Skip to main content
Log in

Fungal and Bacterial Community Succession Differs for Three Wood Types during Decay in a Forest Soil

  • Environmental Microbiology
  • Published:
Microbial Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wood decomposition by soil microorganisms is vital to carbon and nutrient cycles of forested ecosystems. Different wood types decompose at different rates; however, it is not known if there are differences in microbial community succession associated with the decay of different wood types. In this study, the microbial community associated with the decay of pine (decay-susceptible wood), western red cedar (decay resistant) and ACQ-treated pine (Ammoniacal Copper Quaternary, preservative-treated pine for decay resistance) in forest soil was characterized using DNA sequencing, phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) analysis, and microbial activity over a 26-month period. Bray–Curtis ordination using an internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequence and PLFA data indicated that fungal communities changed during succession and that wood type altered the pattern of succession. Nondecay fungi decreased over the 26 months of succession; however, by 18 months of decay, there was a major shift in the fungal communities. By this time, Trametes elegans dominated cedar and Phlebia radiata dominated pine and ACQ-treated pine. The description of PLFA associated with ACQ-treated pine resembled cedar more than pine; however, both PLFA and ITS descriptions indicated that fungal communities associated with ACQ-treated pine were less dynamic, perhaps a result of the inhibition by the ACQ preservative, compared with pine and cedar. Overall, fungal community composition and succession were associated with wood type. Further research into the differences in community composition will help to discern their functional importance to wood decay.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Elliott WM, Elliott NB, Wyman RL (1993) Relative effect of litter and forest type on rate of decomposition. Am Midl Nat 129:87–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Freedman B, Zelazny V, Beaudette D, Fleming T, Johnson G, Flemming S, Gerrow J, Forbes G, Woodley S (1996) Biodiversity implications of changes in the quantity of dead organic matter in managed forests. Environ Rev 4:238–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yavitt JB, Fahey TJ (1986) Litter decay and leaching from the forest floor in Pinus contorta (lodgepole pine) ecosystems. J Ecol 74:525–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Donnelly PK, Entry JA, Crawford DL, Cromack K Jr (1990) Cellulose and lignin degradation in forest soils: response to moisture, temperature, and acidity. Microb Ecol 20:289–95

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Eriksson K-EL, Blanchette RA, Ander P (1990) Microbial and enzymatic degradation of wood and wood components. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Greaves H (1971) The bacterial factor in wood decay. Wood Sci Technol 5:6–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Blanchette RA (2000) A review of microbial deterioration found in archaeological wood from different environments. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 46:189–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Clausen CA (1996) Bacterial associations with decaying wood: a review. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 37:101–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Greaves H (1970) The effect of some wood-inhabiting bacteria on the permeability characteristics and microscopic features of Eucalyptus regnans and Pinus radiata sapwood and heartwood. Holzforschung Int J Biol Chem Phys Technol Wood 24:6–14

    Google Scholar 

  10. Williamson RA, Nickens PR (2000) Science and Technology in Historic Preservation by Ray A. Williamson; Paul R. Nickens; Kluwer Academic/Plenum publishers. New York

  11. Boddy L (2001) Fungal community ecology and wood decomposition processes in angiosperms: from standing tree to complete decay of coarse woody debris. Ecol Bull 49:43–56

    Google Scholar 

  12. Highley TL, Dashek WV (1998) Biotechnology in the study of brown-and white-rot decay. In: Bruce Alan, Palfreyman John W, (eds) Forest products biotechnology. Great Britain: Taylor & Francis, London :15–36

  13. Fukasawa Y, Osono T, Takeda H (2009) Dynamics of physicochemical properties and occurrence of fungal fruit bodies during decomposition of coarse woody debris of Fagus crenata. J Forest Res 14:20–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hyde KD, Jones E (2002) Introduction to fungal succession. Fungal Divers 10:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rajala T, Peltoniemi M, Hantula J, Mäkipää R, Pennanen T (2011) RNA reveals a succession of active fungi during the decay of Norway spruce logs. Fungal Ecol 4:437–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kebli H, Drouin P, Brais S, Kernaghan G (2011) Species composition of saproxylic fungal communities on decaying logs in the boreal forest. Microb Ecol 61:898–910

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rajala T, Peltoniemi M, Pennanen T, Mäkipää R (2012) Fungal community dynamics in relation to substrate quality of decaying Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) logs in boreal forests. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 81:494–505

