Skip to main content
Log in

Is the acetabular cup orientation after total hip arthroplasty on a two dimension or three dimension model accurate?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Malposition of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a common surgical problem that can lead to hip dislocation, reduced range of motion and may result in early loosening. The aim of this study is to validate the accuracy and reproducibility of a single x-ray image based 2D/3D reconstruction technique in determining cup inclination and anteversion against two different computer tomography (CT)-based measurement techniques.

Methods

Cup anteversion and inclination of 20 patients after cementless primary THA was measured on standard antero-posterior (AP) radiographs with the help of the single x-ray 2D/3D reconstruction program and compared with two different 3D CT-based analyses [Ground Truth (GT) and MeVis (MV) reconstruction model].

Results

The measurements from the single x-ray 2D/3D reconstruction technique were strongly correlated with both types of CT image-processing protocols for both cup inclination [=0.69 (GT); =0.59 (MV)] and anteversion [=0.89 (GT); =0.80 (MV)].

Conclusions

The single x-ray image based 2D/3D reconstruction technique is a feasible method to assess cup position on postoperative x-rays. CT scans remain the golden standard for a more complex biomechanical evaluation when a lower tolerance limit (+/-2 degrees) is required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McCollum DE, Gray WJ (1990) Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Causes and prevention. Clin Orthop 261:159–170

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sarmiento A, Ebramzadeh E, Gogan WJ, McKellop HA (1990) Cup containment and orientation in cemented total hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 72:996–1002

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R et al (1978) Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60:217–220

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Patil S, Bergula A, Chen PC et al (2003) Polyethylene wear and acetabular component orientation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(Suppl 4):56–63

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Widmer K-H (2007) Containment versus impingement: finding a compromise for cup placement in total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 31(Suppl 1):S29–S33. doi:10.1007/s00264-007-0429-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kalteis T, Handel M, Herold T et al (2006) Position of the acetabular cup—accuracy of radiographic calculation compared to CT-based measurement. Eur J Radiol 58:294–300. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.10.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Marx A, von Knoch M, Pförtner J et al (2006) Misinterpretation of cup anteversion in total hip arthroplasty using planar radiography. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 126:487–492. doi:10.1007/s00402-006-0163-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tannast M, Zheng G, Anderegg C et al (2005) Tilt and rotation correction of acetabular version on pelvic radiographs. Clin Orthop 438:182–190

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pradhan R (1999) Planar anteversion of the acetabular cup as determined from plain anteroposterior radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 81:431–435

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Widmer K-H (2004) A simplified method to determine acetabular cup anteversion from plain radiographs. J Arthroplasty 19:387–390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Della Valle CJ, Kaplan K, Jazrawi A et al (2004) Primary total hip arthroplasty with a flanged, cemented all-polyethylene acetabular component: evaluation at a minimum of 20 years. J Arthroplasty 19:23–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Arai N, Nakamura S, Matsushita T, Suzuki S (2010) Minimal radiation dose computed tomography for measurement of cup orientation in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 25:263–267. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2009.01.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Seradge H, Nagle KR, Miller RJ (1982) Analysis of version in the acetabular cup. Clin Orthop 166:152–157

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zheng G (2010) Statistically deformable 2D/3D registration for estimating post-operative cup orientation from a single standard AP X-ray radiograph. Ann Biomed Eng 38:2910–2927. doi:10.1007/s10439-010-0060-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zheng G, von Recum J, Nolte L-P et al (2012) Validation of a statistical shape model-based 2D/3D reconstruction method for determination of cup orientation after THA. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 7:225–231. doi:10.1007/s11548-011-0644-7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Murray DW (1993) The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 75:228–232

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nho J-H, Lee Y-K, Kim HJ et al (2012) Reliability and validity of measuring version of the acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 94-B:32–36. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.94B1.27621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bland JM, Altman DG (1996) Measurement error and correlation coefficients. BMJ 313:41–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Lin F, Lim D, Wixson RL et al (2008) Validation of a computer navigation system and a CT method for determination of the orientation of implanted acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty: a cadaver study. Clin Biomech Bristol Avon 23:1004–1011. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.04.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Penney GP, Edwards PJ, Hipwell JH et al (2007) Postoperative calculation of acetabular cup position using 2-D-3-D registration. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 54:1342–1348. doi:10.1109/TBME.2007.890737

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zheng G, Steppacher S, Zhang X, Tannast M (2007) Precise estimation of postoperative cup alignment from single standard X-ray radiograph with gonadal shielding. Med Image Comput Comput-Assist Interv 10:951–959

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zheng G, Zhang X (2010) Computer assisted determination of acetabular cup orientation using 2D-3D image registration. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 5:437–447. doi:10.1007/s11548-010-0407-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Steppacher SD, Tannast M, Zheng G et al (2009) Validation of a new method for determination of cup orientation in THA. J Orthop Res Off Publ Orthop Res Soc 27:1583–1588. doi:10.1002/jor.20929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fujishiro T, Hayashi S, Kanzaki N et al (2014) Computed tomographic measurement of acetabular and femoral component version in total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. doi:10.1007/s00264-013-2264-z

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lu M, Zhou Y-X, Du H et al (2013) Reliability and validity of measuring acetabular component orientation by plain anteroposterior radiographs. Clin Orthop 471:2987–2994. doi:10.1007/s11999-013-3021-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation through the project NCCR-CO-ME.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin Craiovan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Craiovan, B., Renkawitz, T., Weber, M. et al. Is the acetabular cup orientation after total hip arthroplasty on a two dimension or three dimension model accurate?. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 38, 2009–2015 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2336-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2336-8

Keywords

Navigation