Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Environmental Management 2/2015

01.08.2015

Hybrid MCDA Methods to Integrate Multiple Ecosystem Services in Forest Management Planning: A Critical Review

verfasst von: Britta Uhde, W. Andreas Hahn, Verena C. Griess, Thomas Knoke

Erschienen in: Environmental Management | Ausgabe 2/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) is a decision aid frequently used in the field of forest management planning. It includes the evaluation of multiple criteria such as the production of timber and non-timber forest products and tangible as well as intangible values of ecosystem services (ES). Hence, it is beneficial compared to those methods that take a purely financial perspective. Accordingly, MCDA methods are increasingly popular in the wide field of sustainability assessment. Hybrid approaches allow aggregating MCDA and, potentially, other decision-making techniques to make use of their individual benefits and leading to a more holistic view of the actual consequences that come with certain decisions. This review is providing a comprehensive overview of hybrid approaches that are used in forest management planning. Today, the scientific world is facing increasing challenges regarding the evaluation of ES and the trade-offs between them, for example between provisioning and regulating services. As the preferences of multiple stakeholders are essential to improve the decision process in multi-purpose forestry, participatory and hybrid approaches turn out to be of particular importance. Accordingly, hybrid methods show great potential for becoming most relevant in future decision making. Based on the review presented here, the development of models for the use in planning processes should focus on participatory modeling and the consideration of uncertainty regarding available information.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Aldea J, Martínez-Peña F, Diaz-Balteiro L (2012) Integration of fungal production in forest management using a multi-criteria method. Eur J Forest Res 131:1991–2003. doi:10.1007/s10342-012-0649-y Aldea J, Martínez-Peña F, Diaz-Balteiro L (2012) Integration of fungal production in forest management using a multi-criteria method. Eur J Forest Res 131:1991–2003. doi:10.​1007/​s10342-012-0649-y
Zurück zum Zitat André FJ, Cardenete MA, Romero C (2010) Designing public policies. An approach based on multi-criteria analysis and computable general equilibrium modeling. Springer, Berlin, p 642 André FJ, Cardenete MA, Romero C (2010) Designing public policies. An approach based on multi-criteria analysis and computable general equilibrium modeling. Springer, Berlin, p 642
Zurück zum Zitat Bell D (1975) A decision analysis of objectives for a forest pest problem. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg Bell D (1975) A decision analysis of objectives for a forest pest problem. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg
Zurück zum Zitat Belton V, Stewart T (2002) Multiple criteria decision analysis. An integrated approach. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston Belton V, Stewart T (2002) Multiple criteria decision analysis. An integrated approach. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston
Zurück zum Zitat Boroushaki S, Malczewski J (2010) ParticipatoryGIS: a web-based collaborative GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. Urisa 22:23–32 Boroushaki S, Malczewski J (2010) ParticipatoryGIS: a web-based collaborative GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. Urisa 22:23–32
Zurück zum Zitat Brans J, Mareschal B (2005) PROMETHEE methods. In: Figueira J, Greco S, Ehrgott M (eds) Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. Springer, Boston, pp 163–196 Brans J, Mareschal B (2005) PROMETHEE methods. In: Figueira J, Greco S, Ehrgott M (eds) Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. Springer, Boston, pp 163–196
Zurück zum Zitat Butler B, Tyrell M, Feinberg G, VanManen S, Wiseman L, Wallinger S (2007) Understanding and reaching family forest owners: lessons from social marketing research. J Forest 105:348–357 Butler B, Tyrell M, Feinberg G, VanManen S, Wiseman L, Wallinger S (2007) Understanding and reaching family forest owners: lessons from social marketing research. J Forest 105:348–357
Zurück zum Zitat Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B et al (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260. doi:10.1038/387253a0 Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B et al (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260. doi:10.​1038/​387253a0
Zurück zum Zitat de Keyser W, Peeters P (1996) A note on the use of PROMETHEE multicriteria methods. Eur J Oper Res 89:457–461 de Keyser W, Peeters P (1996) A note on the use of PROMETHEE multicriteria methods. Eur J Oper Res 89:457–461
Zurück zum Zitat Destan S, Yilmaz O, Sahin A (2013) Making objective forest stand maps of mixed managed forest with spatial interpolation and multi-criteria decision analysis. iForest 6:268–277. doi:10.3832/ifor0099-006 Destan S, Yilmaz O, Sahin A (2013) Making objective forest stand maps of mixed managed forest with spatial interpolation and multi-criteria decision analysis. iForest 6:268–277. doi:10.​3832/​ifor0099-006
