Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Factors Controlling Sediment Denitrification in Midwestern Streams of Varying Land Use

  • Published:
Microbial Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigated controls on stream sediment denitrification in nine headwater streams in the Kalamazoo River Watershed, Michigan, USA. Factors influencing denitrification were determined by using experimental assays based on the chloramphenicol-amended acetylene inhibition technique. Using a coring technique, we found that sediment denitrification was highest in the top 5 cm of the benthos and was positively related to sediment organic content. To determine the effect of overlying water quality on sediment denitrification, first-order stream sediments were assayed with water from second- and third-order downstream reaches, and often showed higher denitrification rates relative to assays using site-specific water from the first-order stream reach. Denitrification was positively related to nitrate (NO3 ) concentration, suggesting that sediments may have been nutrient-limited. Using stream-incubated inorganic substrata of varying size classes, we found that finer-grained sand showed higher rates of denitrification compared to large pebbles, likely due to increased surface area per volume of substratum. Denitrification was measurable on both inorganic substrata and fine particulate organic matter loosely associated with inorganic particles, and denitrification rates were related to organic content. Using nutrient-amended denitrification assays, we found that sediment denitrification was limited by NO3 or dissolved organic carbon (DOC, as dextrose) variably throughout the year. The frequency and type of limitation differed with land use in the watershed: forested streams were NO3 -limited or co-limited by both NO3 and DOC 92% of the time, urban streams were more often NO3 -limited than DOC-limited, whereas agricultural stream sediments were DOC-limited or co-limited but not frequently limited by NO3 alone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alexander, RB, Smith, RA, Schwarz, GE (2000) Effect of stream channel size on the delivery of nitrogen to the Gulf of Mexico. Nature 403: 758–761

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. APHA (American Public Health Association) (1995) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 19th ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bernot, MJ, Dodds, WK, Gardner, WS, McCarthy, MJ, Sobolev, D, Tank, JL (2003) Comparing denitrification estimates for a Texas estuary by using acetylene inhibition and membrane inlet mass spectrometry. Appl Environ Microbiol 69: 5950–5956

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bölhke, JK, Harvey, JW, Voytek, MA (2004) Reach-scale isotope tracer experiment to quantify denitrification and related processes in a nitrate-rich stream, mid-continent United States. Limnol Oceanogr 49: 821–838

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brock, TD (1961) Chloramphenicol. Bacteriol Rev 25: 32–48

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. David, MB, Gentry, LE, Kovacic, DA, Smith, KM (1997) Nitrogen balance in and export from an agricultural watershed. J Environ Qual 26: 1038–1048

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Garcia-Ruiz, R, Pattinson, SN, Whitton, BA (1998a) Denitrification and nitrous oxide production in sediments of the Wiske, a lowland eutrophic river. Sci Total Environ 210–211: 307–320

    Google Scholar 

  8. Garcia-Ruiz, R, Pattinson, SN, Whitton, BA (1998b) Denitrification in river sediments: relationship between process rate and properties of water and sediment. Freshw Biol 39: 467–476

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Goolsby, DA, Battaglin, WA, Aulenbach, BT, Hooper, RP (2001) Nitrogen input to the Gulf of Mexico. J Environ Qual 30: 329–336

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Groffman, PM, Boulware, NJ, Zipperer, WC, Pouyat, RV, Band, LE, Colosimo, MF (2002) Soil nitrogen cycle processes in urban riparian zones. Environ Sci Technol 36: 4547–4552

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hedin, LO, von Fischer, JC, Ostrom, NE, Kennedy, BP, Brown, MG, Robertson, GP (1998) Thermodynamic constraints on nitrogen transformations and other biogeochemical processes at soil–stream interfaces. Ecology 79: 684–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hill, AR, Devito, KJ, Campagnolo, S, Sanmugadas, K (2000) Subsurface denitrification in a forest riparian zone: interactions between hydrology and supplies of nitrate and organic carbon. Biogeochemistry 51: 193–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Inwood, SE, Tank, JL, Bernot, MJ (2005) The influence of land use on sediment denitrification in 9 midwestern streams. J N Am Benthol Soc 24: 227–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kemp, MJ, Dodds, WK (2002a) Comparisons of nitrification and denitrification in prairie and agriculturally influenced streams. Ecol Appl 12: 998–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kemp, MJ, Dodds, WK (2002b) The influence of ammonium, nitrate, and dissolved oxygen concentrations on uptake, nitrification, and denitrification rates associated with prairie stream substrata. Limnol Oceanogr 47: 1380–1393

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Knowles, R (1982) Denitrification. Microbiol Rev 46: 43–70

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Laursen, A, Seitzinger, SP (2003) Measurement of denitrification in rivers: an integrated whole reach approach. Hydrobiologia 485: 67–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lauver, L, Baker, LA (2000) Mass balance for wastewater nitrogen in the Central Arizona–Phoenix ecosystem. Water Res 34: 2754–2760

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Livingstone, MW, Smith, RV, Laughlin, RJ (2000) A spatial study of denitrification potential of sediments in Belfast and Strangford loughs and its significance. Sci Total Environ 251–252: 369–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Martin, LA, Mulholland, PJ, Webster, JR, Valett, HM (2001) Denitrification potential in sediments of headwater streams in the southern Appalachian Mountains, USA. J N Am Benthol Soc 20: 505–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. McIsaac, GF, David, MB, Gertner, BZ, Goolsby, DA (2001) Nitrate flux in the Mississippi River. Nature 414: 166–167

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mitsch, WJ, Day, JW Jr, Gilliam, W, Groffman, PM, Hey, DL, Randall, GW, Wang, N (2001) Reducing the nitrogen loading to the Gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi River Basin: strategies to counter a persistent ecological problem. Bioscience 51: 373–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mulholland, PJ, Valett, HM, Webster, JR, Thomas, SA, Cooper, LW, Hamilton, SK, Peterson, BJ (2004) Stream denitrification and total nitrate uptake rates measured using a field 15N tracer addition approach. Limnol Oceanogr 49: 809–820

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Pattinson, SN, Garcia-Ruiz, R, Whitton, BA (1998) Spatial and seasonal variation in denitrification in the Swale–Ouse system, a river continuum. Sci Total Environ 210–211: 289–305

    Google Scholar 

  25. Peterson, RJ, Wollheim, WM, Mulholland, PJ, Webster, JR, Meyer, JL, Tank, JL, Marti, E, Bowden, WB, Valett, HM, Hershey, AE, McDowell, WH, Dodds, WK, Hamilton, SK, Gregory, S, Morrall, DD (2001) Control of N export from watershed by headwater streams. Science 292: 86–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Richardson, WB, Strauss, EA, Bartsch, LA, Monroe, EM, Cavanaugh, JC, Vingum, L, Soballe, DM (2004) Denitrification in the Upper Mississippi River: rates, controls, and contribution to nitrate flux. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 61: 1102–1112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Risgaard-Petersen, N (2003) Coupled nitrification–denitrification in autotrophic and heterotrophic estuarine sediments: on the influence of benthic microalgae. Limnol Oceanogr 48: 93–105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Royer, TV, Tank, JL, David, MB (2004) Transport and fate of nitrate in headwater agricultural streams in Illinois. J Environ Qual 33: 1296–1304

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Schaller, JL, Royer, TV, David, MB, Tank, JL (2004) Denitrification in plant beds and benthic sediments of an agricultural stream and its effect on a nitrogen budget. J N Am Benthol Soc 23: 667–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Seitzinger, SP (1988) Denitrification in freshwater and coastal marine ecosystems: ecological and geochemical significance. Limnol Oceanogr 33(2): 702–724

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Seitzinger, SP, Styles, RV, Boyer, EW, Alexander, RB, Billen, G, Howarth, RW, Mayer, B, van Breeman, N (2002) Nitrogen retention in rivers: model development and application to watersheds in the northeastern USA. Biogeochem 57–58: 199–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Smith, MS, Tiedje, JM (1979) Phases of denitrification following oxygen depletion in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 11: 261–267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Tank, JL, Dodds, WK (2003) Nutrient limitation of epilithic and epixylic biofilms in ten North American streams. Freshw Biol 48: 1031–1049

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Tiedje, JS (1982) Denitrification. In: Page, AL (Ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis, Part II, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp 1011–1026

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tiedje, JS, Groffman, PM (1989) Perspectives on measurement of denitrification in the field including recommended protocols for acetylene based methods. In: Clarholm, M, Bergström, L (Eds.) Ecology of Arable Land, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Amsterdam, pp 217–240

    Google Scholar 

  36. USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (1993) The determination of inorganic anions in water by ion chromatography. Method 300.0. Cincinnati, Ohio

  37. van Breeman, N, Boyer, EW, Goodale, CL, Jaworski, NA, Paustian, K, Seitzinger, SP, Lajtha, K, Mayer, B, van Dam, D, Howarth, RW, Nadelhoffer, KJ, Eve, M, Billen, G (2002) Where did all the nitrogen go? Fate of nitrogen inputs to large watersheds in the northeastern USA. Biogeochemistry 57–58: 267–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Vitousek, PM, Aber, JD, Howarth, RW, Likens, GE, Matson, PA, Schindler, DW, Schlesinger, WH, Tilman, DG (1997) Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: sources and consequences. Ecol Appl 7: 737–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wall, L (2003) Spatial and temporal variability of sediment denitrification within an agriculturally influenced reservoir. Master’s thesis, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana

  40. Wang, F, Juniper, SK, Pelegri, SP, Macko, SA (2003) Denitrification in sediments of the Laurentian Trough, St. Lawrence Estuary, Quebec, Canada. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 57: 515–522

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Westerhoff, P, Aiken, G, Gary, G, Debroux, J (1999) Relationships between the structure of natural organic matter and its reactivity towards molecular ozone and hydroxyl radicals. Water Res 33: 2265–2276

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Zumft, WG (1997) Cell biology and molecular basis of denitrification. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 61: 533–616

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Lareina Wall and Todd Royer for helpful comments on rate calculations and early drafts of the manuscript; Clay Arango for GIS support, Jake Beaulieu, Denise Bruesewitz, Laura Taylor, and Josh Inwood for field assistance. This research was funded in part by USDA-CSREES 2001-35102-10778 and NSF-DEB 0111410.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer L. Tank.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Inwood, S.E., Tank, J.L. & Bernot, M.J. Factors Controlling Sediment Denitrification in Midwestern Streams of Varying Land Use. Microb Ecol 53, 247–258 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-006-9104-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-006-9104-2

Keywords

Navigation