Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of public education and social security on fertility

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Population Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introducing a fertility decision and child care cost into an overlapping generations model with public education and social security, we examine the effects of these public policies on fertility. We show that an increase in income tax, which finances social security benefits and public investment in education, increases fertility. On the other hand, with a constant tax rate, a change in the allocation from social security benefits to public investment in education decreases fertility and, with a constant social security tax, the effect of education tax on fertility is neutral.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Apps P, Rees R (2004) Fertility, taxation and family policy. Scand J Econ 106(4):745–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro RJ, Becker GS (1989) Fertility choice in a model of economic growth. Econometrica 57(2):481–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker GS, Barro RJ (1988) A reformulation of the economic theory of fertility. Q J Econ 103(1):1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker GS, Tomes N (1986) Human capital and the rise and fall of families. J Labor Econ 4(3):S1–S39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cremer H, Gahvari F, Pestieau P (2008) Pensions with heterogeneous individuals and endogenous fertility. J Popul Econ 21(4):961–981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de la Croix D, Doepke M (2004) Public versus private education when differential fertility matters. J Dev Econ 73(2):607–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond P (1965) National debt in a neoclassical growth model. Amer Econ Rev 55(5):1126–1150

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckstein Z, Wolpin K (1985) Fertility choice, land, and the Malthusian hypothesis. J Public Econ 27(1):93–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich I, Zhong JG (1998) Social security and the real economy: an inquiry into some neglected issues. Amer Econ Rev 88(2):151–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale WG, Scholz JK (1994) Intergenerational transfers and the accumulation of wealth. J Econ Perspect 8(4):145–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Glomm G, Kaganovich M (2003) Distribution effects of public education in an economy with public pensions. Int Econ Rev 44(3):917–937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glomm G, Kaganovich M (2008) Social security, public education and the growth-inequality relationship. Eur Econ Rev 52(6):1009–1034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glomm G, Ravikumar B (1992) Public versus private investment in human capital endogenous growth and income inequality. J Polit Econ 100(4):813–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groezen BV, Leers B, Meijdam L (2003) Social security and endogenous fertility: pensions and child allowances as siamese twins. J Public Econ 87(2):233–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirazawa M, Yakita A (2009) Fertility, child care outside the home, and pay-as-you-go social security. J Popul Econ (in press)

  • Kaganovich M, Zilcha I (1999) Education, social security, and growth. J Public Econ 71(2):289–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morand OF (1999) Endogenous fertility, income distribution, and growth. J Econ Growth 4(3):331–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pecchenino RA, Utendorf KR (1999) Social security, social welfare and the aging population. J Popul Econ 12(4):607–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pecchenino RA, Pollard PS (2002) Dependent children and aged parents: funding education and social security in an aging economy. J Macroecon 24(2):145–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Razin A, Sadka E, Swagel P (2002) The aging population and the size of the welfare state. J Polit Econ 110(4):900–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson P (1958) An exact consumption-loan model of interest with or without the social contrivance of money. J Polit Econ 66(6):467–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabata K (2003) Inverted U-shaped fertility dynamics, the poverty trap and growth. Econ Lett 81(2):241–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yakita A (2001) Uncertain lifetime, fertility and social security. J Popul Econ 14(4):635–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yew SL, Zhang J (2009) Optimal social security in a dynastic model with human capital externalities, fertility and endogenous growth. J Public Econ (in press)

  • Zhang J, Zhang J (1998) Social security, intergenerational transfers, and endogenous growth. Can J Econ 31(5):1225–1241

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Zhang J (2003) Long-run effects of unfunded social security with earnings-dependent benefits. J Econ Dyn Control 28(3):617–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Zhang J (2004) How does social security affect economic growth? Evidence form cross-country data. J Popul Econ 17(3):473–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Zhang J (2007) Optimal social security in a dynastic model with investment externalities and endogenous fertility. J Econ Dyn Control 31(11):3545–3567

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tatsuya Omori.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Junsen Zhang

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Omori, T. Effects of public education and social security on fertility. J Popul Econ 22, 585–601 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-009-0244-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-009-0244-9

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation