algorithms. Sci Total Environ 615:438–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigila A, Iadanza C, Esposito C, Scarascia-Mugnozza G (2015) Comparison of Logistic Regression and Random Forests techniques for shallow landslide susceptibility assessment in Giampilieri (NE Sicily, Italy). Geomorphology 249:119–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Xi W, Li G, Moayedi H, Nguyen H (2019) A particle-based optimization of artificial neural network for earthquake-induced landslide assessment in Ludian county, China. Geomat Nat Haz Risk 10:1750–1771

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan F, Zhang Q, Ye S, Ren B (2019) A novel hybrid approach for landslide susceptibility mapping integrating analytical hierarchy process and normalized frequency ratio methods with the cloud model. Geomorphology 327:170–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Youssef AM, Pradhan B, Pourghasemi HR, Abdullahi S (2015a) Landslide susceptibility assessment at Wadi Jawrah Basin, Jizan region, Saudi Arabia using two bivariate models in GIS. Geosci J 19:449–469

    Google Scholar 

  • Youssef AM, Pradhan B, Jebur MN, El-Harbi HM (2015b) Landslide susceptibility mapping using ensemble bivariate and multivariate statistical models in Fayfa area, Saudi Arabia. Environ Earth Sci 73:3745–3761

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu S, Lu H (2018) An integrated model of water resources optimization allocation based on projection pursuit model–Grey wolf optimization method in a transboundary river basin. J Hydrol 559:156–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Xiong G, Liu H, Zou H, Guo W (2010) Bearing fault diagnosis using multi-scale entropy and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference. Expert Syst Appl 37:6077–6085

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Y, Wang R, Jiang Y, Liu H, Wei Z (2019) GIS-based logistic regression for rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility mapping under different grid sizes in Yueqing. Southeastern China, Eng Geol, p 105147

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aminreza Neshat.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Paryani, S., Neshat, A., Javadi, S. et al. Comparative performance of new hybrid ANFIS models in landslide susceptibility mapping. Nat Hazards 103, 1961–1988 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04067-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04067-9

Keywords

Navigation