Skip to main content
Log in

Some Thoughts on the Adaptive Function of Inequity Aversion: An Alternative to Brosnan’s Social Hypothesis

  • Published:
Social Justice Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

In this commentary, we review and question Brosnan's hypothesis that inequity aversion (IA) evolved as a domain-specific social mechanism. We then outline an alternative, domain-general, account of IA. As opposed to Brosnan's social hypothesis, we propose that IA evolved from more general reward mechanisms. In particular, we argue reference-dependence and loss-aversion can account for the evolution of IA in primates. We discuss recent work on reference-dependence and explore how it may have given rise to inequality-averse behavior in social settings. We conclude with suggestions for future work examining the proximate mechanisms that give rise to IA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Axelrod R., Hamilton W. D. (1981). The evolution of cooperation. Science 211:1390–1396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan, S. F. (2006). Nonhuman species’ reactions to inequity and their implications for fairness. Soc. Justice Res., this volume.

  • Brosnan S. F., de Waal F. B. M. (2003). Monkeys reject unequal pay. Nature, 425:297–299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan S. F., de Waal F. B. M. (2004). Socially learned preferences for differentially rewarded tokens in the Brown Capuchin Monkey (Cebus apella). J. Comp. Psychol., 118:133–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M. K., Lakshminarayanan, V., and Santos, L. (2006). How basic are behavioral biases? Evidence from Capuchin-Monkey trading behavior.Journal of Political Economy 114: 517–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fragaszy D. M., Fedigan L. M., Visalberghi E. (2004). The Complete Capuchin: The Biology of the Genus Cebus Cambridge University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Genesove D., Mayer C. (2001) Loss aversion and seller behavior: Evidence from the housing market. Quart. J. Econ. 116:1233–1260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gintis, H., Bowles, S., Boyd, Robert T., and Fehr, E. (eds.) (2004). Moral Sentiments and Material Interests: The Foundations of Cooperation in Economic Life, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press

  • Hardie B. G. S., Johnson E. J., Fader P. S. (1993). Modeling loss aversion and reference-dependence effects on brand choice. Market. Sci. 12:378–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, M. D. (2006). Moral Minds: The Unconscious Voice of Right and Wrong, Harper Collins, New York

  • Kahneman D., Tversky A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47:263–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odean T. (1998). Are investors reluctant to realize their losses? J. Finance, 5:1775–1798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayo, L., and Becker, G. (2005). Evolutionary Efficiency and Happiness. University of Chicago Department of Economics Working Paper

  • Santos L. R., Sulkowski G., Spaepen G. M., Hauser M. D. (2002). Object individuation using property/kind information in Rhesus Macaques (Macaca mulatta). Cognition, 83:241–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sober E., Wilson D. S. (1998). Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinklepaugh O. L. (1928). An experimental study of representative factors in monkeys. J. Comp. Psychol., 8:197–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quart. Rev. Biol., 46:35–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky A., Kahneman D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: a reference-dependent model. Quart. J. Econ., 106:1039–1061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Waal F. B. M., Davis J. M. (2003). Capuchin cognitive ecology: Cooperation based on projected returns. Neuropsychologia, 41(2):221–228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Keith Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keith Chen, M., Santos, L.R. Some Thoughts on the Adaptive Function of Inequity Aversion: An Alternative to Brosnan’s Social Hypothesis. Soc Just Res 19, 201–207 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00022138

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00022138

KEY WORDS

Navigation