Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical simulation with experimental verification of the fracture behavior in granite under confining pressures based on the tension-softening model

  • Published:
International Journal of Fracture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of the tension-softening model for analyzing fracture processes of rock is examined with special reference to the effect of confining pressure on the fracture extension. Tension-softening curves are measured by means of the J-based technique from unconfined tests performed on compact tension (CT) specimens of granite. On the basis of the determined tension-softening relation, numerical analyses are executed using a boundary element method (BEM) to simulate fracture of the granite under confining pressures. Numerical results are compared to the experimental results of two series of tests for which CT specimens and thick-walled cylindrical specimens were loaded to failure under confining pressures ranging from 0 to 26.5 MPa. It is shown that the BEM analyses can predict the observed fracture behavior. Based on the results, it is demonstrated that the tension-softening relation provides a suitable model to analyze the fracture process in the rock. The source mechanism for the pressure sensitive fracture is discussed by examining the growth of the fracture process zone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. Abé, T. Mura and L.M. Keer, Journal of Geophysical Research 81(29) (1976) 5335–5340.

    Google Scholar 

  2. H. Takahashi and H. Abé, in Fracture Mechanics of Rock, B.K. Atkinson (ed.) Academic Press, London (1987) 241–276.

    Google Scholar 

  3. E.R. Simonson, A.S. Abou-Sayed and R.J. Clifton, Constrainment of massive hydraulic fracture. SPE Paper No. 6089, 51st Annual Fall Meeting of SPE of AIME (1976).

  4. M. Thiercelin, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts 26(3) (1989) 177–183.

    Google Scholar 

  5. T.K. Perkins and W.W. Krech, Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal 6 (1966) 308–314.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R.A. Schmidt and C.W. Huddle, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts 14 (1977) 289–293.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A.S. Abou-Sayed, An experimental technique for measuring the fracture toughness of rock under downhole stress condition, VDI-Berichte 313 (1978) 819–824.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Kobayashi and N. Otsuka, Journal of the Mining and Metallurgical Institute of Japan 96(1114) (1980) 879–884, in Japanese.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Kosugi, Journal of the Mining and Metallurgical Institute of Japan 102(1182) (1986) 469–476, in Japanese.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Thiercelin, in Proceedings of 28th U.S. Symposium on Rock Mechanics (1987) 149–156.

  11. A.R. Ingraffea, K.L. Gunsallus, J.F. Beech and P.P. Nelson, Chevron-Notched Specimens: Testing and Stress Analysis, J.H. Underwood, S.W. Freiman and F.I. Baretta (eds.), ASTM STP 855 (1984) 152–166.

  12. H. Takahashi, in Fracture Toughness and Fracture Energy-Test Methods for Concrete and Rock, H. Mihashi, H. Takahashi and F.H. Wittmann (eds.), A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam (1989) 591–610.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R.A. Schmidt and H.P. Rossmanith, Rock Fracture Mechanics, H.P.Rossmanith (ed.), CISM Courses and Lectures No. 275, Springer-Verlag, Vienna (1983) 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J.F. Labuz, S.P. Shah and C.H. Dowding, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts 24(4) (1987) 235–246.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. Hillerborg, M. Modeer and P.E. Petersson, Cement and Concrete Research 6 (1976) 773–782.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Hillerborg, Fracture Mechanics of Concrete, F.H. Wittmann (ed.), Elsevier Science Publisher, B.V., Amsterdam (1983) 223–250.

    Google Scholar 

  17. V.C. Li, C.M. Chan and C. Leung, Cement and Concrete Research 17 (1987) 441–452.

    Google Scholar 

  18. E. Bruhwiler and F.H. Wittman, Engineering Fracture Mechanics 35(1/2/3) (1990) 117–125.

    Google Scholar 

  19. T. Hashida and H. Takahashi, Journal of Testing and Evaluation 13(1) (1985) 77–84.

    Google Scholar 

  20. C.F. Shih C, H.G. Delorenzi and W.R. Andrews, International Journal of Fracture 13 (1977) 544–548.

    Google Scholar 

  21. T. Hashida in Fracture Toughness and Fracture Energy-Test Methods for Concrete and Rock, H. Mihashi, H. Takahashi and F.H. Wittmann (eds.), A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam (1989) 47–55.

    Google Scholar 

  22. T. Hashida, in Proceedings of International Conference on Micromechanics of Failure of Quasi-Brittle Materials, S.P. Shah, S.E. Swartz, M.L. Wang (eds.), Elsevier Applied Science, London (1990) 233–243.

    Google Scholar 

  23. For example: W.F. Brace, State of Stress in the Earth's Crust, W.R. Judd (ed.), New York, Elsevier (1964) 111–174.

    Google Scholar 

  24. G. Wijk, Simple strength tests and hydraulic fracturing of rock material, Report DS 1982:10, Swedish Detonic Research Foundation (SveDeFo), Stockholm, Sweden (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  25. D.R. Schmitt and M.D. Zoback, in Proceedings of 2nd International Workshop on Hydraulic Fracturing Stress Measurements 1 (1988) 425–450.

    Google Scholar 

  26. P.L. Swanson, Journal of Geophysical Research 92 (1987) 8015–8036.

    Google Scholar 

  27. F. Ouchterlony, SM Archives 7 (1982) 131–211.

    Google Scholar 

  28. B.K. Atkinson and P.G. Meredith, Fracture Mechanics of Rock, B.K.Atkinson (ed.), Academic Press, London (1987) 477–525.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hashida, T., Oghikubo, H., Takahashi, H. et al. Numerical simulation with experimental verification of the fracture behavior in granite under confining pressures based on the tension-softening model. Int J Fract 59, 227–244 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00012363

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00012363

Keywords

Navigation