Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Separation of global time-variable gravity signals into maximally independent components

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Geodesy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) products provide valuable information about total water storage variations over the whole globe. Since GRACE detects mass variations integrated over vertical columns, it is desirable to separate its total water storage anomalies into their original sources. Among the statistical approaches, the principal component analysis (PCA) method and its extensions have been frequently proposed to decompose the GRACE products into space and time components. However, these methods only search for decorrelated components that on the one hand are not always interpretable and on the other hand often contain a superposition of independent source signals. In contrast, independent component analysis (ICA) represents a technique that separates components based on assumed statistical independence using higher-order statistical information. If one assumes that independent physical processes generate statistically independent signal components added up in the GRACE observations, separating them by ICA is a reliable strategy to identify these processes. In this paper, the performance of the conventional PCA, its rotated extension and ICA are investigated when applied to the GRACE-derived total water storage variations. These analyses have been tested on both a synthetic example and on the real GRACE level-2 monthly solutions derived from GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam (GFZ RL04) and Bonn University (ITG2010). Within the synthetic example, we can show how imposing statistical independence in the framework of ICA improves the extraction of the ‘original’ signals from a GRACE-type super-position. We are therefore confident that also for the real case the ICA algorithm, without making prior assumptions about the long-term behaviour or on the frequencies contained in the signal, improves over the performance of PCA and its rotated extension in the separation of periodical and long-term components.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aires F, Rossow WB, Chedin A (2002) Rotation of EOFs by the independent component analysis: toward a solution of the mixing problem in the decomposition of geophysical time series. J Atmos Sci 59: 111–123. doi:10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059<0111:ROEBTI>2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arendt AA, Luthcke SB, Hock R (2009) Glacier changes in Alaska: can mass-balance models explain GRACE mascon trends?. Ann Glaciol 50: 148–154. doi:10.3189/172756409787769753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beven K (2001) How far can we go in distributed hydrological modelling?. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 5: 1–12. doi:10.5194/hess-5-1-2001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne MW (2001) An overview of analytic rotation in exploratory factor analysis. Multivar Behav Res 36: 111–150 ISSN:0027-3171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso JF (1992) Fourth-order cumulant structure forcing: application to blind array processing, statistical signal and array processing, 1992. In: Conference Proceedings. IEEE Sixth SP Workshop. doi:10.1109/SSAP.1992.246830

  • Cardoso JF (1999) High-order contrasts for independent component analysis. Neural Comput 11: 157–192. doi:10.1162/089976699300016863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso JF, Souloumiac A (1993) Blind beamforming for non-Gaussian signals. In: IEEE proceedings, pp 362–370. doi:10.1.1.8.5684

  • Chambers DP (2006) Observing seasonal steric sea level variations with GRACE and satellite altimetry. J Geophys Res 111: C03010. doi:10.1029/2005JC002914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers DP, Willis JK (2008) Analysis of large-scale ocean bottom pressure variability in the North Pacific. J Geophys Res 113: C11003. doi:10.1029/2008JC004930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comon P (1994a) Independent component analysis, a new concept?. Signal Process 36: 287–314. doi:10.1016/0165-1684(94)90029-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comon P (1994b) Tensor diagonalization, a useful tool in signal processing. In: Proceedings of 10th IFAC symp system identification (IFAC-SYSID), pp 77–82

  • Cromwell D (2006) Temporal and spatial characteristics of sea surface height variability in the North Atlantic ocean. Ocean Sci 2: 147–159. doi:10.5194/osd-3-609-2006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Viron O, Panet I, Diament M (2006) Extracting low frequency climate signal from GRACE data. eEarth 1: 9–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dommenget D, Latif M (2002) A cautionary note on the interpretation of EOFs. J Clim 15: 216–225. doi:10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<0216:ACNOTI>2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenoglio-Marc L (2001) Analysis and representation of regional sea-level variability from altimetry and atmospheric-oceanic data. Geophys J Int 145: 1–18. doi:10.1046/j.1365-246x.2001.00284.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira P, Magueijo J, Silk J (1997) Cumulants as non-Gaussian qualifiers. Phys Rev D 56: 4592–4603. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.56.4592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flechtner F (2007) GFZ Level-2 processing standards document for level-2 product release 0004. GRACE 327-743, Rev 1.0

