Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Neuroeducation – A Critical Overview of An Emerging Field

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Neuroethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present article, we provide a critical overview of the emerging field of ‘neuroeducation’ also frequently referred to as ‘mind, brain and education’ or ‘educational neuroscience’. We describe the growing energy behind linking education and neuroscience in an effort to improve learning and instruction. We explore reasons behind such drives for interdisciplinary research. Reviewing some of the key advances in neuroscientific studies that have come to bear on neuroeducation, we discuss recent evidence on the brain circuits underlying reading, mathematical abilities as well as the potential to use neuroscience to design training programs of neurocognitive functions, such as working memory, that are expected to have effects on overall brain function. Throughout this review we describe how such research can enrich our understanding of the acquisition of academic skills. Furthermore, we discuss the potential for modern brain imaging methods to serve as diagnostic tools as well as measures of the effects of educational interventions. Throughout this discussion, we draw attention to limitations of the available evidence and propose future avenues for research. We also discuss the challenges that face this growing discipline. Specifically, we draw attention to unrealistic expectations for the immediate impact of neuroscience on education, methodological difficulties, and lack of interdisciplinary training, which results in poor communication between educators and neuroscientists. We point out that there should be bi-directional and reciprocal interactions between both disciplines of neuroscience and education, in which research originating from each of these traditions is considered to be compelling in its own right. While there are many obstacles that lie in the way of a productive field of neuroeducation, we contend that there is much reason to be optimistic and that the groundwork has been laid to advance this field in earnest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bruer, J.T. 1997. Education and the brain: A bridge too far. Educational Researcher 26: 4–16.

    Google Scholar 

  2. OECD. 2002. Understanding the brain: Towards a new learning science. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gabrieli, J.D.E. 2009. Dyslexia: A new synergy between education and cognitive neuroscience. Science 325(5938): 280–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Meltzoff, A.N., Kuhl, P.K., Movellan, J., and Sejnowski, T.J. 2009. Foundations of a new science of learning. Science 325(5938): 284–288.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carew, T.J., and S.H. Magsamen. 2010. Neuroscience and education: An ideal partnership for producing evidence-based solutions to Guide 21(st) Century Learning. Neuron 67(5), 685–688.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shonkoff, J.P., and P. Levitt. 2010. Neuroscience and the future of early childhood policy: moving from why to what and how. Neuron 67(5): 689–691.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Keller, T.A., and M.A. Just. 2009. Altering cortical connectivity: Remediation-induced changes in the white matter of poor readers. Neuron 64(5): 624–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bennett, C.M., and A.A. Baird. 2006. Anatomical changes in the emerging adult brain: a voxel-based morphometry study. Human Brain Mapping 27(9): 766–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lenroot, R.K., and J.N. Giedd. 2006. Brain development in children and adolescents: insights from anatomical magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 30(6): 718–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Draganski, B., and A. May. 2008. Training-induced structural changes in the adult human brain. Behavioural Brain Research 192(1): 137–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Grabner, R.H., and D. Ansari. 2010. Promises and potential pitfalls of a ‘cognitive neuroscience of mathematics learning’. ZDM The International Journal on Mathematics Education 42(6): 655–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gazzaniga, M.S. (ed.). 2000. Cognitive neuroscience: A reader. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stern, E., R.H. Grabner, and R. Schumacher. 2005. Lehr-Lern-Forschung und Neurowissenschaften: Erwartungen, Befunde und Forschungsperspektiven. Vol. 13. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hoeft, F., A. Hernandez, G. McMillon, H. Taylor-Hill, J.L. Martindale, A. Meyler, et al. 2006. Neural basis of dyslexia: a comparison between dyslexic and nondyslexic children equated for reading ability. The Journal of Neuroscience 26(42): 10700–10708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hoeft, F., A. Meyler, A. Hernandez, C. Juel, H. Taylor-Hill, J.L. Martindale, et al. 2007. Functional and morphometric brain dissociation between dyslexia and reading ability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104(10): 4234–4239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shaywitz, B.A., S.E. Shaywitz, K.R. Pugh, W.E. Mencl, R.K. Fulbright, P. Skudlarski, et al. 2002. Disruption of posterior brain systems for reading in children with developmental dyslexia. Biological Psychiatry 52(2): 101–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Eden, G.F., K.M. Jones, K. Cappell, L. Gareau, F.B. Wood, T.A. Zeffiro, et al. 2004. Neural changes following remediation in adult developmental dyslexia. Neuron 44(3): 411–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shaywitz, B.A., S.E. Shaywitz, B.A. Blachman, K.R. Pugh, R.K. Fulbright, P. Skudlarski, et al. 2004. Development of left occipitotemporal systems for skilled reading in children after a phonologically- based intervention. Biological Psychiatry 55(9): 926–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Temple, E., G.K. Deutsch, R.A. Poldrack, S.L. Miller, P. Tallal, M.M. Merzenich, et al. 2003. Neural deficits in children with dyslexia ameliorated by behavioral remediation: evidence from functional MRI. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100(5): 2860–2865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. De Smedt, B., and L. Verschaffel. 2010. Travelling down the road from cognitive neuroscience to education.... and back. ZDM The International Journal on Mathematics Education 42: 49–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Molfese, D.L. 2000. Predicting dyslexia at 8 years of age using neonatal brain responses. Brain and Language 72(3): 238–245.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Froyen, D.J., M.L. Bonte, N. van Atteveldt, and L. Blomert. 2009. The long road to automation: neurocognitive development of letter-speech sound processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 21(3): 567–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dehaene, S., Pegado, F., Braga, L.W., Ventura, P., Nunes Filho, G., Jobert, A., et al. How learning to read changes the cortical networks for vision and language. Science 330(6009): 1359–1364.

  24. Coch, D., G. Grossi, S. Coffey-Corina, P.J. Holcomb, and H.J. Neville. 2002. A developmental investigation of ERP auditory rhyming effects. Developmental Science 5(4): 467–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nieder, A., and S. Dehaene. 2009. Representation of number in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience 32: 185–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ansari, D. 2008. Effects of development and enculturation on number representation in the brain. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience 9(4): 278–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Brannon, E. 2006. The representation of numerical magnitude. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 16: 222–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ashkenazi, S., N. Mark-Zigdon, and A. Henik. 2009. Numerical distance effect in developmental dyscalculia. Cognitive Development 24(4): 387–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Landerl, K., A. Bevan, and B. Butterworth. 2004. Developmental dyscalculia and basic numerical capacities: a study of 8-9-year-old students. Cognition 93(2): 99–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mussolin, C., Mejias, S., and M. P. Noel. 2010. Symbolic and nonsymbolic number comparison in children with and without dyscalculia. Cognition 115(1): 10–25.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mussolin, C., De Volder, A., Grandin, C., Schlogel, X., Nassogne, M.C., and M.P. Noel. 2009. Neural correlates of symbolic number comparison in developmental dyscalculia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

  32. Price, G.R., I. Holloway, P. Rasanen, M. Vesterinen, and D. Ansari. 2007. Impaired parietal magnitude processing in developmental dyscalculia. Current Biology 17(24): R1042–R1043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. De Smedt, B., L. Verschaffel, and P. Ghesquiere. 2009. The predictive value of numerical magnitude comparison for individual differences in mathematics achievement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 103(4): 469–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Halberda, J., M.M. Mazzocco, and L. Feigenson. 2008. Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement. Nature 455(7213): 665–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Holloway, I.D., and D. Ansari. 2009. Mapping numerical magnitudes onto symbols: the numerical distance effect and individual differences in children’s mathematics achievement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 103(1): 17–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Mundy, E., and C.K. Gilmore. 2009. Children’s mapping between symbolic and nonsymbolic representations of number. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 103(4): 490–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wilson, A.J., S. Dehaene, P. Pinel, S.K. Revkin, L. Cohen, and D. Cohen. 2006. Principles underlying the design of “The Number Race”, an adaptive computer game for remediation of dyscalculia. Behavioral and Brain Functions 2: 19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wilson, A.J., S.K. Revkin, D. Cohen, L. Cohen, and S. Dehaene. 2006. An open trial assessment of “The Number Race”, an adaptive computer game for remediation of dyscalculia. Behavioral and Brain Functions 2(1): 20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Butterworth, B. 2003. Dyscalculia screener. London: NFER Nelson Publishing Company Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Rivera, S.M., A.L. Reiss, M.A. Eckert, and V. Menon. 2005. Developmental changes in mental arithmetic: evidence for increased functional specialization in the left inferior parietal cortex. Cerebral Cortex 15(11): 1779–1790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Zamarian, L., A. Ischebeck, and M. Delazer. 2009. Neuroscience of learning arithmetic-evidence from brain imaging studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 33(6): 909–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Grabner, R.H., D. Ansari, K. Koschutnig, G. Reishofer, F. Ebner, and C. Neuper. 2009. To retrieve or to calculate? Left angular gyrus mediates the retrieval of arithmetic facts during problem solving. Neuropsychologia 47(2): 604–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. De Smedt, B., Holloway, I. D., & D. Ansari. (in press) Effects of problem size and arithmetic operation on brain activation during calculation in children with varying levels of arithmetical fluency. Neuroimage. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.12.037

