Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic optimization with a nonsmooth, nonconvex technology: the case of a linear objective function

  • Special Issue Article
  • Published:
Economic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper studies a one-sector optimal growth model with linear utility in which the production function is only required to be increasing and upper semicontinuous. The model also allows for a general form of irreversible investment. We show that every optimal capital path is strictly monotone until it reaches a steady state; further, it either converges to zero, or reaches a positive steady state in finite time and possibly jumps among different steady states afterwards. We establish conditions for extinction (convergence to zero), survival (boundedness away from zero), and the existence of a critical capital stock below which extinction is possible and above which survival is ensured. These conditions generalize those known for the case of S-shaped production functions. We also show that as the discount factor approaches one, optimal paths converge to a small neighborhood of the capital stock that maximizes sustainable consumption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Azariadis C., Drazen A. (1990). Threshold externalities in economic development. Q J Econ 105, 501–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark C.W. (1971). Economically optimal policies for the utilization of biologically renewable resources . Math Biosci 12, 245–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark C.W. (1990). Mathematical bioeconomics: the optimal management of renewable resources, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dechert W.D., Nishimura K. (1983). A complete characterization of optimal growth paths in an aggregated model with a non-concave production function. J Econ Theory 31, 332–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekeland I., Scheinkman J.A. (1986). Transversality conditions for some infinite horizon discrete time optimization problems. Math Oper Res 11, 216–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi G., Komlósi S. (1992). Dini derivatives in optimization – Part I, Rivista di Matematica per le Scienze Economiche e Sociali 15, 3–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamihigashi T. (1999). Chaotic dynamics in quasi-static systems: theory and applications. J Math Econ 31, 183–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamihigashi T., Roy S. A nonsmooth, nonconvex model of optimal growth. J Econ Theory (forthcoming) (2005)

  • Majumdar M., Mitra T. (1982). Intertemporal allocation with a non-convex technology: the aggregative framework. J Econ Theory 27, 101–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majumdar M., Mitra T. (1983). Dynamic optimization with a non-convex technology: the case of a linear objective function. Rev Econ Stud 50, 143–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majumdar M., Nermuth M. (1982). Dynamic optimization in non-convex models with irreversible investment: monotonicity and turnpike results. J Econ 42, 339–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitra T., Ray D. (1984). Dynamic optimization on a non-convex feasible set: some general results for non-smooth technologies. J Econ 44, 151–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Skiba A.K. (1978). Optimal growth with a convex-concave production function, Econometrica 46, 527–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence M., Starrett D. (1973). Most rapid approach paths in accumulation problems. Int Econ Rev 16, 388–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topkis D.M. (1978). Minimizing a submodular function on a lattice. Oper Res 26, 305–321

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takashi Kamihigashi.

Additional information

This paper is dedicated to Professor Mukul Majumdar on his 60th birthday. His research with various co-authors in the late 70s and the 80s pioneered innovative techniques for the analysis of nonconvex dynamic optimization models – both deterministic and stochastic. Roy considers himself particularly fortunate for having had the opportunity to learn economic theory and mathematical economics from Professor Majumdar. This paper has benefited from helpful comments and suggestions by an anonymous referee. Financial support from the 21st Century COE Program at GSE and RIEB, Kobe University, is gratefully acknowledged.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kamihigashi, T., Roy, S. Dynamic optimization with a nonsmooth, nonconvex technology: the case of a linear objective function. Economic Theory 29, 325–340 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-005-0029-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-005-0029-7

Keywords

JEL Classification Numbers

Navigation