  • Frappart F, Ramillien G, Leblanc M, Tweed SO, Bonnet MP, Maisongrande P (2010a) An independent component analysis filtering approach for estimating continental hydrology in the GRACE gravity data. Remote Sens Environ 115(1): 187–204. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2010.08.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frappart F, Ramillien G, Maisongrande P, Bonnet MP (2010b) Denoising satellite gravity signals by independent component analysis. Geosci Remote Sens Lett 7: 421–425. doi:10.1109/LGRS.2009.2037837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golub GH, van Loan CF (1996) Matrix computations, 3rd edn. Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN:978-0-470-52833-4

  • Guan B, Nigam S (2009) Analysis of Atlantic SST variability factoring interbasin links and the secular trend: clarified structure of the Atlantic multidecadal oscillation. J Clim 22: 4228–4240. doi:10.1175/2009JCLI2921.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannachi A, Unkel S, Trendafilov NT, Jolliffe IT (2009) Independent component analysis of climate data: a new look at EOF rotation. J Clim 22: 2797–2812. doi:10.1175/2008JCLI2571.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks JR, Leben RR, Born GH, Koblinsky CJ (1996) Empirical orthogonal function analysis of global TOPEX/POSEIDON altimeter data and implications for detection of global sea level rise. J Geophys Res 101: 14131–14145. doi:10.1029/96JC00922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyvaerinen A (1999) Survey on independent component analysis. Neural Comput Surv 2: 94–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyvaerinen A, Oja E (2000) Independent component analysis: algorithms and applications. Neural Netw 13: 411–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jekeli C (1981) Alternative methods to smooth the Earth’s gravity field. Technical report rep 327. Department of Geodesy and Science and Surveying, Ohio State University, Columbus

  • Jolliffe IT (1986) Principal component analysis. Springer, New York. ISBN:9780387954424

  • Jolliffe IT (1989) Rotation of ill-defined principal components. J R Stat Soc Ser C (Appl Stat) 38:139–147. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2347688

  • Jolliffe IT (2003) A cautionary note on artificial examples of EOFs. J Clim 16: 1084–1086. doi:10.1175/1520-0442(2003)016<1084:ACNOAE>2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser H (1958) The VARIMAX criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika 23: 187–200. doi:10.1007/BF02289233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karvanen J, Koivunen V (2002) Blind separation methods based on Pearson system and its extensions. Signal Process 82: 663–673. doi:10.1016/S0165-1684(01)00213-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirimoto T, Amishima T, Okamura A (2011) Separation of mixtures of complex sinusoidal signals with independent component analysis. IEICE Trans Commun 94B:215–221. ISSN:1745-1345. doi:10.1587/transcom.E94.B.215

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurthy V, Goswami BN (2000) Indian Monsoon ENSO relationship on interdecadal timescale. J Clim 13: 579–595. doi:10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013<0579:IMEROI>2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch KR (1988) Parameter estimation and hypothesis testing in linear models. Springer, New York. ISBN:9783540652571

  • Kusche J (2007) Approximate decorrelation and non-isotropic smoothing of time-variable GRACE-type gravity field models. J Geod 81: 733–749. doi:10.1007/s00190-007-0143-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kusche J, Schmidt R, Petrovic S, Rietbroek R (2009) Decorrelated GRACE time-variable gravity solutions by GFZ, and their validation using a hydrological model. J Geod 83: 903–913. doi:10.1007/s00190-009-0308-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kusche J, Rietbroek R, Forootan E (2010) Signal separation: the quest for independent mass flux patterns in geodetic observations. AGU Fall Meeting, 17 December 2010, San Francisco, USA. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010AGUFM.G51C0683K

  • Latif M, Barnett TP (1994) Causes of decadal climate variability over the North Pacific and North America. Science 266: 634–637. doi:10.1126/science.266.5185.634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legates DR (1991) The effect of domain shape on principal components analyses. Int J Climatol 11: 135–146. doi:10.1002/joc.3370110203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lombard A, Cazenave A, Le Traon PY, Ishii M (2005) Contribution of thermal expansion to present-day sea-level change revisited. Glob Planet Change 47: 1–16. doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2004.11.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz E (1956) Empirical orthogonal function and statistical weather prediction. Technical Report Science Report No 1, Statistical Forecasting Project. MIT, Cambridge

  • Mayer-Guerr T, Eicker A, Kurtenbach E (2010) http://www.igg.unibonn.de/apmg/index.php?id=itg-grace2010

  • Mestas-Nunez AM (2000) Orthogonality properties of rotated empirical modes. Int J Climatol 20: 1509–1516. doi:10.1002/1097-0088(200010)20:12<1509::AID-JOC553>3.0.CO;2-Q

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills GF (1995) Principal component analysis of precipitation and rainfall regionalization in Spain. Theor Appl Climatol 50: 169–183. doi:10.1007/BF00866115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naik G, Kumar D, Weghorn H (2007) Performance comparison of ICA algorithms for isometric hand gesture identification using surface EGM. In: Intelligent sensors, sensor networks and information, 2007. ISSNIP2007, pp 613–618

  • North GR, Bell TL, Cahalan RF, Moeng FJ (1982) Sampling errors in the estimation of empirical orthogonal functions. Mon Weather Rev 110: 699–706. doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1982)110<0699:SEITEO>2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogawa R (2010) Transient, seasonal and inter-annual gravity changes from GRACE data: geophysical modelings. PhD Dissertation, Hokkaido University, Sapporo

  • Preisendorfer R (1988) Principal component analysis in meteorology and oceanography. Elsevier, Amsterdam. ISBN:0444430148

  • Preisendorfer R, Barnett TP (1977) Significance tests for EOF. In: 5th Conference on probability and statistics in atmospheric sciences, pp 169–172

  • Rangelova E, Sideris MG (2008) Contributions of terrestrial and GRACE data to the study of the secular geoid changes in North America. J Geodyn 46: 131–143. doi:10.1016/j.jog.2008.03.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rangelova E, van der Wal W, Sideris MG, Wu P (2009) Spatiotemporal analysis of the GRACE-derived mass variations in North America by means of multi-channel singular spectrum analysis. Int Assoc Geod Symposia 2010 135(7): 539–546. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-10634-7_72

    Google Scholar 

  • Richman M (1986) Rotation of principal components. Int J Climatol 6: 293–335. doi:10.1002/joc.3370060305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rieser D, Kuhn M, Pail R, Anjasmara I, Awange J (2010) Relation between GRACE-derived surface mass variations and precipitation over Australia. Austral J Earth Sci 57: 887–900. doi:10.1080/08120099.2010.51264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rietbroek R, Brunnabend SE, Dahle C, Kusche J, Flechtner F, Schrter J, Timmermann R (2009) Changes in total ocean mass derived from GRACE, GPS, and ocean modeling with weekly resolution. J Geophys Res 114: C11004. doi:10.1029/2009JC005449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rietbroek R, Brunnabend SE, Kusche J, Schroter J (2011) Resolving sea level contributions by identifying fingerprints in time-variable gravity and altimetry. In press, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264370711000779 , doi:10.1016/j.jog.2011.06.007

  • Rodell M, Houser PR, Jambor U, Gottschalck J, Mitchell K, Meng CJ, Arsenault K, Cosgrove B, Radakovich J, Bosilovich M, Entin JK, Walker JP., Lohmann D, Toll D (2004) The global land data assimilation system. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 85: 381– 394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaefli B, Harman CJ, Sivapalan M, Schymanski SJ (2011) Hydrologic predictions in a changing environment: behavioral modeling. J Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 15(2): 635–646. doi:10.5194/hess-15-635-2011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmeer M, Bosch W, Schmidt M (2008) Separation of oceanic and hydrological mass variations by simulated gravity observations. DFGI report 83. http://www.dgfi.badw.de/fileadmin/DOC/reports/DGFI_Report_83.pdf. Accessed 31 March 2011

  • Schmidt R, Flechtner F, Meyer U, Neumayer KH, Dahle C, Koenig R, Kusche J (2008) Hydrological signals observed by the GRACE satellites. Surv Geophys 29: 319–334. doi:10.1007/s10712-008-9033-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrama EJO, Wouters B, Lavalle DA (2007) Signal and noise in gravity recovery and climate experiment (GRACE) observed surface mass variations. J Geophys Res 112: B08407. doi:10.1029/2006JB004882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swenson S, Wahr J (2006) Post-processing removal of correlated errors in GRACE data. Geophys Res Lett 33. doi:10.1029/2005GL025285

  • Tapley BD, Bettadpur S, Ries JC, Thompson PF, Watkins MM (2004a) GRACE measurements of mass variability in the Earth system. Science 305: 503–505. doi:10.1126/science.1099192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapley BD, Bettadpur S, Watkins M, Reigber C (2004b) The gravity recovery and climate experiment: mission overview and early results. Geophys Res Lett 31: L09607. doi:10.1029/2004GL019920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapley BD, Ries J, Bettadpur S, Chambers D, Cheng M, Condi F, Gunter B, Kang Z, Nagel P, Pastor R, Pekker T, Poole S, Wang F (2005) GGM02: an improved Earth gravity field model from GRACE. J Geod 79: 467–478. doi:10.1007/s00190-005-0480-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thode HC (2002) Testing for normality. Marcel Dekker. ISBN: 9780824796136

  • Timmen L, Gitlein O, Mueller J, Denker H, Maekinen J, Bilker M, Pettersen B, Lysaker D, Omang O, Svendsen J, Wilmes H, Falk R, Reinhold A, Hoppe W, Scherneck HG, Engen B, Harsson B, Engfeldt A, Lilje M, Strykowski G, Forsberg R (2006) Observing Fennoscandian gravity change by absolute gravimetry. Int Assoc Geod Symposia 131: 193–199. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-38596-7_23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Wal W, Wu P, Sideris MG, Shum CK (2008) Use of GRACE determined secular gravity rates for glacial isostatic adjustment studies in North-America. J Geodyn 46: 144–154. doi:10.1016/j.jog.2008.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Broeke M, Bamber J, Ettema J, Rignot E, Schrama E, van de Berg WJ, van Meijgaard E, Velicogna I, Wouters B (2009) Partitioning recent Greenland mass loss. Science 326: 984–986. doi:10.1126/science.1178176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velicogna I (2009) Increasing rates of ice mass loss from the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets revealed by GRACE. Geophys Res Lett 36: L19503. doi:10.1029/2009GL040222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velicogna I, Wahr J (2005) Greenland mass balance from GRACE. Geophys Res Lett 32: L18505. doi:10.1029/2005GL023955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voeroesmarty CJ, Green P, Salisbury J, Lammers RB (2000) Global water resources: vulnerability from climate change and population growth. Science 289: 284–288. doi:10.1126/science.289.5477.284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Storch H, Zwiers F (1999) Statistical analysis in climate research. Cambridge University Press. ISBN:9780521012300

  • Wahr J, Molenaar M, Bryan F (1998) Time variability of the Earth’s gravity field: hydrological and oceanic effects and their possible detection using GRACE. J Geophys Res 103: 30205–30229. doi:10.1029/98JB02844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waymire E, Gupta VK (1981) The mathematical structure of rainfall representations 1. A review of the stochastic rainfall models. Water Resour Res 17: 1261–1272. doi:10.1029/WR017i005p01261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werth S, Guentner A, Schmidt R, Kusche J (2009) Evaluation of GRACE filter tools from a hydrological perspective. Geophys J Int 179: 1499–1515. doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04355.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westra S, Brown C, Lall U, Sharma A (2007) Modeling multivariable hydrological series: principal component analysis or independent component analysis?. Water Resour Res 43: W06429. doi:10.1029/2006WR005617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wouters B, Schrama EJO (2007) Improved accuracy of GRACE gravity solutions through empirical orthogonal function filtering of spherical harmonics. Geophys Res Lett 34: L23711. doi:10.1029/2007GL032098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu J, von Storch H (1990) Predicting the state of the southern oscillation using principal oscillation pattern analysis. J Clim 3: 1316–1329. doi:10.1175/1520-0442(1990)003<1316:PTSOTS>2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zavala-Fernaendez H, Sander T, Burghoff M, Orglmeister R, Trahms L (2006) Comparison of IAC algorithms for the isolation of biological artifacts in magnetoencephalography. Independent component analysis and blind signal separation. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 3889, pp 511–518. doi:10.1007/11679363_64

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformation, Bonn University, Bonn, Germany

    E. Forootan & J. Kusche

Authors
  1. E. Forootan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Kusche
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Forootan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Forootan, E., Kusche, J. Separation of global time-variable gravity signals into maximally independent components. J Geod 86, 477–497 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-011-0532-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-011-0532-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation