Skip to main content
Log in

Classical globally reflected gravity field determination in modern locally oriented multiscale framework

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Geodesy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is the canonical connection of classical global gravity field determination following the concept of Stokes (Trans Camb Philos Soc 8:672–712, 1849), Bruns (Die Figur der Erde, Publikation Königl. Preussisch. Geodätisches Institut, P. Stankiewicz Buchdruckerei, Berlin, 1878), and Neumann (Vorlesungen über die Theorie des Potentials und der Kugelfunktionen. Teubner, Leipzig, pp 135–154, 1887) on the one hand and modern locally oriented multiscale computation by use of adaptive locally supported wavelets on the other hand. The essential tools are regularization methods of the Green, Neumann, and Stokes integral representations. The multiscale approximation is guaranteed simply as linear difference scheme by use of Green, Neumann, and Stokes wavelets. As an application, gravity anomalies caused by plumes are investigated for the Hawaiian and Iceland areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aardalan AA, Grafarend EW, Finn G (2006) Ellipsoidal vertical deflections and ellipsoidal gravity disturbances: case studies. Stud Geophys Geod 50: 1–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruns EH (1878) Die Figur der Erde, Publikation Königl. Preussisch. Geodätisches Institut, P. Stankiewicz Buchdruckerei, Berlin

  • Driscoll JR, Healy RM (1994) Computing fourier transforms and convolutions on the 2-sphere. Adv Appl Math 15: 202–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ESA (1996) The nine candidate earth explorer missions. Publications Division ESTEC, Noordwijk, SP-1196(1)

  • ESA (1998) European views on dedicated gravity field missions: GRACE and GOCE. ESD–MAG–REP–CON–001

  • ESA (1999) Gravity field and steady-state ocean circulation mission. ESTEC, Noordwijk, ESA SP–1233(1)

  • Fengler MJ, Freeden W, Gutting M (2004) Darstellung des Gravitationsfeldes und seiner Funktionale mit sphärischer Multiskalentechnik. ZfV, 129 Jg., 5:323–334

  • Freeden W (1979) Über eine Klasse von Integralformeln der Mathematischen Geodäsie, Veröff. Geod. Inst. RWTH Aachen

  • Freeden W (1999) Multiscale modelling of spaceborne geodata. Teubner, Stuttgart, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeden W, Gervens T, Schreiner M (1998) Constructive approximation on the sphere (with application to geomathematics). Oxford Sciences Publication, Clarendon Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeden W, Maier T (2002) In multiscale denoising of spherical functions: basic theory and numerical aspects. Electron Trans Numer Anal (ETNA) 14: 40–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeden W, Wolf K (2008) Klassische Erdschwerefeldbestimmung aus der Sicht moderner Geomathematik, Mathematische Semesterberichte, 56:53–77

  • Gauss CF (1828) Bestimmung des Breitenunterschiedes zwischen den Sternwarten von Göttingen und Altona. Vandenhoek und Ruprecht, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Groten E (1979) Geodesy and the Earth’s Gravity Field I, II. Dümmler

  • Haar A (1910) Zur Theorie der orthogonalen Funktionsysteme. Math Ann 69: 331–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heiskanen WA, Moritz H (1967) Physical geodesy. W.H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann-Wellendorf B, Moritz H (2005) Physical geodesy. Springer, Wien, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmert FR (1880) Die mathematischen und physikalischen Theorien der Höheren Geodäsie, 1. B.G. Teubner Verlagsgesellschaft, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmert FR (1884) Die mathematischen und physikalischen Theorien der Höheren Geodäsie, 2. B.G. Teubner Verlagsgesellschaft, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Ji Y, Nataf H-C (1998) Detection of mantle plumes in the lower mantle by diffraction tomography: Hawaii. Earth Planet Sci Lett 159: 99–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg OD (1929) Foundation of potential theory. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambeck K et al (2000) The Integration of geodetic measurements into an Earth science observing program: The example of glacial rebound. In: Rummel R (eds) Towards an integrated global geodetic observing system. Springer, Berlin, pp 84–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Listing JB (1873) Über unsere jetzige Kenntnis der Gestalt und Größe der Erde. Dietrichsche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquart G, Schmeling H (2004) A Dynamic Model for the Iceland Plume and the Atlantic Based on Tomography and Gravity Data. Geophys J Int 159: 40–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathar D (2008) Wavelet variances and their application in geoscientifically relevant feature detection. Diploma Thesis, University of Kaiserslautern, Geomathematics Group

  • Meissl P (1971) On the linearization of the geodetic boundary value problem. Reports of the department of geodetic science, vol 152. The Ohio State University, Columbus

  • Morgan WJ (1971) Convective plumes in the lower mantle. Nature 230: 42–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan WJ, Morgan JP, Price E (1995) Hotspot melting generates both hotspot volcanism and a hotspot swell. J Geophys Res 100: 8054–8062

    Google Scholar 

  • Nataf H-C (2000) Seismic imaging of mantle plumes. Ann Rev Earth Planet Sci 28: 391–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann F (1887) Vorlesungen über die Theorie des Potentials und der Kugelfunktionen. Teubner, Leipzig, pp 135–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Pizzetti P (1910) Sopra il calcoba tesrico delle deviazioni del geoide dall’ ellissoide. Att R Accad Sci Torino 46: 331–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Pizzetti P (1894) Geodesia–Sulla espressione della gravita alla superficie del geoide, supposto ellissoidico. Atti Reale Accademia dei Lincei 3: 166–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter JRR, UR Christensen (2007) Mantle plumes, a multidisciplinary approach. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rummel R (1992) Geodesy, encyclopedia of earth system science, vol 2. Akademic Press, London, pp 253–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Rummel R, Balmino G, Johannessen J, Visser P, Woodworth P (2002) Dedicated gravity field missions—principles and aims. J Geodyn 33: 3–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russel SA, Lay T, Garnero EJ (1998) Seismic evidence for small-scale dynamics in the lower most mantle at the root of the hawaiian hotspot. Nature 396: 255–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmeling H, Marquart G (2005) Crustal accretion and dynamic feedback on mantle melting of a ridge centred plume: the Iceland Case, Tectonophysics, Special Volume Plate motion and crustal processes in and around Iceland

  • Stokes GG (1849) On the variation of gravity at the surface of the Earth. Trans. Cambr. Phil. Soc. 8:672–712. [In: Mathematical and physical papers by george gabriel stokes, vol II. Johnson Reprint Corporation, New York, pp 131–171]

    Google Scholar 

  • Torge W (1991) Geodesy. de Gruyter, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Wangerin A (1921) Theorie des Potentials und der Kugelfunktionen. Vereinigung wissenschaftlicher Verlag Walter de Gruyter & Co, Berlin, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Weyl H (1916) Über die Gleichverteilung von Zahlen mod Eins. Math Ann 77: 313–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JT (1963) A Possible Origin of the Hawaiian Island. Can J Phys 41: 863–868

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf K (2006) Numerical Aspects of Harmonic Spline-Wavelets for the Satellite Gravimetry Problem. Diploma Thesis, University of Kaiserslautern, Geomathematics Group

  • Yuan X, Li X, Wölbern I, Kind R (2007) Tracing the Hawaiian Mantle Plume by Converted Seismic Waves. In: Ritter JRR, Christensen UR (eds) Mantle plumes. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 49–70

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. Freeden.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Freeden, W., Fehlinger, T., Klug, M. et al. Classical globally reflected gravity field determination in modern locally oriented multiscale framework. J Geod 83, 1171–1191 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-009-0335-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-009-0335-0

Keywords

Navigation