  44. Kirk, E.P., and M.H. Ashcraft. 2001. Telling stories: the perils and promise of using verbal reports to study math strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 27(1): 157–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Grabner, R.H., and B. De Smedt. 2011. Neurophysiological evidence for the validity of verbal strategy reports in mental arithmetic. Biological Psychology 87(1): 128–136.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lee, K., Z.Y. Lim, S.H. Yeong, S.F. Ng, V. Venkatraman, and M.W. Chee. 2007. Strategic differences in algebraic problem solving: neuroanatomical correlates. Brain Research 1155: 163–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Klingberg, T. 2010. Training and plasticity of working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14(7), 317–324.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Olesen, P.J., H. Westerberg, and T. Klingberg. 2004. Increased prefrontal and parietal activity after training of working memory. Nature Neuroscience 7(1): 75–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Holmes, J., S.E. Gathercole, and D.L. Dunning. 2009. Adaptive training leads to sustained enhancement of poor working memory in children. Developmental Science 12(4): F9–F15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Owen, A.M., A. Hampshire, J. Grahn, R. Stenton, S. Dajani, A.S. Burns, R.J. Howard, and C.G. Ballard. 2010. Putting brain training to the test. Nature 465: 775–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Jaeggi, S.M., M. Buschkuehl, J. Jonides, and W.J. Perrig. 2008. Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105: 6829–6833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Hillman, C.H., K.I. Erickson, and A.F. Kramer. 2008. Be smart, exercise your heart: exercise effects on brain and cognition. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience 9(1): 58–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Casey, B.J., Duhoux, S., and M. Malter Cohen. 2010. Adolescence: what do transmission, transition, and translation have to do with it? Neuron 67(5): 749–760.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Steinberg, L. 2009. Should the science of adolescent brain development inform public policy? The American Psychologist 64(8): 739–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Hackman, D.A., Farah, M.J., and M.J. Meaney. 2010. Socioeconomic status and the brain: mechanistic insights from human and animal research. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience 11(9): 651–659.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Mangels, J.A., B. Butterfield, J. Lamb, C. Good, and C.S. Dweck. 2006. Why do beliefs about intelligence influence learning success? A social cognitive neuroscience model. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 1(2): 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Ansari, D. 2005. Time to use neuroscience findings in teacher training. Nature 437(7055): 26.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Ansari, D., and D. Coch. 2006. Bridges over troubled waters: education and cognitive neuroscience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10(4): 146–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Stern, E. 2005. Pedagogy meets neuroscience. Science 310: 745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Pashler, H., M. McDaniel, D. Rohrer, and R. Bjork. 2008. Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 9(3): 105–119.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Goswami, U. 2006. Neuroscience and education: from research to practice? Nature Reviews. Neuroscience 7(5): 406–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Szucs, D., and U. Goswami. 2007. Educational neuroscience: Defining a new discipline for the study of mental representations. Mind, Brain and Education 1(3): 114–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Habadzi, H. 2006. Efficient learning for the poor: insights from the frontier of cognitive neuroscience. Washington: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Condliffe Lagemann, E. 2000. An elusive science: the troubling history of education research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Numerical Cognition Laboratory, Department of Psychology, The University of Western Ontario, Westminster Hall, London, ON, N6A 3K7, Canada

    Daniel Ansari

  2. Parenting and Special Education Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

    Bert De Smedt

  3. Institute for Behavioral Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

    Roland H. Grabner

Authors
  1. Daniel Ansari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bert De Smedt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Roland H. Grabner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Ansari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ansari, D., De Smedt, B. & Grabner, R.H. Neuroeducation – A Critical Overview of An Emerging Field. Neuroethics 5, 105–117 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-011-9119-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-011-9119-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation