Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
AI & SOCIETY
Erschienen in: AI & SOCIETY 3/2017

14.10.2015 | Open Forum

Digital technologies and artificial intelligence’s present and foreseeable impact on lawyering, judging, policing and law enforcement

verfasst von: Ephraim Nissan

Erschienen in: AI & SOCIETY | Ausgabe 3/2017

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

‘AI & Law’ research has been around since the 1970s, even though with shifting emphasis. This is an overview of the contributions of digital technologies, both artificial intelligence and non-AI smart tools, to both the legal professions and the police. For example, we briefly consider text mining and case-automated summarization, tools supporting argumentation, tools concerning sentencing based on the technique of case-based reasoning, the role of abductive reasoning, research into applying AI to legal evidence, tools for fighting crime and tools for identification.
Vorheriger Artikel Freud, Frankenstein and our fear of robots: projection in our cultural perception of technology
Nächster Artikel Converging technologies and a modern man: emergence of a new type of thinking

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
Agrawal R, Srikant R (1994) Fast algorithms for mining association rules. In: Proceedings of the 20th international conference on very large data bases (VLDB’94), Santiago, Chile, pp 487–99
Akin L (2012) Effects of velocity on blood drops and blood spatter, in Nissan (2012), Sec. 8.8.5
Aleven V, Ashley KD (1997) Evaluating a learning environment for case-based argumentation skills. In: Proceedings of the sixth international conference on artificial intelligence and law. ACM Press, New York, pp 170–179
Alheit K (1989) Expert systems in law: issues of liability, in Martino (1989), vol 2, pp 43–52
Allen RJ (1991) The nature of juridical proof. Cardozo Law Review 13:373–422
Allen RJ (1994) Factual ambiguity and a theory of evidence. Northeastern University Law Review 88:604–640
Allen RJ (2008a) Explanationism all the way down. Episteme 3(5):320–328CrossRef
Allen RJ (2008b) Juridical proof and the best explanation. Law & Philosophy 27:223–268CrossRef
Allen RJ, Pardo MS (2007) The problematic value of mathematical models of evidence. Journal of Legal Studies 36:107–140CrossRef
Allen RJ, Pardo MS (2008) Juridical proof and the best explanation. Law & Philosophy 27:223–268CrossRef
Allen R, Redmayne M (eds) (1997) In: Bayesianism and juridical proof, special issue of the International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 1 (Blackstone, London), pp 253–360
Anderson T, Schum D, Twining W (2005) Analysis of evidence: how to do things with facts. Based on Wigmore’s science of judicial proof. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKCrossRef
Åqvist L (1984) Deontic logic. In: Gabbay D, Guenthner F (eds) Handbook of Philosphical Logic, Extensions of classical logic, vol 2. Reidel (Kluwer, now Springer), Dordrecht, pp 605–714
Åqvist L (1986) Introduction to Deontic Logic and the Theory of Normative Systems (Indices. Monographs in Philosophical Logic and Formal Linguistics, 4). Bibliopolis, Naples, Italy
Åqvist L (1992) Towards a logical theory of legal evidence: Semantic analysis of the Bolding–Ekelöf degrees of evidential strength. In: Martino AA (ed) Expert systems in law. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 67–86
Aron J (2012) CSI: augmented reality could help solve murders. In: New Scientist (UK edition), vol 213(2849), London, 28 Jan 2012, p 23
Asaro C (2012) Ingegneria della conoscenza giuridica applicata al diritto penale. Aracne, Rome
Asaro C, Nissan E, Martino AA (2012) Daedalus, a procedural-support tool for the italian examining magistrate and prosecutor, in Nissan (2012), Sec. 4.1.3
Ashley K (1991) Modeling legal argument: reasoning with cases and Hypotheticals. The MIT Press (Bradford Books), Cambridge, MA
Baber C (2010) Distributed cognition at the crime scene. AI & Society 25:423–432CrossRef
Badiru AB, Karasz JM, Holloway RT (1988) Arest: [sic] armed robbery eidetic suspect typing expert system. Journal of Police Science and Administration 16(3):210–216
Bain WM (1986) Case-based reasoning: a computer model of subjective assessment, Ph.D. thesis. Computer Science Department, Yale University, New Haven, CT
Bain WM (1989a) Judge. In: Riesbeck CK, Schank RC (eds) Inside case-based reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 93–140
Bain WM (1989b) Microjudge. In: Riesbeck CK, Schank RC (eds) Inside case-based reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 141–163
Ball WJ (1994) Using Virgil to analyse public policy arguments: a system based on Toulmin’s informal logic. Social Science Computer Review 12(1):26–37CrossRef
Barnden JA (2001) Uncertain reasoning about agents’ beliefs and reasoning. Artificial Intelligence and Law 9(2/3):115–152CrossRef
Basta S, Giannotti F, Manco G, Pedreschi D, Spisanti L (2009) SNIPER: a data mining methodology for fiscal fraud detection. In: Mathematics for Finance and Economy, special issue of ERCIM News, 78 (July), pp 27–28
Bayse WA, Morris CG (1987) FBI automation strategy: development of AI applications for national investigative programs, Signal Magazine, May
Bench-Capon TJM (1998) Specification and implementation of Toulmin dialogue game. In: Hage JC, Bench-Capon T, Koers A, de Vey Mestdagh C, Grutters C (eds) Jurix 1998: foundation for legal knowledge based systems. Gerard Noodt Institut, Nijmegen, Netherlands, pp 5–20
Bex FJ (2011) Arguments, stories and criminal evidence: a formal hybrid theory (law and philosophy series, 92). Springer, DordrechtCrossRef
Blackman SJ (1988) Expert systems in case-based law: the rule against hearsay. LL.M. thesis, Faculty of Law, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
Boba R (2005) Crime Analysis and crime mapping. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
Bolding PO (1960) Aspects of the burden of proof, Scandinavian Studies in Law (Faculty of Law, Stockholm University), 4, pp 9–28
Bromby M (2010) Identification, trust and privacy: how biometrics can aid certification of digital signatures. International Review of Law, Computers and Technology 24(1):1–9CrossRef
Bromby MC, Hall MJJ (2002) The development and rapid evaluation of the knowledge model of ADVOKATE: an advisory system to assess the credibility of eyewitness testimony. In: Bench-Capon T, Daskalopulu A, Winkels R (eds) Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, JURIX 2002: the fifteenth annual conference. IOS Publications, Amsterdam, pp 143–152
Bromby M, MacMillan M, McKellar P (2003) A common-KADS representation for a knowledge based system to evaluate eyewitness identification. International Review of Law Computers and Technology 17(1):99–108CrossRef
Bromby M, MacMillan M, McKellar P (2007) An examination of criminal jury directions in relation to eyewitness identification in commonwealth jurisdictions. Common Law World Review 36(4):303–336CrossRef
Carr CS (2003) Using computer supported argument visualization to teach legal argumentation. In: Kirschner PA, Buckingham Shum SJ, Carr CS (eds) Visualizing argumentation: software tools for collaborative and educational sense-making. Springer, London, pp 75–96CrossRef
Chan H, Lee R, Dillon T, Chang E (2001) E-commerce: fundamentals and applications. Wiley, Chichester, UK
Chau DH, Pandit S, Faloutsos C (2006) Detecting fraudulent personalities in networks of online auctioneers. In: Proceedings of the European conference on machine learning (ECM) and Principles and practice of knowledge discovery in databases (PKDD) 2006. Berlin, 18–22 Sept 2006, pp 103–114
Chen H, Chung W, Xu JJ, Wang G, Qin Y, Chau M (2004) Crime data mining. IEEE Computer 37(4):50–56CrossRef
Choueka Y (1989) Responsa, a full-text retrieval system with linguistic processing for a 65 million-word corpus of Jewish heritage in Hebrew. In: Special issue on non-english interfaces to databases, data engineering (IEEE Computer Society), 12(4), pp 22–31
Choueka Y, Cohen M, Dueck J, Fraenkel AS, Slae M (1971) Full-text document retrieval: Hebrew legal texts (report on the first phase of the Responsa Retrieval Project). In: Minker M, Rosenfeld S (eds) Proceedings of the ACM symposium on information storage and retrieval (Maryland, 1971). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, pp 61–79
Choueka, Y., Cohen, M., Dueck, J., Fraenkel, A.S., and Slae, M. (1972), Full-text law retrieval: the responsa project (working papers on legal information processing series, 3), J. Schweitzer Verlag, Berlin, p 64 (a solicited expanded form of the preceding paper)
Choueka Y, Slae M, Schreiber A (1980) The responsa project: computerization of traditional Jewish law, Ch. 18. In: Erez B (ed) Legal and legislative information processing. Greenwood Press, New York, pp 261–286
Ciampolini A, Torroni P (2004) Using abductive logic agents for modelling judicial evaluation of criminal evidence. Applied Artificial Intelligence 18(3/4):251–275CrossRef
Coady WF (1985) Automated link analysis: artificial intelligence-based tool for investigators. Police Chief 52(9):22–23
Combrink-Kuiters CJM, De Mulder RV, van Noortwijk C (2000) Jurimetrical research on judicial decision-making: a review, at Intelligent decision support for legal practice (IDS 2000). In: Proceedings of the international ICSC congress “Intelligent systems and applications” (ISA 2000), Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia, December 2000. Wetaskiwin, ICSC Academic Press, Alberta, Canada, 2000, Vol. 1, pp 109–117
Console L, Torasso P (1991) A spectrum of logical definitions of model-based diagnosis. Computational Intelligence 7(3):133–141CrossRef
Daniels JJ, Rissland EL (1997) Finding legally relevant passages in case opinions. In: Proceedings of the sixth international conference on artificial intelligence and law. Melbourne, Australia. ACM Press, New York, pp 39–46
de Kleer J (1986) An assumption-based TMS. Artificial Intelligence 28:127–162CrossRef
de Kleer J (1988) A general labeling algorithm for assumption-based truth maintenance. In: Proceedings of the 7th national conference on artificial intelligence, pp 188–192
Dyer MG (1983) In-depth understanding: a computer model of integrated processing of narrative comprehension. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Ebert LC, Ruder T, Zimmermann D, Zuber S, Buck U, Roggo A, Thali M, Hatch G (2012) Virtopsy: the virtual autopsy, in Nissan (2012), Chapter 9
Ekelöf PO (1964) Free evaluation of evidence. Scandinavian Studies in Law (Faculty of Law, Stockholm University), 8, pp 45–66
Fakher-Eldeen F, Kuflik T, Nissan E, Puni G, Salfati R, Shaul Y, Spanioli A (1993) Interpretation of imputed behaviour in ALIBI (1 to 3) and skill. Informatica e Diritto (Florence), Year 19, 2nd Series, 2(1/2), pp 213–242
Falkenhainer B, Forbus K (1991) Compositional modeling: finding the right model for the job. Artificial Intelligence 51:95–143CrossRef
Fenton NE, Neil M (2000), The jury observation fallacy and the use of Bayesian networks to present probabilistic legal arguments. Mathematics today: bulletin of the Institute of Mathematics and its Application (IMA), 36(6), 180–187. http://​www.​agena.​co.​uk/​resources.​html
Finkelstein MO, Levin B (2003) On the probative value of evidence from a screening search. Jurimetrics Journal 43:265–290
Freeman K, Farley AM (1996) A model of argumentation and its application to legal reasoning. Artificial Intelligence and Law 4(3/4):157–161
Fu X, Boongoen T, Shen Q (2010) Evidence directed generation of plausible crime scenarios with identity resolution. Applied Artificial Intelligence 24(4):253–276CrossRef
Furtado V, Vasconcelos E (2007) Geosimulation in education: a system for teaching police resource allocation. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 17:57–81
Gelbart D, Smith JC (1993) FLEXICON: an evaluation of a statistical model adapted to intelligent text management. In: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on artificial intelligence and law (ICAIL’93), Amsterdam. ACM Press, New York, pp 142–151
Gilbreth FB, Gilbreth LM (1917) Applied motion study. Sturgis and Walton, New York
Goble L (1999) Deontic logic with relevance. In: McNamara P, Prakken H (eds) Norms, logics and information systems. ISO Press, Amsterdam, pp 331–346
Goldberg HG, Wong RWH (1998) Restructuring transactional data for link analysis in the FinCEN AI system. In Jensen D, Goldberg H (eds) Artificial intelligence and link analysis: papers from the AAAI fall symposium, Orlando, Florida
Gordon TF, Walton D (2006) The Carneades argumentation framework: using presumptions and exceptions to model critical questions, at The sixth international workshop on computational models of natural argument, held together with ECAI’06, Riva del Garda, Italy, August 2006
Grover C, Hachey B, Hughson I, Korycinski C (2003) Automatic summarisation of legal documents. In: Proceedings of the ninth international conference on artificial intelligence and law (ICAIL 2003), Edinburgh, Scotland. ACM Press, New York, pp 243–251
Gulotta G, Zappalà A (2001) The conflict between prosecution and defense in a child sexual abuse case and in an attempted homicide case. In: Peterson DM, Barnden JA, Nissan E (eds) Artificial intelligence and law, special issue of Information and Communications Technology Law, 10(1), pp 91–108
HaCohen-Kerner Y, Schild UJ (1999) The judge’s apprentice. In: Knight B, Nissan E (eds) Forum on Case-Based Reasoning, thematic section in the New Review of Applied Expert Systems, vol 5, pp 191–202
Hahn U, Mani I (2000) The challenges of automatic summarization. IEEE Computer 33(11):29–36CrossRef
Hartley JRM, Varley G (2001) The design and evaluation of simulations for the development of complex decision-making skills. In: Okamoto T, Hartley R, Kinshuk, Klus JP (eds) Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on advanced learning technology: issues, achievements and challenge. IEEE computer society, Washington, DC, pp 145–148CrossRef
Hitchcock D, Verheij B (2005) The Toulmin model today: introduction to the special issue on contemporary work using Stephen Edelston Toulmin’s layout of arguments. Argumentation 19:255–258CrossRef
Holmström-Hintikka G (1995) Expert witnesses in legal argumentation. Argumentation 9(3):489–502CrossRef
Holmström-Hintikka G (2001) Expert witnesses in the model of interrogation. In: Martino AA, Nissan E (eds) Software, Formal models, and artificial intelligence for legal evidence, special issue of Computing and Informatics, 20(6):555–579
Horty JF (1993) Deontic logic as founded on nonmonotonic logic. In: Meyer JJ, Wieringa R (eds) Deontic logic in computer science. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, vol 9. Baltzer, Basel, pp 69–91
Jain AK, Bolleand R, Pankanti S (1999) Biometrics: personal identification in networked society. Kluwer (now Springer), DordrechtCrossRef
Jain AK, Prabhakar S, Hong L, Pankanti S (2000) Filterbank-based fingerprint matching. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 9(5):846–859CrossRef
Jedrzejek C, Falkowski M, Smolenski M (2009) Link analysis of fuel laundering scams and implications of results for scheme understanding and prosecutor strategy. In: Governatori G (ed) Proceedings of Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2009, 25 July 2009. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 79–88
Johnson MK, Farid H (2007) Exposing digital forgeries in complex lighting environments. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 2(3):450–461CrossRef
Johnston VS, Caldwell C (1997) Tracking a criminal suspect through face space with a genetic algorithm. In: Bäck T, Fogel DB, Michalewics Z (eds) Handbook of evolutionary computation. Institute of Physics Publishing and Oxford University Press, Bristol and New York
Josephson JR, Josephson SG (eds) (1994) Abductive inference: computation, philosophy, technology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKMATH
Kangas LJ, Terrones KM, Keppel RD, La Moria RD (2003) Computer aided tracking and characterization of homicides and sexual assaults (CATCH). Sec. 12.6 in Mena (2003), pp 364–375
Kaptein H, Prakken H, Verheij B (eds) (2009) Legal evidence and proof: statistics, stories, logic. Applied legal philosophy series, Ashgate Publishing, Farnham, Surrey, UK
Keppens J, Schafer B (2003b) Assumption based peg unification for crime scenario modelling. In: Proceeding of the 2003 conference on legal knowledge and information systems; JURIX 2003: the eighteenth annual conference. IOS Press, Amsterdam. http://​www.​jurix.​nl/​pdf/​j05-07.​pdf
Keppens J, Schafer B (2004) “Murdered by persons unknown”—Speculative reasoning in law and logic. In: Gordon T (ed) Legal knowledge and information systems. Jurix 2004: the seventeenth annual conference. IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2004, pp 109–118
Keppens J, Schafer B (2005) Assumption based peg unification for crime scenario modelling. In: Proceeding of the 2005 conference on legal knowledge and information systems; JURIX 2005: the eighteenth annual conference (frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications, 134), IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 49–58
Keppens J, Schafer B (2006) Knowledge based crime scenario modelling. Expert Systems with Applications 30(2):203–222CrossRef
Keppens J, Zeleznikow J (2002) On the role of model-based reasoning in decision support in crime investigation. In: Proceedings of the IASTED third international conference on law and technology (LawTech2002). ACTA Press, Anaheim, CA, pp 77–83
Keppens J, Zeleznikow J (2003) A model based reasoning approach for generating plausible crime scene scenarios from evidence. In: Sartor G (ed). Proceedings of the ninth international conference on artificial intelligence and law (ICAIL 2003), Edinburgh, Scotland, 24–28 June 2003. ACM Press, New York, pp 51–59
Keppens J, Shen Q, Lee M (2005) Compositional Bayesian modelling and its application to decision support in crime investigation. In: Proceedings of the 19th international workshop on qualitative reasoning, pp 138–148
Khuwaja GA (2006) A multimodal biometric identification system using compressed finger images. Cybernetics and Systems 37(1):23–46CrossRef
Kuflik T, Nissan E, Puni G (1989) Finding excuses with ALIBI: alternative plans that are deontically more defensible. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Communication, Meaning and Knowledge vs. Information Technology, Lisbon, September 1989. Then again in Computers and Artificial Intelligence, 10(4), 1991, pp 297–325. Then in a selection from the Lisbon conference: Lopes Alves J (ed) Information Technology and Society: Theory, Uses, Impacts. Associação Portuguesa para o Desenvolvimento das Comunicações (APDC), Lisbon, and Sociedade Portuguesa de Filosofia (SPF), Lisbon, 1992, pp 484–510
Leary R (2012) FLINTS, a Tool for police investigation and intelligence analysis, in Nissan (2012), Chapter 7
MacCrimmon M (1989) Facts, stories and the hearsay rule, in Martino (1989), vol 1, pp 461–475
MacCrimmon M, Tillers P (eds) (2002) The dynamics of judicial proof: computation, logic, and common sense (Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, 94). Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg
Mani I (2001) Automatic summarization (natural language processing, 3). Benjamins, AmsterdamCrossRef
Marks P (2014) Hands off: an app that creates maps of sexual harassment could help women in Bangladesh fight back. In: New Scientist (UK edition), vol 222(2971), 31 May 2014, p 21
Martino AA (ed) (1989) Pre-proceedings of the third international conference on “Logica, Informatica, Diritto: Legal expert systems”, Florence, 1989 (2 vols + Appendix). Istituto per la Documentazione Giuridica, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Florence
Martino AA, Nissan E (eds) (1998) Formal Models of Legal Time, special issue of Information and Communications Technology Law, 7(3)
Martino AA, Nissan E (eds) (2001) Formal approaches to legal evidence, special issue of Artificial Intelligence and Law, 9(2/3), pp 85–224
McGinnis JO, Pearce RG (2014) The great disruption: how machine intelligence will transform the role of lawyers in the delivery of legal services. Fordham Law Review 82:3041–3066
Mena J (2003) Investigative data mining for security and criminal detection. Butterworth, Boston, MA
Moens M-F (2000) Automatic indexing and abstracting of document texts. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
Moens M-F (2001) Legal text retrieval. Artificial Intelligence and Law 9(1):29–57CrossRef
Moens M-F, Uyttendaele C, Dumortier J (1997). Abstracting of legal cases: The SALOMON experience. In: Proceedings of the sixth international conference on artificial intelligence and law, Melbourne, Australia. ACM Press, New York, pp 114–122
Moens M-F, Uyttendaele C, Dumortier J (1999) Abstracting of legal cases: the potential of clustering based on the selection of representative objects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 50(2):151–161CrossRef
Murbach R, Nonn E (1991) Sentencing by artificial intelligence tools: some possibilities and limitations. In: The joint meeting of the law and society association and the research committee of the sociology of law of the International Sociological Association, Amsterdam
Murphy BL, Morrison RD (eds) (2002) Introduction to environmental forensics. Academic Press, San Diego, CA
Nance DA, Morris SB (2002) An empirical assessment of presentation formats for trace evidence with a relatively large and quantifiable random match probability. Jurimetrics Journal 42:403–445
Nirenburg S, Raskin V (2004) Principles of ontological semantics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Nissan E (2001a) An AI formalism for competing claims of identification: capturing the “Smemorato di Collegno” amnesia case. Computing and Informatics 20(6):625–656MathSciNetMATH
Nissan E (2001b) ‘The Bayesianism debate in legal scholarship’ [review article on Allen and Redmayne (1997)]. Artificial Intelligence and Law 9(2/3):199–214CrossRef
Nissan E (2012) Legal evidence, police investigation, case argumentation, and computer tools, (Law, Governance and Technology series, 5), vol 2. Springer, DordrechtCrossRef
Nissan E, Martino AA (eds) (2001), Software, formal models, and artificial intelligence for legal evidence, special issue of Computing and Informatics, 20(6), pp 509–656
Nissan E, Martino AA (eds) (2003) Building blocks for an artificial intelligence framework in the field of legal evidence, special issue (two parts) of Cybernetics and Systems, 34(4/5), pp 233–411; 34(6/7), pp 413–583
Nissan E, Martino AA (eds) (2004) The construction of judicial proof: a challenge for artificial intelligence modelling, special issue of Applied Artificial Intelligence, 18(3/4), pp 183–393
Nissan E, Hall D, Lobina E, de la Motte R (2004) A formalism for a case study in the watertime project: the city water system in Grenoble, from privatization to remunicipalization. Applied Artificial Intelligence 18(3/4):305–366CrossRef
Nute D (ed) (1996) Defeasible deontic logic (Synthese Library, 263). Kluwer, Dordrecht
Oatley G, Ewart B (2003) Crimes analysis software: “Pins in Maps”, clustering and Bayes net prediction. Expert Systems with Applications 25(4):569–588CrossRef
Oatley G, Ewart B (2011) Data mining and crime analysis. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews (WIREs): Data Minining and Knowledge Discovery 1(2):147–153
Oatley G, Ewart B, Zeleznikow J (2006) Decision support systems for police: lessons from the application of data mining techniques to “soft” forensic evidence. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Law 14(1/2):35–100
Pamula VK (2003) Detection of explosives, Chapter 23. In: Pearce TC, Schiffman SS, Nagle HT, Gardner JW (eds) Handbook of Machine olfaction: electronic nose technology. Wiley–VCH, Weinheim, Baden-Württemberg, Germany, pp 547–560. doi:10.​1002/​3527601597.​ch23
Pandit S, Chau DH, Wang S, Faloutsos C (2007) NetProbe: a fast and scalable system for fraud detection in online auction networks. In: WWW 2007: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web, Banff, Alberta, Canada, Track: Data Mining, Session: Mining in Social Networks. ACM, New York, pp 201–210
Peterson DM, Barnden JA, Nissan E (eds) (2001) Artificial intelligence and law, special issue of Information and Communications Technology Law, 10(1)
Poole P (2002) Logical argumentation, abduction and Bayesian decision theory: a Bayesian approach to logical arguments and its application to legal evidential reasoning, in MacCrimmon and Tillers (2002), pp 385–396
Prakken H (2001) Modelling reasoning about evidence in legal procedure.In: Proceedings of the eighth international conference on artificial intelligence and law (ICAIL 2001), St. Louis, Missouri. ACM Press, New York, pp 119–128
Prakken H (2002) Incomplete arguments in legal discourse: a case study. In: Bench-Capon TJM, Daskalopulu A, Winkels R (eds), Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2002: the fifteenth annual conference. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 93–102
Prakken H (2004) Analysing reasoning about evidence with formal models of argumentation. Law, Probability & Risk 3:33–50CrossRef
Prakken H (2006) Formal systems for persuasion dialogue. The Knowledge Engineering Review 21:163–188CrossRef
Prakken H (2008) A formal model of adjudication dialogues. Artificial Intelligence and Law 16:305–328CrossRef
Prakken H, Renooij S (2001) Reconstructing causal reasoning about evidence: a case study. In: Verheij B, Lodder AR, Loui RP, Muntjwerff AJ (eds) Legal knowledge and information systems. Jurix 2001: the 14th annual conference, IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 131–137
Prakken H, Sartor G (2002) The role of logic in computational models of logic argument: a critical survey. In: Kakas A, Sadri F (eds) Computational logic: logic programming and beyond. Essays in honour of Robert A. Kowalski, Part II (lecture notes in computer science, 2048). Springer, Berlin, pp 342–380
Prakken H, Reed C, Walton DN (2003) Argumentation schemes and generalisations in reasoning about evidence. In: Sartor G (ed) Proceedings of the ninth international conference on artificial intelligence and law (ICAIL 2003), Edinburgh, Scotland, 24–28 June 2003. ACM Press, New York, pp 32–41
Rattani A, Mehrotra H, And H, Gupta P (2008) Multimodal biometric systems. In: Quigley M (ed) Encyclopedia of information ethics and security. IGI Global, Hershey, PA, pp 478–485
Redmond MA, Blackburn C (2003) Empirical analysis of case-based reasoning and other prediction methods in a social science domain: repeat criminal victimization. In: Ashley KD, Bridge DG (eds) Case-based reasoning research and development: proceedings of the 5th international conference on case-based reasoning (ICCBR 2003), Trondheim, Norway, 23–26 June 2003, (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2689), Springer, Berlin
Reed CA, Rowe GWA (2004) Araucaria: software for argument analysis, diagramming and representation. International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools 14(3/4):961–980CrossRef
Rissland EL, Skalak DB (1991) CABARET: statutory interpretation in a hybrid architecture. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 34:839–887CrossRef
Ross A, Jain AK (2003) Information fusion in biometrics. Pattern Recognition Letters 24(13):2115–2125CrossRef
Ruger TW, Kim PT, Martin AD, Quinn KM (2004) The Supreme Court forecasting project: legal and political science approaches to predicting Supreme Court decisionmaking. Columbia Law Review 104:1150–1209CrossRef
Rutkin A (2014) Information from the inside: a device that keeps tabs on inmates vital signs could save lives in the slammer. New Scientist (UK edition), vol 222(2971), 31 May 2014, p 22
Schank RG (1972) Conceptual dependency: a theory of natural language understanding. Cognitive Psychology 3:552–631CrossRef
Schank P, Ranney M (1995) Improved reasoning with convince me. In: CHI 95: conference companion on human factors in computing systems, ACM Press, New York, pp 276–277
Schank RG, Riesbeck CK (eds) (1981) Inside Computer Understanding: Five Programs Plus Miniatures. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ (afterwards, Mahwa, NJ)
Schroeder J, Xu J, Chen H, Chau M (2007) Automated criminal link analysis based on domain knowledge. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58(6):842–855CrossRef
Shen Q, Keppens J, Aitken C, Schafer B, Lee M (2006) A scenario-driven decision support system for serious crime investigation. Law, Probability & Risk 5:87–117CrossRef
Shimony SE, Nissan E (2001) Kappa calculus and evidential strength: a note on Åqvist’s logical theory of legal evidence. Artificial Intelligence and Law 9(2/3):153–163CrossRef
Simon E, Gaes G, Rhodes W (1991) ASSYST: the design and implementation of computer assisted sentencing. Federal Probation 55:46–55
Snow P, Belis M (2002) Structured deliberation for dynamic uncertain inference, in MacCrimmon and Tillers (2002), pp 397–416
Stranieri A, Zeleznikow J (2005) Knowledge discovery from legal databases (Springer law and philosophy library, 69). Springer, DordrechtCrossRef
Stranieri A, Zeleznikow J, Yearwood J (2012) Argumentation for dialectical situations, versus for structuring knowledge non-dialectically, and an integration of the two, in Nissan (2012), Sec. 3.11
Stranieri A, Zeleznikow J, Nissan E (2012) Using genetic algorithms in data mining, in Nissan (2012), Sec. 6.1.16
Surden H (2014) Machine learning and law. Washington Law Review 89:87–115
Thagard P (1989) Explanatory coherence. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 12(3):435–467. Commentaries and riposte up to p 502CrossRef
Thagard P (2000) Coherence in thought and action. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Thagard P (2004) Causal inference in legal decision making: explanatory coherence versus Bayesian networks. Applied Artificial Intelligence 18(3/4):231–249CrossRef
Toulmin SE (1958) The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (reprints: 1974, 1999)
Uyttendaele C, Moens M-F, Dumortier J (1998) SALOMON: automatic abstracting of legal cases for effective access to court decisions. Artificial Intelligence and Law 6(1):59–79CrossRef
Valcour L (1997) Investigate B&E: break and enter expert system. Technical report TR–11–97, Canadian Police Research Centre
Valente A (1995) Legal knowledge engineering: a modeling approach. IOS Press, AmsterdamMATH
van den Braak SW, Vreeswijk GAW(2006) A knowledge representation architecture for the construction of stories based on interpretation and evidence, at the sixth international workshop on computational models of natural argument, held with ECAI’06, Riva del Garda, Italy, August 2006
van den Braak SW, van Oostendorp H, Prakken H, Vreeswijk GAW (2006) A critical review of argument visualization tools: do users become better reasoners?’, ibid
van Gelder TJ (2002) Argument mapping with Reason!Able [sic]. The American Philosophical Association Newsletter on Philosophy and Computers 2002:85–90
Verheij B (2003) Dialectical argumentation with argumentation schemes: an approach to legal logic. Artificial Intelligence and Law 11:167–195CrossRef
Walton D, Reed C, Macagno F (2008) Argumentation schemes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKMATHCrossRef
Xiang Y, Chau M, Atabakhsh H, Chen H (2005) Visualizing criminal relationships: comparisons of a hyperbolic tree and a hierachical list. Decision Support System 41:69–83CrossRef
Xu JJ, Chen H (2004) Fighting organized crimes: using shortest-path algorithms to identify associations in criminal networks. Decision Support System 38:473–487CrossRef
Yinon J (2003) Detection of explosives by electronic noses. Analytical Chemistry 75(5):99A–105ACrossRef
Zeide JS, Liebowitz J (1987) Using expert systems: the legal perspective. IEEE Expert, Spring, pp 19–20
Zeleznikow J (2002) Using Web-based legal decision support systems to improve access to justice. Information and Communications Technology Law 11(1):15–33CrossRef
Zeleznikow J, Stranieri A (1995) The split up system: integrating neural networks and rule based reasoning in the legal domain. In: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on artificial intelligence and law (ICAIL’95). ACM Press, New York, pp 185–194
Zeleznikow J, Stranieri A (1998) Split up: the use of an argument based knowledge representation to meet expectations of different users for discretionary decision making. In: Proceedings of IAAI’98: tenth annual conference on innovative applications of artificial intelligence. AAAI/MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 1146–1151
Metadaten
Titel
Digital technologies and artificial intelligence’s present and foreseeable impact on lawyering, judging, policing and law enforcement
verfasst von
Ephraim Nissan
Publikationsdatum
14.10.2015
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
AI & SOCIETY / Ausgabe 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0951-5666
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-5655
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-015-0596-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2017

AI & SOCIETY 3/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Open Forum

Understanding the social impact of ICN: between myth and reality

Original Article

Engineering sustainable mHealth: the role of Action Research

Editorial

Hermeneutic of performing data

Open Forum

A socially inspired energy feedback technology: challenges in a developing scenario

Original Article

Comparative foundations of Eastern and Western thought

Open Forum

Freud, Frankenstein and our fear of robots: projection in our cultural perception of technology