Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of femoral attachment location on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: graft tension patterns and restoration of normal anterior–posterior laxity patterns

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

The issue of the best place to attach an anterior cruciate ligament graft to the femur is controversial, and different anatomic or isometric points have been recommended. It was hypothesised that one attachment site could be identified that would be best for restoring normal anterior–posterior laxity throughout the range of knee flexion. It was also hypothesised that these different attachment sites would cause different graft tension patterns during knee flexion. Using six cadaver knees, an isometric point was found 3 mm distal to the posterior edge of Blumensaat’s line, at the 10:30–11:00 o’clock position in right knees, at the antero-proximal edge of the anatomic ACL attachment. Anterior–posterior laxity was measured at ±150 N draw force at 20–120° flexion with the knee intact and after anterior cruciate ligament transection. The graft was placed at the isometric point, and AP laxity was restored to normal at 20° flexion, then measured at other angles. Graft tension was measured throughout, and also during passive flexion–extension. This was repeated for four other graft positions around the isometric point in every knee. Laxity was restored best by grafts tensioned to a mean of 9±14 N, positioned isometrically and 3 mm posterior to the isometric point. Their tension remained low until terminal extension. Grafts 3 mm anterior to the isometric point caused significant overconstraint, and had higher tension beyond 80° knee flexion. Small changes in attachment site had large effects on laxity and tension patterns. These results support an isometric/posterior anatomic femoral graft attachment, which restored knee laxity to normal from 20 to 120° flexion and did not induce high graft tension as the knee flexed. Grafts attached to the roof of the intercondylar notch caused overconstraint and higher tension in the flexed knee.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abrahams M (1967) Mechanical behaviour of tendon in vitro. Med Biol Eng 5:433–443

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Amis AA (1989) Anterior cruciate ligament replacement: knee stability and the effects of implants. J Bone Joint Surg Br 71:819–824

    Google Scholar 

  3. Amis AA, Dawkins GPC (1991) Functional anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament—fibre bundle actions related to ligament replacements and injuries. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:260–267

    Google Scholar 

  4. Amis AA, Jakob RP (1998) Anterior cruciate ligament graft positioning, tensioning and twisting. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6(Suppl 1):S2–S12

    Google Scholar 

  5. Amis AA, Scammell BE (1993) Biomechanics of intra-articular and extra-articular reconstructions of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75:812–817

    Google Scholar 

  6. Amis AA, Zavras TD (1995) Review article: isometricity and graft placement during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee 2:5–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Andersen HN, Amis AA (1994) Review on tension in the natural and reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2:192–202

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bull AMJ, Andersen HN, Basso O, Targett J, Amis AA (1999) Incidence and mechanism of the pivot shift: an in vitro study. Clin Orthop 363:219–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Butler DL, Noyes FR, Grood ES (1980) Ligamentous restraints to anterior–posterior drawer in the human knee: a biomechanical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 62:259–270

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bylski-Austrow DI, Grood ES, Hefzy MS, Holden JP, Butler DL (1990) Anterior cruciate ligament replacements: a mechanical study of femoral attachment location, flexion angle at tensioning, and initial tension. J Orthop Res 8:522–531

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Daniel DM, Stone ML (1990) KT-1000 anterior–posterior displacement measurements. In: Daniel D, Akeson W, O’Connor J (eds) Knee ligaments: structure, function, injury and repair. Raven, New York, pp 427–447

    Google Scholar 

  12. Drillis R, Contini R (1966) Body segment parameters. Technical report 1166.03, New York University

  13. Fleming B, Beynnon B, Howe J, McLeod W, Pope M (1992) Effect of tension and placement of a prosthetic anterior cruciate ligament on the anteroposterior laxity of the knee. J Orthop Res 10:177–186

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fleming B, Beynnon BD, Johnson J, McLeod WD, Pope MH (1993) Isometric versus tension measurements. Am J Sports Med 21:82–88

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Friederich NF, Muller W (1993) How important is isometric placement of cruciate ligament grafts? Intraoperative measurement vs mid-term clinical follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75(Orthop Proc - Suppl 2):150–151

    Google Scholar 

  16. Friederich NF, O’Brien WR (1992) Functional anatomy of the cruciate ligaments. In: Jakob RP, Staubli HU (eds) The knee and the cruciate ligaments. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 78–91

    Google Scholar 

  17. Friederich NF, Muller W, O’Brien WR (1992) Klinische Anwendung biomechanischer und funkionell anatomischer Daten am Kniegelenk. (Clinical application of biomechanic and functional anatomical findings of the knee joint). Orthopade 21:41–50

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Harner CD, Fu FH, Irrgang JJ, Vogrin TM (2001) Anterior and posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the new millennium: a global perspective. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 9:330–336

    Google Scholar 

  19. Harries WJ, Amis AA (1995) The Apex polyester fibre anterior cruciate ligament implant: operative procedure and early results. Knee 1:209–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hefti F, Drobny T, Hackenbruch W et al (1990) Evaluation of knee ligament injuries: the OAK and IKDC forms. In: Jakob RP, Staubli HU (eds) The knee and the cruciate ligaments. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 134–139

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hefzy MS, Grood ES, Noyes FR (1989) Factors affecting the region of most isometric femoral attachments. Part II: the anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 17:208–216

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hoogland T, Hillen B (1984) Intra-articular reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: an experimental study of length changes in different ligament reconstructions. Clin Orthop 185:197–202

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Howell SM, Taylor MA (1998) Failure of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament due to impingement by the intercondylar roof. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:1044–1055

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kohn D, Busche T, Carls J (1998) Drill hole position in endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: results of an advanced arthoroscopy course. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6(suppl 1):S13-S15

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kurosawa H, Yamakoshi KI, Yasuda K, Sasaki T (1991) Simultaneous measurement of changes in length of the cruciate ligaments during knee motion. Clin Orthop 265:233–240

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Markolf KL, Hame S, Hunter M, Oakes DA, Zoric B, Gause P, Finerman GAM (2002) Effects of femoral tunnel placement on knee laxity and forces in an anterior cruciate ligament graft. J Orthop Res 20:1016–1024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Melhorn MJ, Henning CE (1987) The relationship of the femoral attachment site to the isometric tracking of the anterior cruciate ligament graft. Am J Sports Med 15:539–542

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. O’Meara PM, O’Brien WR, Henning CE (1992) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction stability with continuous passive motion. Clin Orthop 277:201–209

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Penner DA, Daniel DM, Wood P, Mishra D (1988) An in vitro study of anterior cruciate ligament graft placement and isometry. Am J Sports Med 16:238–243

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Piziali RL, Rastegar J, Nagel DA, Schurman DJ (1980) The contribution of the cruciate ligaments to the load–displacement characteristics of the human knee joint. J Biomech Eng 102:277–283

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Race A, Amis AA (1998) PCL reconstruction: in vitro biomechanical comparison of “isometric” versus single and double-bundled “anatomic” grafts. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:173–179

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sapega AA, Moyer RA, Schneck C, Komalahiranya N (1990) Testing for isometry during reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:259–267

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sidles JA, Larson RV, Garbini JL, Downey DJ, Matsen FA (1988) Ligament length relationships in the moving knee. J Orthop Res 6:583–610

    Google Scholar 

  34. Simmons R, Howell SM, Hull ML (2003) Effect of the angle of the femoral and tibial tunnels in the coronal plane and incremental excision of the posterior cruciate ligament on tension of an anterior cruciate ligament graft: an in vitro study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85(A6):1018–1029

    Google Scholar 

  35. Uh BS, Beynnon BD, Johnson RJ, Fleming BC, Renstron PA, Nichols CE (1998) The elongation behavior of the anterior cruciate ligament graft in-vivo: a long-term follow-up study. In: Proceedings of the 44th Annual Meeting of the Orthopedic Research Society, p 69

  36. Wallace MP, Howell SM, Hull ML (1997) In vivo tensile behavior of a four-bundle hamstring graft as a replacement for the anterior cruciate ligament. J Orthop Res 15:539–545

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Woo SL-Y, Hollis JM, Adams DJ, Lyon RM, Takai S (1991) Tensile properties of the human femur-anterior cruciate ligament-tibia complex: the effects of specimen age and orientation. Am J Sports Med 19:217–225

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Zavras TD, Amis AA (1998) Method for visualising and measuring the position of the femoral attachment of the ACL and ACL grafts in experimental work. J Biomech 31:387–390

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Zavras TD, Race A, Bull AMJ, Amis AA (2001) A comparative study of isometric points for ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 9:28–33

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the Arthritis Research Campaign, a charity based in Chesterfield, England. The protocol was developed with assistance from Mr. Anil Rekraj, M.Sc. student. We also thank Mr. Kevin Pickett for his technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew A. Amis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zavras, T.D., Race, A. & Amis, A.A. The effect of femoral attachment location on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: graft tension patterns and restoration of normal anterior–posterior laxity patterns. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13, 92–100 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-004-0541-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-004-0541-5

Keywords

Navigation