Skip to main content
Log in

Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced computed tomography in the immediate assessment of radiofrequency ablation success in colorectal liver metastases

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

To determine the accuracy of contrast-enhanced multislice computed tomography (CT) in the assessment of treatment success immediately after CT-guided radiofrequency (RF) ablation.

Methods

26 patients with 38 Colorectal liver metastasis (CRM) were treated by CT-guided RF ablation. Pre-contrast and portal phase CT features before and immediately after ablation were retrospectively evaluated quantitatively and qualitatively: Influence of attenuation characteristics, safety margin, congruency between tumor and coagulation, and morphological criteria (shape, margin distinction, margin configuration, and margin continuity) were investigated. Findings were statistically analyzed with regard to local tumor progression.

Results

Mean observation period for follow-up scans was 6.4 months (range: 3–40 months). Attenuation characteristics, safety margin, and congruency had no significant effect on the probability of local tumor progression. Coagulations whose margin was categorized as “discontinuous” were significantly more often associated with local recurrence (p = 0.038). No significant influence on local recurrence could be detected regarding coagulation shape, margin distinction, and configuration.

Conclusion

Computed tomography imaging immediately after RF ablation allows for morphological characterization of the coagulation and provides a valid baseline status for follow-up imaging. However, in CRM, morphological image criteria and attenuation characteristics have limited predictive value for immediate detection of persistent tumor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. (2006) Cancer statistics, 2006 CA Cancer J Clin 56(2):106–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Livraghi T, Solbiati L (2001) [Percutaneous treatment: radiofrequency ablation of hepatic metastases in colorectal cancer] Tumori 87(1 Suppl 1):S69

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Manfredi S, Lepage C, Hatem C, et al. (2006) Epidemiology and management of liver metastases from colorectal cancer Ann Surg 244(2):254–259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pereira PL (2007) Actual role of radiofrequency ablation of liver metastases Eur Radiol 17(8):2062–2070

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Solbiati L, Livraghi T, Goldberg SN, et al. (2001) Percutaneous radio-frequency ablation of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: long-term results in 117 patients Radiology 221(1):159–166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rhim H, Goldberg SN, Dodd GD 3rd, et al. (2001) Essential techniques for successful radio-frequency thermal ablation of malignant hepatic tumors. Radiographics 21 Spec No:S17–S35; discussion S36–S19

  7. Barker DW, Zagoria RJ, Morton KA, et al. (2005) Evaluation of liver metastases after radiofrequency ablation: utility of 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT AJR Am J Roentgenol 184(4):1096–1102

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim YS, Rhim H, Cho OK, et al. (2006) Intrahepatic recurrence after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of the pattern and risk factors Eur J Radiol 59(3):432–441

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Antoch G, Vogt FM, Veit P, et al. (2005) Assessment of liver tissue after radiofrequency ablation: findings with different imaging procedures J Nucl Med 46(3):520–525

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim SK, Lim HK, Kim YH, et al. (2003) Hepatocellular carcinoma treated with radio-frequency ablation: spectrum of imaging findings Radiographics 23(1):107–121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chopra S, Dodd GD 3rd, Chintapalli KN, et al. (2001) Tumor recurrence after radiofrequency thermal ablation of hepatic tumors: spectrum of findings on dual-phase contrast-enhanced CT AJR Am J Roentgenol 177(2):381–387

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ninomiya T, Seo Y, Yano Y, et al. (2006) Evaluation of the therapeutic effect using MD-CT immediately after RFA for HCC Hepatogastroenterology 53(70):558–560

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dromain C, de Baere T, Elias D, et al. (2002) Hepatic tumors treated with percutaneous radio-frequency ablation: CT and MR imaging follow-up Radiology 223(1):255–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Limanond P, Zimmerman P, Raman SS, et al. (2003) Interpretation of CT and MRI after radiofrequency ablation of hepatic malignancies AJR Am J Roentgenol 181(6):1635–1640

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tsuda M, Rikimaru H, Majima K, et al. (2003) Time-related changes of radiofrequency ablation lesion in the normal rabbit liver: findings of magnetic resonance imaging and histopathology Invest Radiol 38(8):525–531

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Goldberg SN, Grassi CJ, Cardella JF, et al. (2005) Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria Radiology 235(3):728–739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gillams AR, Lees WR (2004) Radio-frequency ablation of colorectal liver metastases in 167 patients Eur Radiol 14(12):2261–2267

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Aliberti C, Soriani M, Tilli M, et al. (2004) Radiofrequency ablation of liver malignancies: MRI for evaluation of response J Chemother 16(Suppl 5):79–81

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Veit P, Antoch G, Stergar H, et al. (2006) Detection of residual tumor after radiofrequency ablation of liver metastasis with dual-modality PET/CT: initial results Eur Radiol 16(1):80–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Meloni MF, Livraghi T, Filice C, et al. (2006) Radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors: the role of microbubble ultrasound contrast agents Ultrasound Q 22(1):41–47

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gillams AR, Lees WR (2005) Radiofrequency ablation of colorectal liver metastases Abdom Imaging 30(4):419–426

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Paul SB, Gulati MS (2002) Spectrum of hepatocellular carcinoma on triple phase helical CT: a pictorial essay Clin Imaging 26(4):270–279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chiang SH, Thng CH, Teh CS, et al. (2003) Computed tomographic appearance of colorectal hepatic metastases Ann Acad Med Singapore 32(2):191–195

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Goldberg SN, Gazelle GS, Mueller PR (2000) Thermal ablation therapy for focal malignancy: a unified approach to underlying principles, techniques, and diagnostic imaging guidance AJR Am J Roentgenol 174(2):323–331

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Anderson GS, Brinkmann F, Soulen MC, et al. (2003) FDG positron emission tomography in the surveillance of hepatic tumors treated with radiofrequency ablation Clin Nucl Med 28(3):192–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. van Duijnhoven FH, Jansen MC, Junggeburt JM, et al. (2006) Factors influencing the local failure rate of radiofrequency ablation of colorectal liver metastases Ann Surg Oncol 13(5):651–658

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ng KK, Poon RT (2005) Radiofrequency ablation for malignant liver tumor Surg Oncol 14(1):41–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sutherland LM, Williams JA, Padbury RT, et al. (2006) Radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors: a systematic review Arch Surg 141(2):181–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Jiao LR, Hansen PD, Havlik R, et al. (1999) Clinical short-term results of radiofrequency ablation in primary and secondary liver tumors Am J Surg 177(4):303–306

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Cady B, Jenkins RL, Steele GD Jr., et al. (1998) Surgical margin in hepatic resection for colorectal metastasis: a critical and improvable determinant of outcome Ann Surg 227(4):566–571

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Hamady ZZ, Cameron IC, Wyatt J, et al. (2006) Resection margin in patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastasis: a critical appraisal of the 1 cm rule Eur J Surg Oncol 32(5):557–563

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Bricault I, Kikinis R, Morrison PR, et al. (2006) Liver metastases: 3D shape-based analysis of CT scans for detection of local recurrence after radiofrequency ablation Radiology 241(1):243–250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Choi H, Loyer EM, DuBrow RA, et al. (2001) Radio-frequency ablation of liver tumors: assessment of therapeutic response and complications. Radiographics 21 Spec No:S41–S54

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christina Schraml.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schraml, C., Clasen, S., Schwenzer, N.F. et al. Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced computed tomography in the immediate assessment of radiofrequency ablation success in colorectal liver metastases. Abdom Imaging 33, 643–651 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9351-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9351-9

Keywords

Navigation