nach oben

The Annals of Regional Science

01.08.2006 | Original Paper

On the measurement of comparative advantage

verfasst von: Alex R. Hoen, Jan Oosterhaven

Erschienen in: The Annals of Regional Science | Ausgabe 3/2006

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This paper shows that the standard measure of revealed comparative advantage (RCA), ranging from 0 to ∞, has problematic properties. Due to its multiplicative specification, it has a moving mean larger than its expected value of 1, while its distribution strongly depends on the number of countries and industries. These properties make its outcomes incomparable across time and place and its economic interpretation problematic. We propose an alternative measure, the additive RCA, ranging from −1 to +1, with a symmetric distribution that centers on a stable mean of zero, independent of the classifications used. Statistical tests show the distribution of the additive index to be more stable. Besides, we propose an aggregate RCA, a regional specialization index, ranging from 0 for pure intra-industry trade to 1 for pure inter-industry trade. The same conclusions and proposals hold for the multiplicative location quotient (LQ), which is used as a measure for the revealed locational attractiveness of certain regions or countries for certain types of industry.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

In fact, if domestic demand specialization and import specialization are added to export and domestic output specialization, a handy choice of formula applied to the appropriate accounting identity results in a precise relationship between the RCA and the LQ (see van der Linden and Oosterhaven 2001, for an empirical account). Bowen (1983, 1985, 1986) uses this relationship to derive his alternative, net trade definition of the RCA. Combined with the assumption of identical homothetic preferences, this leads to an RCA that equals the production LQ minus 1. Balance et al. 1985, 1986) and Volrath (1991) however, challenged Bowen’s RCA on several grounds.

These data were collected for a study into the consequences of the EU-enlargement for the bilateral trade between The Netherlands and Poland (Hoen and de Mooij 2001). The reference group consists of the EU-countries Austria, Belgium/Luxembourg, Denmark, Germany, Spain, Finland, France, United Kingdom, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Portugal, and Sweden. The reference group excludes the Netherlands and Poland for reasons to be given in the next section.

Figures 1 and 2 only display the first 50 classes. The last classes have MRCAs that are all larger than, respectively, 10 and 2. The omitted classes contain, respectively, 10 and 107 MRCAs. The total number of MRCAs in this study is 528.

Hinloopen and Van Marrewijk (2001) compute the average of 814 MRCAs, with and without the largest observation and observe that including the largest observation increases the average by 20%. Table 1 shows that this specific result is strongly dependent on the sector classification.

Husted and Melvin (2000, p. 137) aggregate the absolute differences between export and import shares, and Krugman and Obstfeld (2000, p. 138) use the difference between exports and imports divided by the sum of both, all per sector. Our specification has the advantage of only using export data, which are mutually more comparable (van der Linden 1998, p. 82–89). The standard deviation of (4) also represents a measure of aggregate export specialization. However, with squared differences extreme deviations are weighted more heavily. We prefer (5) as it weighs all differences equally, be they small or large.

In order to be comparable with the Figs. 1 and 2, Figs. 3 and 4 display the (central) 50 classes around zero. Figure 3 omits the ten most extreme values, and Fig. 4 omits the 108 most extreme values from a total of 528 Additive RCAs.

Note that the SITC-1 classification only contains ten very aggregate commodity groups, which in general is too aggregate for a meaningful empirical analysis of comparative advantage.

This Additive Spatial Concentration Index has much better properties than the widely used Herfindahl index, which aggregates squared shares (Herfindahl 1950). A major disadvantage of the Herfindahl index is that it has an unstable lower bound (perfect spreading) that depends on the number of countries used in the analysis, but this is a topic for another article.

Balassa B (1965) Trade liberalisation and ‘revealed’ comparative advantage. Manch Sch Econ Soc Stud 33:99–123CrossRef

Balance R, Forstner H, Murray T (1985) On measuring comparative advantage: a note on Bowen’s indices. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 121:346–350CrossRef

Balance R, Forstner H, Murray T (1986) More on measuring comparative advantage: a reply. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 122:375–378CrossRef

Bowen HP (1983) On the theoretical interpretation of indices of trade intensity and revealed comparative advantage. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 119:464–472CrossRef

Bowen HP (1985) On measuring comparative advantage: a reply and extension. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 121:351–354CrossRef

Bowen HP (1986) On measuring comparative advantage: further comments. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 122:379–381CrossRef

Herfindahl OC (1950) Concentration in the steel industry. Ph.D thesis, Columbia University, New York

Hinloopen J, Van Marrewijk C (2001) On the empirical distribution of the RCA. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 137:1–35CrossRef

Hoen AR (2002) An input–output analysis of European integration. North-Holland/Elsevier, Amsterdam

Hoen AR, de Mooij R (2001) Polish-Dutch economic relations. CPB Report 2001-4:29–35

Husted S, Melvin M (2000) International economics. Addison Wesley Longman, Boston

Isard W, Ketilson LH, Fulton M, Fairbairn B (1960) Methods of regional analysis: an introduction to regional science. MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts

Kanji GK (1999) 100 statistical tests. Sage, London

Krugman PR, Obstfeld M (2000) International economics, theory and policy. Addison-Wesley, Reading

Kunimoto K (1977) Typology of trade intensity indices. Hitotsubashi J Econ 17:15–32

van der Linden JA (1998) Interdependence and specialisation in the European Union: intercountry input–output analysis and economic integration. Ph.D thesis, Labyrinthe, Capelle a/d IJssel

van der Linden JA, Oosterhaven J (2001) Specialisation and concentration in the European Union, 1965–1985. In: Bröcker J, Herrmann H (eds) Spatial change and interregional flows in the integrating Europe. Physica Verlag, Heidelberg, pp 181–200

Oosterhaven J (1995) Changing specialisation and interdependency of EC economics 1959–1975. Australas J Reg Stud 1:51–64

Ten Raa T, Mohnen P (2001) The location of comparative advantage on the basis of fundamentals only. Econ Syst Res 13:93–108CrossRef

Vollrath TL (1991) A theoretical evaluation of alternative trade intensity measures of revealed comparative advantage. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 127:265–279CrossRef

Titel: On the measurement of comparative advantage
verfasst von: Alex R. Hoen
Jan Oosterhaven
Publikationsdatum: 01.08.2006
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: The Annals of Regional Science / Ausgabe 3/2006
Print ISSN: 0570-1864
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0592
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-006-0076-4