Abstract
Recent attention has focused on resource management initiatives at the watershed scale with emphasis on collaborative, locally driven, and decentralized institutional arrangements. Existing literature on limited selections of well-established watershed-based organizations has provided valuable insights. The current research extends this focus by including a broad survey of watershed organizations from across the United States as a means to estimate a national portrait. Organizational characteristics include year of formation, membership size and composition, budget, guiding principles, and mechanisms of decision-making. These characteristics and the issue concerns of organizations are expected to vary with respect to location. Because this research focuses on organizations that are place based and stakeholder driven, the forces driving them are expected to differ across regions of the country. On this basis of location, we suggest basic elements for a regional assessment of watershed organizations to channel future research and to better approximate the organizational dynamics, issue concerns, and information needs unique to organizations across the country. At the broadest level, the identification of regional patterns or organizational similarities may facilitate the linkage among organizations to coordinate their actions at the much broader river basin or ecosystem scale.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
American Rivers. 2002. http://www.americanrivers.org Accessed 1 September 2002
Bentrup G., 2001. Evaluation of a collaborative model: a case study analysis of watershed planning in the Intermountain West Environmental Management 27:739–748
Born S. M., K. D. Genskow., 1999. Exploring the watershed approach: Critical dimensions of statelocal partnerships, The Four Corners Watershed Innovators Initiative Final Report River Network Portland 124 pp
Born S. M., K. D. Genskow., 2000. The watershed approach: An empirical assessment of innovation in environmental management. Learning from innovations in environmental protection, research paper #7 National Academy of Public Administration Washington, DC 70 pp
Chess C., G. Gibson., 2001. Watersheds are not equal Journal of the American Water Resources Association 37:775–782
Clarke J. N., D. C. McCool., 1996. Staking out the terrain: An analysis of agency power among our natural resource protectors 2nd ed. SUNY Press New York 279 pp
Coburn, J. 1999. Integrating science into watershed management decisions at Lake Tahoe. In E. Kendy (ed.), Science into policy: Water in the public realm. American Water Resources Association, Herndon, VA
Dillman D. A., 2000. Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method, 2nd ed. John Wiley, New York, 464 pp
Duram L. A., K. G. Brown., 1999. Assessing public participation in US watershed planning initiatives Society and Natural Resources 125:455–467
Griffin C. B., 1999. Evaluating watershed councils. E. Kendy (ed.), Science into policy: Water in the public realm American Water Resources AssociationHerndon, Virginia Pages 227–232
Habron G., 2003. Role of adaptive management for watershed councils Environmental Management 31:29–41
Holland M. M., 1996. Ensuring sustainability of natural resources: Focus on institutional arrangements Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 53:432–439
Imperial M. T., 1999. Institutional analysis and ecosystembased management: The institutional analysis and development framework Environmental Management 24: 449–465
Information Center for the Environment. 2002. http://www.ice.ucdavis.edu. Accessed 20 September 2002
John D., 1993. Civic environmentalism: Alternatives to regulation in states and communities. CQ Press, Washington, DC, 347 pp
Johnson B. R., R. Campbell., 1999. Ecology and participation in landscapebased planning in the Pacific Northwest Policy Studies Journal 27:502–529
Kenney D., S. T. McAllister, W. H. Caile, J. S. Peckman., 2000. The new watershed source book: A directory and review of watershed initiatives in the western United States Natural Resources Law Center Boulder344 pp
Korfmacher, K. S. 1999. Public participation in watershed modeling: What is appropriate? In E. Kendy (ed.), Science into policy: Water in the public realm. American Water Resources Association, Herndon, VA
Landre B. K., B. A. Knuth., 1993. Success of citizen advisory committees in consensus-based water resources planning in the Great Lakes Basin Society and Natural Resources 63:229–257
Leach W. D., and N. W. Pelkey. 2001. Making watershed partnerships work: A review of empirical literature. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management November/December:378–385
Lubell M., M. S. Schneider, J. T. Scholz, M. Mete. 2002. Watershed partnerships and the emergence of collective action institutions American Journal of Political Science 461:148–163
Mazmanian D. A., M. E. Kraft, editors 1999. Toward sustainable communities: Transition and transformations in environmental policy MIT Press Cambridge 323 pp
Michaels, S. 1999. Configuring who does what in watershed management: The Massachusetts Watershed Initiative. Policy Studies Journal 27:565–577
Moore E. A., T. M. Koontz., 2003. A typology of watershed groups: Citizenbased, agencybased, and mixed partnerships Society and Natural Resources 16:451–460
National Resource Conservation Service. 2004. A story of land and people. Accessed 22 June 2004. http://www.nrcs .usda.gov/about/history/story.html
Randolph J., M. Bauer., 1999. Improving environmental decision-making through collaborative methods Policy Studies Review 16:12–29
Rieke E. A., D. S. Kenney., 1997. Resource management at the watershed level: an assessment of the changing federal role in the emerging era of community base watershed management: Report to the Western Water Policy Review Advisory CommissionThe Commission Springfield 198 pp
River Network. 2002. http://www.rivernetwork.org. Accessed 20 September 2002
Scheberle D., 1997. Federalism and environmental policy: Trust and the politics of implementation Georgetown University Press Washington, DC 207 pp
Selin S. W., M. A. Schuett, D. S. Carr. 1997. Has collaborative planning taken root in the national forests? Journal of Forestry 5:25–28
Sheehan K., 2001. Email survey response rates: A review Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 6:44–51
Singleton S., 2000. Cooperation or capture? The paradox of comanagement and community participation in natural resource management and environmental policy-making Environmental Politics 9:319–328
Steelman T. A., J. Carmin., 2002. Community based watershed remediation: Connecting organizational resources to social and substantive outcomes. In D. Rahm (ed.), Toxic waste and environmental policy in the 21st century McFarland United States. 284 pp
Thomas C. W., 1999. Linking public agencies with community based watershed organizations: Lessons from California. Policy Studies Journal 27:544–565
Weber E. P., 1998. Successful collaboration Environment 40:10–18
Weber E. P., 2000. A new vanguard for the environment: Grassroots ecosystem management as a new environmental movement Society and Natural Resources 13:237–259
Wooley J. T., M. V. McGinnis., 1999. The politics of watershed policy-making. Policy Studies Journal 27:389–410
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Clark, B.T., Burkardt, N. & King, D. Watershed Management and Organizational Dynamics: Nationwide Findings and Regional Variation. Environmental Management 36, 297–310 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-1039-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-1039-0