Skip to main content
Log in

Fracture mechanics-based model of abrasive waterjet cutting for brittle materials

  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Advanced engineering ceramic materials such as silicon carbides and silicon nitride have been used in many engineering applications. The abrasive waterjet is becoming the most recent cutting technique of such materials because of its inherent advantages.

In the present study, two elastic-plastic erosion models are adopted to develop an abrasive waterjet model for cutting brittle materials. As a result, two cutting models based on fracture mechanics are derived and introduced. The suggested models predict the maximum depth of cut of the target material as a function of the fracture toughness and hardness as well as the process parameters.

It is found that both models predict the same depth of cut within a maximum of ≈ 11%, for the practical range of process parameters used in the present study. The maximum depth of cut predicted by the suggested models are compared with published experimental results for three types of ceramics. The effect of process parameters on the maximum depth of cut for a given ceramic material is also studied and compared with experimental work. The comparison reveals that there is a good agreement between the models' predictions and experimental results, where the difference between the predicted and experimental value of the maximum depth of cut is found to be an average value of 10%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

C :

abrasive efficiency factor, see equation (16)

C 1,C 2 :

c 1/4/3π, c2/4/3π

c 1,c 2 :

erosion models constants, see equations (1) and (2)

d a :

local effective jet diameter

d j :

nozzle diameter

d S :

infinitesimal length along the kerf

f 1 E ):

function defined by equation (7)

f 2 E ):

function defined by equation (8)

f 3 e ):

function defined by equation (14)

g 1 E ):

f 1 e )/f 23 e )

g 2 e ):

f 2 e /f 23 e )

H :

Vickers hardness of the target material

h :

maximum depth of cut

K c :

fracture toughness of target material

k :

kerf constant

M :

linear removal rate, dh/dt

m :

mass of a single particle

\(\dot m_a\) :

abrasive mass flow rate

\(\dot m_w\) :

water mass flow rate

P :

water pressure

Q :

total material removal rate, see equation (11)

R :

abrasive to water mass flow rates

r :

particle radius

S :

kerf length

u :

traverse speed

V :

material volume removal rate (erosion rate)

δV :

idealised volume removal by an individual abrasive particle

ν :

particle impact velocity

ν 0 :

initial abrasive particle velocity

x,y :

kerf coordinates

α:

local kerf angle, Fig. 1

α E :

jet exit angle at the bottom of the workpiece, Fig. 1

ρ:

particle density

ρ w :

water density

References

  1. H. Hocheng and K. R. Chang, “Material removal analysis in abrasive waterjet cutting of ceramic plates”,Journal of Materials Processing Technology,40, pp. 287–304, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Ramulu and D. Arola, “Influence of abrasive waterjet cutting conditions on the surface quality of graphite/epoxy laminate”,International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture,34, (3), pp. 295–313, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Hashish and J. Whalen, “Precision drilling of ceramic-coated components with abrasive-waterjets,Journal of Engineering of Gas Turbines and Power, Transactions ASME 115, (1), pp. 148–154, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. A. Engel,Impact Wear of Materials, Elsevier, New York, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Preece, C. M. (ed.),Treatise on Materials Science and Technology, Vol. 16, Erosion, Academic Press, NY, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  6. I. M. Hutchings, “A model for the erosion of metals by spherical particles at normal incidence”,Wear,70, pp. 269–281, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  7. I. Finnie, A. Levy and M. McFadden, “On the velocity dependence of the erosion of ductile metals by solid particles at low angle of incidence”,Wear,48, pp. 181–190, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. W. Ruff and S. M. Wiederhorn, “Erosion by solid particle impact”, in C. M. Preece, (ed.),Treatise on Material Science and Technology, Vol. 16, Erosion, Academic Press, NY, p. 69, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S.M. Wiederhorn and B. J. Hockey, “Effect of material parameters on the erosion resistance of brittle materials”,Journal of Material Science,18, pp. 766–780, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. E. Ritter “Erosion damage in structural ceramics”,Materials Science and Engineering,71, pp. 195–207, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  11. B. R. Lawn, and T. R. Wilshaw, “Fracture of brittle solids”,Journal of Material Science,10, pp. 1049–1081, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  12. B. R. Lawn and D. B. Marshall, “Flaw and testing”, in B. C. Bradt, D. P. H. Hasselman and F. F. Lange (eds).,Fracture Mechanics of Ceramics, vol. 3, Plenum Press, NY, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  13. H. C. Meng and K. C. Ludema, “Wear models and predictive equations: their form and content”,Wear, vol. 181–183, pp. 433–457, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. G. Evan, M. E. Gulden and M. E. Rosenblatt, “Impact damage in brittle materials in the elastic-plastic response regime”,Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A,361, pp. 343–365, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. M. Wiederhorn and B. R. Lawn “Erosion of brittle materials by solid particle impact”,Journal of the American Ceramic Society,62, pp. 66–70, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. Ramulu, S. P. Raju, H. Inoue and J. Zeng, “Hydro-abrasive erosion characteristics of 30 vol.%SiCp/6061-T6 A1 composite at shallow impact angles”,Wear,166, pp. 55–63, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. A. El-Domiaty, M. A. Shabara, A. A. Abdel-Rahman and A. K. Al-Sabeeh, “On the modeling of abrasive waterjet cutting”,Proceedings 5th International Conference of Fluid Mechanics, Cairo, Egypt, Vol. 3, pp. 1123–1147, 2–5 January 1995. Also, accepted for publication inThe International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Y. Chung and E. S. Geskin, “Prediction of geometry of the kerf created in the course of abrasive waterjet machining of ductile materials”,11th International Conference on Jet Cutting Technology, St Andrews, Scotland, pp. 525–541, 8–10 September 1992.

  19. M. Hashish, “A comparative evaluation of abrasive liquid jet machining systems”,Journal of Engineering for Industry, Transactions ASME,115, pp. 44–50, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. Zeng and T. J. Kim, “Development of an abrasive waterjet kerf cutting model for brittle materials”,11th International Conference on Jet Cutting Technology, St Andrews, Scotland, pp. 483–501, 8–10 September 1992.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

On leave from: Mechanical Engineering Department, Suez Canal University, Egypt.

On leave from: Mechanical Power Engineering Department, Alexandria University, Egypt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

El-Domiaty, A.A., Abdel-Rahman, A.A. Fracture mechanics-based model of abrasive waterjet cutting for brittle materials. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 13, 172–181 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01305869

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01305869

Keywords

Navigation