Skip to main content
Log in

Racemic therapeutics — ethical and regulatory aspects

  • Special Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Racemic therapeutics are fixed ratio mixtures of stereoisomers to be regarded biologically as different compounds. Usually only one of the isomers fully contributes to the therapeutics action, and the other is often classifiable as “isomeric ballast”. Due to differences in turnover and pharmacokinetics, the proportion of enantiomers (1:1 in the racemate) continuously changes in plasma. The implications of the neglect of stereoselectivity for various levels in the investigation of racemic drugs are discussed and summarized in Table 2.

The fact is that clinical investigators, Ethical Committees and regulatory authorities have for decades accepted invalid pharmacokinetic data on some 25% of therapeutics. That those racemates remain in use make the benefit of and necessity for kinetics generally questionable.

Exposure of patients to the “isomeric ballast” present in about 50% of the most commonly used drugs will probably containe for many decades. As a result of a change in attitude of the regulatory authorities, however, for new drugs the choice in future between the racemic therapeutic or the single isomeric ballast-free drug will largely be based on a critical evaluation of the chiral characteristics with regard to their therapeutic, toxicological and pharmacokinetic aspects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ariëns EJ (1984) Stereochemistry, a basis for sophisticated nonsense in pharmacokinetics and clinical pharmacology. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 26: 663–668

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ariëns EJ, Soudijn W, Timmermans PBMWM (1982) Stereochemistry and biological activity of drugs. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp 1–190

    Google Scholar 

  3. Series on Chirality, Trends in Pharmacological Sciences (1986) 7: 20–24, 60–65, 112–115, 155–158, 200–205, 227–230, 281–301

  4. Ariëns EJ, Wuis EW (1987) Bias in pharmacokinetics and clinical pharmacology. Clin Pharmacol Ther 42: 361–363

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ariëns EJ, Wuis EW, Veringa EJ (1988) Stereoselectivity of bioactive xenobiotics. A pre-Pasteur attitude in medicinal chemistry, pharmacokinetics and clinical pharmacology. Biochem Pharmacol 37: 9–18

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ariëns EJ (1990) Stereoselectivity in pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 120: 131–134

    Google Scholar 

  7. Drayer DE (1986) Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic differences between drug enantiomers in humans: an overview. Clin Pharmacol Ther 40: 125–133

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wainer IW, Drayer DE (1988) Drug stereochemistry. Analytical methods and pharmacology. Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jamali F, Mehvar R, Pasutto FM (1989) Enantioselective aspects of drug action and disposition: Therapeutic pitfalls. J Pharm Sci 78: 695–715

    Google Scholar 

  10. Smith DF (1989) The stereoselectivity of drug action. Pharmacol Toxicol 65: 321–331

    Google Scholar 

  11. Evans AM (1988) Stereoselective drug disposition: potential for misinterpretation of drug disposition data. Br J Clin Pharmacol 26: 771–780

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ariëns EJ, v. Rensen JJS, Welling W (1988) Stereoselectivity of pesticides — biological and chemical problems. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  13. Eichelbaum M, Gross S (1990) Stereoselectivity in drug action and disposition. N Engl J Med

  14. Ariëns EJ (1991) Chirality and isomeric ballast in bio-active products: Proceedings 3rd Netherlands Biotechnology Congress Amsterdam, in press. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lehmann FPA, Rodriques de Miranda JF, Ariëns EJ (1976) Stereoselectivity and affinity in molecular pharmacology. In: Jucker E (ed) Vol 20. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 101–142

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vogelgesang B, Echizen H, Schmidt E, Eichelbaum M (1984) Stereoselective first-pass metabolism of highly cleared drugs: studies of the bioavailability of L- and D-verapamil examined with a stable isotope technique. Br J Clin Pharmacol 18: 733–740

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tokuma Y, Fujiwara T, Niwa T, Hashimoto T, Noguchi H (1989) Stereoselective disposition of nivaldipine, a new dihydropyridine calcium antagonist, in the rat and dog. Res. Comm. Chem Pathol Pharmacol 63: 249–262

    Google Scholar 

  18. Caldwell J, Hutt AJ, Fournel-Gigleux S (1988) The metabolic chiral inversion and dispositional enantioselectivity of the 2-arylpropionic acids and their biological consequences. Biochem Pharmacol 37: 105–114

    Google Scholar 

  19. Levine RJ (1986) Ethics and regulation of clinical research, 2nd ed. Urban and Schwarzenberg, Baltimore, pp 393–429

    Google Scholar 

  20. Morganroth J (1987) New antiarrhythmic agents: Mexiletine, tocainide, flecainide, encainide and amiodarone. Rational Drug Therapy. Am Soc Pharm Exp Ther 21: 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  21. Soons PA, de Boer AG, van Brummelen P, Breimer DD (1989) Oral absorption profile of nitrendipine in healthy subjects: a kinetic and dynamic study. Br J Clin Pharmacol 27: 179–189

    Google Scholar 

  22. Harten J van Burggraaf J, Lichthart GJ, Brummelen P van, Breimer DD (1989) Single- and multiple-dose nisoldipine kinetics and effects in the young, the middle-aged, and the elderly. Clin Pharmacol Ther 45: 600–607

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dunselman PHJM, Edgar B, Scaf AHJ, Kuntze CEE, Wesseling H (1989) Pharmacokinetics of felodipine after intravenous and chronic oral administration in patients with congestive heart failure. Br J Clin Pharmacol 28: 45–52

    Google Scholar 

  24. Smith RL, Caldwell J (1988) Racemates towards a New Year solution? TIPS 9: 75–77

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pasteur L (1901) On the asymmetry of naturally occurring organic compounds, the foundations of stereochemistry. In: Richardson GM (ed) Memoirs by Pasteur, Van't Hoff, Le Bel and Wislicenus. American Book Co, New York, pp 1–33

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ariëns, E.J. Racemic therapeutics — ethical and regulatory aspects. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 41, 89–93 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00265897

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00265897

Key words

Navigation