Abstract
Generalized Darwinian evolutionary theory has emerged as central to the description of economic process (e.g., Aldrich et al., J Evol Econ 18:577–596, 2008). Just as Darwinian principles provide necessary, but not sufficient, conditions for understanding the dynamics of social entities, so too the asymptotic limit theorems of information theory instantiate another set of necessary conditions that constrain socioeconomic evolution. These restrictions can be formulated as a statistics-like analytic toolbox for the study of empirical data that is consistent with generalized Darwinism, but escapes the intellectual straightjacket of replicator dynamics. The formalism is a coevolutionary theory in which punctuated convergence to temporary quasi-equilibira is inherently nonequilibrium, involving highly dynamic ‘languages’ rather than system stable points.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adami C, Cerf N (2000) Physical complexity of symbolic sequences. Physica D 137:62–69
Adami C, Ofria C, T. Collier T (2000) Evolution of biological complexity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 97:4463–4468
Aldrich H, Hodgson G, Hull D, Knudsen T, Mokyr J, Vanberg V (2008) In defense of generalized Darwinism. J Evol Econ 18:577–596
Ash R (1990) Information theory. Dover, New York
Atlan H, Cohen I (1998) Immune information, self-organization and meaning. Int Immunol 10:711–717
Beck C, Schlogl F (1993) Thermodynamics of chaotic systems: an introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Beinhocker E (2011) Evolution as computation: integrating self-organization with generalized Darwinism. J Evol Econ 7. doi:10.1017/S1744137411000257
Champagnat N, Ferriere R, Meleard S (2006) Unifying evolutionary dynamics: from individual stochastic processes to macroscopic models. Theor Popul Biol 69:297–321
Cover T, Thomas J (1991) Elements of information theory. Wiley, New York
Dembo A, Zeitouni O (1998) Large deviations and applications, 2nd edn. Springer, New York
Diekmann U, Law R (1996) The dynamical theory of coevolution: a derivation from stochastic ecological processes. J Math Biol 34:579–612
Eldredge N, Gould S (1972) Punctuated equilibrium: an alternative to phyletic gradualism. In Schopf T (ed) Models in paleobiology. Freeman, Cooper and Co., San Francisco, pp 82–115
Feynman R (2000) Lectures on computation. Westview, New York
Fodor J, Piatelli-Palmarini M (2010) What Darwin got wrong. Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, New York
Glazebrook JF, Wallace R (2009) Rate distortion manifolds as models for cognitive information. Informatica 33:309–345
Gould S (2002) The structure of evolutionary theory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Haldane A, May R (2011) Systemic risk in banking ecosystems. Nature 469:351–355
Hodgson G, Knudsen T (2006a) Why we need a generalized Darwinism: and why a generalized Darwinism is not enough. J Econ Behav Organ 61:1–19
Hodgson G, Knudsen T (2006b) Dismantling Lamarckism: why descriptions of socioeconomic evolution as Lamarckian are misleading. J Evol Econ 16:343–366
Hodgson G, Knudsen T (2010) Darwin’s conjecture: the search for general principles of social and economic evolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Holling C (1992) Cross-scale morphology, geometry and dynamics of ecosystems. Ecol Monogr 62:447–502
Johnson N (2011) Proposing policy by analogy is risky. Nature 469:302–303
Khinchin A (1957) Mathematical foundations of information theory. Dover, New York
Levin S (1989) Ecology in theory and application. In Levin S, Hallam T, Gross L (eds) Applied mathematical ecology. Biomathematics texts, vol 18. Springer, New York
Lewontin R (2010) Not so natural selection. New York Review of Books. http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2010/may/27/not-so-natural-selection/
Ofria C, Adami C, Collier T (2003) Selective pressures on genomes in molecular evolution. J Theor Biol 222:62–69
Pelikan P (2010) Evolutionary developmental economics: how to generalize Darwinism fruitfully to help comprehend economic change. J Evol Econ 21:341–366. doi:10.1007/s00191-010-0178-0
Pielou E (1977) Mathematical ecology. Wiley, New York
Stoelhorst J (2005) The naturalist view of universal Darwinism: an application of evolutionary theory to the firm. In Finch J, Orillard M (eds) Complexity and the economy: implications for economic policy. Cheltenham, UK, pp 127–147
Stoelhorst J (2008) The explanatory logic and ontological commitments of generalized Darwinism. J Econ Method 15:343–363
Wallace R (2005) Consciousness: a mathematical treatment of the global neuronal workspace model. Springer, New York
Wallace R (2010) Expanding the modern synthesis. C R Biol 333:701–709
Wallace R, Wallace RG (2008a) On the spectrum of prebiotic chemical systems: an information-theoretic treatment of Eigen’s Paradox. Orig Life Evol Biosph 38:419–455
Wallace R, Wallace D (2008b) Punctuated equilibrium in statistical models of generalized coevolutionary resilience. Trans Comput Sys Biol IX, LNBI 5121:23–85
Wallace R, Wallace D (2009) Code, context and epigenetic catalysis in gene expression. Trans Comput Sys Biol XI, LNBI 5750:283–334
Wallace R, Wallace D, Wallace RG (2009) Farming human pathogens: ecological resilience and evolutionary process. Springer, New York
Wymer C (1997) Structural nonlinear continuous-time models in econometrics. Macroecon Dyn 1:518–548
Zhu R, Rebirio A, Salahub D, Kaufmann S (2007) Studying genetic regulatory networks at the molecular level: delayed reaction stochastic models. J Theor Biol 246:725–745
Acknowledgement
The author thanks a reviewer for remarks useful in revision.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wallace, R. A new formal approach to evolutionary processes in socioeconomic systems. J Evol Econ 23, 1–15 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-011-0237-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-011-0237-1