Zurück zum Zitat Diaz-Balteiro L, Romero C (2003) Forest management optimisation models when carbon captured is considered: a goal programming approach. Forest Ecol Manag 174:447–457. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00075-0 Diaz-Balteiro L, Romero C (2003) Forest management optimisation models when carbon captured is considered: a goal programming approach. Forest Ecol Manag 174:447–457. doi:10.​1016/​S0378-1127(02)00075-0
Zurück zum Zitat Diaz-Balteiro L, Gonzalez-Pachon J, Romero C (2009b) Forest management with multiple criteria and multiple stakeholders: an application to two public forests in Spain. Scan J For Res 24:87–93. doi:10.1080/02827580802687440 Diaz-Balteiro L, Gonzalez-Pachon J, Romero C (2009b) Forest management with multiple criteria and multiple stakeholders: an application to two public forests in Spain. Scan J For Res 24:87–93. doi:10.​1080/​0282758080268744​0
Zurück zum Zitat Diaz-Balteiro L, Martell DL, Romero C, Weintraub A (2014) The optimal rotation of a flammable forest stand when both carbon sequestration and timber are valued: a multi-criteria approach. Nat Hazards 72:375–387. doi:10.1007/s11069-013-1013-3 Diaz-Balteiro L, Martell DL, Romero C, Weintraub A (2014) The optimal rotation of a flammable forest stand when both carbon sequestration and timber are valued: a multi-criteria approach. Nat Hazards 72:375–387. doi:10.​1007/​s11069-013-1013-3
Zurück zum Zitat Duncker PS, Raulund-Rasmussen K, Gundersen P, Katzensteiner K, de Jong J, Ravn HP et al (2012) How forest management affects ecosystem services, including timber production and economic return: synergies and trade-offs. Ecol and Soc 17:50. doi:10.5751/ES-05066-170450 Duncker PS, Raulund-Rasmussen K, Gundersen P, Katzensteiner K, de Jong J, Ravn HP et al (2012) How forest management affects ecosystem services, including timber production and economic return: synergies and trade-offs. Ecol and Soc 17:50. doi:10.​5751/​ES-05066-170450
Zurück zum Zitat Feizizadeh B, Blaschke T (2013) GIS-multicriteria decision analysis for landslide susceptibility mapping: comparing three methods for the Urmia lake basin, Iran. Nat Hazards 65:2105–2128. doi:10.1007/s11069-012-0463-3 Feizizadeh B, Blaschke T (2013) GIS-multicriteria decision analysis for landslide susceptibility mapping: comparing three methods for the Urmia lake basin, Iran. Nat Hazards 65:2105–2128. doi:10.​1007/​s11069-012-0463-3
Zurück zum Zitat Field D (1973) Goal programming for forest management. J Forest 19:125–135 Field D (1973) Goal programming for forest management. J Forest 19:125–135
Zurück zum Zitat Fontana V, Radtke A, Bossi Fedrigotti V, Tappeiner U, Tasser E, Zerbe S, Buchholz T (2013) Comparing land-use alternatives: using the ecosystem services concept to define a multi-criteria decision analysis. Ecol Econ 93:128–136. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.05.007 Fontana V, Radtke A, Bossi Fedrigotti V, Tappeiner U, Tasser E, Zerbe S, Buchholz T (2013) Comparing land-use alternatives: using the ecosystem services concept to define a multi-criteria decision analysis. Ecol Econ 93:128–136. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ecolecon.​2013.​05.​007
Zurück zum Zitat García-Barrios L, Speelman E, Pimm M (2008) An educational simulation tool for negotiating sustainable natural resource management strategies among stakeholders with conflicting interests. Ecol Model 210:115–126 García-Barrios L, Speelman E, Pimm M (2008) An educational simulation tool for negotiating sustainable natural resource management strategies among stakeholders with conflicting interests. Ecol Model 210:115–126
Zurück zum Zitat Goldstein JH, Caldarone G, Duarte TK, Ennaanay D, Hannahs N, Mendoza G et al (2012) Integrating ecosystem-service tradeoffs into land-use decisions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:7565–7570. doi:10.1073/pnas.1201040109 Goldstein JH, Caldarone G, Duarte TK, Ennaanay D, Hannahs N, Mendoza G et al (2012) Integrating ecosystem-service tradeoffs into land-use decisions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:7565–7570. doi:10.​1073/​pnas.​1201040109
Zurück zum Zitat Görener A (2012) Comparing AHP and ANP: an application of strategic decisions making in a manufacturing company. Int J Bus Soc Sci 3:194–208 Görener A (2012) Comparing AHP and ANP: an application of strategic decisions making in a manufacturing company. Int J Bus Soc Sci 3:194–208
Zurück zum Zitat Groselj P, Zadnik Stirn L (2013) Between compromise and consensus in group decisions in forest management. Šumar list 7–8:403–410 Groselj P, Zadnik Stirn L (2013) Between compromise and consensus in group decisions in forest management. Šumar list 7–8:403–410
Zurück zum Zitat Gupta A, Harboe R, Tabucanon M (2000) Fuzzy multiple-criteria decision making for crop area planning in Narmada river basin. Agr Syst 63:1–18 Gupta A, Harboe R, Tabucanon M (2000) Fuzzy multiple-criteria decision making for crop area planning in Narmada river basin. Agr Syst 63:1–18
Zurück zum Zitat Hahn A, Knoke T (2010) Sustainable development and sustainable forestry: analogies, differences, and the role of flexibility. Eur J Forest Res 129:787–801 Hahn A, Knoke T (2010) Sustainable development and sustainable forestry: analogies, differences, and the role of flexibility. Eur J Forest Res 129:787–801
Zurück zum Zitat Hahn A, Knoke T (2013) Angebot, Nachfrage und Nachhaltigkeit im Wald. Holz-Zentralblatt 139:530–531 Hahn A, Knoke T (2013) Angebot, Nachfrage und Nachhaltigkeit im Wald. Holz-Zentralblatt 139:530–531
Zurück zum Zitat Halog A, Manik Y (2011) Advancing integrated systems modelling framework for life cycle sustainability assessment. Sustainability 3:469–499. doi:10.3390/su3020469 Halog A, Manik Y (2011) Advancing integrated systems modelling framework for life cycle sustainability assessment. Sustainability 3:469–499. doi:10.​3390/​su3020469
Zurück zum Zitat Härtl F, Hahn A, Knoke T (2013) Risk-sensitive planning support for forest enterprises: the YAFO model. Comput Electr Agr 94:58–70 Härtl F, Hahn A, Knoke T (2013) Risk-sensitive planning support for forest enterprises: the YAFO model. Comput Electr Agr 94:58–70
Zurück zum Zitat Hjortsø CN (2004) Enhancing public participation in natural resource management using Soft OR—an application of strategic option development and analysis in tactical forest planning. Eur J Oper Res 152:667–683. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00065-1 Hjortsø CN (2004) Enhancing public participation in natural resource management using Soft OR—an application of strategic option development and analysis in tactical forest planning. Eur J Oper Res 152:667–683. doi:10.​1016/​S0377-2217(03)00065-1
Zurück zum Zitat Huth A, Drechsler M, Köhler P (2005) Using multicriteria decision analysis and a forest growth model to assess impacts of tree harvesting in Dipterocarp lowland rain forests. Forest Ecol Manag 207:215–232. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.028 Huth A, Drechsler M, Köhler P (2005) Using multicriteria decision analysis and a forest growth model to assess impacts of tree harvesting in Dipterocarp lowland rain forests. Forest Ecol Manag 207:215–232. doi:10.​1016/​j.​foreco.​2004.​10.​028
Zurück zum Zitat Hyde KM (2006) Uncertainty analysis methods for multi-criteria decision analysis. School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Adelaide, Adelaide Hyde KM (2006) Uncertainty analysis methods for multi-criteria decision analysis. School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Adelaide, Adelaide
Zurück zum Zitat Jactel H, Branco M, Duncker P, Gardiner B, Grodzki W, Langstrom B et al (2012) A multicriteria risk analysis to evaluate impacts of forest management alternatives on forest health in Europe. Ecol and Soc 17:52. doi:10.5751/ES-04897-170452 Jactel H, Branco M, Duncker P, Gardiner B, Grodzki W, Langstrom B et al (2012) A multicriteria risk analysis to evaluate impacts of forest management alternatives on forest health in Europe. Ecol and Soc 17:52. doi:10.​5751/​ES-04897-170452
Zurück zum Zitat Kangas J (1992a) Metsikön uudistamisketjun valinta—monitavoitteiseen hyötyteoriaan perustuva päätösanalyysimalli. Summary: Choosing the regeneration chain in a forest stand: a decision analysis model based on multi-attribute utility theory. University of Joensuu, Joensuu Kangas J (1992a) Metsikön uudistamisketjun valinta—monitavoitteiseen hyötyteoriaan perustuva päätösanalyysimalli. Summary: Choosing the regeneration chain in a forest stand: a decision analysis model based on multi-attribute utility theory. University of Joensuu, Joensuu
Zurück zum Zitat Kangas J (1996) A participatory approach to tactical forest planning. Finnish society of forest planning; Finnish Forest Research Institute, Helsinki. Acta For Fenn 251 Kangas J (1996) A participatory approach to tactical forest planning. Finnish society of forest planning; Finnish Forest Research Institute, Helsinki. Acta For Fenn 251
Zurück zum Zitat Kangas AS, Kangas J (2004) Probability, possibility and evidence: approaches to consider risk and uncertainty in forestry decision analysis. Forest Policy Econ 6:169–188. doi:10.1016/S1389-9341(02)00083-7 Kangas AS, Kangas J (2004) Probability, possibility and evidence: approaches to consider risk and uncertainty in forestry decision analysis. Forest Policy Econ 6:169–188. doi:10.​1016/​S1389-9341(02)00083-7
Zurück zum Zitat Kangas J, Store R, Leskinen P, Mehtatalo L (2000) Improving the quality of landscape ecological forest planning by utilizing advanced decision support tools. Forest Ecol Manag 132:157–171 Kangas J, Store R, Leskinen P, Mehtatalo L (2000) Improving the quality of landscape ecological forest planning by utilizing advanced decision support tools. Forest Ecol Manag 132:157–171
Zurück zum Zitat Kangas A, Kangas J, Pykäläinen J (2001a) Outranking methods as tools in strategic natural resources planning. Silva Fenn 35:215–227 Kangas A, Kangas J, Pykäläinen J (2001a) Outranking methods as tools in strategic natural resources planning. Silva Fenn 35:215–227
Zurück zum Zitat Kangas J, Hytönen LA, Loikkanen T (2001b) Integrating the AHP and HERO into process of participatory natural resources planning. In: Schmoldt DL, Kangas J, Mendoza G, Pesonen M (eds) The analytic hierarchy process in natural resource and environmental decision making. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 131–147 Kangas J, Hytönen LA, Loikkanen T (2001b) Integrating the AHP and HERO into process of participatory natural resources planning. In: Schmoldt DL, Kangas J, Mendoza G, Pesonen M (eds) The analytic hierarchy process in natural resource and environmental decision making. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 131–147
Zurück zum Zitat Kangas J, Kangas A, Leskinen P, Pykäläinen J (2001c) MCDM methods in strategic planning of forestry on state-owned lands in Finland: applications and experiences. J Multi Crit Decis Anal 10:257–271. doi:10.1002/mcda.306 Kangas J, Kangas A, Leskinen P, Pykäläinen J (2001c) MCDM methods in strategic planning of forestry on state-owned lands in Finland: applications and experiences. J Multi Crit Decis Anal 10:257–271. doi:10.​1002/​mcda.​306
Zurück zum Zitat Kangas J, Pesonen M, Kurttila M, Kajanus M (2001) A’WOT: integrating the AHP with SWOT analysis. In: Dellman K (ed) Proceedings of the sixth international symposium on the analytic hierarchy process ISAHP 2001. Kursaal Bern, 2–4 Aug, Berne-Switzerland pp 189–199 Kangas J, Pesonen M, Kurttila M, Kajanus M (2001) A’WOT: integrating the AHP with SWOT analysis. In: Dellman K (ed) Proceedings of the sixth international symposium on the analytic hierarchy process ISAHP 2001. Kursaal Bern, 2–4 Aug, Berne-Switzerland pp 189–199
Zurück zum Zitat Kangas J, Pukkala T, Kangas A (2001e) HERO: heuristic optimisation for multi-criteria forestry decision analysis. In: Schmoldt DL, Kangas J, Mendoza G, Pesonen M (eds) The analytic hierarchy process in natural resource and environmental decision making. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 51–66 Kangas J, Pukkala T, Kangas A (2001e) HERO: heuristic optimisation for multi-criteria forestry decision analysis. In: Schmoldt DL, Kangas J, Mendoza G, Pesonen M (eds) The analytic hierarchy process in natural resource and environmental decision making. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 51–66
Zurück zum Zitat Kangas A, Kangas J, Kurttila M (2008) Decision support for forest management. Springer, Dordrecht Kangas A, Kangas J, Kurttila M (2008) Decision support for forest management. Springer, Dordrecht
Zurück zum Zitat Keeney R, Raiffa H (1976) Decisions with multiple objectives. preferences and value tradeoffs. Wiley, New York Keeney R, Raiffa H (1976) Decisions with multiple objectives. preferences and value tradeoffs. Wiley, New York
Zurück zum Zitat Khadka C, Vacik H (2012) Use of multi-criteria analysis (MCA) for supporting community forest management. iForest 5:60–71. doi:10.3832/ifor0608-009 Khadka C, Vacik H (2012) Use of multi-criteria analysis (MCA) for supporting community forest management. iForest 5:60–71. doi:10.​3832/​ifor0608-009
Zurück zum Zitat Knoke T, Calvas B, Ochoa Moreno WS, Onyekwelu JC, Griess VC (2013) Food production and climate protection—what abandoned lands can do to preserve natural forests. Global Environ Chang 23:1064–1072. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.004 Knoke T, Calvas B, Ochoa Moreno WS, Onyekwelu JC, Griess VC (2013) Food production and climate protection—what abandoned lands can do to preserve natural forests. Global Environ Chang 23:1064–1072. doi:10.​1016/​j.​gloenvcha.​2013.​07.​004
Zurück zum Zitat Korosuo A, Wikström P, Öhman K, Eriksson LO (2011) An integrated MCDA software application for forest planning: a case study in southwestern Sweden. Math Comput For Nat Res Sci 3:75–86 Korosuo A, Wikström P, Öhman K, Eriksson LO (2011) An integrated MCDA software application for forest planning: a case study in southwestern Sweden. Math Comput For Nat Res Sci 3:75–86
Zurück zum Zitat Krcmar E, van Kooten GC, Vertinsky I (2005) Managing forest and marginal agricultural land for multiple tradeoffs: compromising on economic, carbon and structural diversity objectives. Ecol Model 185:451–468. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.12.014 Krcmar E, van Kooten GC, Vertinsky I (2005) Managing forest and marginal agricultural land for multiple tradeoffs: compromising on economic, carbon and structural diversity objectives. Ecol Model 185:451–468. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ecolmodel.​2004.​12.​014
Zurück zum Zitat Kurttila M, Pesonen M, Kangas J, Kajanus M (2000) Utilizing the analytic hierarchy process AHP in SWOT analysis a hybrid method and its application to a forest-certification case. Forest Policy Econ 1:41–52 Kurttila M, Pesonen M, Kangas J, Kajanus M (2000) Utilizing the analytic hierarchy process AHP in SWOT analysis a hybrid method and its application to a forest-certification case. Forest Policy Econ 1:41–52
Zurück zum Zitat Leskinen L, Leskinen P, Kurttila M, Kangas J, Kajanus M (2006) Adapting modern strategic decision support tools in the participatory strategy process—a case study of a forest research station. Forest Policy Econ 8:267–278. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2004.06.007 Leskinen L, Leskinen P, Kurttila M, Kangas J, Kajanus M (2006) Adapting modern strategic decision support tools in the participatory strategy process—a case study of a forest research station. Forest Policy Econ 8:267–278. doi:10.​1016/​j.​forpol.​2004.​06.​007
Zurück zum Zitat Lexer M, Vacik H, Palmetzhofer D, Oitzinger G (2005) A decision support tool to improve forestry extension services for small private landowners in southern Austria. Comput Electr Agr 49:81–102. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2005.02.004 Lexer M, Vacik H, Palmetzhofer D, Oitzinger G (2005) A decision support tool to improve forestry extension services for small private landowners in southern Austria. Comput Electr Agr 49:81–102. doi:10.​1016/​j.​compag.​2005.​02.​004
Zurück zum Zitat Limaei SM, Kouhi MS, Sharaji TR (2014) Goal programming approach for sustainable forest management (case study in Iranian Caspian forests). J For Res 25:429–435. doi:10.1007/s11676-014-0472-z Limaei SM, Kouhi MS, Sharaji TR (2014) Goal programming approach for sustainable forest management (case study in Iranian Caspian forests). J For Res 25:429–435. doi:10.​1007/​s11676-014-0472-z
Zurück zum Zitat Linkov I, Bakr Ramadan A (eds) (2004) Comparative risk assessment and environmental decision making., NATO science series. Series IV, Earth and environmental sciencesKluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, p 38 Linkov I, Bakr Ramadan A (eds) (2004) Comparative risk assessment and environmental decision making., NATO science series. Series IV, Earth and environmental sciencesKluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, p 38
Zurück zum Zitat Linkov I, Seager T, Kiker G, Bridges T (2004) Multi-criteria decision analysis: a framework for structuring remedial decisions at contaminated sites. In: Linkov I, Bakr Ramadan A (eds) Comparative risk assessment and environmental decision making, vol 38., NATO science series. Series IV, Earth and environmental sciencesKluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 15–54 Linkov I, Seager T, Kiker G, Bridges T (2004) Multi-criteria decision analysis: a framework for structuring remedial decisions at contaminated sites. In: Linkov I, Bakr Ramadan A (eds) Comparative risk assessment and environmental decision making, vol 38., NATO science series. Series IV, Earth and environmental sciencesKluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 15–54
Zurück zum Zitat Lootsma FA (1990) The French and the American school in multi-criteria decision analysis. Oper Res 24:380–388 Lootsma FA (1990) The French and the American school in multi-criteria decision analysis. Oper Res 24:380–388
Zurück zum Zitat Malczewski J (1999) GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. Wiley, New York Malczewski J (1999) GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. Wiley, New York
Zurück zum Zitat MEA (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. A report of the millennium ecosystem assessment. Island Press, Washington MEA (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. A report of the millennium ecosystem assessment. Island Press, Washington
Zurück zum Zitat Mendoza G, Martins H (2006) Multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management: a critical review of methods and new modelling paradigms. Forest Ecol Manag 230:1–22. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2006.03.023 Mendoza G, Martins H (2006) Multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management: a critical review of methods and new modelling paradigms. Forest Ecol Manag 230:1–22. doi:10.​1016/​j.​foreco.​2006.​03.​023
Zurück zum Zitat Mendoza GA, Prabhu R (2000) Development of a methodology for selecting criteria and indicators of sustainable forest management: a case study on participatory assessment. Environ Manage 26:659–673. doi:10.1007/s002670010123 Mendoza GA, Prabhu R (2000) Development of a methodology for selecting criteria and indicators of sustainable forest management: a case study on participatory assessment. Environ Manage 26:659–673. doi:10.​1007/​s002670010123
Zurück zum Zitat Mendoza G, Macoun P, Prabhu R, Sukadri D, Purnomo H, Hartanto H (1999) Guidelines for applying multi-criteria analysis to the assessment of criteria and indicators, vol 9., The Criteria & indicators toolbox seriesCenter for International Forestry Research, Jakarta Mendoza G, Macoun P, Prabhu R, Sukadri D, Purnomo H, Hartanto H (1999) Guidelines for applying multi-criteria analysis to the assessment of criteria and indicators, vol 9., The Criteria & indicators toolbox seriesCenter for International Forestry Research, Jakarta
Zurück zum Zitat Mustajoki J, Saarikoski H, Marttunen M, Ahtikoski A, Hallikainen V, Helle T et al (2011) Use of decision analysis interviews to support the sustainable use of the forests in Finnish Upper Lapland. J Environ Manage 92:1550–1563. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.01.007 Mustajoki J, Saarikoski H, Marttunen M, Ahtikoski A, Hallikainen V, Helle T et al (2011) Use of decision analysis interviews to support the sustainable use of the forests in Finnish Upper Lapland. J Environ Manage 92:1550–1563. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jenvman.​2011.​01.​007
Zurück zum Zitat Myllyviita T, Hujala T, Kangas A, Leskinen P (2011) Decision support in assessing the sustainable use of forests and other natural resources—a comparative review. Open For Sci J 4:24–41 Myllyviita T, Hujala T, Kangas A, Leskinen P (2011) Decision support in assessing the sustainable use of forests and other natural resources—a comparative review. Open For Sci J 4:24–41
Zurück zum Zitat Nelson E, Mendoza G, Regetz J, Polasky S, Tallis H, Cameron D et al (2009) Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Front Ecol Environ 7:4–11. doi:10.1890/080023 Nelson E, Mendoza G, Regetz J, Polasky S, Tallis H, Cameron D et al (2009) Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Front Ecol Environ 7:4–11. doi:10.​1890/​080023
Zurück zum Zitat Nordström E, Eriksson L, Öhman K (2010) Integrating multiple criteria decision analysis in participatory forest planning: experience from a case study in northern Sweden. Forest Policy Econ 12:562–574. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2010.07.006 Nordström E, Eriksson L, Öhman K (2010) Integrating multiple criteria decision analysis in participatory forest planning: experience from a case study in northern Sweden. Forest Policy Econ 12:562–574. doi:10.​1016/​j.​forpol.​2010.​07.​006
Zurück zum Zitat Nordström E, Holmström H, Öhman K (2013) Evaluating continuous cover forestry based on the forest owner’s objectives by combining scenario analysis and multiple criteria decision analysis. Silva Fenn. 47:1–22. doi:10.14214/sf.1046 Nordström E, Holmström H, Öhman K (2013) Evaluating continuous cover forestry based on the forest owner’s objectives by combining scenario analysis and multiple criteria decision analysis. Silva Fenn. 47:1–22. doi:10.​14214/​sf.​1046
Zurück zum Zitat Pagiola S, von Ritter K, Bishop J (2004) Assessing the economic value of ecosystem conservation. World Bank Environment Department, Washington Pagiola S, von Ritter K, Bishop J (2004) Assessing the economic value of ecosystem conservation. World Bank Environment Department, Washington
Zurück zum Zitat Palma J, Graves A, Burgess P, van der Werf W, Herzog F (2007) Integrating environmental and economic performance to assess modern silvoarable agroforestry in Europe. Ecol Econ 63:759–767. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.011 Palma J, Graves A, Burgess P, van der Werf W, Herzog F (2007) Integrating environmental and economic performance to assess modern silvoarable agroforestry in Europe. Ecol Econ 63:759–767. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ecolecon.​2007.​01.​011
Zurück zum Zitat Paul C, Knoke T (2015) Between land sharing and land sparing—what role remains for forest management and conservation? Int Forest Rev (in press) Paul C, Knoke T (2015) Between land sharing and land sparing—what role remains for forest management and conservation? Int Forest Rev (in press)
Zurück zum Zitat Pauwels D, Lejeune P, Rondeux J (2007) A decision support system to simulate and compare silvicultural scenarios for pure even-aged larch stands. Ann For Sci 64:345–353. doi:10.1051/forest:2007011 Pauwels D, Lejeune P, Rondeux J (2007) A decision support system to simulate and compare silvicultural scenarios for pure even-aged larch stands. Ann For Sci 64:345–353. doi:10.​1051/​forest:​2007011
Zurück zum Zitat Perman R (2011) Natural resource and environmental economics, 4th edn. Pearson Addison Wesley, Harlow Perman R (2011) Natural resource and environmental economics, 4th edn. Pearson Addison Wesley, Harlow
Zurück zum Zitat Polatidis H, Haralambopoulos D, Munda G, Vreeker R (2006) Selecting an appropriate multi-criteria decision analysis technique for renewable energy planning. Energy Source Part B 1:181–193. doi:10.1080/009083190881607 Polatidis H, Haralambopoulos D, Munda G, Vreeker R (2006) Selecting an appropriate multi-criteria decision analysis technique for renewable energy planning. Energy Source Part B 1:181–193. doi:10.​1080/​009083190881607
Zurück zum Zitat Pykäläinen J, Hiltunen V, Leskinen P (2007) Complementary use of voting methods and interactive utility analysis in participatory strategic forest planning: experiences gained from western Finland. Can J For Res 37:853–865. doi:10.1139/X06-241 Pykäläinen J, Hiltunen V, Leskinen P (2007) Complementary use of voting methods and interactive utility analysis in participatory strategic forest planning: experiences gained from western Finland. Can J For Res 37:853–865. doi:10.​1139/​X06-241
Zurück zum Zitat Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson G, Bennett E (2010) Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:5242–5247. doi:10.1073/pnas.0907284107 Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson G, Bennett E (2010) Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:5242–5247. doi:10.​1073/​pnas.​0907284107
Zurück zum Zitat Rinner C, Malczewski J (2002) Web-enabled spatial decision analysis using ordered weighted averaging (OWA). J Geogr Syst 4:385–403. doi:10.1007/s101090300095 Rinner C, Malczewski J (2002) Web-enabled spatial decision analysis using ordered weighted averaging (OWA). J Geogr Syst 4:385–403. doi:10.​1007/​s101090300095
Zurück zum Zitat Rivas-Dávalos F, Moreno-Goytia E, Gutiérrez-Alcaraz G, Tovar-Hernández J (2007) Evolutionary multi-objective optimization in power systems: state-of-the-art. In : IEEE Lausanne Power Tech, 2007. Lausanne, Switzerland. IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, 1–5 July 2007 Rivas-Dávalos F, Moreno-Goytia E, Gutiérrez-Alcaraz G, Tovar-Hernández J (2007) Evolutionary multi-objective optimization in power systems: state-of-the-art. In : IEEE Lausanne Power Tech, 2007. Lausanne, Switzerland. IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, 1–5 July 2007
Zurück zum Zitat Robert N (2013) Sustaining the supply of multiple ecosystem services. An analysis based on the simulation of the joint production of wood and non-wood goods in forests. Dissertation, Paris Tech, Nancy Cedex. French National Institute of Geographic and Forest Information (IGN) and Laboratory of Forest Economics Robert N (2013) Sustaining the supply of multiple ecosystem services. An analysis based on the simulation of the joint production of wood and non-wood goods in forests. Dissertation, Paris Tech, Nancy Cedex. French National Institute of Geographic and Forest Information (IGN) and Laboratory of Forest Economics
Zurück zum Zitat Romero C, Tamiz M, Jones DF (1998) Goal programming, compromise programming and reference point method formulations: linkages and utility interpretations. J Oper Res Soc 49:986–991. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600611 Romero C, Tamiz M, Jones DF (1998) Goal programming, compromise programming and reference point method formulations: linkages and utility interpretations. J Oper Res Soc 49:986–991. doi:10.​1057/​palgrave.​jors.​2600611
Zurück zum Zitat Roy B (1968) Classement et choix en présence de points de vue multiples—La méthode ELECTRE. RIRO 8:57–75 Roy B (1968) Classement et choix en présence de points de vue multiples—La méthode ELECTRE. RIRO 8:57–75
Zurück zum Zitat Saaty T (1990) The analytic hierarchy process. planning, priority setting, resource allocation, 2nd edn. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh Saaty T (1990) The analytic hierarchy process. planning, priority setting, resource allocation, 2nd edn. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh
Zurück zum Zitat Schmoldt DL, Mendoza G (2001) Past developments and future directions for the AHP in natural resources. In: Schmoldt DL, Kangas J, Mendoza G, Pesonen M (eds) The analytic hierarchy process in natural resource and environmental decision making. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 289–305 Schmoldt DL, Mendoza G (2001) Past developments and future directions for the AHP in natural resources. In: Schmoldt DL, Kangas J, Mendoza G, Pesonen M (eds) The analytic hierarchy process in natural resource and environmental decision making. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 289–305
Zurück zum Zitat Schwenk W, Donovan T, Keeton W, Nunery J (2012) Carbon storage, timber production, and biodiversity: comparing ecosystem services with multi-criteria decision analysis. Ecol Appl 22:1612–1627 Schwenk W, Donovan T, Keeton W, Nunery J (2012) Carbon storage, timber production, and biodiversity: comparing ecosystem services with multi-criteria decision analysis. Ecol Appl 22:1612–1627
Zurück zum Zitat Seidl R, Lexer MJ (2013) Forest management under climatic and social uncertainty: trade-offs between reducing climate change impacts and fostering adaptive capacity. J Environ Manage 114:461–469. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.09.028 Seidl R, Lexer MJ (2013) Forest management under climatic and social uncertainty: trade-offs between reducing climate change impacts and fostering adaptive capacity. J Environ Manage 114:461–469. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jenvman.​2012.​09.​028
Zurück zum Zitat Shen J, Jing Z, Wen Y (2013) Measuring the true technical efficiency of farmers’ forest management in Fujian, China: a three-stage dea analysis. Inf Technol J 12:8604–8608. doi:10.3923/itj.2013.8604.8608 Shen J, Jing Z, Wen Y (2013) Measuring the true technical efficiency of farmers’ forest management in Fujian, China: a three-stage dea analysis. Inf Technol J 12:8604–8608. doi:10.​3923/​itj.​2013.​8604.​8608
Zurück zum Zitat Triantakonstantis DP, Kalivas DP, Kollias VJ (2013) Autologistic regression and multicriteria evaluation models for the prediction of forest expansion. New Forest 44:163–181. doi:10.1007/s11056-012-9308-x Triantakonstantis DP, Kalivas DP, Kollias VJ (2013) Autologistic regression and multicriteria evaluation models for the prediction of forest expansion. New Forest 44:163–181. doi:10.​1007/​s11056-012-9308-x
Zurück zum Zitat Triantaphyllou E (2000) Multi-criteria decision making methods. A comparative study. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht Triantaphyllou E (2000) Multi-criteria decision making methods. A comparative study. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
Zurück zum Zitat UNCED (1992) The non-legally binding authoritative statement of principles for a global consensus on the management, conservation and sustainable development of all types of forests. Report on the United Nations Conference on Environment and Dept. Rio de Janeiro UNCED (1992) The non-legally binding authoritative statement of principles for a global consensus on the management, conservation and sustainable development of all types of forests. Report on the United Nations Conference on Environment and Dept. Rio de Janeiro
Zurück zum Zitat Uribe D, Geneletti D, del Castillo R, Orsi F (2014) Integrating stakeholder preferences and GIS-based multicriteria analysis to identify forest landscape restoration priorities. Sustainability 6:935–951. doi:10.3390/su6020935 Uribe D, Geneletti D, del Castillo R, Orsi F (2014) Integrating stakeholder preferences and GIS-based multicriteria analysis to identify forest landscape restoration priorities. Sustainability 6:935–951. doi:10.​3390/​su6020935
Zurück zum Zitat Vahidnia M, Alesheikh A, Alimohammadi A, Bassiri A (2008) Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process in GIS application. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci 37(B2):593–596 Vahidnia M, Alesheikh A, Alimohammadi A, Bassiri A (2008) Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process in GIS application. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci 37(B2):593–596
Zurück zum Zitat Vassilev V, Genova K, Vassileva M (2005) A brief survey of multicriteria decision making and software systems. Cybernet Inf Tech 5:3–13 Vassilev V, Genova K, Vassileva M (2005) A brief survey of multicriteria decision making and software systems. Cybernet Inf Tech 5:3–13
Zurück zum Zitat Velasquez M, Hester PT (2013) An analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods. Int J Oper Res 10:56–66 Velasquez M, Hester PT (2013) An analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods. Int J Oper Res 10:56–66
Zurück zum Zitat von Winterfeldt D, Edwards W (1986) Decision analysis and behavioral research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge von Winterfeldt D, Edwards W (1986) Decision analysis and behavioral research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Zurück zum Zitat Weintraub A, Romero C (2006) Operations research models and the management of agricultural and forestry resources: a review and comparison. Interfaces 36:446–457. doi:10.1287/inte.1060.0222 Weintraub A, Romero C (2006) Operations research models and the management of agricultural and forestry resources: a review and comparison. Interfaces 36:446–457. doi:10.​1287/​inte.​1060.​0222
Zurück zum Zitat Willis AJ (1997) The ecosystem: an evolving concept viewed historically. Funct Ecol 11:268–271 Willis AJ (1997) The ecosystem: an evolving concept viewed historically. Funct Ecol 11:268–271
Zurück zum Zitat Wise M, Calvin K, Thomson A, Clarke L, Bond-Lamberty B, Sands R et al (2009) Implications of Limiting CO2 concentrations for land use and energy. Science 324:1183–1186. doi:10.1126/science.1168475 Wise M, Calvin K, Thomson A, Clarke L, Bond-Lamberty B, Sands R et al (2009) Implications of Limiting CO2 concentrations for land use and energy. Science 324:1183–1186. doi:10.​1126/​science.​1168475
Zurück zum Zitat Wolfslehner B, Seidl R (2010) Harnessing ecosystem models and multi-criteria decision analysis for the support of forest management. Environ Manag 46:850–861. doi:10.1007/s00267-009-9414-5 Wolfslehner B, Seidl R (2010) Harnessing ecosystem models and multi-criteria decision analysis for the support of forest management. Environ Manag 46:850–861. doi:10.​1007/​s00267-009-9414-5
Zurück zum Zitat Wolfslehner B, Brüchert F, Fischbach J, Rammer W, Becker G, Lindner M, Lexer MJ (2012) Exploratory multi-criteria analysis in sustainability impact assessment of forest-wood chains: the example of a regional case study in Baden-Württemberg. Eur J Forest Res 131:47–56. doi:10.1007/s10342-011-0499-z Wolfslehner B, Brüchert F, Fischbach J, Rammer W, Becker G, Lindner M, Lexer MJ (2012) Exploratory multi-criteria analysis in sustainability impact assessment of forest-wood chains: the example of a regional case study in Baden-Württemberg. Eur J Forest Res 131:47–56. doi:10.​1007/​s10342-011-0499-z
Zurück zum Zitat Zadeh L (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8:338–353 Zadeh L (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8:338–353
Zurück zum Zitat Zarghami M, Szidarovszky F (2011) Multicriteria analysis. Applications to water and environment management. Springer, Berlin Zarghami M, Szidarovszky F (2011) Multicriteria analysis. Applications to water and environment management. Springer, Berlin
Zurück zum Zitat Zeleny M (1973) Compromise programming. In: Cochrane JL, Zeleny M (eds) Multiple criteria decision making, 1st edn. University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, pp 262–301 Zeleny M (1973) Compromise programming. In: Cochrane JL, Zeleny M (eds) Multiple criteria decision making, 1st edn. University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, pp 262–301
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang Z, Sherman R, Yang Z, Wu R, Wang W, Yin M et al (2013) Integrating a participatory process with a GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis for protected area zoning in China. J Nat Conserv 21:225–240. doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2012.12.006 Zhang Z, Sherman R, Yang Z, Wu R, Wang W, Yin M et al (2013) Integrating a participatory process with a GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis for protected area zoning in China. J Nat Conserv 21:225–240. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jnc.​2012.​12.​006
Metadaten
Titel
Hybrid MCDA Methods to Integrate Multiple Ecosystem Services in Forest Management Planning: A Critical Review
verfasst von
Britta Uhde
W. Andreas Hahn
Verena C. Griess
Thomas Knoke
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Environmental Management / Ausgabe 2/2015
Print ISSN: 0364-152X
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1009
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0503-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2015

Environmental Management 2/2015 Zur Ausgabe