Skip to main content
Log in

Land degradation assessment based on environmental geoindicators in the Fortaleza metropolitan region, state of Ceará, Brazil

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Geology

Abstract

This paper summarizes the results obtained by land degradation assessment in the Fortaleza Metropolitan Region, in the state of Ceará, Brazil. Area assessment was done in a two-phase study: the characterization of the environmental components by field and laboratory work, and a more detailed study in the degraded sites. Environmental geoindicators were used to classify the degradation level for each drainage basin as low, intermediate, or high. Coastal erosion, gravitational mass movements, dune movements, water erosion, sedimentation, water pollution, sanitary landfills in inappropriate sites, caves and abandoned mines of aggregates exploitation and occupation in swamp areas are the main land degradation sources registered in the region. Among the drainage basins for degradation level, 5 were classified as high, 3 as intermediate, and 4 as low. These problems have affected the people living in the region and demanded heavy investments to rehabilitate degraded areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6a,b a
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11a,b
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

References

  • Allen NT, Brooks DR, Jesson JG (1990) Multiple land-use and mineral sands mining on Australia’s east coast. In: Proc Aust Min Ind Co Environ Workshop, vol 2, Wollongong, October 1990, pp 159–194

  • Baraldi F, Castaldini D, Marchetti M (2001) Geomorphological impact assessment in the River Mincio plain (Province of Mantova, Northern Italy). In: Marchetti M, Pinas V (eds) Geomorphology and environmental impact assessments. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 7–30

  • Barrow CJ (1991) Land degradation. Cambridge University Press, New York, 295 pp

  • Berger AR (1996) The geoindicator concept and its application: an introduction. In: Berger AR, Iams WJ (eds) Geoindicators: assessing rapid environmental changes in Earth systems. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 1–14

  • Berger AR, Iams WJ (eds) (1996) Geoindicators: assessing rapid environmental changes in Earth systems. Balkema, Rotterdam, 466 pp

  • Berger AR (1997) Assessing rapid environmental change using geoindicators. Environ Geol 32(1):36–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaike P, Brookfield H (1987) Land degradation and society. Methuen, London

  • Brunsden D, Moore R (1999) Engineering geomorphology on the coast: lessons from West Dorset. Geomorphology 31:391–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bush DM, Neal WJ, Young RS, Pilkey OH (1999) Utilization of geoindicators for rapid assessment of coastal-hazard risk and mitigation. Ocean Coast Manage 42:647–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conacher AJ, Sola M (eds) (1999) Land degradation in Mediterranean environments of the World: nature and extent, causes and solutions. Wiley, New York, 491 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg AC (2000) Interpretations of environmental change and diversity: a critical approach to indications of degradation – The case of Kalakamate, northeast Botswana. Land Degrad Dev 11:549–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of the Environment (1990) The government’s response to the First Report from the House of Commons Select Committee on the environment on contaminated land. HMSO, London

  • Dumansk J, Pieri C (2000) Land quality indicators: research plan. Agr Ecosyst Environ 81:93–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (1979) A provisional methodology for soil degradation assessment. FAO, Rome

  • Forbes DL, Liverman DGE (1996) Geological indicators in the coastal zone. In: Berger AR, Iams WJ (eds) Geoindicators: assessing rapid environmental changes in Earth systems. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 175–195

  • Gray LC (1999) Is land being degraded? A multi-scale investigation of landscape change in southwestern Burkina Faso. Land Degrad Dev 10:329–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta A (2002) Geoindicators for tropical urbanization. Environ Geol 42:736–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond A, Adriaanse A, Rodenburg E, Bryant D, Woodward R (1995) Environmetal indicators: a systematic approach to measuring and reporting on environmental policy performance in the context of sustainable development. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (2002) Dados sobre os censos desenvolvidos no Brasil desde 1980 até 2002. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil

  • Johnson D, Lewis L (1995) Land degradation: creation and destruction. Blackwell, Oxford, 490 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson DN, Lamb P, Saul M, Winter-Nelson AE (1997) Meaning of environmental terms. J Environ Qual 26:581–589

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lindskog P, Tengberg A (1994) Land degradation, natural resources and local knowledge in the Sahel zone of Burkina Faso. Geojournal 33:365–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubke RA, Avis AM (1998) A review of the concepts and application of rehabilitation following heavy mineral dune mining. Mar Poll Bull 37(8–12):546–557

    Google Scholar 

  • Maltby E (1986) Water logged wealth : why waste the World’s wet places? Earthscan, London, 530 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti M, Panizza M (2001) Geomorphology and environmental impact assesssment: - a case study in Moema ( Dolomites – Italy). In: Marchetti M, Pinas V (eds) Geomorphology and environmental impact assessments. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 71–82

  • Martin Duque JF, Pedroza J, Díez A, Sanz MA, Carrasco RM (1998) A geomorphological design for the rehabilitation of an abandoned sand quarry in central Spain. Landscape Urban Plan 42:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morton RA (1996) Geoindicators of coastal wet land and shorelines. In: Berger AR, Iams WJ (eds) Geoindicators: assessing rapid environmental changes in Earth systems. Balkemia, Rotterdam, pp:207–232

  • Morton RA (2002) Coastal geoindicators of environmental change in the humic tropics. Environ Geol 42:711–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murthy RC, Rao YR, Inamdar AB (2001) Integrated coastal management of Mumbai metropolitan region. Ocean Coast Manage 44:355–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neimanis U, Kerr A (1996) Developing national environmental geoindicators. In: Berger AR, Iams WJ (eds) Geoindicators: assessing rapid environmental changes in Earth systems. Balkemia, Rotterdam, pp 369–376

  • Osterkamp WR, Schumm SA (1996) Geoindicators for river and river-valley monitoring. In: Berger AR, Iams WJ (eds) Geoindicators: assessing rapid environmental changes in Earth systems. Balkemia, Rotterdam, pp 97–114

  • Osterkamp WR (2002) Geoindicators for river and river-valley monitoring in the humid tropics. Environ Geol 42:725–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilkey OH (1991) Coastal erosion. Episodes 14(1):46–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Radbruch-hall DA, Varnes DJ (1976) Landslide-cause and effects. Bull Int Assoc Eng Geol 14:205–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Riksen MJPM, DeGraaf J (2001) On-site and off-site affects of wind erosion on European light soils. Land Degrad Dev 12:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stocking MA (1993) Soil erosion in developing countries: where geomorphology fears to tread. School of Development Studies Discussion. Paper no 241

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeung YM (2001) Coastal mega cities in Asia: transformation, sustainability and management. Ocean Coast Manage 44:319–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. V. Zuquette.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zuquette, L.V., Pejon, O.J. & dos Santos Collares, J.Q. Land degradation assessment based on environmental geoindicators in the Fortaleza metropolitan region, state of Ceará, Brazil. Env Geol 45, 408–425 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-003-0892-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-003-0892-0

Keywords

Navigation