Skip to main content
Log in

The impact of magnetic storms on GPS receiver performance

  • Published:
Journal of Geodesy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

 During the past decade, geodetic measurements have been greatly improved through the use of space geodesy techniques based on the global positioning system (GPS). The GPS allows for precise surveys, where centimetre-level accuracies may be obtained through differential carrier phase-based positioning algorithms. GPS positioning techniques often rely on the availability of dual-frequency data for formation of ionosphere-free and widelane observables (in the case of ambiguity resolution). While GPS positioning results generally provide adequate accuracies for several precise positioning applications, users may experience degraded positioning accuracies over the next few years. Of particular concern are ionospheric phenomena called magnetic storms, which are characterized by an increased spatial decorrelation of ionosphere range delays and scintillation effects at low and high latitudes. During such events, degradations in differential positioning accuracies are observed, and availability of the L2 observations may be limited through loss of signal lock. The magnitude of such effects is estimated during a global magnetic storm event, and a performance comparison of two survey-grade receivers is conducted. This storm is representative of the activity at solar maximum and several years beyond.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 26 May 2000 / Accepted: 4 April 2001

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Skone, S. The impact of magnetic storms on GPS receiver performance. Journal of Geodesy 75, 457–468 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s001900100198

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001900100198

Navigation