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ponge J-F (2010) Fungal communities: relation to resource succession. The fungal community: its organization and role in the ecosystem 23: 169

  19. Renvall P (1995) Community structure and dynamics of wood-rotting basidiomycetes on decomposing conifer trunks in northern Finland. Karstenia 35:1–51

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rayner AD, Boddy L (1988) Fungal decomposition of wood. Its biology and ecology. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mun SP, Prewitt L (2011) Antifungal activity of organic extracts from Juniperus virginiana heartwood against wood decay fungi. For Prod J 61:443–9

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Laboratory FP (1987) Wood handbook: wood as an engineering material. United States Government Printing

  23. White NA, Boddy L (1992) Extracellular enzyme localization during interspecific fungal interactions. FEMS Microbiol Lett 98:75–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. American Wood Protection Association (2008) AWPA book of standards. Processing and treatment standard. AWPA Method T1-08. American Wood Protection Association

  25. Kang Y, Prewitt L, Diehl S, Nicholas D (2010) Screening of basidiomycetes and gene expression of selected lignin modifying enzymes of Phlebia radiata during biodeterioration of three wood types. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 64:545–53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. American Wood Protection Association (2006) Accelerated method of evaluating wood preservatives in soil contact. Standard method of evaluating wood preservatives by field tests with stakes. AWPA Method E23-06. Book of standards American Wood Protection Association

  27. Gardes M, Bruns TD (1993) ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol Ecol 2:113–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. White DC, Ringelberg DB (1998) Signature lipid biomarker analysis. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  29. Butler JL, Williams MA, Bottomley PJ, Myrold DD (2003) Microbial community dynamics associated with rhizosphere carbon flow. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:6793–800

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Williams MA, Myrold DD, Bottomley PJ (2006) Carbon flow from 13C-labeled straw and root residues into the phospholipid fatty acids of a soil microbial community under field conditions. Soil Biol Biochem 38:759–68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. McCune B, Grace JB (2002) Analysis of ecological communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach

    Google Scholar 

  32. Schloss PD, Handelsman J (2005) Introducing DOTUR, a computer program for defining operational taxonomic units and estimating species richness. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:1501–6

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Amirta R, Tanabe T, Watanabe T, Honda Y, Kuwahara M, Watanabe T (2006) Methane fermentation of Japanese cedar wood pretreated with a white rot fungus, Ceriporiopsis subvermispora. J Biotechnol 123:71–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Illman BL, Yang VW, Ferge L (2000) Bioprocessing preservative-treated waste wood. Stockholm, IRG Secretariat

    Google Scholar 

  35. Okano K, Kitagawa M, Sasaki Y, Watanabe T (2005) Conversion of Japanese red cedar (Cryptomeria japonica) into a feed for ruminants by white-rot basidiomycetes. Anim Feed Sci Technol 120:235–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Levy J, Eveleigh D (1987) The natural history of the degradation of wood [and discussion]. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A Math Phys Sci 321:423–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Boddy L (2000) Interspecific combative interactions between wood‐decaying basidiomycetes. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 31:185–94

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hammel K (1997) Fungal degradation of lignin. Driven by nature: plant litter quality and decomposition. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 33–46

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hatakka AI (1983) Pretreatment of wheat straw by white-rot fungi for enzymic saccharification of cellulose. Eur J Appl Microbiol 18:350–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Eaton RA, Hale MD (1993) Wood: decay, pests and protection. Chapman and Hall Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  41. Mettlemary SP, Cooper P (2011) Influence of alkaline copper quat (ACQ) solution parameters on copper complex distribution and leaching. University of Toronto

  42. Rui C, Morrell JJ (1994) Assessing biocide effects on protoplasts of wood decay fungi. Wood Fiber Sci 26:205–11

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Grogan DW, Cronan JE (1997) Cyclopropane ring formation in membrane lipids of bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 61:429–41

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support for this work provided by the National Science Foundation (MCB-0641788) and the Lucas Biodeterioration Center. Also, special thanks to Mr. Min Lee for his help in this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Williams.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Prewitt, L., Kang, Y., Kakumanu, M.L. et al. Fungal and Bacterial Community Succession Differs for Three Wood Types during Decay in a Forest Soil. Microb Ecol 68, 212–221 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-014-0396-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-014-0396-3

Keywords

Navigation