Skip to main content
Log in

Nash implementing non-monotonic social choice rules by awards

  • Published:
Economic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary.

By a slight generalization of the definition of implementation (called implementation by awards), Maskin monotonicity is no more needed for Nash implementation. In fact, a weaker condition, to which we refer as almost monotonicity is both necessary and sufficient for social choice correspondences to be Nash implementable by awards. Hence our framework paves the way to the Nash implementation of social choice rules which otherwise fail to be Nash implementable. In particular, the Pareto social choice rule, the majority rule and the strong core are almost monotonic (hence Nash implementable by awards) while they are not Maskin monotonic (hence fail to be Nash implementable in the standard framework).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Remzi Sanver.

Additional information

Received: 12 April 2004, Revised: 18 March 2005,

JEL Classification Numbers:

D 79.

I thank François Maniquet, Efe Ok and Ipek Ozkal-Sanver for their valuable contributions. The paper is part of a project on Electoral System Design supported by Bilgi University Research Fund.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sanver, M.R. Nash implementing non-monotonic social choice rules by awards. Economic Theory 28, 453–460 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-005-0626-5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-005-0626-5

Keywords and Phrases:

Navigation