Skip to main content
Log in

Exploratory backdraft experiments

  • Published:
Fire Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study is a qualitative exploration of backdraft phenomena. Backdraft is defined as a rapid deflagration following the introduction of oxygen into a compartment filled with accumulated excess pyrolyzates. A scenario describing the physical and chemical fundamentals underlying backdraft phenomena is presented. A half-scale apparatus, designed to avoid dangerous overpressures, was used to obtain data from backdraft experiments. A gas burner supplied a 150 kW natural gas fire in a 1.2 m high, 1.2 m wide, 2.4 m long compartment with a small, 25 mm high, 0.3 m wide vent to ambient at floor level. Significant unburnt fuel accumulates in 180 seconds, when a hatch covering a 0.4 m high, 1.2 m wide vent, centered on a short wall, is opened, simulating a window breaking due to thermal stresses. The propagation across the compartment of the cold density-driven flow, which enters through the new opening, is called a “gravity current.” This gravity current carries a flammable mixed layer to a spark located near the burner on the opposite wall. The rapid deflagration that results upon ignition of the mixed layer is the backdraft. A compartment fire model is used to calculate conditions in the compartment before the vent opens. The hypothesized scenario appears to be confirmed by the deflagrations and exterior fire balls observed in these preliminary experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pagni, P. J., and Shih, T. M., “Excess Pyrolvzates,” 16th Symposium (Int'l) on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, Penn., 1976, pp. 1329–1343.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pagni, P.J., “Diffusion Flame Analyses,”Fire Safety Journal, 3 (1980/81), pp. 273–286.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pagni, P.J., and Joshi, A.A., “Glass Breaking in Fires,”Fire Safety Science: Proceedings of the Third International Symposium, Elsevier Science Publishing, London, 1991, pp. 791–802.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Keski-Rahkonen, O., “Breaking of Window Glass Close to Fire,”Fire and Materials, 12 (1988), pp. 61–69.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Russell, D., “Seven Fire Fighters Caught in Explosion,”Fire Engineering, 136 (1983), pp. 20–23.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bowen, J.E., “Flashover/Backdraft Explosive Situation,”Western Fire Journal, 34 (1982), pp. 33–38.

    Google Scholar 

  7. “Fatal Mattress Store Fire at Chatham Dockyard,”Fire, 67 (1975), pp. 388.

  8. Croft, W.M., “Fires Involving Explosions: A Literature Review,”Fire Safety Journal, 3 (1980/81), pp. 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Steward, P.D.C., “Dust and Smoke Explosions,”National Fire Protection Association Quarterly, 7 (1914), pp. 424–428.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dunn, V., “Beating the Backdraft,”Fire Engineering, 141 (1988), pp. 44–48.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Woolley, W.D., and Ames, S.A., “The Explosion Risk of Stored Foamed Rubber,”Fire International, 50 (1975), pp. 45–54.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Burklin, R.W., and Purington. R.G.,Fire Terms: A Guide to Their Meaning and Use, National Fire Protection Association: Boston, Mass., 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jones, W.W., “A Review of Compartment Fire Models,”NBSIR 83- 2681, National Bureau of Standards: Gaithersburg, Md., 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mitler, H.E., “The Harvard Fire Model,”Fire Safety Journal, 9 (1985), pp. 7–16.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Friedman, R., “Survey of Computer Models for Fire and Smoke,” Factory Mutual Research Corporation: Norwood, Mass., 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Emmons, H.W., “The Calculation of a Fire in a Large Building,”ASME Paper No. 81-HT-2, American Society for Mechanical Engineers, New York, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Simpson, J.E., “Gravity Currents in the Laboratory, Atmosphere, and Ocean,”Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 14 (1982), pp. 213–234.

    Google Scholar 

  18. FIeischmann, C. M., and McGrattan, K., “Modeling Compartment Gravity Currents,” to be published.

  19. Britter, R. E., and Simpson, J.E., “Experiments on the Dynamics of a Gravity Current Head,”Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 88 (1978), pp. 223–240.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Simpson, J.E., and Britter, R.E., “The Dynamics of the Head of a Gravity Current Advancing over a Horizontal Surface,”Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 94 (1979), pp. 477–495.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zalosh, R. G., “Explosion Protection,”SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, P. DiNenno, ed., National Fire Protection Association: Quincy, Mass., 1988, pp. 2–88 to 2–105.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Factory Mutual Engineering Corporation, “Damage-Limiting Construction,”Loss Prevention Data Sheet 1–44, Norwood, Mass., 1991.

  23. Neoceram Super Heat-Resistant Glass for Industrial Use, Nippon Electric Glass Co., Ltd.

  24. Sugawa, O., Kawagoe, K., Oka, Y., and Ogahara, I., “Burning Behavior in a Poorly Ventilated Compartment Fire—Ghosting Fire,”Fire Science and Technology, 9 (1989), pp. 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Phillips, H., “Flame in a Buoyant Methane Layer,” 10th Symposium (Int'l) on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, Penn., 1965, pp. 1277–1283.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Fleischmann, C.M., Pagni, P.J., and Williamson, R.B.,Salt Water Modeling of Compartment Gravity Currents, to be published.

  27. Mitler, H.E., and Rockett, J.A., “Users' Guide to FIRST, a Comprehensive Single-Room Fire Model,”NBSIR 87-3595, National Bureau of Standards: Gaithersburg, Md., 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mitler, H.E., and Emmons, H.W., “Documentation for CFC V, the Fifth Harvard Computer Fire Code,”Home Fire Project Technical Report No. 45, Harvard University: Cambridge, Mass., 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rockett, J.A., Morita, M., and Cooper, L. Y., “Comparison of NBS/Harvard Vl Simulations and Full-Scale, Multi-Room Fire Test Data,”NBSIR 87-3567, National Bureau of Standards: Gaithersburg, Md., 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zukoski, E. E., Kubota, T., and Cetegen, B., “Entrainment of Fire Plumes,”Fire Safety Journal, 3 (1980/81).

  31. Mitler, H. E., “The Physical Basis for the Harvard Computer Fire Code,”Home Fire Project Technical Report No. 45, Harvard University: Cambridge, Mass., 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Quintiere, J. G., Steckler, K., and Corley, D., “An Assessment of Fire-Induced Flows in Compartments,”Fire Science and Technology, 4 (1984), pp. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fleischmann, C.M., Pagni, P.J. & Williamson, R.B. Exploratory backdraft experiments. Fire Technol 29, 298–316 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01052526

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01052526

Key words

Navigation