Abstract
The Everglades, an ecosystem of international significance, has elevated biota mercury levels representing risk to human and wildlife consumers of fish. Given the critical role of sulfate in the methylation of mercury, and because there is a significant agricultural contribution, one potential means of reducing these mercury levels is reducing Everglades sulfate inputs. Julian II (Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 90:329–332, 2013) conducted regression modeling of the relationship between surface water sulfate concentrations and Gambusia spp. mercury bioconcentration factors across the major hydrologic subunits of the Everglades, and used those results to draw conclusions about the role of sulfate in the cycling of mercury in the Everglades. We however demonstrate a number of fundamental problems with the analysis, interpretation and conclusions. As a result, we strongly caution against using the results of Julian II (Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 90:329–332, 2013) to formulate management decisions regarding mitigation of the Everglades mercury problem.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The EvPA comprises the following four major hydrologic units – the Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge (LNWR), Water Conservation Area 2 (WCA2), Water Conservation Area 3 (WCA3), and Everglades National Park (ENP).
Gambusia spp. Hg concentrations originally reported by USEPA have units of ng/g, while methyl Hg concentrations are reported as ng/L. As a result, the initial ratios were multiplied by 1,000 to express BAF as essentially dimensionless – i.e., (ng/kg)/(ng/L).
R-EMAP measured total organic carbon for the three sets of wet/dry cycle sampling conducted prior to 2005, and supplanted TOC measurements with dissolved organic carbon (DOC) measurements in 2005. Since TOC typically correlates closely with DOC, we concatenated the TOC and DOC values as a single parameter for our statistical modeling (henceforth referred to TOC).
References
Axelrad DM, Atkeson TD, Pollman CD, Lange T, Rumbold DG, Weaver K (2005) Mercury monitoring, research and environmental assessment in South Florida. South Florida Environmental Report Vol 1 Chapter 2B South Florida Water Management District West Palm Beach FL
Axelrad DM, Pollman CD, Gu B, Lange T (2013) Mercury and sulfur environmental assessment for the Everglades. South Florida Environmental Report Vol 1 Chapter 3B South Florida Water Management District West Palm Beach FL
Bates AL, Orem WH, Harvey JW, Spiker EC (2002) Tracing sources of sulfur in the Florida Everglades. J Environ Qual 31(1):287–299
Branfireun BA, Bishop K, Roulet NT, Granberg G, Nilsson M (2001) Mercury cycling in boreal ecosystems: the long-term effect of acid rain constituents on peatland pore water methylmercury concentrations. Geophys Res Lett 28(7):1227–1230
Carlier A, Riera P, Amouroux J-M, Bodiou J-Y, Desmalades M, Grémare A (2008) Food web structure of two Mediterranean lagoons under varying degree of eutrophication. J Sea Res 60:264–275
Chen CY, Holt CL (2005) High phytoplankton densities reduce mercury biomagnification. Environ Sci Technol 39:115–121
Driscoll CT, Blette V, Yan C, Schofield CL, Munson R, Holsapple J (1995) The role of dissolved organic carbon in the chemistry and bioavailability of mercury in remote Adirondack lakes. Water Air Soil Poll 80:499–508
Gabriel MC, Howard N, Osborne TZ (2014) Fish mercury and surface water sulfate relationships in the Everglades Protection Area. Environ Manage 53:583–593. doi:10.1007/s00267-013-0224-4
Gilmour CC (2011) A review of the literature on the impact of sulfate on methylmercury in sediments and soils. Submitted by the Smithsonian Environmental Research Center to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection Tallahassee FL
Gilmour C, Henry E (1991) Mercury methylation in aquatic systems affected by acid deposition. Environ Poll 71:131–169
Gilmour CC, Henry EA, Mitchell R (1992) Sulfate stimulation of mercury methylation in fresh-water sediments. Environ Sci Technol 26:2281–2287
Gu B, Axelrad DM, Lange T (2012) Regional mercury and sulfur monitoring and Environmental Assessment. 2012 South Florida Environmental Report Vol. 1 Chapter 3B South Florida Water Management District West Palm Beach FL
