Skip to main content
Log in

An analytical modeling for process parameter planning in the machining of Ti-6Al-4V for force specifications using an inverse analysis

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The reverse computation methodology is proposed to obtain the process parameters for force specifications. A physics-based model along with an iterative gradient search method is employed to design the process parameters such as cutting velocity and depth of cut from the experimentally determined cutting forces. In order to obtain the desired cutting forces, it is required to have a systematic approach to determine the process parameters. An iterative gradient search procedure based on Kalman filter is set up to adaptively approach the specific forces by the optimization of process parameters such that an inverse reasoning can be achieved. A physics-based model is used to predict the cutting forces in each iteration based on shear deformation and chip formation model, as proposed by Oxley. The experimental data are used to illustrate the implementation and validate the viability of the computational methodology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kumar KK, Choudhury S (2008) Investigation of tool wear and cutting force in cryogenic machining using design of experiments. J Mater Process Technol 203(1):95–101

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Kuljanic E, Sortino M (2005) TWEM, a method based on cutting forces—monitoring tool wear in face milling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45(1):29–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Özel T, Karpat Y (2005) Predictive modeling of surface roughness and tool wear in hard turning using regression and neural networks. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45(4):467–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Saffar RJ et al (2008) Simulation of three-dimension cutting force and tool deflection in the end milling operation based on finite element method. Simul Model Pract Theory 16(10):1677–1688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Su, J.-C.,(2006) Residual stress modeling in machining processes. Georgia Institute of Technology

  6. Strenkowski JS, Carroll J (1985) A finite element model of orthogonal metal cutting. J Eng Ind 107(4):349–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yen Y-C, Jain A, Altan T (2004) A finite element analysis of orthogonal machining using different tool edge geometries. J Mater Process Technol 146(1):72–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Umbrello D (2008) Finite element simulation of conventional and high speed machining of Ti6Al4V alloy. J Mater Process Technol 196(1):79–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shao Y, Li B, Chiang KN, Liang SY (2015) Physics-based analysis of minimum quantity lubrication grinding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 79:1659–1670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Karpat Y, Özel T (2006) Predictive analytical and thermal modeling of orthogonal cutting process—part I: predictions of tool forces, stresses, and temperature distributions. J Manuf Sci Eng 128(2):435–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Barry J, Byrne G (2001) Cutting tool wear in the machining of hardened steels: part I: alumina/TiC cutting tool wear. Wear 247(2):139–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Oxley, P.L.B.,(1989) The mechanics of machining: an analytical approach to assesing machinability. Ellis Horwood

  13. Budak E, Altintas Y, Armarego E (1996) Prediction of milling force coefficients from orthogonal cutting data. J Manuf Sci Eng 118(2):216–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. AOKI H et al (1997) Use of alternative protein sources as substitutes for fish meal in red sea bream diets. Aquac Sci 45(1):131–139

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bocciarelli M, Bolzon G, Maier G (2005) Parameter identification in anisotropic elastoplasticity by indentation and imprint mapping. Mech Mater 37(8):855–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nakamura EF, Loureiro AA, Frery AC (2007) Information fusion for wireless sensor networks: methods, models, and classifications. ACM Comput Surv(CSUR) 39(3):9–es

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Delalleau A, Josse G, Lagarde JM, Zahouani H, Bergheau JM (2006) Characterization of the mechanical properties of skin by inverse analysis combined with the indentation test. J Biomech 39(9):1603–1610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pan, Z., Shih D.S., Garmestani H., Liang S.Y., Residual stress prediction for turning of Ti-6Al-4V considering the microstructure evolution. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf, 2017: p. 0954405417712551, 095440541771255

  19. Komanduri R, Hou ZB (2001) Thermal modeling of the metal cutting process—part III: temperature rise distribution due to the combined effects of shear plane heat source and the tool–chip interface frictional heat source. Int J Mech Sci 43(1):89–107

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elham Mirkoohi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mirkoohi, E., Bocchini, P. & Liang, S.Y. An analytical modeling for process parameter planning in the machining of Ti-6Al-4V for force specifications using an inverse analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 98, 2347–2355 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2393-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2393-z

Keywords

Navigation