Skip to main content
Log in

Assessing the impacts of land use changes on watershed hydrology using MIKE SHE

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Geology

Abstract

A fully distributed, physically-based hydrologic modeling system, MIKE SHE, was used in this study to investigate whole-watershed hydrologic response to land use changes within the Gyeongancheon watershed in Korea. A grid of 200 × 200 m was established to represent spatial variations in geology, soil, and land use. Initial model performance was evaluated by comparing observed and simulated streamflow from 1988 to 1991. Results indicated that the calibrated MIKE SHE model was able to predict streamflow well during the calibration and validation periods. Proportional changes in five classes of land use within the watershed were derived from multi-temporal Landsat TM imageries taken in 1980, 1990 and 2000. These imageries revealed that the watershed experienced conversion of approximately 10% non-urban area to urban area between 1980 and 2000. The calibrated MIKE SHE model was then programmed to repeatedly analyze an artificial dataset under the various land use proportions identified in the Landsat TM imageries. The analysis was made to quantitatively assess the impact of land use changes (predominantly urbanization) on watershed hydrology. There were increases in total runoff (5.5%) and overland flow (24.8%) as a response to the land use change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott MB, Bathurst JC, Cunge JA, O’Connell PE, Rasmussen J (1986a) An introduction to the European hydrological system-Systeme Hydrologique Europeen, “SHE”, 1: history and philosophy of a physically-based, distributed modeling system. J Hydrol 87:45–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbott MB, Bathurst JC, Cunge JA, O’Connell PE, Rasmussen J (1986b) An introduction to the European hydrological system-Systeme Hydrologique Europeen, “SHE”, 2: structure of a physically-based, distributed modeling system. J Hydrol 87:61–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bathurst JC (1986) Physically-based distributed modeling of an upland catchment using the Systeme Hydrologique Europeen. J Hydrol 87:79–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beven KJ (1989) Changing ideas in hydrology: the case of physically-based models. J Hydrol 105:157–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beverly C, Bari M, Christy B, Hocking M, Smettem K (2005) Predicted salinity impacts from land use change: comparison between rapid assessment approaches and a detailed modeling framework. Aust J Exp Agric 45(11):1453–1469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calder IR (1992) Hydrologic effects of land use change. In: Maidment DR (ed) Handbook of hydrology. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • DHI (Danish Hydraulic Institute) (1999) MIKE SHE water movement: user manual, Hørsholm, Denmark

  • Engman ET (1986) Roughness coefficients for routing surface runoff. J Irrig Drain Eng 112(1):39–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewen J, Parkin G (1996) Validation of catchment models for predicting land-use and climate change impacts. 1. Method. J Hydrol 175:583–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (1998) Crop evapotranspiration, FAO irrigation and drainage Paper No. 56, Rome

  • Feyen L, Vázquez R, Christiaens K, Sels O, Feyen J (2000) Application of a distributed physically-based hydrological model to a medium size catchment. Hydro Earth Syst Sci 4(1):47–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Fohrer N, Haverkamp S, Eckhardt K, Frede HG (2001) Hydrologic response to land use changes on the catchment scale. Phys Chem Earth 26(7–8):577–582

    Google Scholar 

  • Grayson RB, Moore ID, McMahon TA (1992) Physically based hydrologic modeling, 1. A terrain-based model for investigative purposes. Water Resour Res 28:2639–2658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henriksen HJ, Troldborg L, Nyegaard P, Sonnenborg TO, Refsgaard JC, Madsen B (2003) Methodology for construction, calibration and validation of a national hydrological model for Denmark. J Hydrol 280(1):52–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hundecha Y, Bárdossy A (2004) Modeling of the effect of land use changes on the runoff generation of a river basin through parameter regionalization of a watershed model. J Hydrol 292:281–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Im S, Brannan KM, Mostaghimi S (2003) Simulating hydrologic and water quality impacts on an urbanizing watershed. J Am Water Resour Assoc 39(6):1465–1479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain SK, Storm B, Bathurst JC, Refsgaard JC, Singh RD (1992) Application of the SHE to catchments in India: Part 2. Field experiments and simulation studies with the SHE on the Kolar subcatchment of the Narmada River. J Hydrol 140:25–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayatilaka CJ, Storm B, Mudgway LB (1998) Simulation of water flow on irrigation bay scale with MIKE-SHE. J Hydrol 208:108–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KICT (Korea Institute of Construction Technology) (2003) Operation and research on the hydrological characteristics of the experimental catchment. KICT Report No. 2003-051, Goyang, Korea

  • Klöcking B, Haberlandt U (2002) Impact of land use changes on water dynamics: a case study in temperature meso and macroscale river basin. Phys Chem Earth 27:619–629

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen KJ, Jensen SE (1975) A model for estimating actual evapotranspiration from potential evapotranspiration. Nord Hydro 6:170–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuczera G, Raper GP, Brah NS, Jayasuriya MD (1993) Modelling yield changes after strip thinning in a mountain ash catchment: an exercise in catchment model validation. J Hydrol 150:433–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lørup JK, Refsgaard JC, Mazvimavi D (1998) Assessing the effect of land use change on catchment runoff by combined use of statistical tests and hydrological modeling: case studies from Zimbabwe. J Hydrol 205:147–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCuen RH (2002) Modeling hydrologic change: statistical methods, Lewis Publishers

  • Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models. J Hydrol 10:282–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neitsch SL, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Williams JR (2005) Soil and water assessment tool theoretical documentation. ARS, TX

    Google Scholar 

  • Oogathoo S (2006) Runoff simulation in the Canagagigue Creek watershed using the MIKE SHE model. McGill University, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  • RDA (Rural Development Administration) (1992) The Korea soil database. RDA Report No. 13, Suwon, Korea

  • RDA (2005) The experimental report of crop growth and yield, Suwon, Korea

  • Refsgaard JC (1997) Parameterisation, calibration and validation of distributed hydrological models. J Hydrol 198:69–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Refsgaard JC, Storm B (1995) MIKE SHE In: Singh VP (ed) Computer models of watershed hydrology. Water Resources Publications CO, USA, pp 806–846

    Google Scholar 

  • Refsgaard JC, Seth SM, Bathurst JC, Erlich M, Storm B, Jørgensen GH, Chandra S (1992) Application of the SHE to catchments in India; Part I. General results. J Hydrol 140:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutter AJ, Kershaw KA, Robins PC, Morton AJ (1971) A predictive model of rainfall interception in forests. I. Derivation of the model from observations in a plantation of Corsican pine. Agric Meteorol 9:367–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahoo GB, Ray C, De Carlo EH (2006) Calibration and validation of a physically distributed hydrological model, MIKE SHE, to predict streamflow at high frequency in a flashy mountainous Hawaii stream. J Hydrol 327:94–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siriwardena L, Finlayson BL, McMahon TA (2006) The impact of land use change on catchment hydrology in large catchments: the Comet River, central Queensland, Australia. J Hydrol 326:199–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thanapakpawin P, Richey J, Thomas D, Rodda S, Campbell B, Logsdon M (2007) Effects of landuse change on the hydrologic regime of the Mae Chaem river basin, NW Thailand. J Hydrol 334:215–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JR, Sørenson HR, Gavin H, Refsgaard A (2004) Application of the coupled MIKE SHE/MIKE 11 modelling system to a lowland wet grassland in southeast England. J Hydrol 293:151–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez RF, Feyen J (2003) Effect of potential evapotranspiration estimates on effective parameters and performance of the MIKE SHE-code applied to a medium-size catchment. J Hydrol 270:309–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wegehenkel M (2002) Estimating of the impact of land use changes using the conceptual hydrological model THESEUS-a case study. Phys Chem Earth 27:631–640

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chulgyum Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Im, S., Kim, H., Kim, C. et al. Assessing the impacts of land use changes on watershed hydrology using MIKE SHE. Environ Geol 57, 231–239 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-008-1303-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-008-1303-3

Keywords

Navigation