Skip to main content
Log in

Designing a stochastic distribution network model under risk

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we present a stochastic supply chain network model under risk, in which three tiers of decision makers of suppliers, distribution centers (DCs), and customers seek to determine their optimal plans. Unlike other studies in the extant literature, we use financial risk measure to model and for the first time, a new methodology based on finance literature is used to optimize the conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) measure for the problem. In fact the aim of this paper is to show the benefits of considering CVaR to control the risks in the supply chain networks. Also in order to obtain the economics of scale, a piecewise linear transportation cost function is applied between suppliers and DCs. We formulate the problem as a convex mixed integer program. A two-phase (constructive and improvement) heuristic method is developed to solve the problem. In the constructive phase, an initial solution is built randomly, and in improvement phase, this solution is improved iteratively by using a hybrid algorithm combining Tabu search and simulated annealing methods. Numerical experiments demonstrate the practicability of considering CVaR in the model which is promising in the supply chain network area, and also the significant efficiency of the heuristic method in terms of CPU times.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ambrosino D, Scutella MG (2005) Distribution network design: new problems and related models. Eur J Oper Res 165:610–624

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Peidro D, Mula J, Polar R (2009) Quantitative models for supply chain planning under uncertainty: a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 43:400–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ambrosino D, Schiomachen A, Scutella MG (2009) A heuristic based on multi exchange techniques for a regional fleet assignment location-routing problem. Comput Oper Res 36(2):442–460

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Daskin MS, Snyder LV, Berger RT (2005) Facility location in supply chain design. In: Langevin A, Riopel D (eds) Logistics systems: design and operation, Chap. 2. Springer, New York, pp 39–66

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Shen Z, Qi L (2007) Incorporating inventory and routing cost in strategic location models. Eur J Oper Res 179:372–389

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Fazel Zarandi MH, Hemmati A, Davari S (2011) The multi-depot capacitated location-routing problem with fuzzy travel times. Expert Syst Appl 38:10075–10084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tang CS (2006) Perspectives in supply chain risk management. Int J Prod Econ 103(2):451–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Christopher M (2004) Creating resilient supply chains. Logistics Europe:14–21

  9. Alexander S, Coleman T, Li Y (2006) Minimizing cvar and var for a portfolio of derivatives. J Bank Finance 30:583–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S (2000) Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J Risk 2(3):21–41

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S (2002) Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions. J Bank Finance 26(7):1443–1471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Balakrishnan A, Ward JE, Wong RT (1987) Integrated facility location and vehicle routing models: recent work and future prospects. Am J Math Manag Sci 7:35–61

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Laporte G (1989) A survey of algorithms for location-routing problems. Investigacion Operativa 1:93–123

    Google Scholar 

  14. Min H, Jayaraman V, Srivastava R (1998) Combined location-routing problems: a synthesis and future research directions. Eur J Oper Res 108:1–15

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Nagy G, Salhi S (2007) Location-routing, issues, models, and methods: a review. Eur J Oper Res 117:649–672

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Branco IM, Coelho JD (1990) The Hamiltonian p-median problem. Eur J Oper Res 47:86–95

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Tuzun D, Burke LI (1999) A two-phase tabu search approach to the location routing problem. Eur J Oper Res 116:87–99

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu SC, Lee SB (2003) A two-phase heuristic method for the multi-depot location routing problem taking inventory control decisions into considerations. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 22:941–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Albareda-Sambola M, Diaz JA, Fernandez E (2005) A compact model and tight bounds for a combined location routing problem. Comput Oper Res 32:407–428

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Prins C, Prodhon C, Wolfler Calvo R (2006) Solving the capacitated location routing problem by a GRASP complemented by a learning process and a path re linking. 4OR 4(3):221–238

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Peng Y (2008) Integrated location-routing problem modeling and GA algorithm solving. Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation (ICICTA), 2008 International Conference 1:81–84.

  22. Derbel H, Jarboui B, Hanafi S, Chabchoub H (2010) An iterated local search for solving a location-routing problem. Electron Notes Discrete Math 36:875–882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Prodhon C, Prins C (2008) A memetic algorithm with population management for the periodic location-routing problem. Lect Notes Comput Sci 5296:43–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Schwardt M, Fischer K (2009) Combined location-routing problems: a neural network approach. Ann Oper Res 167(1):253–269

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang K, Wu M (2009) DBLAR: a distance-based location-aided routing for MANET. J Electron 26(2):152–160

    Google Scholar 

  26. Duhamel C, Lacomme P, Prins C, Prodhon C (2010) A GRASP×ELS approach for the capacitated location-routing problem. Comput Oper Res 37(11):1912–1923

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Yu VF, Lin S-W, Lee W, Ting C-J (2010) A simulated annealing heuristic for the capacitated location routing problem. Comput Ind Eng 58(2):288–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Prodhon C (2011) A hybrid evolutionary algorithm for the periodic location-routing problem. Eur J Oper Res 210:204–212

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Manzour-Al-Ajdad SMH, Torabi SA, Salhi S (2012) A hierarchical algorithm for the planar single-facility location routing problem. Comput Oper Res 39(2):461–470

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Perl J, Daskin MS (1985) A warehouse location-routing problem. Transportation Research Part B 19:381–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Watson-Gandy CDT, Dohrn PJ (1973) Depot location with van salesmen—a practical approach. Omega 1:321–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Jacobsen SK, Madsen OBG (1980) A comparative study of heuristics for a two-level routing-location problem. Eur J Oper Res 5:378–387

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Madsen OBG (1983) Methods for solving combined two level location routing problems of realistic dimensions. Eur J Oper Res 12:295–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kulcar T (1996) Optimizing solid waste collection in Brussels. Eur J Oper Res 90:26–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lin CKY, Chow CK, Chen A (2002) A location-routing loading problem for bill delivery services. Comput Ind Eng 43:5–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Murty KG, Djang PA (1999) The US army national guard’s mobile training simulators location and routing problem. Oper Res 47:175–182

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Bruns A, Klose A, Stähly P (2000) Restructuring of Swiss parcel delivery services. OR Spektrum 22:285–302

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Wasner M, Zäpfel G (2004) An integrated multi-depot hub location vehicle routing model for network planning of parcel service. Int J Prod Econ 90:403–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Aksen D, Altinkemer K (2008) A location-routing problem for the conversion to the “click-and-mortar” retailing: the static case. Eur J Oper Res 186:554–575

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Artzner P, Delbaen F, Eber JM, Health D (1997) Thinking coherently. Risk 10(11):68–71

    Google Scholar 

  41. Artzner P, Delbaen F, Eber JM, Health D (1999) Coherent measures of risk. Math Finance 9:203–228

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Embrechts P, Resnick SI, Samorodnitsky G (1999) Extreme value theory as a risk management tool. North American Actuarial Journal 3(2):32–41

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. Wu T-H, Low C, Bai J-W (2002) Heuristic solution to multi depot location-routing problems. Comput Oper Res 29:1393–1415

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Mishra N, Prakash TMK, Shankar R, Chan FTS (2005) Hybrid tabu-simulated annealing based approach to solve multi-constraint product mix decision problem. Expert Syst Appl 29(2):446–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Sahin R, Turkbey O (2009) A new hybrid tabu-simulated annealing heuristic for the dynamic facility layout problem. Int J Prod Res 47(24):6855–6873

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Chan FTS, Kumar V (2009) Hybrid TSSA algorithm-based approach to solve warehouse-scheduling problems. Int J Prod Res 47(4):919–940

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. Yildiz AR (2009) A novel particle swarm optimization approach for product design and manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 40(5):617–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Yildiz AR (2009) Hybrid immune-simulated annealing algorithm for optimal design and manufacturing. Int J Mater Prod Tech 34(3):217–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Yildiz AR, Ozturk F (2006) Hybrid enhanced genetic algorithm to select optimal machining parameters in turning operation. J Eng Manufact 220(12):2041–2053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Yildiz AR (2009) A new design optimization framework based on immune algorithm and taguchi method. Comput Ind 60(8):613–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Yildiz AR (2009) A novel hybrid immune algorithm for global optimization in design and manufacturing. Robot Comput Integrated Manuf 25(2):261–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Yildiz AR, Saitou K (2011) Topology synthesis of multicomponent structural assemblies in continuum domains. ASME J Mech Des 133(1)

  53. Yildiz AR (2009) An effective hybrid immune-hill climbing optimization approach for solving design and manufacturing optimization problems in industry. J Mater Process Technol 50(4):224–228

    Google Scholar 

  54. Yildiz AR (2008) Hybrid taguchi-harmony search algorithm for solving engineering optimization problems. Int J Ind Eng Theor Appl Pract 15(3):286–293

    Google Scholar 

  55. Yildiz AR, Ozturk N, Kaya N, Ozturk F (2007) Hybrid multi-objective shape design optimization using taguchi’s method and genetic algorithm. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 34(4):277–365

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  56. Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CD, Vecchi MP (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220:45–98

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  57. Safaei N, Saidi-Mehrabad M, Jabal-Ameli MS (2008) A hybrid simulated annealing for solving an extended model of dynamic cellular manufacturing system. Eur J Oper Res 185:563–592

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  58. Ghezavati VR, Saidi-Mehrabad M (2011) An efficient hybrid self-learning method for stochastic cellular manufacturing problem: a queuing-based analysis. Exp Syst Appl 38:1326–1335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Arkat J, Saidi M, Abbasi B (2007) Applying simulated annealing to cellular manufacturing system design. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 32:531–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Skiscim CC, Golden BL (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing: a preliminary computational study for the TSP. Winter Simulation Conference

  61. Amiri A (2006) Designing a distribution network in a supply chain system: formulation and efficient solution procedure. Eur J Oper Res 171:567–576

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  62. Markowitz HM (1952) Portfolio selection. J Finance 7:77–91

    Google Scholar 

  63. Markowitz HM (1959) Portfolio selection. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  64. ISL (2008) Shipping Statistics and Market Review 52. ISL Institute of Shipping Economics and Logistics

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nader Azad.

Appendix

Appendix

Definition of coherent risk measure: \( \rho :\delta \to \Re \) (δ is a set of stochastic variables) is a coherent risk measure if it has the following four properties.

  1. a.
    $$ \matrix{{*{20}{c}} {X \geqslant Y \Rightarrow \rho (X) \geqslant \rho (Y)} \hfill & {\forall X,Y \in \delta } \hfill \\ } $$
  2. b.
    $$ \matrix{{*{20}{c}} {\rho \left( {X + c} \right) = \rho (X) + c} \hfill & {\forall X \in \delta, \,c \in \Re } \hfill \\ } $$
  3. c.
    $$ \matrix{{*{20}{c}} {\rho \left( {\lambda \,X} \right) = \lambda \rho (X)} \hfill & {\forall X \in \delta, \,\lambda > 0} \hfill \\ } $$
  4. d.
    $$ \matrix{{*{20}{c}} {\rho \left( {\lambda X + (1 - \lambda )Y} \right) \leqslant \lambda \rho (X) + (1 - \lambda )\rho (Y)} \hfill & {\forall X,Y \in \delta, \lambda > 0} \hfill \\ } $$

The convexity axiom (d) is a key property from both the methodological and computational perspectives. In a mathematical programming context, it means that ρ is a convex function of the decision vector. This, in turn, entails that the minimization of risk over a convex set of decision variables constitutes a convex programming problem, amenable to efficient solution procedures.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Azad, N., Davoudpour, H. Designing a stochastic distribution network model under risk. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 64, 23–40 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4000-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4000-z

Keywords

Navigation