Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

New versions of the BDS/GNSS zenith tropospheric delay model IGGtrop

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Geodesy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The initial IGGtrop model proposed for Chinese BDS (BeiDou System) is not very suitable for BDS/GNSS research and application due to its large data volume while it shows a global mean accuracy of 4 cm. New versions of the global zenith tropospheric delay (ZTD) model IGGtrop are developed through further investigation on the spatial and temporal characteristics of global ZTD. From global GNSS ZTD observations and weather reanalysis data, new ZTD characteristics are found and discussed in this study including: small and inconsistent seasonal variation in ZTD between \(10^{\circ }\hbox {S}\, \mathrm{and}\, 10^{\circ }\hbox {N}\) and stable seasonal variation outside; weak zonal variation in ZTD at higher latitudes (north of \(60^{\circ }\hbox {N}\) and south of \(40^{\circ }\hbox {S}\)) and at heights above 6 km, etc. Based on these analyses, new versions of IGGtrop, named \(\hbox {IGGtrop}\_{r}_{{i}}\, ({i}=1, 2, 3)\), are established through employing corresponding strategies: using a simple algorithm for equatorial ZTD; generating an adaptive spatial grid with lower resolutions in regions where ZTD varies little; and creating a method for optimized storage of model parameters. Thus, the \(\hbox {IGGtrop}\_{r}_{{i}}\,({i}=1, 2, 3)\) models require much less parameters than the IGGtrop model, nearly 3.1–21.2 % of that for the IGGtrop model. The three new versions are validated  by five years of GNSS-derived ZTDs at 125 IGS sites, and it shows that: \(\hbox {IGGtrop}\_{r}_{1}\) demonstrates the highest ZTD correction performance, similar to IGGtrop; \(\hbox {IGGtrop}\_{r}_{3}\) requires the least model parameters; \(\hbox {IGGtrop}\_{r}_{2}\) is moderate in both zenith delay prediction performance and number of model parameters. For the \(\hbox {IGGtrop}\_{r}_{3}\) model, the biases at those IGS sites are between \(-6.4\) and 4.3 cm with a mean value of \(-0.8~\)cm and RMS errors are between 2.1 and 8.5 cm with a mean value of 4.0 cm. Different BDS and other GNSS users can choose a suitable model according to their application and research requirements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Collins JP, Langley RB (1997) A tropospheric delay model for the user of the Wide Area Augmentation System. Final contract report for Nav Canada, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering Technical Report No. 187, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, N.B., Canada

  • Collins JP, Langley RB (1998) The residual tropospheric propagation delay: how bad can it get? In: Proceedings of the ION GPS 1998. Nashville, Tennessee, USA, pp 729–738

  • Dow JM, Neilan RE, Rizos C (2009) The international GNSS service in a changing landscape of global navigation satellite systems. J Geod 83:191–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duan JP, Bevis M, Fang P, Bock Y, Chiswell S, Businger S, Rocken C, Solheim F, van Hove T, Ware R, Simon M, Thomas A, Robert WK (1996) GPS meteorology: direct estimation of the absolute value of precipitable water. J Appl Meteorol 35(6):830–838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao Y, Chen K (2004) Performance analysis of precise point positioning using real-time orbit and clock products. J Global Position Syst 3(1–2):95–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopfield HS (1971) Tropospheric effect on electromagnetically measured range: prediction from surface weather data. Radio Sci 6:351–367

  • Kanamitsu M, Ebisuzaki W, Woollen J (2002) NCEP-DEO AMIP-II reanalysis (R-2). Bull Atmos Met Soc 83:1631–1643

  • Krueger E, Schüler T, Hein GW, Martellucci A, Blarzino G (2004) Galileo tropospheric correction approaches developed within GSTB-V1. In: Proceedings of ENC-GNSS

  • Lagler K, Schindelegger M, Böhm J, Krásná H, Nilsson T (2013) GPT2: empirical slant delay model for radio space geodetic techniques. Geophy Res Lett 40(6):1069–1073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leandro RF, Santos MC, Langley RB (2006) UNB neutral atmosphere models: development and performance. In: Proceedings of the ION NTM 2006. Monterey, California, USA, pp 564–573

  • Leandro RF, Langley RB, Santos MC (2008) UNB3m_pack: a neutral atmosphere delay package for radiometric space techniques. GPS Solut 12(1):65–70

  • Leandro RF, Santos MC, Langley RB (2009) A North America wide area neutral atmosphere model for GNSS applications. Navigation 56(1):57–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li W, Yuan YB, Ou JK, Li H, Li ZS (2012) A new global zenith tropospheric delay model IGGtrop for GNSS applications. Chin Sci Bull 57:2132–2139. doi:10.1007/s11434-012-5010-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liou YA, Huang CY, Teng YT (2000) Precipitable water observed by ground-based GPS receivers and microwave radiometry. Earth Planets Space 52(6):445–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liou YA, Teng YT, Van Hove T, Liljegren J (2001) Comparison of precipitable water observations in the near tropics by GPS, microwave radiometer, and radiosondes. J Appl Meteor 40(1):5–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Möller G, Weber R, Böhm J (2013) Improved troposphere blind models based on numerical weather data. In: Proceedings of the ION GNSS 2013. Nashville, Tennessee, USA, pp 2489–2495

  • Penna N, Dodson A, Chen W (2001) Assessment of EGNOS tropospheric correction model. J Navig 54(1):37–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saastamoinen J (1972) Atmospheric correction for the troposphere and stratosphere in radio ranging satellites. Geophy Monogr Ser 15:247–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Schüler T (2014) The TropGrid2 standard tropospheric correction model. GPS Solut 18(1):123–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schüler T, Hein GW, Eissfeller B (2001) A new tropospheric correction model for GNSS navigation. In: Proceedings of GNSS 2001, 5th international symposium on global navigation satellite systems, Instituto de Navigacion de Espana, Sevilla, Spain, 8–11 May

  • Song SL, Zhu WY, Chen QM, Liou YA (2011) Establishment of a new tropospheric delay correction model over China area. Sci China Phys Mech 54(12):2271–2283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uemo M, Hoshinoo K, Matsunaga K, Kawai M, Nakao H, Langley RB, Bisnath SB (2001) Assessment of atmospheric delay correction models for the Japanese MSAS. In: Proceedings of the ION GPS 2001. Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, pp 2341–2350

  • Xu GC (2007) GPS: theory, algorithms and applications. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 55–62

  • Yao YB, He CY, Zhang B, Xu CQ (2013) A new global zenith tropospheric delay model GZTD (in Chinese). Chin J Geophys 56(7):2218–2227

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the IGS for providing GNSS ZTD data and NOAA for providing NCEP reanalysis data. This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China 2012CB825604, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41231064, 41104103, 41021003), the CAS Knowledge Innovation Program (KGCXZ-EW-407-2), the 863 program 2012AA121803, and the National Science Council (NSC) of Taiwan 101-2111-M-008-018.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, W., Yuan, Y., Ou, J. et al. New versions of the BDS/GNSS zenith tropospheric delay model IGGtrop. J Geod 89, 73–80 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-014-0761-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-014-0761-5

Keywords

Navigation