Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
Erschienen in: Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 1/2018

27.06.2017 | REVIEW ARTICLE

A survey of adaptive sampling for global metamodeling in support of simulation-based complex engineering design

verfasst von: Haitao Liu, Yew-Soon Ong, Jianfei Cai

Erschienen in: Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Metamodeling is becoming a rather popular means to approximate the expensive simulations in today’s complex engineering design problems since accurate metamodels can bring in a lot of benefits. The metamodel accuracy, however, heavily depends on the locations of the observed points. Adaptive sampling, as its name suggests, places more points in regions of interest by learning the information from previous data and metamodels. Consequently, compared to traditional space-filling sampling approaches, adaptive sampling has great potential to build more accurate metamodels with fewer points (simulations), thereby gaining increasing attention and interest by both practitioners and academicians in various fields. Noticing that there is a lack of reviews on adaptive sampling for global metamodeling in the literature, which is needed, this article categorizes, reviews, and analyzes the state-of-the-art single−/multi-response adaptive sampling approaches for global metamodeling in support of simulation-based engineering design. In addition, we also review and discuss some important issues that affect the success of an adaptive sampling approach as well as providing brief remarks on adaptive sampling for other purposes. Last, challenges and future research directions are provided and discussed.
Vorheriger Artikel Local maximum-entropy based surrogate model and its application to structural reliability analysis
Nächster Artikel The relevance of reliability-based topology optimization in early design stages of aircraft structures

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
Acar E (2014) Simultaneous optimization of shape parameters and weight factors in ensemble of radial basis functions. Struct Multidiscip Optim 49(6):969–978CrossRef
Acar E, Rais-Rohani M (2009) Ensemble of metamodels with optimized weight factors. Struct Multidiscip Optim 37(3):279–294CrossRef
Ajdari A, Mahlooji H (2014) An adaptive exploration-exploitation algorithm for constructing metamodels in random simulation using a novel sequential experimental design. Commun Stat Simul Comput 43(5):947–968MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Alexandrov NM, Dennis JE Jr, Lewis RM, Torczon V (1998) A trust-region framework for managing the use of approximation models in optimization. Struct Optimization 15(1):16–23CrossRef
Alvarez M, Lawrence ND (2009) Sparse convolved Gaussian processes for multi-output regression. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp 57–64
Alvarez MA, Rosasco L, Lawrence ND (2012) Kernels for vector-valued functions: a review. Found Trends Mach Learn 4(3):195–266MATHCrossRef
Atamturktur S, Williams B, Egeberg M, Unal C (2013) Batch sequential design of optimal experiments for improved predictive maturity in physics-based modeling. Struct Multidiscip Optim 48(3):549–569CrossRef
Atkinson EJ, Therneau TM (2000) An introduction to recursive partitioning using the RPART routines. Mayo Foundation, Rochester
Audze P, Eglais V (1977) New approach for planning out of experiments. Problems of Dynamics and Strengths 35:104–107
Auffray Y, Barbillon P, Marin J-M (2012) Maximin design on non hypercube domains and kernel interpolation. Stat Comput 22(3):703–712MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Aurenhammer F (1991) Voronoi diagrams—a survey of a fundamental geometric data structure. ACM Comput Surv 23(3):345–405CrossRef
Aute VC (2009) Single and multiresponse adaptive design of experiments with application to design optimization of novel heat exchangers. University of Maryland, College Park, City of College Park
Aute V, Saleh K, Abdelaziz O, Azarm S, Radermacher R (2013) Cross-validation based single response adaptive design of experiments for kriging metamodeling of deterministic computer simulations. Struct Multidiscip Optim 48(3):581–605CrossRef
Barton RR (1997) Design of experiments for fitting subsystem metamodels. In: Proceedings of the 29th conference on Winter simulation, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. IEEE, pp 303–310
Beck J, Guillas S (2016) Sequential design with mutual information for computer experiments (MICE): emulation of a tsunami model. SIAM/ASA J Uncertain Quantif 4(1):739–766MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Benamara T, Breitkopf P, Lepot I, Sainvitu C (2016) Adaptive infill sampling criterion for multi-fidelity optimization based on Gappy-POD. Struct Multidiscip Optim 54(4):843–855CrossRef
Bonilla EV, Chai KMA, Williams CK (2007) Multi-task Gaussian process prediction. In: NIPs, pp 153–160
Braconnier T, Ferrier M, Jouhaud J-C, Montagnac M, Sagaut P (2011) Towards an adaptive POD/SVD surrogate model for aeronautic design. Comput Fluids 40(1):195–209MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Burbidge R, Rowland JJ, King RD (2007) Active learning for regression based on query by committee. In: International Conference on Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning. Springer, pp 209–218
Busby D (2009) Hierarchical adaptive experimental design for Gaussian process emulators. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94(7):1183–1193CrossRef
Busby D, Farmer CL, Iske A (2007) Hierarchical nonlinear approximation for experimental design and statistical data fitting. SIAM J Sci Comput 29(1):49–69MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Cai X, Qiu H, Gao L, Yang P, Shao X (2016) An enhanced RBF-HDMR integrated with an adaptive sampling method for approximating high dimensional problems in engineering design. Struct Multidiscip Optim 53(6):1209–1229CrossRef
Caruana R (1995) Learning many related tasks at the same time with backpropagation. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. pp 657–664
Černý V (1985) Thermodynamical approach to the traveling salesman problem: an efficient simulation algorithm. J Optim Theory Appl 45(1):41–51MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Chen R-B, Hsu Y-W, Hung Y, Wang W (2014) Discrete particle swarm optimization for constructing uniform design on irregular regions. Comput Stat Data Anal 72:282–297MathSciNetCrossRef
Chuang S, Hung Y (2010) Uniform design over general input domains with applications to target region estimation in computer experiments. Comput Stat Data Anal 54(1):219–232MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Clarke SM, Griebsch JH, Simpson TW (2005) Analysis of support vector regression for approximation of complex engineering analyses. J Mech Des 127(6):1077–1087CrossRef
Collobert R, Weston J (2008) A unified architecture for natural language processing: deep neural networks with multitask learning. In: Proceedings of the 25th International conference on machine learning. ACM, p 160–167
Crombecq K (2011) Surrogate modeling of computer experiments with sequential experimental design. Ghent University, AntwerpenMATH
Crombecq K, Gorissen D, Deschrijver D, Dhaene T (2011a) A novel hybrid sequential design strategy for global surrogate modeling of computer experiments. SIAM J Sci Comput 33(4):1948–1974MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Crombecq K, Laermans E, Dhaene T (2011b) Efficient space-filling and non-collapsing sequential design strategies for simulation-based modeling. Eur J Oper Res 214(3):683–696CrossRef
Damblin G, Couplet M, Iooss B (2013) Numerical studies of space-filling designs: optimization of Latin hypercube samples and subprojection properties. J Simul 7(4):276–289CrossRef
De Geest J, Dhaene T, Faché N, De Zutter D (1999) Adaptive CAD-model building algorithm for general planar microwave structures. IEEE Trans Microwave Theory Tech 47(9):1801–1809CrossRef
de Oliveira Castro P, Petit E, Beyler JC, Jalby W (2012) ASK: adaptive sampling kit for performance characterization. In: European conference on parallel processing, Rhodes Island, Greece. Springer, pp 89–101
Deschrijver D, Crombecq K, Nguyen HM, Dhaene T (2011) Adaptive sampling algorithm for macromodeling of parameterized-parameter responses. IEEE Trans Microwave Theory Tech 59(1):39–45CrossRef
Devabhaktuni VK, Zhang Q-J (2000) Neural network training-driven adaptive sampling algorithm for microwave modeling. In: 2000 30th European microwave conference, Paris, France. IEEE, pp 1–4
dos Santos MIR, dos Santos PMR (2008) Sequential experimental designs for nonlinear regression metamodels in simulation. Simul Model Pract Theory 16(9):1365–1378CrossRef
Douak F, Melgani F, Alajlan N, Pasolli E, Bazi Y, Benoudjit N (2012) Active learning for spectroscopic data regression. J Chemom 26(7):374–383CrossRef
Draguljić D, Santner TJ, Dean AM (2012) Noncollapsing space-filling designs for bounded nonrectangular regions. Technometrics 54(2):169–178MathSciNetCrossRef
Dyn N, Levin D, Rippa S (1986) Numerical procedures for surface fitting of scattered data by radial functions. SIAM J Sci Stat Comput 7(2):639–659MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Eason J, Cremaschi S (2014) Adaptive sequential sampling for surrogate model generation with artificial neural networks. Comput Chem Eng 68:220–232CrossRef
Efron B, Tibshirani RJ (1994) An introduction to the bootstrap. CRC press, FloridaMATH
Farhang-Mehr A, Azarm S (2005) Bayesian meta-modelling of engineering design simulations: a sequential approach with adaptation to irregularities in the response behaviour. Int J Numer Methods Eng 62(15):2104–2126MATHCrossRef
Fedorov VV (1972) Theory of optimal experiments. Academic Press, New York
Fernández-Godino MG, Park C, Kim N-H, Haftka RT (2016) Review of multi-fidelity models. arXiv preprint arXiv:160907196
Finkel RA, Bentley JL (1974) Quad trees a data structure for retrieval on composite keys. Acta Informatica 4(1):1–9MATHCrossRef
Forrester AI, Keane AJ (2009) Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization. Prog Aerosp Sci 45(1):50–79CrossRef
Forrester AI, Sóbester A, Keane AJ (2007) Multi-fidelity optimization via surrogate modelling. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Eng Sci 463(2088):3251–3269MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Freund Y, Seung HS, Shamir E, Tishby N (1993) Information, prediction, and query by committee. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp 483–483
Fu Y, Zhu X, Li B (2013) A survey on instance selection for active learning. Knowl Inf Syst 35(2):249–283CrossRef
Gao Y, Wang Y-J (2007) A memetic differential evolutionary algorithm for high dimensional functions' optimization. In: Third International Conference on Natural Computation. IEEE, pp 188–192
Gazut S, Martinez J-M, Dreyfus G, Oussar Y (2008) Towards the optimal design of numerical experiments. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 19(5):874–882CrossRef
Geman S, Bienenstock E, Doursat R (1992) Neural networks and the bias/variance dilemma. Neural Comput 4(1):1–58CrossRef
Ghoreyshi M, Badcock K, Woodgate M (2009) Accelerating the numerical generation of aerodynamic models for flight simulation. J Aircr 46(3):972–980CrossRef
Golzari A, Sefat MH, Jamshidi S (2015) Development of an adaptive surrogate model for production optimization. J Pet Sci Eng 133:677–688CrossRef
Gorissen D, Couckuyt I, Demeester P, Dhaene T, Crombecq K (2010) A surrogate modeling and adaptive sampling toolbox for computer based design. J Mach Learn Res 11:2051–2055
Gramacy RB, Lee HK (2006) Adaptive design of supercomputer experiments. The Statistical Laboratory, University of Cambridge, UK
Gramacy RB, Lee HKH (2008) Bayesian treed Gaussian process models with an application to computer modeling. J Am Stat Assoc 103(483):1119–1130MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Gramacy RB, Lee HK (2009) Adaptive design and analysis of supercomputer experiments. Technometrics 51(2):130–145MathSciNetCrossRef
Grosso A, Jamali A, Locatelli M (2009) Finding maximin latin hypercube designs by iterated local search heuristics. Eur J Oper Res 197(2):541–547MATHCrossRef
Guenther J, Lee HK, Gray GA (2015) Sequential design for achieving estimated accuracy of global sensitivities. Appl Stoch Model Bus Ind 31(6):782–800MathSciNetCrossRef
Haaland B, Qian PZ (2010) An approach to constructing nested space-filling designs for multi-fidelity computer experiments. Stat Sin 20(3):1063MathSciNetMATH
Haftka RT, Villanueva D, Chaudhuri A (2016) Parallel surrogate-assisted global optimization with expensive functions–a survey. Struct Multidiscip Optim 54(1):3–13MathSciNetCrossRef
Halton JH (1960) On the efficiency of certain quasi-random sequences of points in evaluating multi-dimensional integrals. Numer Math 2(1):84–90MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Han Z-H, Görtz S, Hain R (2010a) A variable-fidelity modeling method for aero-loads prediction. In: New results in numerical and experimental fluid mechanics VII. Springer, pp 17–25
Han Z-H, Zimmermann R, Goretz S (2010b) A new cokriging method for variable-fidelity surrogate modeling of aerodynamic data. In: 48th AIAA Aerospace sciences meeting including the new horizons forum and Aerospace exposition, p 1225
Han Z-H, Görtz S, Zimmermann R (2013) Improving variable-fidelity surrogate modeling via gradient-enhanced kriging and a generalized hybrid bridge function. Aerosp Sci Technol 25(1):177–189CrossRef
Helton JC, Davis F, Johnson JD (2005) A comparison of uncertainty and sensitivity analysis results obtained with random and Latin hypercube sampling. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 89(3):305–330CrossRef
Helton JC, Johnson JD, Oberkampf W, Sallaberry CJ (2006) Sensitivity analysis in conjunction with evidence theory representations of epistemic uncertainty. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91(10):1414–1434CrossRef
Hendrickx W, Dhaene T (2005) Sequential design and rational metamodelling. In: Proceedings of the 37th conference on Winter simulation, Orlando, Florida. ACM, pp 290–298
Hernández-Lobato JM, Hoffman MW, Ghahramani Z (2014) Predictive entropy search for efficient global optimization of black-box functions. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. pp 918–926
Huang Z, Qiu H, Zhao M, Cai X, Gao L (2015) An adaptive SVR-HDMR model for approximating high dimensional problems. Eng Comput 32(3):643–667CrossRef
Huang H, Lin DK, Liu M-Q, Yang J-F (2016) Computer experiments with both qualitative and quantitative variables. Technometrics 58(4):495–507MathSciNetCrossRef
Husslage B, Van Dam E, Den Hertog D (2005) Nested maximin Latin hypercube designs in two dimensions. CentER discussion paper no. 2005-79
Iooss B, Lemaître P (2015) A review on global sensitivity analysis methods. In: Uncertainty management in simulation-optimization of complex systems. Springer, pp 101–122
Janouchová E, Kučerová A (2013) Competitive comparison of optimal designs of experiments for sampling-based sensitivity analysis. Comput Struct 124:47–60CrossRef
Jiang P, Shu L, Zhou Q, Zhou H, Shao X, Xu J (2015) A novel sequential exploration-exploitation sampling strategy for global metamodeling. IFAC-PapersOnLine 48(28):532–537CrossRef
Jin Y (2011) Surrogate-assisted evolutionary computation: recent advances and future challenges. Swarm Evol Comput 1(2):61–70CrossRef
Jin R, Chen W, Simpson TW (2001) Comparative studies of metamodelling techniques under multiple modelling criteria. Struct Multidiscip Optim 23(1):1–13CrossRef
Jin R, Chen W, Sudjianto A (2002) On sequential sampling for global metamodeling in engineering design. In: ASME 2002 International design engineering technical Conferences and Computers and information in engineering conference, Montreal, Canada. ASME, pp 539–548
Jin R, Chen W, Sudjianto A (2005) An efficient algorithm for constructing optimal design of computer experiments. J Stat Plan Inference 134(1):268–287MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Jin Y, Li J, Du W, Qian F (2016) Adaptive sampling for surrogate modelling with artificial neural network and its application in an industrial cracking furnace. Can J Chem Eng 94(2):262–272CrossRef
Johnson ME, Moore LM, Ylvisaker D (1990) Minimax and maximin distance designs. J Stat Plan Inference 26(2):131–148MathSciNetCrossRef
Jones DR, Perttunen CD, Stuckman BE (1993) Lipschitzian optimization without the Lipschitz constant. J Optim Theory Appl 79(1):157–181MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Jones DR, Schonlau M, Welch WJ (1998) Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions. J Glob Optim 13(4):455–492MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Joseph VR, Hung Y (2008) Orthogonal-maximin Latin hypercube designs. Stat Sin 18(1):171–186MathSciNetMATH
Kalagnanam JR, Diwekar UM (1997) An efficient sampling technique for off-line quality control. Technometrics 39(3):308–319MATHCrossRef
Kennedy MC, O'Hagan A (2000) Predicting the output from a complex computer code when fast approximations are available. Biometrika 87(1):1–13MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Kenny QY, Li W, Sudjianto A (2000) Algorithmic construction of optimal symmetric Latin hypercube designs. J Stat Plan Inference 90(1):145–159MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Kim B, Lee Y, Choi D-H (2009) Construction of the radial basis function based on a sequential sampling approach using cross-validation. J Mech Sci Technol 23(12):3357–3365CrossRef
Kitayama S, Arakawa M, Yamazaki K (2011) Sequential approximate optimization using radial basis function network for engineering optimization. Optim Eng 12(4):535–557MATHCrossRef
Kleijnen JP (2005) An overview of the design and analysis of simulation experiments for sensitivity analysis. Eur J Oper Res 164(2):287–300MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Kleijnen JP (2008) Design and analysis of simulation experiments. Springer, New YorkMATH
Kleijnen JP (2015) Kriging metamodels and their designs. In: Design and analysis of simulation experiments. Springer, pp 179–239
Kleijnen JP, Van Beers WC (2004) Application-driven sequential designs for simulation experiments: kriging metamodelling. J Oper Res Soc 55(8):876–883MATHCrossRef
Krogh A, Vedelsby J (1995) Neural network ensembles, cross validation, and active learning. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp 231–238
Kupresanin A, Johannesson G (2011) Comparison of sequential designs of computer experiments in high dimensions. Technical report LLNL-TR-491692, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore
Lam CQ (2008) Sequential adaptive designs in computer experiments for response surface model fit. Ph.D. thesis. The Ohio State University, Columbus
Le Gratiet L, Cannamela C (2015) Cokriging-based sequential design strategies using fast cross-validation techniques for multi-fidelity computer codes. Technometrics 57(3):418–427MathSciNetCrossRef
Le Gratiet L, Garnier J (2014) Recursive co-kriging model for design of computer experiments with multiple levels of fidelity. Int J Uncertain Quantif 4(5):365–386MathSciNetCrossRef
Le Gratiet L, Marelli S, Sudret B (2017) Metamodel-based sensitivity analysis: polynomial chaos expansions and Gaussian processes. In: Ghanem R, Higdon D, Owhadi H (eds) Handbook of uncertainty quantification. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 1289–1325. doi:10.​1007/​978-3-319-12385-1_​38
Li G, Azarm S, Farhang-Mehr A, Diaz A (2006) Approximation of multiresponse deterministic engineering simulations: a dependent metamodeling approach. Struct Multidiscip Optim 31(4):260–269CrossRef
Li B, Peng L, Ramadass B (2009) Accurate and efficient processor performance prediction via regression tree based modeling. J Syst Archit 55(10):457–467CrossRef
Li G, Aute V, Azarm S (2010) An accumulative error based adaptive design of experiments for offline metamodeling. Struct Multidiscip Optim 40(1):137–155CrossRef
Li E, Wang H, Li G (2012) High dimensional model representation (HDMR) coupled intelligent sampling strategy for nonlinear problems. Comput Phys Commun 183(9):1947–1955MathSciNetCrossRef
Liefvendahl M, Stocki R (2006) A study on algorithms for optimization of Latin hypercubes. J Stat Plan Inference 136(9):3231–3247MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Lin Y (2004) An efficient robust concept exploration method and sequential exploratory experimental design. Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta
Lin Y, Mistree F, Allen JK, Tsui K-L, Chen VC (2004) A sequential exploratory experimental design method: development of appropriate empirical models in design. In: ASME 2004 International design engineering technical Conferences and Computers and information in engineering conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. ASME, pp 1021–1035
Lin CD, Mukerjee R, Tang B (2009) Construction of orthogonal and nearly orthogonal Latin hypercubes. Biometrika 96(1):243–247MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Liu X, Zhu Q, Lu H (2014) Modeling multiresponse surfaces for airfoil design with multiple-output-Gaussian-process regression. J Aircr 51(3):740–747CrossRef
Liu H, Xu S, Wang X (2015a) Sequential sampling designs based on space reduction. Eng Optim 47(7):867–884CrossRef
Liu H, Xu S, Wang X, Wu J, Song Y (2015b) A global optimization algorithm for simulation-based problems via the extended DIRECT scheme. Eng Optim 47(11):1441–1458MathSciNetCrossRef
Liu H, Xu S, Ma Y, Chen X, Wang X (2016a) An adaptive Bayesian sequential sampling approach for global metamodeling. J Mech Des 138(1):011404CrossRef
Liu H, Xu S, Wang X, Meng J, Yang S (2016b) Optimal weighted pointwise ensemble of radial basis functions with different basis functions. AIAA J 3117–3133
Liu H, Xu S, Wang X, Yang S, Meng J (2016c) A multi-response adaptive sampling approach for global metamodeling. Proc Inst Mech Eng Pt C J Mechan Eng Sci. doi:10.​1177/​0954406216672250​
Liu H, Wang X, Xu S (2017a) Generalized radial basis function-based high-dimensional model representation handling existing random data. J Mech Des 139(1):011404CrossRef
Liu H, Xu S, Chen X, Wang X, Ma Q (2017b) Constrained optimization via a DIRECT-type constraint-handling technique and an adaptive metamodeling strategy. Struct Multidiscip Optim 55(1):155–177MathSciNetCrossRef
Loeppky JL, Sacks J, Welch WJ (2009) Choosing the sample size of a computer experiment: a practical guide. Technometrics 51(4):366–376MathSciNetCrossRef
Loeppky JL, Moore LM, Williams BJ (2010) Batch sequential designs for computer experiments. J Stat Plan Inference 140(6):1452–1464MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Loeppky JL, Moore LM, Williams BJ (2012) Projection array based designs for computer experiments. J Stat Plan Inference 142(6):1493–1505MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Lovison A, Rigoni E (2011) Adaptive sampling with a Lipschitz criterion for accurate metamodeling. Commun Appl Ind Math 1(2):110–126MathSciNetMATH
Mackman T, Allen C (2010a) Aerodynamic data modelling using multi-criteria adaptive sampling. In: 13th AIAA/ISSMO multidisciplinary analysis optimization conference, Ft. worth. AIAA, pp AIAA 2010-9194
Mackman T, Allen C (2010b) Investigation of an adaptive sampling method for data interpolation using radial basis functions. Int J Numer Methods Eng 83(7):915–938MATH
Mackman T, Allen C, Ghoreyshi M, Badcock K (2013) Comparison of adaptive sampling methods for generation of surrogate aerodynamic models. AIAA J 51(4):797–808CrossRef
Martins JR, Lambe AB (2013) Multidisciplinary design optimization: a survey of architectures. AIAA J 51(9):2049–2075CrossRef
McKay MD, Beckman RJ, Conover WJ (1979) Comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics 21(2):239–245MathSciNetMATH
Meckesheimer M, Booker AJ, Barton RR, Simpson TW (2002) Computationally inexpensive metamodel assessment strategies. AIAA J 40(10):2053–2060CrossRef
Mendes-Moreira J, Soares C, Jorge AM, Sousa JFD (2012) Ensemble approaches for regression: a survey. ACM Comput Surv 45(1):10MATHCrossRef
Morris MD, Mitchell TJ, Ylvisaker D (1993) Bayesian design and analysis of computer experiments: use of derivatives in surface prediction. Technometrics 35(3):243–255MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Osborne MA, Roberts SJ, Rogers A, Jennings NR (2012) Real-time information processing of environmental sensor network data using bayesian gaussian processes. ACM Trans Sens Netw 9(1):1CrossRef
Owen AB (1992) Orthogonal arrays for computer experiments, integration and visualization. Stat Sin 2(2):439–452MathSciNetMATH
Pan SJ, Yang Q (2010) A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 22(10):1345–1359CrossRef
Pan G, Ye P, Wang P (2014a) A novel Latin hypercube algorithm via translational propagation. Sci World J 2014:163949
Pan G, Ye P, Wang P, Yang Z (2014b) A sequential optimization sampling method for metamodels with radial basis functions. Sci World J 2014:192862
Park C, Haftka RT, Kim NH (2017) Remarks on multi-fidelity surrogates. Struct Multidiscip Optim 55(3):1029–1050MathSciNetCrossRef
Parr J, Holden CM, Forrester AI, Keane AJ (2010) Review of efficient surrogate infill sampling criteria with constraint handling. In: 2nd International conference on engineering optimization, pp 1-10
Patterson H (1954) The errors of lattice sampling. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol 16(1):140–149MathSciNetMATH
Peherstorfer B, Willcox K, Gunzburger M (2016) Survey of multifidelity methods in uncertainty propagation, inference, and optimization. Department of Aeronautics & Astronautics, MIT, CambridgeMATH
Pholdee N, Bureerat S (2015) An efficient optimum Latin hypercube sampling technique based on sequencing optimisation using simulated annealing. Int J Syst Sci 46(10):1780–1789MATHCrossRef
Pickett B, Turner CJ (2011) A review and evaluation of existing adaptive sampling criteria and methods for the creation of nurbs-based metamodels. In: ASME 2011 International design engineering technical Conferences and Computers and information in engineering conference, Washington, DC, USA. ASME, p 609–618
Qian PZ, Ai M (2010) Nested lattice sampling: a new sampling scheme derived by randomizing nested orthogonal arrays. J Am Stat Assoc 105(491):1147–1155MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Qian PZ, Wu CJ (2008) Bayesian hierarchical modeling for integrating low-accuracy and high-accuracy experiments. Technometrics 50(2):192–204MathSciNetCrossRef
Qian PZG, Wu H, Wu CJ (2008) Gaussian process models for computer experiments with qualitative and quantitative factors. Technometrics 50(3):383–396MathSciNetCrossRef
Qian PZ, Tang B, Wu CJ (2009) Nested space-filling designs for computer experiments with two levels of accuracy. Stat Sin 9(1):287–300MathSciNetMATH
Quan A (2014) Batch sequencing methods for computer experiments. The Ohio State University, Columbus
Queipo NV, Haftka RT, Shyy W, Goel T, Vaidyanathan R, Tucker PK (2005) Surrogate-based analysis and optimization. Prog Aerosp Sci 41(1):1–28CrossRef
Rai R, Campbell M (2008) Q2S2: a new methodology for merging quantitative and qualitative information in experimental design. J Mech Des 130(3):031103CrossRef
Rasmussen CE (2006) Gaussian processes for machine learning. The MIT press, LondonMATH
RayChaudhuri T, Hamey LG (1995) Minimisation of data collection by active learning. In: IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks. IEEE, p 1338–1341
Razavi S, Tolson BA, Burn DH (2012a) Numerical assessment of metamodelling strategies in computationally intensive optimization. Environ Model Softw 34:67–86CrossRef
Razavi S, Tolson BA, Burn DH (2012b) Review of surrogate modeling in water resources. Water Resour Res 48(7):1–32CrossRef
Regis RG, Shoemaker CA (2005) Constrained global optimization of expensive black box functions using radial basis functions. J Glob Optim 31(1):153–171MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Regis RG, Shoemaker CA (2007) A stochastic radial basis function method for the global optimization of expensive functions. INFORMS J Comput 19(4):497–509MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Reichart R, Tomanek K, Hahn U (2008) Rappoport a multi-task active learning for linguistic annotations. In: ACL, p 861–869
Rennen G, Husslage B, Van Dam ER, Den Hertog D (2010) Nested maximin Latin hypercube designs. Struct Multidiscip Optim 41(3):371–395MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Rimmel A, Teytaud F (2014) A survey of meta-heuristics used for computing maximin latin hypercube. In: European Conference on Evolutionary Computation in Combinatorial Optimization. Springer, p 25–36
Rippa S (1999) An algorithm for selecting a good value for the parameter c in radial basis function interpolation. Adv Comput Math 11(2):193–210MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Romero DA, Amon CH, Finger S (2006) On adaptive sampling for single and multi-response bayesian surrogate models. In: ASME 2006 International design engineering technical Conferences and Computers and information in engineering conference, Philadelphia. ASME, p 393–404
Romero DA, Amon CH, Finger S (2012) Multiresponse metamodeling in simulation-based design applications. J Mech Des 134(9):091001CrossRef
Rosenbaum B (2013) Efficient global surrogate models for responses of expensive simulations. Universität Trier, Trier
Rosenbaum B, Schulz V (2012) Comparing sampling strategies for aerodynamic kriging surrogate models. J Appl Math Mech 92(11–12):852–868MathSciNetMATH
Rumpfkeil M, Yamazaki W, Dimitri M (2011) A dynamic sampling method for kriging and cokriging surrogate models. In: 49th AIAA Aerospace sciences meeting including the new horizons forum and Aerospace exposition, p 883
Saka Y, Gunzburger M, Burkardt J (2007) Latinized, improved LHS, and CVT point sets in hypercubes. Int J Numer Anal Model 4(3–4):729–743MathSciNetMATH
Saltelli A, Ratto M, Andres T, Campolongo F, Cariboni J, Gatelli D, Saisana M, Tarantola S (2008) Global sensitivity analysis: the primer. Wiley, UKMATH
Sanchez SM, Wan H (2015) Work smarter, not harder: a tutorial on designing and conducting simulation experiments. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Winter Simulation conference. IEEE Press, p 1795–1809
Sasena MJ (2002) Flexibility and efficiency enhancements for constrained global design optimization with kriging approximations. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Sasena M, Parkinson M, Goovaerts P, Papalambros P, Reed M (2002) Adaptive experimental design applied to ergonomics testing procedure. In: ASME 2002 International design engineering technical Conferences and Computers and information in engineering conference, Montreal. ASME, p 529–537
Settles B (2010) Active learning literature survey. Computer science technical report 1648, University of Wisconsin, Madison
Seung HS, Opper M, Sompolinsky H (1992) Query by committee. In: Proceedings of the fifth annual workshop on computational learning theory, Pittsburgh. ACM, pp 287–294
Shahsavani D, Grimvall A (2009) An adaptive design and interpolation technique for extracting highly nonlinear response surfaces from deterministic models. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94(7):1173–1182CrossRef
Shan S, Wang GG (2010a) Metamodeling for high dimensional simulation-based design problems. J Mech Des 132(5):051009CrossRef
Shan S, Wang GG (2010b) Survey of modeling and optimization strategies to solve high-dimensional design problems with computationally-expensive black-box functions. Struct Multidiscip Optim 41(2):219–241MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Shan S, Wang GG (2011) Turning black-box functions into white functions. J Mech Des 133(3):031003CrossRef
Shewry MC, Wynn HP (1987) Maximum entropy sampling. J Appl Stat 14(2):165–170CrossRef
Singh P, Deschrijver D, Dhaene T (2013) A balanced sequential design strategy for global surrogate modeling. In: 2013 Winter simulations conference, Georgia. IEEE, pp 2172–2179
Sóbester A, Leary SJ, Keane AJ (2005) On the design of optimization strategies based on global response surface approximation models. J Glob Optim 33(1):31–59MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Sobol IM (1993) Sensitivity estimates for nonlinear mathematical models. Math Model Comput Exp 1(4):407–414MathSciNetMATH
Spyromitros-Xioufis E, Tsoumakas G, Groves W, Vlahavas I (2016) Multi-target regression via input space expansion: treating targets as inputs. Mach Learn 104(1):55–98MathSciNetCrossRef
Srinivas N, Krause A, Kakade SM, Seeger M (2010) Gaussian process optimization in the bandit setting: no regret and experimental design. In: Proceedings of the 27th International conference on machine learning. ACM, pp 1015–1022
Steinberg D, Colla P (2009) CART: classification and regression trees. The Top Ten Algorithms in Data Mining 9:179
Stinstra E, den Hertog D, Stehouwer P, Vestjens A (2003) Constrained maximin designs for computer experiments. Technometrics 45(4):340–346MathSciNetCrossRef
Stocki R (2005) A method to improve design reliability using optimal Latin hypercube sampling. Comput Assist Mech Eng Sci 12(4):393
Sundararajan S, Keerthi SS (2001) Predictive approaches for choosing hyperparameters in Gaussian processes. Neural Comput 13(5):1103–1118MATHCrossRef
Tian W (2013) A review of sensitivity analysis methods in building energy analysis. Renew Sust Energ Rev 20:411–419CrossRef
Toal DJ (2015) Some considerations regarding the use of multi-fidelity kriging in the construction of surrogate models. Struct Multidiscip Optim 51(6):1223–1245CrossRef
Turner CJ, Crawford RH, Campbell MI (2007) Multidimensional sequential sampling for NURBs-based metamodel development. Eng Comput 23(3):155–174CrossRef
van Dam ER, Husslage B, den Hertog D, Melissen H (2007) Maximin Latin hypercube designs in two dimensions. Oper Res 55(1):158–169MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
van der Herten J, Couckuyt I, Deschrijver D, Dhaene T (2015) A fuzzy hybrid sequential design strategy for global surrogate modeling of high-dimensional computer experiments. SIAM J Sci Comput 37(2):A1020–A1039MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Vasile M, Minisci E, Quagliarella D, Guénot M, Lepot I, Sainvitu C, Goblet J, Filomeno Coelho R (2013) Adaptive sampling strategies for non-intrusive POD-based surrogates. Eng Comput 30(4):521–547CrossRef
Viana FA (2013) Things you wanted to know about the Latin hypercube design and were afraid to ask. In: 10th world Congress on Structural and multidisciplinary optimization, Orlando, pp 1–9
Viana FA, Haftka RT, Steffen V Jr (2009) Multiple surrogates: how cross-validation errors can help us to obtain the best predictor. Struct Multidiscip Optim 39(4):439–457CrossRef
Viana FA, Picheny V, Haftka RT (2010a) Using cross validation to design conservative surrogates. AIAA J 48(10):2286–2298CrossRef
Viana FA, Venter G, Balabanov V (2010b) An algorithm for fast optimal Latin hypercube design of experiments. Int J Numer Methods Eng 82(2):135–156MathSciNetMATH
Viana FA, Simpson TW, Balabanov V, Toropov V (2014) Metamodeling in multidisciplinary design optimization: how far have we really come? AIAA J 52(4):670–690CrossRef
Villemonteix J, Vazquez E, Walter E (2009) An informational approach to the global optimization of expensive-to-evaluate functions. J Glob Optim 44(4):509MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Wang GG (2003) Adaptive response surface method using inherited latin hypercube design points. J Mech Des Trans ASME 125(2):210–220CrossRef
Wang GG, Shan S (2007) Review of metamodeling techniques in support of engineering design optimization. J Mech Des 129(4):370–380CrossRef
Wang L, Shan S, Wang GG (2004) Mode-pursuing sampling method for global optimization on expensive black-box functions. Eng Optim 36(4):419–438CrossRef
Wang H, Wu Z, Rahnamayan S (2011) Enhanced opposition-based differential evolution for solving high-dimensional continuous optimization problems. Soft Comput 15(11):2127–2140CrossRef
Wei X, Wu Y-Z, Chen L-P (2012) A new sequential optimal sampling method for radial basis functions. Appl Math Comput 218(19):9635–9646MathSciNetMATH
Williams BJ, Loeppky JL, Moore LM, Macklem MS (2011) Batch sequential design to achieve predictive maturity with calibrated computer models. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 96(9):1208–1219CrossRef
Xiong Y, Chen W, Apley D, Ding X (2007) A non-stationary covariance-based kriging method for metamodelling in engineering design. Int J Numer Methods Eng 71(6):733–756MATHCrossRef
Xiong F, Xiong Y, Chen W, Yang S (2009) Optimizing Latin hypercube design for sequential sampling of computer experiments. Eng Optim 41(8):793–810CrossRef
Xu S, Liu H, Wang X, Jiang X (2014) A robust error-pursuing sequential sampling approach for global metamodeling based on voronoi diagram and cross validation. J Mech Des 136(7):071009CrossRef
Yang Z, Tang K, Yao X (2007) Differential evolution for high-dimensional function optimization. In: 2007 I.E. Congress on evolutionary computation, Singapore. IEEE, pp 3523–3530
Yao W, Chen X, Luo W (2009) A gradient-based sequential radial basis function neural network modeling method. Neural Comput & Applic 18(5):477–484CrossRef
Younis A, Dong Z (2010) Metamodelling and search using space exploration and unimodal region elimination for design optimization. Eng Optim 42(6):517–533CrossRef
Zhang Y, Hoang TN, Low KH, Kankanhalli M (2016) Near-optimal active learning of multi-output Gaussian processes. In: Proceedings of the 30th AAAI conference on artificial intelligence. AAAI Press, pp 2351–2357
Zhao L, Choi K, Lee I, Gorsich D (2009) Sequential-sampling-based kriging method with dynamic basis selection. In: 8th world Congress on Structural and multidisciplinary optimization, Lisbon
Zhou Q, Shao X, Jiang P, Gao Z, Zhou H, Shu L (2016) An active learning variable-fidelity metamodelling approach based on ensemble of metamodels and objective-oriented sequential sampling. J Eng Des 27(4–6):205–231CrossRef
Zhou Q, Jiang P, Shao X, Hu J, Cao L, Wan L (2017) A variable fidelity information fusion method based on radial basis function. Adv Eng Inform 32:26–39CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
A survey of adaptive sampling for global metamodeling in support of simulation-based complex engineering design
verfasst von
Haitao Liu
Yew-Soon Ong
Jianfei Cai
Publikationsdatum
27.06.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1615-147X
Elektronische ISSN: 1615-1488
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-017-1739-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe

RESEARCH PAPER

Multiobjective optimization of modular design concepts for a collection of interacting systems

RESEARCH PAPER

Multi-material topology optimization with multiple volume constraints: a general approach applied to ground structures with material nonlinearity

RESEARCH PAPER

Sequential exploration-exploitation with dynamic trade-off for efficient reliability analysis of complex engineered systems

RESEARCH PAPER

Stress-based topology optimization using spatial gradient stabilized XFEM

RESEARCH PAPER

Multiobjective topology optimization with the sko-method

RESEARCH PAPER

Local maximum-entropy based surrogate model and its application to structural reliability analysis

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise