Abstract
Growth, sporulation, synthesis of δ-endotoxins, and toxicity against the larvae of Aedes aegypti and Culex pipiens were studied during fermentation of Bacillus thuringiensis H14 in a 20-L fermentor. Measurements of optical density and dielectric permittivity for biomass determination suggest a highly promising technique for on-line evaluation of sporulation. The synthesis of 65-, 25- and 130-kDa proteins started at 16, 18, and 23 h, respectively. These proteins were enriched in different ways until the end of culture (48 h). Toxicity in the course of sporulation was significantly different for the larvae of both mosquito species. Maximal activity against Ae. aegypti was obtained at the end of culture, whereas for Cx. pipiens, the sample at 38 h was the most active.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
H Agaisse D Lereclus (1994) ArticleTitleExpression in Bacillus subtilis of the Bacillus thuringiensis Cry III A toxin gene is not dependent on a sporulation-specific sigma factor and is increased in a Spo OA mutant J Bacteriol 176 4734–4741 Occurrence Handle8045904
H Agaisse D Lereclus (1995) ArticleTitleHow does Bacillus thuringiensis produce so much insecticidal crystal protein? J Bacteriol 177 6027–6032 Occurrence Handle7592363
AI Aronson (1993) ArticleTitleThe two faces of Bacillus thuringiensis: insecticidal proteins and post-exponential survival Mol Microbiol 7 489–496 Occurrence Handle8384686
C Avignone Rossa CF Mignone (1995) ArticleTitleBacillus thuringiensis growth and toxicity Mol Biotech 4 55–71
PR Bhattacharya (2000) ArticleTitleHyper production of insecticidal crystal protein (δ-entotoxin) by Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis is not related to sporulation-specific biochemical functions Curr Microbiol 41 187–191
RG Buchanan NE Gibbon (1974) Endospore forming rods and cocci DH Bergey RE Buchanan NE Gibbon (Eds) et al. Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology EditionNumber8 Williams & Wilkins Co Baltimore 529–545
CN Chilcott DJ Ellar (1988) ArticleTitleComparative toxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis crystal proteins in vitro J Gen Microbiol 134 2551–2558 Occurrence Handle3254944
N Crickmore DR Zeigler J Feitelson E Schnepf J Rie Particlevan D Lereclus J Baum DH Dean (1998) ArticleTitleRevision of the nomenclature for the Bacillus thuringiensis pesticidal crystal proteins Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62 807–813
H Barjac Particlede (1978) ArticleTitleUne nouvelle variété de Bacillus thuringiensis très toxique pour les moustiques: Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis sérotype 14 CR Acad Sci Paris sér D 286 797–800
BA Federici P Lüthy J Ibarra (1990) Parasporal body of Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis H Barjac Particlede D Sutherland (Eds) Bacterial control of mosquitoes and blackflies: biochemistry, genetics and applications of Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis and Bacillus sphaericus Rutgers University Press New Brunswick, NJ 16–44
H Höfte HR Whiteley (1989) ArticleTitleInsecticidal crystal proteins of Bacillus thuringiensis Microbiol Rev 53 242–255 Occurrence Handle2666844
C Krittanai P Lungchukiet S Ruangwetdee T Tuntitippawan (2001) ArticleTitleRedesign of an interhelical loop of the Bacillus thuringiensis Cry4B delta-endotoxin for proteolytic cleavage J Biochem Mol Biol 34 150–155
UK Laemmli M Favre (1973) ArticleTitleMaturation of the head of bacteriophage T4.I. DNA packaging agents J Mol Biol 80 575–599 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0022-2836(73)90198-8 Occurrence Handle4204102
WM Liu R Bajpai V Bihari (1994) ArticleTitleHigh-density cultivation of sporeformers Ann NY Acad Sci 721 310–325 Occurrence Handle8010682
R Losick P Youngman PJ Piggot (1986) ArticleTitleGenetics of endospore formation in Bacillus subtilis Ann Rev Genet 20 625–669 Occurrence Handle10.1146/annurev.ge.20.120186.003205 Occurrence Handle3101583
OH Lowry NJ Rosebrough AL Farr RJ Randall (1951) ArticleTitleProtein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent J Biol Chem 193 265–275 Occurrence Handle14907713
D Pearson OP Ward (1988) ArticleTitleEffect of culture conditions on growth and sporulation of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis and development of media for production of the protein crystal endotoxin Biotech Lett 10 451–456 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01027055
M Perani AH Bishop (2000) ArticleTitleEffects of media composition on δ-endotoxin production and morphology of Bacillus thuringiensis in wild type and spontaneously mutated strains Microbios 101 47–66 Occurrence Handle10677843
E Schnepf N Crickmore J Rie Particlevan D Lereclus J Baum J Feitelson DR Zeigler DH Dean (1998) ArticleTitleBacillus thuringiensis and its pesticidal crystal proteins Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62 775–806
SA Siano (1997) ArticleTitleBiomass measurement by inductive permittivity Biotech Bioeng 55 289–304 Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19970720)55:2<289::AID-BIT7>3.0.CO;2-E
M Starzak RK Bajpai (1991) ArticleTitleA structured model for vegetative growth and sporulation in Bacillus thuringiensis Appl Biochem Biotech 28/29 699–718
WE Thomas DJ Ellar (1983) ArticleTitleBacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis crystal δ-endotoxin: effects on insect and mammalian cells in vitro and in vivo J Cell Sci 60 181–197 Occurrence Handle6874728
World Health Organization, 1981. Report of informal consultation on standardization of Bacillus thuringiensis H-14. TDR/BCV/BTH-14/811, WHO/VBC/81-828, Geneva, Switzerland: WHO
D Wu FN Chang (1985) ArticleTitleSynergism in mosquitocidal activity of 26 and 65 kDa proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis crystal FEBS Lett 190 232–236 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0014-5793(85)81290-4
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Mr. H. Oreal for providing the strain. We also thank Fogale Nanotech Co. for supplying the permittivity BIOMASS SYSTEM. This work has been partially supported by Ecautec S.A.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sarrafzadeh, M.H., Guiraud, J.P., Lagneau, C. et al. Growth, Sporulation, δ-Endotoxins Synthesis, and Toxicity During Culture of Bacillus thuringiensis H14. Curr Microbiol 51, 75–81 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-005-4463-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-005-4463-3