Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Augmentation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction—a histological and biomechanical study on goats

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We studied reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) in skeletally mature goats. In one group, the autogenous tissue was augmented with polydioxanone (PDS), the other group had no augmentation. Histological complete incorporation and remodeling of the transplant was found in both groups. The newly formed connective tissues gradually assumed the microscopic properties of the normal ligament. The augmented group showed a delay in remodeling and maturation of the fiber bundles. Mechanically, the PDS-augmented transplants were stronger than the nonaugmented transplants immediately after surgery. During the first 6 weeks, a rapid decrease in strength of the augmented transplants was found, whereas the strength of the nonaugmented group gradually increased. The results of our experiment do not favor augmentation of autografts in reconstruction of the ACL.

Résumé

Nous avons étudié la reconstruction du ligament croisé antérieur chez la chèvre à squelette mature. Dans un groupe le tissu autogène a été renforcé avec du polydioxanone (PDS), l’autre groupe n’avait aucun renforcement. Une incorporation histologique complète et un remodelage du transplant a été constaté. Les tissus conjonctifs récemment formés ont pris progressivement les propriétés microscopiques du ligament normal. Le groupe renforcé a montré un délai dans le remodelage et la maturation des faisceaux de fibres. Mécaniquement les greffes renforcées au PDS étaient plus fortes que les greffes non renforcées immédiatement après la chirurgie. Pendant les six premières semaines une baisse rapide de la force des greffes renforcées a été constatée, alors que la force du groupe non—renforcé a augmenté progressivement. Les résultats de notre expérience ne sont pas en faveur d’un renforcement des autogreffes dans la reconstruction du ligament croisé antérieur.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1A
Fig. 2A–H

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amiel D, Kleiner JB, Akeson WH (1986) The natural history of the anterior cruciate ligament autograft of patellar tendon origin. Am J Sports Med 14:449-462

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Arnoczky SP (1983) Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament. Clin Orthop 172:19–25

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Asahina S, Yamamoto H, Muneta T, Ishibashi T, Furuya K (1995) Evaluation of anterior cruciate reconstruction reinforced by the Kennedy ligament augmentation device. An arthroscopic and histological study. Int Orthop 19:229–233

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Blauth W, Hassenpflug J (1985) Reconstruction of the cruciate ligament with special reference to synthetic substitute materials. Unfallchirurg 88:118-125

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bolton CW, Bruchman WC (1985) The GORE-TEX expanded polytetrafluoroethylene prosthetic ligament. An in vitro and in vivo evaluation. Clin Orthop 196:202–213

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bonnaire F, Berwarth H, Munst P, Eichinger S, Kuner EH (1995) Kann das Ergebnis nach Kreuzbandoperationen arthrometrisch erfasst werden? Ein Vergleich der subjektiven Einschatzung, des Lysholm-Scores, der klinischen Stabilitatseinstufung und der Stabilitatsmessung mit dem KT 1000 nach komplexen Kniebandverletzungen. Unfallchirurgie 21:83–91

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Claes L, Durselen L, Kiefer H, Mohr W (1987) The combined anterior cruciate and medial collateral ligament replacement by various materials: a comparative animal study. J Biomed Mater Res 21 [Suppl 3] 319–343

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hehl G, Strecker W, Richter M, Kiefer H, Wissmeyer T (1999) Clinical experience with PDS-II augmentation for operative of acute proximal ACL ruptures—2-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 7:102–106

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Holzmuller W, Wehmeyer M, Rehm KE, Perren SM (1994) Histologische Untersuchungen zum Ersatz des vorderen Kreuzbands mit PDS-augmentierten Patellarsehnentransplantaten. Unfallchirurg 97:144–150

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang D, Chang TR, Aggarwal A, Lee RC, Ehrlich HP (1993) Mechanisms and dynamics of mechanical strengthening in ligament equivalent fibroblast populated collagen matrices. Ann Biomed Eng 21:289–305

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lekic P, McCulloch CA (1996) Periodontal ligament cell population: the central role of fibroblasts in creating a unique tissue. Anat Rec 245:327–341

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Margevicius KJ, Claes LE, Durselen L, Hanselmann K (1996) Identification and distribution of synthetic ligament wear particles in sheep. J Biomed Mater Res 31:319–328

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McPherson GK, Mendenhall HV, Gibbons DF, Plenk H, Rottmann W, Sanford JB, Kennedy JC, Roth JH (1985) Experimental mechanical and histologic evaluation of the Kennedy ligament augmentation device. Clin Orthop 196:186–195

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Oberbillig C, Kirschner P (1989) Postoperative kontinuierliche passive Bewegung (CPM) nach Augmentation von vorderen Kreuzbandrupturen mit Polydioxanon-Bandern. Fruhergebnisse einer prospektiven Studie. Unfallchirurgie 15:145–151

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Puddu G, Cipolla M, Cerullo G, Franco V, Gianni E (1993) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and augmentation with PDS graft. Clin Sports Med 12:13–24

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ray JA, Doddi N, Regula D, Williams JA, Melveger A (1981) Polydioxanone (PDS), a novel monofilament synthetic absorbable suture. Surg Gynecol Obstet 153:497–507

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rehm KE, Schultheis KH (1985) Ligament replacement with polydioxanone (PDS) Unfallchirurgie 11:264–273

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tohyama H, Yasuka K (1998) Significance of graft tension in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Basic background and clinical outcome. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6 [Suppl 1] 30–37

  19. Trager D, Pohle, K, Tschirner W (1995) Anterior cruciate ligament suture in comparison with plasty. A 5-year follow-up study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 114:278–280

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. van Rens TJ (1977) Fixation of ligament structures in the knee. In: Injuries of ligaments and their repair, Chapchal G (ed), George Thieme, Stuttgart

  21. van Rens TJ, van den Berg AF, Huiskes R, Kuypers W (1986) Substitution of the anterior cruciate ligament: a long-term histologic and biomechanical study with autogenous pedicled grafts of the iliotibial band in dogs. Arthroscopy 2:139–154

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wissing J, van Vroonhoven TJ, Schattenkerk ME, Veen HF, Ponsen RJ, Jeekel J (1987) Fascia closure after midline laparotomy: results of a randomized trial. Br J Surg 74:738–741

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Buma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buma, P., Kok, H.J., Blankevoort, L. et al. Augmentation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction—a histological and biomechanical study on goats. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 28, 91–96 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-003-0515-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-003-0515-0

Keywords

Navigation