Skip to main content
Log in

Fracture-toughness testing of limestone

KIc of indiana limestone was measured using three-point-bend specimens, and toughness is seen to increase with crack length much like many aluminum alloys

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fracture-toughness measurements were made on standard three-point-bend fracture specimens of Indiana limestone. Specimen dimensions, experimental techniques, and methods of data reduction were chosen to comply as closely as possible to the Tentative Method of Test for Plane Strain Fracture Toughness of Metallic Materials (ASTM Designation: E399-72T). Typical strain-gage-type clip-in displacement gages were found to lack the necessary sensitivity for measuring the crack-opening displacement while an LVDT displacement transducer having a linear range of ±0.25 mm (±0.010 in.) was found to be ideal.

Fatigue cracks were successfully introduced by repeated cycling to 85 percent of the fracture load. Load vs. crack opening-displacement records indicated that crack closure occurred in these tests. Effective crack lengths were determined using an experimental compliance calibration that was checked analytically. Final fracture was stable when using displacement control in a stiff load frame. Some size effects were noted, with toughness increasing with specimen size. Values ofK c, fracture toughness, were found to approach 990 kNm−3/2 (900\(psi\sqrt {in} \).) for the largest specimens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. “Tentative Method of Test for Plane Strain Fracture Toughness of Metallic Materials (ASTM Designation: E399-72T),” 1972 Annual Book of Standards, Part 31, ASTM, Phila. (1972).

  2. Srawley, J. E. and Brown, Jr., W. F., “Fracture Toughness Test Methods, Fracture Toughness Testing and its Applications,” ASTM STP 381, ASTM, 133 (1965).

  3. McClintock, F. A. and Walsh, J. B., “Friction on Griffith Cracks in Rocks under Pressure,” Proc. Fourth U.S. Nat. Congr. App. Mech., 1015–1021 (1962).

  4. Hardy, M. P., “Fracture Mechanics Applied to Rock,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Minnesota (Dec. 1973).

  5. Griffith, A. A., “The Theory of Rupture,” Proc. of First Int'l. Cong. on Appl. Mech., 55 (1924).

  6. Orowan, E., Fatigue and Fracture of Metals, Proc. of 1950 Conf. at M.I.T., John Wiley, N.Y., 139 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Irwin, G. R., “Analysis of Stresses and Strains Near the End of a Crack Traversing a Plate,”J. of Appl. Mech.,24,361 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rice, J. R., “A Path Independent Integral and the Approximate Analysis of Strain Concentration by Notches and Cracks,”J. of App. Mech.,35,379 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fairhurst, C., “On the Validity of the ‘Brazilian’ Test for Brittle Materials,”Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci.,1,535 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Peng, S. andJohnson, A. M., “Crack Growth and Faulting in Cylindrical Specimens of Chelmsford Granite,”Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci.,9,37 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Krech, W. W., “The Energy Balance Theory and Rock Fracture Energy Measurements for Uniaxial Tension,” Advances in Rock Mechanics, Proc. of Third Int'l. Soc. Rock Mech. Cong.,2-A,167 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brown, W. S., Swanson, S. R., and Mason, W. E., “Fracture Mechanics Applications to Rock,” Rept. to B. of Mines on ARPA Order No. 1579, Amend. No. 2,Univ. of Utah (Feb. 1972).

  13. Johnson, J. N., Clifton, R. J., Simonson, E. R., and Green, S. J., “Analysis of Fracture for Hollow Cylindrical and Spherical Rock Specimens subject to Internal Pressure with Application to Underground Nuclear Containment,” Terra Tek report on Contract No. DNA 001-73-C-0153, Salt Lake City, Utah (1973).

  14. Handin, J. and Friedman, M., “Mechanical Properties of Rocks Related to Drilling Technology,” Second Quarterly Progress Report to Sandia Laboratories on Contract No. 82-9473 (1974).

  15. Callender, J., Geology Department, University of New Mexico, private communication (1975).

  16. Gross, B., Roberts, E., and Srawley, J. E., “Elastic Displacements for Various Edge-Cracked Plate Specimens,” NASA Technical Note TN D-4232, NASA (November 1967).

  17. Hoagland, R. G., Hahn, G. T., andRosenfield, A. R., “Influence of Microstructure on Fracture Propagation in Rock,”Rock Mech.,5,77–106 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Paris, P. C., “The Fracture Mechanics Approach to Fatigue,” Fatigue—”An Interdisciplinary Approach, Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, N.Y., 107 (1965).

  19. Johnson, H. H. andParis, P. C., “Subcritical Flaw Growth,”Engrg. Fract. Mech.,1,3 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schmidt, R. A. and Paris, P. C., “Threshold for Fatigue Crack Propagation and the Effects of Load Ratio and Frequency,” Progress in Flaw Growth and Fracture Toughness Testing, ASTM STP 536, 79–94 (1973).

  21. Elber, W., “The Significance of Fatigue Crack Closure,” Damage Tolerance in Aircraft Structures, ASTM STP 486, 230 (1971).

  22. Pitoniak, F. J., Grandt, A. F., Montalli, L. T., andPackman, P. F., “Fatigue Crack Retardation and Closure in Polymethylmethacrylate,”Engrg. Fract. Mech.,6,663–670 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Srawley, J. E., “Plane Strain Fracture Toughness,”Fracture—An Advanced Treatise, Academic Press, N.Y.,IV,45–68 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Brown, Jr., W. F. and Srawley, J. E., “Plane Strain Crack Toughness Testing of High Strength Metallic Materials,” ASTM STP 410, ASTM, 1–65 (1966).

  25. Hardy, Jr., H. R. andJoyaramon, N. I., “An Investigation of Methods for the Determination of the Tensile Strength of Rock,”Proc. of Second Cong. of Int'l. Soc. for Rock Mech.,3,85 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hickerson, J. P., “Elements of Experimental Fracture Mechanics,” Sandia Laboratories Report SLA-73-0424 (March 1974).

  27. Schmidt, R. A., Unpublished Fracture Toughness Data on Charcoal Granite (1975).

  28. Nelson, F. G., Schilling, P. E., andKaufman, S. G., “The Effect of Specimen Size on the Results of Plane-Strain Fracture-Toughness Tests,”Engrg. Fract. Mech.,4,33 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jones, M. H. and Brown, Jr., W. F., “The Influence of Crack Length and Thickness in Plane-Strain Fracture Toughness Tests,” ASTM STP 463, ASTM, 63 (1970).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Work was supported by the U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schmidt, R.A. Fracture-toughness testing of limestone. Experimental Mechanics 16, 161–167 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02327993

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02327993

Keywords

Navigation