Hall BD, Bodaly RA, Fudge RJP, Rudd JWM, Rosenberg DM (1997) Food as the dominant pathway of methylmercury uptake by fish. Water Air Soil Poll 100:13–24
Jeremiason JD, Engstrom DR, Swain EB, Nater EA, Johnson BM, Almendinger JE, Monson BA, Kolka RK (2006) Sulfate addition increases methylmercury production in an experimental wetland. Environ Sci Technol 40:3800–3806
Julian P II (2013) Mercury bio-concentration factor in mosquito fish (Gambusia spp.) in the Florida Everglades. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 90:329–332
Landing WM (2011) Peer review report on the Third Annual Workshop on mercury and sulfur in South Florida Wetlands. June 21–22, 2011. South Florida Water Management District West Palm Beach Florida
Landing WM (2014) Peer review report on the Everglades agricultural area regional sulfur mass balance: technical Webinar: November 20, 2013. South Florida Water Management District West Palm Beach Florida
Liu G, Cai Y, Philippi T, Kalla PI, Scheidt DJ, Richards J, Scinto L, Appleby C (2008) Distribution of total and methylmercury in different ecosystem compartments in the Everglades: implications for mercury bioaccumulation. Environ Poll 153:257–265
Pickhardt PC, Fisher NS (2007) Accumulation of inorganic and methylmercury by freshwater phytoplankton in two contrasting water bodies. Environ Sci Technol 41(1):125–131
Pickhardt PC, Folt CL, Chen CY, Klaue B, Blum JD (2002) Algal blooms reduce the uptake of toxic methylmercury in freshwater food webs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:4419–4423
Pickhardt PC, Stepanova M, Fisher NS (2006) Contrasting uptake routes and tissue distributions of inorganic and methylmercury in mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis) and redear sunfish (Lepomis microlophus). Environ Toxicol Chem 25:2132–2142
Pollman CD (2012) Modeling sulfate and Gambusia mercury relationships in the Everglades. Final Report submitted by Aqua Lux Lucis to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection Tallahassee FL August 8 2012
Pollman CD (2014) Mercury cycling in aquatic ecosystems and trophic-state related variables—implications from structural equation modeling. Sci Tot Environ 499:62–73
Pollman CD, Axelrad DM (2014) Mercury bioaccumulation factors and spurious correlations. Sci Tot Environ 496:vi–xii
Rawcliffe R, Sayer CD, Woodward G, Grey J, Davidson TA, Jones JI (2010) Back to the future: using paleolimnology to infer long-term changes in shallow lake food webs. Freshwat Biol 55:600–613
Scheidt DJ, Kalla PI (2007) Everglades ecosystem assessment: water management and quality, eutrophication, mercury contamination, soils and habitat: monitoring for adaptive management: a R-EMAP status report. USEPA Region 4 Athens GA USEPA Report 904-R-07-001
UMAQL (University of Michigan Air Quality Laboratory) (2012) State of Florida mercury total maximum daily load (TMDL) Project. CMAQ Model evaluation—draft report June 25 2012 University of Michigan Air Quality Laboratory Ann Arbor Michigan
Ward DM, Nislow KH, Folt CL (2010) Bioaccumulation syndrome: identifying factors that make some stream food webs prone to elevated mercury bioaccumulation. Ann NY Acad Sci 1195:62–83
Watras CJ, Back RC, Halvorsen S, Hudson RJM, Morrison KA, Wente SP (1998) Bioaccumulation of mercury in pelagic freshwater food webs. Sci Tot Environ 219:183–208
Acknowledgments
We thank Cindy Gilmour of the Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Bill Orem, Dave Krabbenhoft, and George Aiken of the US Geological Survey for constructive discussions on mercury, sulfate and DOC. We also thank Dan Scheidt and Pete Kalla of the US Environmental Protection Agency and Ted Lange of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission for the use of their data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pollman, C.D., Axelrad, D.M. Mercury Bioaccumulation and Bioaccumulation Factors for Everglades Mosquitofish as Related to Sulfate: A Re-analysis of Julian II (2013). Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 93, 509–516 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-014-1384-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-014-1384-5