Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Critical success factors for Kaizen implementation in manufacturing industries in Mexico

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Kaizen is one of the most important methodologies used to manage continuous improvement in the maquiladora industry located in Ciudad Juarez, Chihuahua, Mexico; however, it is frequently implemented without obtaining the expected results. This article presents the results of a survey with 37 main tasks associated with Kaizen implementation and it was applied to personnel with responsibilities in continuous improvement programs in companies located in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico. The survey was validated using a rational validation, judge validation, and statistical validation using the Cronbach alpha index. A factor analysis by principal components and varimax rotation was applied for finding the critical success factors for Kaizen; results indicate that seven factors are the most important: education and training in operators, communication process, documentation and evaluation of projects results, human resources integration, management commitment, and customer focus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aoki K (2008) Transferring Japanese Kaizen activities to overseas plants in China. Int J of Oper and Prod Manage 28(6):518–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bateman N (2005) Sustainability: the elusive element of process improvement. Int J of Oper and Prod Manage 25(3):261–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bessant J, Caffyn S (1997) High-involvement innovation through continuous improvement. Int J Technol Manag 14(1):7–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhuiyan N, Baghel A, Wilson J (2007) A sustainable continuous improvement methodology at an aerospace company. Int J Product Perform Manag 55(8):671–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bisgaard S (2007) Quality management and Juran's legacy. Qual Reliab Eng Int 23:665–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cheser R (1998) The effect of Japanese Kaizen on employee motivation in US manufacturing. Int J Organ Anal 6(3):197–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cooney R, Sohal A (2004) Teamwork and total quality management: a durable partnership. Total Qual Manag Bus Excell 15(8):1131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cox A, Zagelmeyer S, Marchington M (2006) Embedding employee involvement and participation at work. Hum Resour Manag J 16(3):250–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cronbach LJ (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16(3):297–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cua A, Mckone K, Schroedr R (2001) Relationships between implementation of TQM, JIT and TPM and manufacturing performance. J Oper Manag 19(6):675–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dale B, Boaden R, Wilcox M, McQuarter R (1997) Sustaining total quality management: what are the key issues? TQM Mag 9(2):372–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Denneberg D, Grabisch M (2004) Measure and integral with purely ordinal scales. J Math Psychol 48(1):15–22

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Devaraj S, Hollingworth D, Schroedew R (2004) Generic manufacturing strategies and plant performance. J Oper Manag 22(3):313–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Farris JA (2003) A standard frame work for sustaining Kaizen events. Master’sThesis, Department of Industrial and Manufacturing. Wichita, KS, USA

  15. Flynn BB, Sakakibara S (1995) Relationship between JIT and TQM: practices and performance. Acad Manag J 38(5):1325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hejazi S, Yazdanpanah S, Hadi-Vencheh A (2011) Critical success and failure factors analysis in Management Information System utilization using fuzzy approach (Case Study: Islamic Azad University, Khorasgan Branch). Interdisc J of ContempRes in Bus 3(3):717–730

    Google Scholar 

  17. Imai M (1996) Kaizen: the key to Japan's competitive success. Editorial CECSA, México. (In Spanish)

  18. Jaca C, Mateo R, Tanco M, Viles E, Santos J (2010) Sostenibilidad de los sistemas de mejora continua en la industria: Encuesta en la CAV y Navarra. Intangible Capital 6(1):51–77

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jørgensen F, Boer H, Gertsen F (2004) Development of a team-based framework for conducting self-assessment of continuous improvement. J Manuf Technol Manag 15(4):343–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kaya N (2006) The impact of human resource management practices and corporate entrepreneurship on firm performance: evidence from Turkish firms. Int J Hum Resour Manag 17(12):2074–2090

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Kaye M, Anderson R (1999) Continuous improvement: the ten essential criteria. Int J of Qual and Reliab Manage 16(5):485–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Landa Am (2009) Critical success factors and permanence for Kaizen events. Sinnco, 1–20 (In Spanish)

  23. Lévy JP, Varela M (2003) Multivariate analysis for social sciences, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Madrid (In Spanish)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Likert R (1932) A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology 22(140):1–55

    Google Scholar 

  25. Long RJ, Shields JL (2005) Best practice or best fit? High involvement management and base pay practices in Canadian and Australian firms. Asia Pacific J of Hum Resour 43(1):52–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Melnyk S (1998) Short-term action in pursuit of long-term improvements: Introducing Kaizen. Prod Invent Manag J 39(4):69–76

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Nemoto M (1987) Total quality control for management strategies and techniques from Toyota and Toyoda Gosei. Prentice Hall. Inc., New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  28. Nunnally JC (1978) Psychometric theory, 1st edn. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  29. Nunnally JC, Bernstein H (2005) Psychometric theory, 2nd edn, McGraw-Hill, Interamericana, México, D.F. (In Spanish)

  30. Ooi KB, Arumugam V, Safa MS, Bakar NA (2007) HRM and TQM: association with job involvement. Pers Rev 36(6):939–962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Pollandt S, Wille R (2005) Functorial scaling of ordinal data. Discret Appl Math 147(1):101–111

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Rapp C, Eklund J (2002) Sustainable development of improvement activities—the long-term operation of a suggestion scheme in a Swedish company. Total Qual Manag 13(7):945–969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Readman J (2007) What challenges lie ahead for improvement programmes in the UK? Lessons from the CINet Continuous Improvement Survey 2003. Int J Technol Manag 37(3):290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rink J (2005) Lean can save American manufacturing. Reliable plant. [Online] http://www.rmdonovan/articles/pdf_2005/Lean_. Accessed 15 Sept 2011

  35. Romero R, Noriega S, Escobar C, Ávila D (2009) Critical success factors: a competitiveness strategy. CULCYT 6(31):5–14 (In Spanish)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Schroeder RG, Bates KA, Junttila MA (2002) A resource-based view of manufacturing strategy and the relationship to manufacturing performance. Strateg Manag J 23(3):105–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Streiner D, Norman GR (1995) Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  38. Suárez B, Miguel J, Castillo I (2011) The application of Kaizen in Mexican organizations: an empirical study. GCG 5(4):60–74 (in Spanish)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Tanner C, Roncarti J (1994) Kaizen leads to breakthroughs in responsiveness and the Shingo Prize at Critikon. National Productivity Review 13(4):517–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Tapias A, Yeison A, Correa R, Hernan J (2010) Kaizen: a case study. Redalyc 16(45):59–64 (In Spanish)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Tastle W.J. Wierman M.J. (2007) Using consensus to measure weighted targeted agreement, en NAFIPS '07, 31–35, Annual Meeting of the North American. San Diego, CA, USA

  42. Upton D (1996) Mechanism for building and sustaining operations improvement. Eur Manag J 14(3):215–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Zacharatos A, Barling J, Iverson RD (2005) High-performance work systems and occupational safety. J Appl Psychol 90(1):77–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Prajogo D, Sohal A (2004) Transitioning from total quality management to total innovation management. Total Qual Manag Bus, 21(8):861–875

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial Engineering and Manufacturing, Autonomous University of Ciudad Juarez, Av. Del Charro 450 Norte, Ciudad Juarez, Chihuahua, Mexico, 32315

    Jorge L. García, Denisse G. Rivera & Alejandro Alvarado Iniesta

Authors
  1. Jorge L. García
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Denisse G. Rivera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alejandro Alvarado Iniesta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jorge L. García.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

García, J.L., Rivera, D.G. & Iniesta, A.A. Critical success factors for Kaizen implementation in manufacturing industries in Mexico. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 68, 537–545 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-4750-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-4750-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation