nach oben

Journal of Management Control

Erschienen in:

01.02.2013 | Original Paper

Management accounting and the construction of the legitimate manager

verfasst von: Lukas Goretzki

Erschienen in: Journal of Management Control | Ausgabe 4/2013

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate why managers use management accounting techniques. Therefore, a qualitative single case study was conducted in an innovative and product-driven firm in which management accounting is considered playing an important role for management and control. Taking a philosophical stance, the case study illustrates how managers use management accounting as a “technology of the self” by which means they reflect and act upon themselves in order to become legitimate actors within the firm. Accordingly, the study shows how management accounting can support managers’ activities of self-control and self-constitution in the context of an institutionalised “regime of truth”.

Vorheriger Artikel The essence of Controlling—the perspective of the Internationaler Controller Verein (ICV) and the Internatinal Group of Controlling (IGC)

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

See, e.g., Kosmala and McKernan (2011) for a recent overview of Foucault’s later work and its potential relevance for management accounting research.

CASEFIRM is a fictitious name that is used by the author to ensure anonymity of the firm studied.

In Foucauldian research, the term subject has two different meanings: “There are two meanings of the word ‘subject’: subject to someone else by control and dependence; and tied to his [sic] own identity by a conscience or self-knowledge. Both meanings suggest a form of power which subjugates and makes subject to” (Foucault 1982, p. 781).

The notation varies in different writings (i.e., subjectification, subjection, subjectivation, or subjectifation). In order to ensure coherence, in this paper the notation “subjectification” will be used.

Foucault defined technologies of the self as “those reflective and voluntary practises by which men not only set themselves rules of conduct, but seek to transform themselves, to change themselves in their singular being, and to make their life into an oeuvre that carries certain aesthetic values and meets certain stylistic criteria” (Foucault 1986, pp. 10–11).

Because the case study was conducted in a German firm, both management accounting and management control are subsumed under the heading of “Controlling” as is mostly the case in the German-speaking business context.

Differences between the managers interviewed have only been observed in terms of the respective operational issues or problems mentioned for which management accounting should provide a solution and that hence created the operational context for the use of these techniques.

Ahrens, T. (1996). Styles of accountability. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 21(2/3), 139–173. CrossRef

Ahrens, T. (1997). Strategic interventions of management accountants: everyday practise of British and German brewers. European Accounting Review, 6(4), 557–588. CrossRef

Ahrens, T., & Chapman, C. S. (2004). Accounting for flexibility and efficiency: a field study of management control systems in a restaurant chain. Contemporary Accounting Research, 21(2), 271–302. CrossRef

Ahrens, T., & Chapman, C. S. (2006). Doing qualitative field research in management accounting: positioning data to contribute to theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(8), 819–841. CrossRef

Ahrens, T., & Chapman, C. S. (2007). Management accounting as practise. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(1–2), 1–27. CrossRef

Anderson-Gough, F., Grey, C., & Robson, K. (2005). “Helping them to forget..”: the organisational embedding of gender relations in public audit firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30(5), 469–490. CrossRef

Armstrong, P. (1985). Changing management control strategies: the role of competition between accountancy and other organisational professions. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 10(2), 129–148. CrossRef

Barratt, E. (2008). The later Foucault in organization and management studies. Human Relations, 61(4), 515–537. CrossRef

Baxter, J., & Chua, W. F. (2003). Alternative management accounting research—whence and whither. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(2–3), 97–126. CrossRef

Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (1999). The sociology of critical capacity. European Journal of Social Theory, 2(3), 359–377.

Burkitt, I. (2002). Technologies of the self: habitus and capacities. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 32(2), 219–237. CrossRef

Burns, J., & Baldvinsdottir, G. (2005). An institutional perspective of accountants’ new roles—the interplay of contradictions and praxis. European Accounting Review, 14(4), 725–757. CrossRef

Butler, J. (2005). Giving an account of oneself. New York: Fordham University Press. CrossRef

Caglio, A. (2003). Enterprise resource planning systems and accountants: towards hybridization? European Accounting Review, 12(1), 123–153. CrossRef

Callon, M. (1998). The laws of the markets (sociology of cultural studies). Oxford: Blackwell Sci.

Catasús, B. (2008). In search of accounting absence. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 19(7), 1004–1019. CrossRef

Covaleski, M. A., Dirsmith, M. W., Heian, J. B., & Samuel, S. (1998). The calculated and the avowed: techniques of discipline and struggles over identity in big six public accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(2), 293–327. CrossRef

Cowton, C. J., & Dopson, S. (2002). Foucault’s prison? Management control in an automotive distributor. Management Accounting Research, 13(2), 191–213. CrossRef

Dambrin, C., Lambert, C., & Sponem, S. (2007). Control and change—analysing the process of institutionalisation. Management Accounting Research, 18(2), 172–208. CrossRef

Davidson, A. I. (1991). Archaelogy, genealogy, ethics. In D. C. Hoy (Ed.), Foucault: a critical reader (pp. 221–233). Oxford: Blackwell Sci.

Ezzamel, M. (1994). Organizational change and accounting: understanding the budgeting system in its organisational context. Organization Studies, 15(2), 213–240. CrossRef

Ezzamel, M., & Burns, J. (2005). Professional competition, economic value added and management control strategies. Organization Studies, 26(5), 755–777. CrossRef

Fligstein, N. (1990). The transformation of corporate control. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. London: Tavistock.

Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795. CrossRef

Foucault, M. (1986). The use of pleasure: volume 2 of the history of sexuality. London: Penguin.

Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self. In L. H. Martin, H. Gutman, & P. H. Hutton (Eds.), Technologies of the self. A seminar with Michael Foucault (pp. 16–49). Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.

Foucault, M., Martin, L. H., Gutman, H., & Hutton, P. H. (1988). Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.

Francis, J. R. (1990). After virtue? Accounting as a moral and discursive practise. Accounting Auditing & Accountability, 3(3), 5–17.

Granlund, M. (2001). Towards explaining stability in and around management accounting systems. Management Accounting Research, 12(2), 141–166. CrossRef

Hasselbladh, H., & Kallinikos, J. (2000). The project of rationalization: a critique and reappraisal of neo-institutionalism in organization studies. Organization Studies, 21(4), 697–720. CrossRef

Hopper, T., & Macintosh, N. (1993). Management accounting as disciplinary practise: the case of ITT under Harold Geneen. Management Accounting Research, 4(3), 181–216. CrossRef

Hopwood, A. G. (1987). The archeology of accounting systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(3), 207–234. CrossRef

Hoskin, K., & Macve, R. (1994). Writing, examining, disciplining: the genesis of accounting’s modern power. In A. Hopwood & P. Miller (Eds.), Accounting as social and institutional practise (pp. 67–97). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jacobs, C., & Heracleous, L. (2001). “Seeing without being seen:” toward an archaeology of controlling science. International Studies of Management & Organization, 31(3), 113–135.

Jones, T. C., & Dugdale, D. (2001). The concept of an accounting regime. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 12(1), 35–64. CrossRef

Jönsson, S. (1998). Relate management accounting research to managerial work! Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(4), 411–434. CrossRef

Jönsson, S. (2009). The study of controller agency. In C. S. Chapman, D. J. Cooper, & P. B. Miller (Eds.), Accounting, organizations, and institutions—essays in honour of Anthony Hopwood (pp. 233–259). New York: Oxford University Press. CrossRef

Jørgensen, B., & Messner, M. (2010). Accounting and strategising: a case study from new product development. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(2), 184–204. CrossRef

Kosmala, K., & McKernan, J. F. (2011). From care of the self to care for the other: neglected aspects of Foucault’s late work. Accounting Auditing & Accountability, 24(3), 377–402. CrossRef

Kosmala MacLullich, K. (2003). The emperor’s “new” clothes? New audit regimes: insights from Foucault’s technologies of the self. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 14(8), 791–811. CrossRef

Lambert, C., & Pezet, E. (2011). The making of the management accountant—becoming the producer of truthful knowledge. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36(1), 10–30. CrossRef

Lawrence, T. B. (2008). Power, institutions and organizations. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin (Eds.), Handbook of organisational institutionalism, sage publications (under print) (pp. 170–198). London: Sage. CrossRef

Lawrence, T., Mauws, M., Dyck, B., & Kleysen, R. (2005). The politics of organisational learning: integrating power into the 4i framework. The Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 180–191. CrossRef

Lawrence, T. B., Winn, M. I., & Jennings, P. D. (2001). The temporal dynamics of institutionalization. The Academy of Management Review, 26(4), 624–644.

Lounsbury, M. (2008). Institutional rationality and practise variation: new directions in the institutional analysis of practise. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4–5), 349–361. CrossRef

Macintosh, N. B., & Scapens, R. W. (1990). Structuration theory in management accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 15(5), 455–477. CrossRef

Messner, M. (2009). The limits of accountability. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(8), 918–938. CrossRef

Messner, M., Clegg, S., & Kornberger, M. (2008). Critical practises in organizations. Journal of Management Inquiry, 17(2), 17–68. CrossRef

Meyer, J. W., & Jepperson, R. L. (2000). The ‘actors’ of modern society: the cultural construction of social agency. Sociological Theory, 18(1), 100–120. CrossRef

Miller, P. (1992). Accounting and objectivity: the invention of calculating selves and calculable spaces. Annals of Scholarship, 9(1/2), 61–86.

Miller, P. (1994). Accounting as social and institutional practise: an introduction. In A. Hopwood & P. Miller (Eds.), Accounting as social and institutional practise (pp. 1–39). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Miller, P. (2001). Governing by numbers: why calculative practices matter. Social research, 68(2), 379–396.

Miller, P., & O’Leary, T. (1987). Accounting and the construction of the governable person. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(3), 235–265. CrossRef

Morgan, G. (1988). Accounting as reality construction: towards a new epistemology for accounting practise. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 13(5), 477–485. CrossRef

Oakes, L. S., Townley, B., & Cooper, D. J. (1998). Business planning as pedagogy: language and control in a changing institutional field. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(2), 257–292. CrossRef

Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. The Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179.

Randall, J., & Munro, I. (2010). Foucault’s care of the self: a case from mental health work. Organization Studies, 31(11), 1485–1504. CrossRef

Roberts, J. (2009). No one is perfect: the limits of transparency and an ethic for ‘intelligent’ accountability. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(8), 957–970. CrossRef

Roberts, J., Sanderson, P., Barker, R., & Hendry, J. (2006). In the mirror of the market: the disciplinary effects of company/fund manager meetings. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(3), 277–294. CrossRef

Rose, N. (1991). Governing by numbers: figuring out democracy. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 16(7), 673–692. CrossRef

Strauß, E., & Zecher, C. (2012). Management control systems: a review. J Manage Control, in press.

Styhre, A. (2001). Kaizen, ethics, and care of the operations: management after empowerment. Journal of Management Studies, 38(6), 795–810. CrossRef

Townley, B. (1995). Know thyself’: self-awareness, self-formation and managing. Organization, 2(2), 271–289. CrossRef

Vaivio, J. (1999). Examining “the quantified customer”. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 24(8), 689–715. CrossRef

Vollmer, H. (2003). Bookkeeping, accounting, calculative practise: the sociological suspense of calculation. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 14(3), 353–381. CrossRef

Vollmer, H. (2007). How to do more with numbers: elementary stakes, framing, keying, and the three-dimensional character of numerical signs. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(6), 577–600. CrossRef

Weber, J. (2011). The development of controller tasks: explaining the nature of controllership and its changes. Journal of Management Control, 22(1), 25–46. CrossRef

Titel: Management accounting and the construction of the legitimate manager
verfasst von: Lukas Goretzki
Publikationsdatum: 01.02.2013
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: Journal of Management Control / Ausgabe 4/2013
Print ISSN: 2191-4761
Elektronische ISSN: 2191-477X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-012-0163-x

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2013

Management control as a package—The need for international research

The essence of Controlling—the perspective of the Internationaler Controller Verein (ICV) and the Internatinal Group of Controlling (IGC)

Management accounting research in Germany: from splendid isolation to being part of the international community

Conceptualisations of ‘controlling’ in German-speaking countries: analysis and comparison with Anglo-American management control frameworks

Management control systems: a review