Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Endometrial cancer: magnetic resonance imaging

  • INVITED UPDATE
  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Carcinoma of the endometrium is the most common invasive gynecologic malignancy of the female genital tract. Clinically, patients with endometrial carcinoma present with abnormal uterine bleeding. The role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in endometrial carcinoma is disease staging and treatment planning. MRI has been shown to be the most valuable imaging mod-ality in this task, compared with endovaginal ultrasound and computed tomography, because of its intrinsic contrast resolution and multiplanar capability. MRI protocol includes axial T1-weighted images; axial, sagittal, and coronal T2-weighted images; and dynamic gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted imaging. MR examination is usually performed in the supine position with a phased array multicoil using a four-coil configuration. Endometrial carcinoma is isointense with the normal endometrium and myometrium on noncontrast T1-weighted images and has a variable appearance on T2-weighted images demonstrating heterogeneous signal intensity. The appearance of noninvasive endometrial carcinoma on MRI is characterized by a normal or thickened endometrium, with an intact junctional zone and a sharp tumor-myometrium interface. Invasive endometrial carcinoma is characterized disruption or irregularity of the junctional zone by intermediate signal intensity mass on T2-weighted images. Invasion of the cervical stroma is diagnosed when the low signal intensity cervical stroma is disrupted by the higher signal intensity endometrial carcinoma. MRI in endometrial carcinoma performs better than other imaging modalities in disease staging and treatment planning. Further, the accuracy and the cost of MRI are equivalent to those of surgical staging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. WT Creasman (2003) Malignant tumors of the uterine corpus JA Rock HW Jones (Eds) Operative gynecology EditionNumber9th Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Philadelphia 1445–1486

    Google Scholar 

  2. SM Ascher C Reinhold (2002) ArticleTitleImaging of cancer endometrium Radiol Clin North Am 40 563–576 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0033-8389(01)00013-6 Occurrence Handle12117193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. RR Barakat PW Grigsby SP Zaino (2000) Corpus epithelial tumors WJ Hoskins CA Perez RC Young (Eds) Principles and practice of gynecologic oncology EditionNumber3rd Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Philadelphia 919–959

    Google Scholar 

  4. KA Frei K Kinkel (2001) ArticleTitleStaging endometrial cancer: role of magnetic resonance imaging J Magn Reson Imaging 13 850–855 Occurrence Handle10.1002/jmri.1121 Occurrence Handle11382943

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. PG Rose (1996) ArticleTitleEndometrial carcinoma N Engl J Med 335 640–649 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJM199608293350907 Occurrence Handle8692240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Reinhold C, Gallix BP, Ascher SM (1997) Uterus, cervix. In: Semelka R, Ascher SM, Reinhold C, eds. MRI of the abdomen and pelvis. New York: Wiley-Liss, pp 585–660

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goodman A (1994) Premalignant and malignant disorders of the uterine corpus. In: Decherney AH, Pernoll ML, eds. Current obstetric and gynecologic diagnosis and treatment, 8th ed. Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange, pp 937–953

  8. RC Boronow CP Morrow WT Creaseman et al. (1984) ArticleTitleSurgical staging in endometrial carcinoma: clinical-pathological findings of a prospective study Obstet Gynecol 63 825–832 Occurrence Handle6728365

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. W Faught GV Krepart R Lotocki M Heywood (1994) ArticleTitleShould selective para-aortic lymphadenectomy be part of surgical staging for endometrial cancer? Gynecol Oncol 55 51–55 Occurrence Handle10.1006/gyno.1994.1246 Occurrence Handle7959266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. MS Piver SB Lele JJ Barlow L Blumenson (1982) ArticleTitleParaortic lymph node evaluation in stage I endometrial carcinoma Obstet Gynecol 59 97–100 Occurrence Handle7078856

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. JH Shepherd (1989) ArticleTitleRevised FIGO staging for gynecological cancer Br J Obstet Gynaecol 96 889–892 Occurrence Handle2775686

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. LA Hardesty JH Sumkin ME Nath et al. (2000) ArticleTitleUse of preoperative MR imaging in the management of endometrial carcinoma: cost analysis Radiology 215 45–49 Occurrence Handle10751466

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. H Hricak LV Rubinstein CM Gherman N Karstaedt (1991) ArticleTitleMR imaging evaluation of endometrial carcinoma: results of an NCI cooperative study Radiology 179 829–832 Occurrence Handle2028000

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. R Manfredi P Mirk G Maresca et al. (2004) ArticleTitleLocal-regional staging of endometrial carcinoma: role of MR imaging in surgical planning Radiology 231 372–378 Occurrence Handle15031434

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. K Kinkel KK Yu Y Kaji et al. (1999) ArticleTitleRadiological staging in patients with endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis Radiology 212 711–718 Occurrence Handle10478237

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Y Yamashita M Harada T Sawada et al. (1993) ArticleTitleNormal uterus and FIGO stage I endometrial carcinoma: dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging Radiology 186 495–501 Occurrence Handle8421757

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. H Seki T Takano K Sakai (2000) ArticleTitleValue of dynamic MR imaging in assessing endometrial carcinoma involvement of the cervix AJR 175 171–176 Occurrence Handle10882269

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. McCarthy S, Hricak H (1997) The uterus and vagina. In: Higgins CB, Hricak H, Helms CA eds. Magnetic resonance imaging of the body, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, :761–814

  19. EJ Lee JY Byun B Kim et al. (1999) ArticleTitleStaging of early endometrial carcinoma: assessment with T2-weighted and gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted imaging Radiographics 19 937–945 Occurrence Handle10464801

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. R Smith-Bindman K Kerlikowske VA Feldstein et al. (1998) ArticleTitleEndovaginal ultrasound to exclude endometrial cancer and other endometrial abnormalities JAMA 280 1510–1517 Occurrence Handle10.1001/jama.280.17.1510 Occurrence Handle9809732

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. V Sahakian C Syrop D Turner (1991) ArticleTitleEndometrial carcinoma: transvaginal ultrasonography prediction of deep myometrial invasion Gynecol Oncol 43 217–219 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0090-8258(91)90023-X Occurrence Handle1752490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. K Hasumi M Mutsuzawa HG Chen et al. (1982) ArticleTitleComputed tomography in the evaluation and treatment of endometrial carcinoma Cancer 50 904–908 Occurrence Handle7093928

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Y Hirano K Kubo Y Hirai et al. (1992) ArticleTitlePreliminary experience with gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MR imaging for uterine neoplasm Radiographics 12 243–256 Occurrence Handle1561414

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. HH Lien V Blomlie C Trope et al. (1991) ArticleTitleCancer of the endometrium: value of MR imaging in determining depth of invasion into the myometrium AJR 157 1221–1223 Occurrence Handle1950869

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. H Hricak B Hamm R Semelka et al. (1991) ArticleTitleCarcinoma of the uterus: use of gadopentetate dimeglumine in MR imaging Radiology 181 95–106 Occurrence Handle1887062

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. S Sironi E Colombo G Villa et al. (1992) ArticleTitleMyometrial invasion by endometrial carcinoma: assessment with plain and gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging Radiology 185 207–212 Occurrence Handle1523309

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. SS Chen WM Rumancik C Spiegel (1990) ArticleTitleMagnetic resonance imaging in stage I endometrial carcinoma Obstet Gynecol 75 274–277 Occurrence Handle2300356

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. A Maschio ParticleDel A Vanzulli S Sironi et al. (1993) ArticleTitleEstimating the depth of myometrial involvement by endometrial carcinoma: efficacy of transvaginal sonography vs MR imaging AJR 160 533–538 Occurrence Handle8430547

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. F Saez A Urresola JA Larena et al. (2000) ArticleTitleEndometrial carcinoma: assessment of myometrial invasion with plain and gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging J Magn Reson Med 12 460–466 Occurrence Handle10.1002/1522-2586(200009)12:3<460::AID-JMRI12>3.0.CO;2-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. H Seki M Kimura K Sakai (1997) ArticleTitleMyometrial invasion of endometrial carcinoma: assessment with dynamic MR and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images Clin Radiol 52 18–23 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0009-9260(97)80300-5 Occurrence Handle9022575

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. SS Chen WM Rumancik C Spiegel (1990) ArticleTitleMagnetic resonance imaging in stage I endometrial carcinoma Obstet Gynecol 75 274–277 Occurrence Handle2300356

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mazzon I, Corrado G, Morricone D, Scambia G (2005) Reproductive preservation for treatment of stage IA endometrial cancer in a young woman: hysteroscopic resection. Int J Gynecol Cancer in press

    Google Scholar 

  33. LM Scoutt SM McCarthy SD Flynn et al. (1995) ArticleTitleClinical stage I endometrial carcinoma: pitfalls in preoperative assessment with MR imaging Work in progress. Radiology 194 567–572

    Google Scholar 

  34. WT Yang WWM Lam MY Yu et al. (2000) ArticleTitleComparison of dynamic helical CT and dynamic MR imaging in the valuation of pelvic lymph nodes in cervical carcinoma AJR 175 759–766 Occurrence Handle10954463

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. MG Hirisinghami J Barentsz PF Hahn et al. (2003) ArticleTitleNoninvasive detection of clinically occult lymph node metastases in prostate cancer N Engl J Med 348 2491–2499 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJMoa022749 Occurrence Handle12815134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. A Fagotti G Ferrandina R Longo et al. (2002) ArticleTitleMinilaparotomy in early endometrial cancer: an alternative to standard and laparoscopic treatment Gynecol Oncol 86 177–183 Occurrence Handle10.1006/gyno.2002.6721 Occurrence Handle12144825

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. GH Eltabbakh MI Shamonki JM Moody LL Garafano (2001) ArticleTitleLaparoscopy as the primary modality for the treatment of women with endometrial carcinoma Cancer 91 378–387 Occurrence Handle10.1002/1097-0142(20010115)91:2<378::AID-CNCR1012>3.0.CO;2-F Occurrence Handle11180085

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. G Massi L Savino T Susini (1996) ArticleTitleVaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy for the treatment of stage I endometrial adenocarcinoma Am J Obstet Gynecol 174 1320–1326 Occurrence Handle8623864

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, “A. Gemelli” University Hospital, Rome, Italy

    R. Manfredi, B. Gui, G. Maresca & L. Bonomo

  2. Department of Gynecology, Centro di Ricerca e Formazione ad Alta Technologia nelle Scienze Biomediche, Campobasso, Italy

    F. Fanfani

Authors
  1. R. Manfredi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B. Gui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. G. Maresca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. F. Fanfani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. L. Bonomo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Manfredi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Manfredi, R., Gui, B., Maresca, G. et al. Endometrial cancer: magnetic resonance imaging. Abdom Imaging 30, 626–636 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-004-0298-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-004-0298-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation