Skip to main content
Log in

The evolution of portfolio rules and the capital asset pricing model

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Economic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to test the performance of capital asset pricing model (CAPM) in an evolutionary framework. We model an economy where a heterogeneous population of long-lived agents invest their wealth according to different portfolio rules, and prove that traders who either “believe” in CAPM and use it as a rule of thumb, or are endowed with genuine mean-variance preferences, under some very weak conditions, vanish in the long run.We show that a sufficient condition to drive CAPM or mean-variance traders’ wealth shares to zero is that an investor endowed with a logarithmic utility function enters the market.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  • Algoet P.H., Cover T.M. (1988) Asymptotic optimality and asymptotic equipartition properties of log-optimum investment. Ann Prob 16: 876–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biais B., Shadur R. (2000). Darwinian selection does not eliminate irrational traders. Eur Econ Rev 44: 469–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blume L.E., Easley D. (1992) Evolution and market behaviour. J Econ Theory 58: 9–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blume, L.E., Easley, D.: If you’re so smart, why aren’t you rich? belief selection in complete and incomplete markets. Econometrica (forthcoming) (2005)

  • Breiman, L.: Optimal gambling systems for favorable games. In: Proceedings of the 4 berkeley symposium. University of California Press 1961

  • Caldarelli, G., Piccioni, M., Sciubba, E.: A numerical study on the evolution of portfolio rules. In: Chen, S.H. (ed) Genetic algorithms and genetic programming in computational finance. Kluwer, Boston (2002)

  • Cooper W.S., Kaplan R.H. (1982) Adaptive ‘Coin-Flipping’: a decision-theoretic examination of natural selection for random individual variation. J Theor Biol 94: 135–151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coury T., Sciubba E. (2005) Belief heterogeneity and survival in incomplete markets. University of Oxford, Mimeo

    Google Scholar 

  • De Long J.B., Shleifer A., Summers L.H., Waldmann R.J. (1990). Noise trader risk in financial markets. J Political Econ 98: 703–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Long J.B., Shleifer A., Summers L.H., Waldmann R.J. (1991). The survival of noise traders in financial markets. J Business 64: 1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama E.F., French K.R.(1996). Multifactor explanations of asset pricing anomalies. J Finance 51: 55–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama F., French K.R. (1996) The CAPM is wanted, dead or alive. J Finance 51: 1947–1958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein M., Whitley R. (1981) Optimal strategies for repeated games. Adv Appl Prob 13: 415–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman M.B.(1974) A negative report on the ‘Near Optimality’ of the max-expected-log policy as applied to bounded utilities for long lived programs. J Financial Econ 1: 97–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guidolin, M.: High equity premia and crash fears. Rational Foundations. Economic Theory (forthcoming) (2005)

  • Hakansson N.H. (1971) Multi-period mean-variance analysis: toward a general theory of portfolio choice. J Finance 26: 857–884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hens T., Schenk-Hoppé K. (2005). Evolutionary stability of porfolio rules in incomplete markets. J Math Econ 41: 43–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jagannathan R., Wang Z. (1996) The conditional CAPM and the cross-sections of expected returns. J Finance 51: 3–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly J.L. (1956) A new interpretation of information rate. Bell Syst Tech J 35: 917–926

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyle A.S., Wang F.A. (1997) Speculation duopoly with agreement to disagree: can overconfidence survive the market test?. J Finance 5: 2073–2090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurz M., Motolese M. (2001). Endogenous uncertainty and market volatility. Econo Theory 17: 497–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latane H.A.(1959). Criteria of choice among risky ventures. J Political Econo 67: 144–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lintner J. (1965) The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets. Review of Economics and Statistics 43: 13–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luenberger D.G. (1993). A preference foundation for log mean-variance criteria in portfolio choice problems. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 17: 887–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mailath G.J., Sandroni A. (2003) Market selection and asymmetric information. Review of Economic Studies 70: 343–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton R.C., Samuelson P.A.(1974). Fallacy of the log-normal approximation to optimal portfolio decision-making over many periods. Journal of Financial Economics 1: 67–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mossin J. (1966) Equilibrium in a capital asset market. Econometrica 34:768–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mossin J. (1968). Optimal multiperiod portfolio policies. Journal of Business 41: 215–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pástor L. (2000). Portfolio selection and asset pricing models. Journal of Finance 55: 179–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandroni A. (2000). Do markets favour agents able to make accurate predictions?. Econometrica 68: 1303–1341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sciubba, E.: The evolution of portfolio rules and the capital asset pricing model. University of Cambridge DAE Working Paper 9909 (1999)

  • Sciubba E. (2005) Asymmetric information and survival in financial markets. Economic Theory 25: 353–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe W.F.(1964). Capital asset prices: a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. Journal of Finance 19: 425–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emanuela Sciubba.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sciubba, E. The evolution of portfolio rules and the capital asset pricing model. Economic Theory 29, 123–150 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-005-0013-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-005-0013-2

Keywords

JEL Classification Numbers

Navigation