Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of three calibration methods to compensate matrix effects in environmental analysis with LC-ESI-MS

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In quantitative analysis of environmental samples using high-performance liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (HPLC-ESI-MS) one of the major problems is the suppression or, less frequently, the enhancement of the analyte signals in the presence of matrix components. Standard addition is the most suitable method for compensating matrix effects, but it is time-consuming and laborious. In this study we compare the potential of three calibration approaches to compensate matrix effects that occurred when seven analytes (naphthalene sulfonates) were quantified in time series samples of waters with different matrices (untreated and treated industrial wastewater). The data obtained by external calibration, internal calibration with one standard, and external sample calibration (corresponding to matrix-matched calibration) were compared with those obtained by standard addition. None of the three approaches were suitable for a sample series of highly loaded, untreated wastewater with highly variable matrix. For less heavily loaded and less variable samples (treated wastewater effluents), the external sample calibration provided reasonable results for most analytes with deviations mostly below 25% as compared to standard addition. External sample calibration can be suitable to compensate matrix effects from moderately loaded samples with more uniform matrices, but it is recommended to verify this for each sample series against the standard addition approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Niessen WMA, Tinke AP (1995) J Chromatogr A 703:37–57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cole RB (1997) Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry – fundamentals, instrumentation and applications. Wiley, New York

  3. Barceló D (1996) Applications of LC-MS in environmental chemistry. Elsevier, Amsterdam

  4. Reemtsma T (2001) Trends Anal Chem 20:500–517

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rosenberg E (2003) J Chromatogr A 1000:841–889

    Google Scholar 

  6. Reemtsma T (2003) J Chromatogr A 1000:477–501

    Google Scholar 

  7. Reemtsma T (2001) Trends Anal Chem 20:533–542

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zrostlíková J, Hajslová J, Poustka J, Begany P (2002) J Chromatogr A 973:13–26

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hajslová J, Zrostlíková J (2003) J Chromatogr A 1000:181–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Barnes KA, Fussel RJ, Startin JR, Pegg MK, Thorpe SA, Reynolds SL (1997) Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 11:117–123

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Buhrmann DL, Price PI, Rudewicz PJ (1996) J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 7:1099-1105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Choi BK, Gusev AI, Hercules DM (1999) Anal Chem 71:4107-4110

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Choi BK, Hercules DM, Gusev AI (2001) J Chromatogr A 907:337-342

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Choi BK, Hercules DM, Gusev AI (2001) Fresenius J Anal Chem 369:370-377

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pascoe R, Foley JP, Gusev AI (2001) Anal Chem 73:6014-6023

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dijkman E, Mooibroek D, Hoogerbrugge R, Hogendoorn E, Sancho J-V, Pozo O, Hernández F (2001) J Chromatogr A 926:113-125

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ikonomou MG, Blades AT, Kebarle P (1991) Anal Chem 63:1989-1998

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kebarle P, Tang L (1993) Anal Chem 65:972A-978A

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Fenn JB, Rosell J, Meng CK (1997) J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 8:1147-1157

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bruins AP (1998) J Chromatogr A 794:345-357

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kebarle P (2000) J Mass Spectrom 35:804-817

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Thomson BA, Iribarne JV (1979) J Chem Phys 71:4451-4463

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Matuszewski BK, Constanzer ML, Chavez-Eng CM (1998) Anal Chem 70:882-889

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Di Corcia A, Constantino A, Crescenzi C, Samperi R (1999) J Chromatogr A 852:465-474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Clarke SD, Hill HM, Noctor TAG, Thomas D (1996) Pharm Sci 2:203-207

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Matuszewski BK, Constanzer ML, Chavez-Eng CM (2003) Anal Chem 75:3019–3030

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ito S, Tsukada K (2001) J Chromatogr A 943:39-46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Krauth K (1996) Water Sci Tech 34(3):389-394

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Reemtsma T, Zywicki B, Stueber M, Kloepfer A, Jekel M (2002) Environ Sci Technol 36:1102–1106

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Storm T, Reemtsma T, Jekel M (1999) J Chromatogr A 854:175–185

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Stueber M, Reemtsma T, Jekel M (2002) Vom Wasser 98:133–144

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding by the German Research Council (DFG, Bonn) through SFB 193 ‘Biological treatment of industrial wastewater’ TP A14 and by the European Union through the project P-THREE (EVK1-CT-2002–00116) is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Water Quality Control, Technical University of Berlin, Sekr KF 4, Strasse des 17 Juni 135, 10623, Berlin, Germany

    Markus Stüber & Thorsten Reemtsma

Authors
  1. Markus Stüber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thorsten Reemtsma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thorsten Reemtsma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stüber, M., Reemtsma, T. Evaluation of three calibration methods to compensate matrix effects in environmental analysis with LC-ESI-MS. Anal Bioanal Chem 378, 910–916 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-003-2442-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-003-2442-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation