Abstract
In this paper, we present a stochastic supply chain network model under risk, in which three tiers of decision makers of suppliers, distribution centers (DCs), and customers seek to determine their optimal plans. Unlike other studies in the extant literature, we use financial risk measure to model and for the first time, a new methodology based on finance literature is used to optimize the conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) measure for the problem. In fact the aim of this paper is to show the benefits of considering CVaR to control the risks in the supply chain networks. Also in order to obtain the economics of scale, a piecewise linear transportation cost function is applied between suppliers and DCs. We formulate the problem as a convex mixed integer program. A two-phase (constructive and improvement) heuristic method is developed to solve the problem. In the constructive phase, an initial solution is built randomly, and in improvement phase, this solution is improved iteratively by using a hybrid algorithm combining Tabu search and simulated annealing methods. Numerical experiments demonstrate the practicability of considering CVaR in the model which is promising in the supply chain network area, and also the significant efficiency of the heuristic method in terms of CPU times.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ambrosino D, Scutella MG (2005) Distribution network design: new problems and related models. Eur J Oper Res 165:610–624
Peidro D, Mula J, Polar R (2009) Quantitative models for supply chain planning under uncertainty: a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 43:400–420
Ambrosino D, Schiomachen A, Scutella MG (2009) A heuristic based on multi exchange techniques for a regional fleet assignment location-routing problem. Comput Oper Res 36(2):442–460
Daskin MS, Snyder LV, Berger RT (2005) Facility location in supply chain design. In: Langevin A, Riopel D (eds) Logistics systems: design and operation, Chap. 2. Springer, New York, pp 39–66
Shen Z, Qi L (2007) Incorporating inventory and routing cost in strategic location models. Eur J Oper Res 179:372–389
Fazel Zarandi MH, Hemmati A, Davari S (2011) The multi-depot capacitated location-routing problem with fuzzy travel times. Expert Syst Appl 38:10075–10084
Tang CS (2006) Perspectives in supply chain risk management. Int J Prod Econ 103(2):451–488
Christopher M (2004) Creating resilient supply chains. Logistics Europe:14–21
Alexander S, Coleman T, Li Y (2006) Minimizing cvar and var for a portfolio of derivatives. J Bank Finance 30:583–605
Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S (2000) Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J Risk 2(3):21–41
Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S (2002) Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions. J Bank Finance 26(7):1443–1471
Balakrishnan A, Ward JE, Wong RT (1987) Integrated facility location and vehicle routing models: recent work and future prospects. Am J Math Manag Sci 7:35–61
Laporte G (1989) A survey of algorithms for location-routing problems. Investigacion Operativa 1:93–123
Min H, Jayaraman V, Srivastava R (1998) Combined location-routing problems: a synthesis and future research directions. Eur J Oper Res 108:1–15
Nagy G, Salhi S (2007) Location-routing, issues, models, and methods: a review. Eur J Oper Res 117:649–672
Branco IM, Coelho JD (1990) The Hamiltonian p-median problem. Eur J Oper Res 47:86–95
Tuzun D, Burke LI (1999) A two-phase tabu search approach to the location routing problem. Eur J Oper Res 116:87–99
Liu SC, Lee SB (2003) A two-phase heuristic method for the multi-depot location routing problem taking inventory control decisions into considerations. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 22:941–950
Albareda-Sambola M, Diaz JA, Fernandez E (2005) A compact model and tight bounds for a combined location routing problem. Comput Oper Res 32:407–428
Prins C, Prodhon C, Wolfler Calvo R (2006) Solving the capacitated location routing problem by a GRASP complemented by a learning process and a path re linking. 4OR 4(3):221–238
Peng Y (2008) Integrated location-routing problem modeling and GA algorithm solving. Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation (ICICTA), 2008 International Conference 1:81–84.
Derbel H, Jarboui B, Hanafi S, Chabchoub H (2010) An iterated local search for solving a location-routing problem. Electron Notes Discrete Math 36:875–882
Prodhon C, Prins C (2008) A memetic algorithm with population management for the periodic location-routing problem. Lect Notes Comput Sci 5296:43–57
Schwardt M, Fischer K (2009) Combined location-routing problems: a neural network approach. Ann Oper Res 167(1):253–269
Wang K, Wu M (2009) DBLAR: a distance-based location-aided routing for MANET. J Electron 26(2):152–160
Duhamel C, Lacomme P, Prins C, Prodhon C (2010) A GRASP×ELS approach for the capacitated location-routing problem. Comput Oper Res 37(11):1912–1923
Yu VF, Lin S-W, Lee W, Ting C-J (2010) A simulated annealing heuristic for the capacitated location routing problem. Comput Ind Eng 58(2):288–299
Prodhon C (2011) A hybrid evolutionary algorithm for the periodic location-routing problem. Eur J Oper Res 210:204–212
Manzour-Al-Ajdad SMH, Torabi SA, Salhi S (2012) A hierarchical algorithm for the planar single-facility location routing problem. Comput Oper Res 39(2):461–470
Perl J, Daskin MS (1985) A warehouse location-routing problem. Transportation Research Part B 19:381–396
Watson-Gandy CDT, Dohrn PJ (1973) Depot location with van salesmen—a practical approach. Omega 1:321–329
Jacobsen SK, Madsen OBG (1980) A comparative study of heuristics for a two-level routing-location problem. Eur J Oper Res 5:378–387
Madsen OBG (1983) Methods for solving combined two level location routing problems of realistic dimensions. Eur J Oper Res 12:295–301
Kulcar T (1996) Optimizing solid waste collection in Brussels. Eur J Oper Res 90:26–44
Lin CKY, Chow CK, Chen A (2002) A location-routing loading problem for bill delivery services. Comput Ind Eng 43:5–25
Murty KG, Djang PA (1999) The US army national guard’s mobile training simulators location and routing problem. Oper Res 47:175–182
Bruns A, Klose A, Stähly P (2000) Restructuring of Swiss parcel delivery services. OR Spektrum 22:285–302
Wasner M, Zäpfel G (2004) An integrated multi-depot hub location vehicle routing model for network planning of parcel service. Int J Prod Econ 90:403–419
Aksen D, Altinkemer K (2008) A location-routing problem for the conversion to the “click-and-mortar” retailing: the static case. Eur J Oper Res 186:554–575
Artzner P, Delbaen F, Eber JM, Health D (1997) Thinking coherently. Risk 10(11):68–71
Artzner P, Delbaen F, Eber JM, Health D (1999) Coherent measures of risk. Math Finance 9:203–228
Embrechts P, Resnick SI, Samorodnitsky G (1999) Extreme value theory as a risk management tool. North American Actuarial Journal 3(2):32–41
Wu T-H, Low C, Bai J-W (2002) Heuristic solution to multi depot location-routing problems. Comput Oper Res 29:1393–1415
Mishra N, Prakash TMK, Shankar R, Chan FTS (2005) Hybrid tabu-simulated annealing based approach to solve multi-constraint product mix decision problem. Expert Syst Appl 29(2):446–454
Sahin R, Turkbey O (2009) A new hybrid tabu-simulated annealing heuristic for the dynamic facility layout problem. Int J Prod Res 47(24):6855–6873
Chan FTS, Kumar V (2009) Hybrid TSSA algorithm-based approach to solve warehouse-scheduling problems. Int J Prod Res 47(4):919–940
Yildiz AR (2009) A novel particle swarm optimization approach for product design and manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 40(5):617–628
Yildiz AR (2009) Hybrid immune-simulated annealing algorithm for optimal design and manufacturing. Int J Mater Prod Tech 34(3):217–226
Yildiz AR, Ozturk F (2006) Hybrid enhanced genetic algorithm to select optimal machining parameters in turning operation. J Eng Manufact 220(12):2041–2053
Yildiz AR (2009) A new design optimization framework based on immune algorithm and taguchi method. Comput Ind 60(8):613–620
Yildiz AR (2009) A novel hybrid immune algorithm for global optimization in design and manufacturing. Robot Comput Integrated Manuf 25(2):261–270
Yildiz AR, Saitou K (2011) Topology synthesis of multicomponent structural assemblies in continuum domains. ASME J Mech Des 133(1)
Yildiz AR (2009) An effective hybrid immune-hill climbing optimization approach for solving design and manufacturing optimization problems in industry. J Mater Process Technol 50(4):224–228
Yildiz AR (2008) Hybrid taguchi-harmony search algorithm for solving engineering optimization problems. Int J Ind Eng Theor Appl Pract 15(3):286–293
Yildiz AR, Ozturk N, Kaya N, Ozturk F (2007) Hybrid multi-objective shape design optimization using taguchi’s method and genetic algorithm. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 34(4):277–365
Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CD, Vecchi MP (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220:45–98
Safaei N, Saidi-Mehrabad M, Jabal-Ameli MS (2008) A hybrid simulated annealing for solving an extended model of dynamic cellular manufacturing system. Eur J Oper Res 185:563–592
Ghezavati VR, Saidi-Mehrabad M (2011) An efficient hybrid self-learning method for stochastic cellular manufacturing problem: a queuing-based analysis. Exp Syst Appl 38:1326–1335
Arkat J, Saidi M, Abbasi B (2007) Applying simulated annealing to cellular manufacturing system design. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 32:531–536
Skiscim CC, Golden BL (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing: a preliminary computational study for the TSP. Winter Simulation Conference
Amiri A (2006) Designing a distribution network in a supply chain system: formulation and efficient solution procedure. Eur J Oper Res 171:567–576
Markowitz HM (1952) Portfolio selection. J Finance 7:77–91
Markowitz HM (1959) Portfolio selection. Wiley, New York
ISL (2008) Shipping Statistics and Market Review 52. ISL Institute of Shipping Economics and Logistics
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Definition of coherent risk measure: \( \rho :\delta \to \Re \) (δ is a set of stochastic variables) is a coherent risk measure if it has the following four properties.
-
a.
$$ \matrix{{*{20}{c}} {X \geqslant Y \Rightarrow \rho (X) \geqslant \rho (Y)} \hfill & {\forall X,Y \in \delta } \hfill \\ } $$
-
b.
$$ \matrix{{*{20}{c}} {\rho \left( {X + c} \right) = \rho (X) + c} \hfill & {\forall X \in \delta, \,c \in \Re } \hfill \\ } $$
-
c.
$$ \matrix{{*{20}{c}} {\rho \left( {\lambda \,X} \right) = \lambda \rho (X)} \hfill & {\forall X \in \delta, \,\lambda > 0} \hfill \\ } $$
-
d.
$$ \matrix{{*{20}{c}} {\rho \left( {\lambda X + (1 - \lambda )Y} \right) \leqslant \lambda \rho (X) + (1 - \lambda )\rho (Y)} \hfill & {\forall X,Y \in \delta, \lambda > 0} \hfill \\ } $$
The convexity axiom (d) is a key property from both the methodological and computational perspectives. In a mathematical programming context, it means that ρ is a convex function of the decision vector. This, in turn, entails that the minimization of risk over a convex set of decision variables constitutes a convex programming problem, amenable to efficient solution procedures.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Azad, N., Davoudpour, H. Designing a stochastic distribution network model under risk. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 64, 23–40 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4000-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4000-z