Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Higher-level knowledge construction in asynchronous online discussions: an analysis of group size, duration of online discussion, and student facilitation techniques

  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study is concerned with the challenge of understanding what factors may influence students’ higher level knowledge construction. We defined higher level knowledge construction occurrences as the sum of the number of phases II to V measured using Gunawardena et al.’s (J Educ Comput Res 17(4):397–431, 1997) interaction analysis model. This paper is organized into two studies. In the first study, we examined the relationship between the frequency of higher level knowledge construction occurrences and group size, as well as the duration of the online discussion. Data were collected through online observations of 40 discussion forums. We found a significant positive relationship between group size and the frequency of higher level knowledge construction occurrences. However, there was no correlation between the duration of the online discussion and the frequency of such occurrences. In the second study, we examined the types of student facilitation techniques used. A further analysis of the data was conducted—of the 40 forums, 14 forums with higher incident rate of higher level knowledge construction occurrences were identified. Fourteen less frequent forums were then randomly chosen from the remaining forums. We found significant differences in the frequency of four student facilitation techniques employed between the more frequent group and the less frequent one. The results of this study suggest that using these four techniques more frequently may promote knowledge construction in asynchronous online discussions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (1999). Knowledge management systems: Issues, challenges, and benefits. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 1(7), 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chai, C. S., & Khine, M. S. (2006). An analysis of interaction and participation patterns in online community. Educational Technology & Society, 9(1), 250–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, W. S., & Hew, K. F. (2005). How can we facilitate students’ in-depth thinking and interaction in an asynchronous online discussion environment? a case study. In Proceedings of the association for educational communications and technology, USA (Vol. 28, pp. 114–121).

  • Cheung, W. S., & Hew, K. F. (2006). Examining students’ creative and critical thinking and student to student interactions in an asynchronous online discussion environment: A Singapore case study. Asia-Pacific Cybereducation Journal, 2(2). Retrieved November 10, 2009, from http://www.acecjournal.org/current_issue_current_issue.php.

  • Cifuentes, L., Murphy, K. L., Segur, R., & Kodali, S. (1997). Design considerations for computer conferences. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 30(2), 177–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Laat, M. F., & Lally, V. (2003). Complexity, theory and praxis: Researching collaborative learning and tutoring processes in a networked learning community. Instructional Science, 31, 7–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennen, V. P. (2005). From message posting to learning dialogues: Factors affecting learner participation in asynchronous discussion. Distance Education, 26(1), 127–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, J. C. (2005). Workload reduction in online courses: Getting some shuteye. Performance and Improvement, 44(5), 18–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N., Tait, H., & McCune, V. (2000). Patterns of response to an approaches to studying inventory across contrasting groups and contexts. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15, 33–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fauske, J., & Wade, S. E. (2003–2004). Research to practice online: Conditions that foster democracy, community, and critical thinking in computer-mediated discussions. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(2), 137–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, P. (1996). Observational research. In R. Sapsford & V. Jupp (Eds.), Data collection and analysis. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goh, S. H. L., Lau, W. L., & Teo, J. S. L. (2006). Philosophical enquiry for teens. Paper presented at the ERAS conference 2006, Singapore.

  • Goldberg, E., & Podell, K. (2000). Adaptive decision making, ecological validity, and the frontal lobes. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 22(1), 56–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2008). Attracting student participation in asynchronous online discussions: A case study of peer facilitation. Computers & Education, 51, 1111–1124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2009). Participation in student-facilitated discussion forums: An empirical analysis of facilitators’ habits of mind. In B. H. Tan & S. R. Galea (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th international conference on thinking 2009 (pp. 268–279). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Universiti Putra Malaysia.

  • Hew, K. F., Cheung, W. S., & Ng, C. S. L. (2009). Student contribution in asynchronous online discussion: A review of the research and empirical exploration. Instructional Science. doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9087-0.

  • Hew, K. F., & Hara, N. (2007a). Empirical study of motivators and barriers of teacher online knowledge sharing. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55, 573–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hew, K. F., & Hara, N. (2007b). Knowledge sharing in online environments: A qualitative case study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(14), 2310–2324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-structured problem solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 65–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanuka, H., & Anderson, T. (1998). On-line social interchange, discord and knowledge construction. Journal of Distance Education, 13(1), 57–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kear, K. (2001). Following the thread in computer conferences. Computers & Education, 37, 81–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitchner, K. S. (1983). Cognition, metacognition, and epistemic cognition: A three-level model of cognitive processing. Human Development, 26, 222–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lally, V. (2001). Analysing teaching and learning interactions in a networked collaborative learning environment: Issues and work in progress. In Euro CSCL 2001 (pp. 397–405). Retrieved August 7, 2008, from http://www.ll.unimaas.nl/euro-cscl/Papers/97.doc.

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., Doore, B., & Li, L. (2008). Scaffolding knowledge co-construction in web-based discussions through message labeling. In K. McFerrin et al. (Ed.), Proceedings of society for information technology and teacher education international conference 2008 (pp. 3041–3046). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.

  • Lu, L. L., & Jeng, I. (2006). Knowledge construction in inservice teacher online discourse: Impacts of instructor roles and facilitative strategies. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(2), 183–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, C., & Stewart, F. (2000). Internet communication and qualitative research: A handbook for researching online. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J. A. (1992). Understanding and validity in qualitative research. Harvard Educational Research, 62(3), 279–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLoughlin, C., &Luca, J. (2000). Cognitive engagement and higher order thinking through computer conferencing: We know why but do we know how? In A. Herrmann & M. M. Kulski (Ed.), Flexible futures in tertiary teaching. Proceedings of the 9th annual teaching learning forum, 2–4 February 2000. Perth: Curtin University of Technology. Retrieved November 7, 2008, from http://lsn.curtin.edu.au/tlf/tlf2000/mcloughlin.html.

  • Meacham, J. A., & Emont, N. C. (1989). The interpersonal basis of everyday problem solving. In J. D. Sinnott (Ed.), Everyday problem solving: Theory and applications (pp. 7–23). New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B. (2001). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, D. M. (2000). Student participation in a discussion-oriented online course: A case study. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(2), 162–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savin-Baden, M., & Gibbon, C. (2006). Online learning and problem-based learning: Complementary or colliding approaches? In M. Savin-Baden & K. Wilkie (Eds.), Problem-based learning online (pp. 126–139). Berkshire, England: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schellens, T., Keer, H. V., & Valcke, M. (2005). The impact of role assignment on knowledge construction in asynchronous discussion groups. Small Group Research, 36(6), 704–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2005). Collaborative learning in asynchronous discussion groups: What about the impact on cognitive processing? Computers in Human Behaviour, 21(6), 957–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voss, J. F. (1988). Learning and transfer in subject-matter learning: A problem solving model. International Journal of Educational Research, 11, 607–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voss, J. F., & Post, T. A. (1988). On the solving of ill-structured problems. In M. H. Chi, R. Glaser, & M. J. Farr (Eds.), The nature of expertise (pp. 261–285). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2000). It is what one does: Why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9, 155–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, N., & McDougall, D. (2005). Cultural factors affecting Chinese students’ participation in asynchronous online learning. In G. Richards (Ed.), Proceedings of world conference on e-learning in corporate, government, healthcare, and higher education 2005 (pp. 2723–2729). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, 1 Nanyang Walk, Singapore, 637616, Singapore

    Khe Foon Hew & Wing Sum Cheung

Authors
  1. Khe Foon Hew
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wing Sum Cheung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Khe Foon Hew.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hew, K.F., Cheung, W.S. Higher-level knowledge construction in asynchronous online discussions: an analysis of group size, duration of online discussion, and student facilitation techniques. Instr Sci 39, 303–319 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9129-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9129-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation