Abstract
A realistic assessment of the total uncertainty budget of Global Positioning System (GPS) observations and its adequate mathematical treatment is a basic requirement for all analysis and interpretation of GPS-derived point positions, in particular GPS heights, and their respective changes. This implies not only the random variability but also the remaining systematic errors. At present in geodesy, the main focus is on stochastic approaches in which errors are modeled by means of random variables. Here, an alternative approach based on interval mathematics is presented. It allows us to model and to quantify the impact of remaining systematic errors in GPS carrier-phase observations on the final results using deterministic error bands. In this paper, emphasis is given to the derivation of the observation intervals based on influence parameters and to the study of the complex linear transfer of this type of uncertainty to estimated point positions yielding zonotopes. From the presented simulation studies of GPS baselines, it turns out that the uncertainty due to remaining systematic effects dominates the total uncertainty budget for baselines longer than 200 km.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alefeld G, Herzberger J (1983) Introduction to interval computations. Academic Press, New York
Beutler G, Bauersima I, Gurtner W, Rothacher M, Schildknecht T, Geiger A (1988) Atmospheric refraction and other important biases in GPS carrier phase observations. In: Brunner FK (eds) Atmospheric effects on geodetic space measurements. Monograph12, School of Surveying University of New South Wales, Sydney, pp 15–44
Breams I, Kieffer M, Walter E (2003) Prior characterization of the performance of software sensors. In: Proceedings of the SysId2003, Rotterdam, pp 313–318
Brunner FK (1994) On the deformation of GPS networks. In: Proceedings of the XX FIG Congress, Melbourne, pp T501.4 1–T501.4 8
Brunner FK, Tregoning P (1994) Tropospheric propagation effects in GPS height results using meteorological observations. Aust J Geod Photogram Surv 60:49–65
Heindl G, Reinhart E (1975) Adjustment by the principle of minimal maximum error In: Beiträge der Bundesrepublik Deutschland zur Vorlage bei der XVI. Generalversammlung der Internationalen Union für Geodäsie und Geophysik, Grenoble 1975, Deutsche Geodätische Kommission, B 213:33–44
ISO (1995) Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurements (GUM). International Organization for Standardization, Geneva
Jaulin L, Kieffer M, Didrit O, Walter E (2001) Applied interval analysis. Springer, London
Kieffer M, Jaulin L, Walter E, Meizel D (2000) Robust autonomous robot localization using interval analysis. Reliab Comput 6:337–362
Klatte R, Kulisch U, Neaga M, Ratz D, Ullrich C (1991) PASCAL XSC – Sprachbeschreibung in Beispielen. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Koch KR. (1999). Parameter estimation and hypothesis testing in linear models. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Kouba J (2003) A guide to using international GPS service (IGS) products (http://igscb.jpl.nasa.gov/igscb/resource/pubs/ GuidetoUsingIGSProducts.pdf)
Kreinovich V (1995) Data processing beyond traditional statistics: applications of interval computations. Supplement of the Journal of Reliable Computing, pp 13–21
Kuang D, Schutz BE, Watkins MM (1996) On the structure of geometric positioning information in GPS measurements. J Geod 71(1):35–43
Kutterer H (1994) Intervallmathematische Behandlung endlicher Unschärfen linearer Ausgleichungsmodelle, Deutsche Geodätische Kommission C 423, München
Kutterer H (2001) An imprecise search space for GPS phase ambiguity parameters. In: Carosio A, Kutterer H (eds) First international symposium on robust statistics and fuzzy techniques in geodesy and GIS. ETH Zurich Institute of Geodesy and Photogrammetry, Bericht 295, pp 215–220
Lachapelle G, Alves P (2002) Multiple reference station approach: overview and current research. J Glob Position Syst 1(2):13–136
Leick A (1995) GPS satellite surveying. Wiley, New York
Leinen S (2001) Fuzzy-logic based GPS on-the-fly ambiguity search. In: Carosio A, Kutterer H (eds) First international symposium on robust statistics and fuzzy techniques in geodesy and GIS. ETH Zurich Institute of Geodesy and Photogrammetry, Bericht 295, pp 209–214
Muhanna R, Mullen R (2004) Proceedings of the NSF workshop on reliable engineering computing, Savannah
Neumeier A (1990) Interval methods for linear systems of equations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Niell AE (1996) Global mapping functions for the atmosphere delay at radio wavelengths. J Geophys Res 101(B2):3227–3246
Rizos C, Han S (2003) Reference station network based RTK systems – concepts and progress. Wuhan Univ J Nat Sci 8(2B):566–574
Rump S (2004) INTLAB INTerval LABoratory, a Matlab toolbox for verified computations Vers.4.0 (http://www.ti3.ttu-harburg.de~rump/intlab/)
Saastamoinen J (1973) Contribution to the theory of atmospheric refraction. Part II Refraction corrections in satellite geodesy. Bulletin Géodésique 107:13–34
Santerre R (1991) Impact of GPS satellite sky distribution. Manuscripta Geodaetica 16(1):28–53
Schmidbauer HO, Schnädelbach K (1991) Computation of the point positions in three-dimensional networks on the base of tolerance intervals for the observations. Manuscripta Geodaetica 16(2):111–117
Schmitt G (1977) Some considerations using interval analysis in adjustment computations, Deutsche Geodätische Kommission B 221:87–97 Frankfurt/Main
Schön S (2003) Analyse und Optimierung geodätischer Messanordnungen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Intervallansatzes. Dissertation, Deutsche Geodätische Kommission C 567. München
Schön S, Kutterer H (2003) Imprecision in Geodetic Observations – case study GPS monitoring network. In: Stiros S, Pytharouli S (eds) Proceedings of the 11th: FIG international symposium on deformation measurements. Geodesy and Geodetic Applications Lab., Patras University, Publication No. 2, pp 471–478
Schön S, Kutterer H (2005a) Realistic uncertainty measures for GPS observations. In: Sanso F (eds) A window on the future of geodesy. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 54–59
Schön S, Kutterer H (2005b) Using zonotopes for overestimation-free interval least-squares – some geodetic applications. Reliab Comput 11(2):137–155
Spofford PR, Remondi BW (1997) The national geodetic survey standard GPS format SP3. National Geodetic Survey National Ocean Service (NOAA), Silver Spring
Viertl R (1996) Statistical methods for non-precise data. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Ziegler GM (1997) Lectures on polytopes. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schön, S., Kutterer, H. Uncertainty in GPS Networks due to Remaining Systematic Errors: The Interval Approach. J Geodesy 80, 150–162 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-006-0042-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-006-0042-z