Skip to main content
Log in

Detection and Identification of Wild Yeast Contaminants of the Industrial Fuel Ethanol Fermentation Process

  • Published:
Current Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Monitoring for wild yeast contaminants is an essential component of the management of the industrial fuel ethanol manufacturing process. Here we describe the isolation and molecular identification of 24 yeast species present in bioethanol distilleries in northeast Brazil that use sugar cane juice or cane molasses as feeding substrate. Most of the yeast species could be identified readily from their unique amplification-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) fingerprint. Yeast of the species Dekkera bruxellensis, Candida tropicalis, Pichia galeiformis, as well as a species of Candida that belongs to the C. intermedia clade, were found to be involved in acute contamination episodes; the remaining 20 species were classified as adventitious. Additional physiologic data confirmed that the presence of these major contaminants cause decreased bioethanol yield. We conclude that PCR fingerprinting can be used in an industrial setting to monitor yeast population dynamics to early identify the presence of the most important contaminant yeasts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abbott DA, Hynes SH, Ingledew WM (2005) Growth rates of Dekkera/Brettanomyces yeasts hinder their ability to compete with Saccharomyces cerevisiae in batch corn mash fermentations. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 66:641–647

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Capece A, Salzano G, Romano P (2003) Molecular typing techniques as a tool to differentiate non-Saccharomyces wine species. Int J Food Microbiol 84:33–39

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. de Azeredo LA, Gomes EA, Mendonca-Hagler LC, Hagler AN (1998) Yeast communities associated with sugarcane in Campos, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Int Microbiol 1:205–208

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. de Souza-Liberal AT, da Silva Filho EA, de Morais JOF, Simões DA, de Morais Jr MA (2005) Contaminant yeast detection in industrial ethanol fermentation must by rDNA-PCR. Lett Appl Microbiol 40:19–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. de Souza-Liberal AT, Basílio ACM, Brasileiro BTRV, Silva-Filho EA, Simões DA, de Morais Jr MA (2007) Identification of the yeast Dekkera bruxellensis as major contaminant in continuous fuel ethanol fermentation. J App Microbiol 102:538–547

    Google Scholar 

  6. Esteve-Zarzoso B, Belloch C, Uruburu F, Querol A (1999) Identification of yeasts by RFLP analysis of the 5.8S rRNA gene and two ribosomal internal transcribed spacers. Int J Syst Bacteriol 49:329–337

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kurtzman CP, Robnett CJ (1998) Identification and phylogeny of ascomycetous yeasts from analysis of nuclear large subunit (26S) ribosomal DNA partial sequences. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 73:331–371

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Loureiro V, Malfeito-Ferreira M (2003) Spoilage yeasts in the wine industry. Int J Food Microbiol 86:23–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Olasupo NA, Bakre S, Teniola OD, James SA (2003) Identification of yeasts isolated from Nigerian sugar cane peels. J Basic Microbiol 43:530–533

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pina C, Teixeira P, Leite P, Villa M, Belloch C, Brito L (2005) PCR-fingerprinting and RAPD approaches for tracing the source of yeast contamination in a carbonated orange juice production chain. J Appl Microbiol 98:1107–1114

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schwan RF, Mendonca AT, da Silva Jr JJ, Rodrigues V, Wheals AE (2001) Microbiology and physiology of Cachaça (Aguardente) fermentations. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 79:89–96

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Schuller D, Valero E, Dequin S, Casal M (2004) Survey of molecular methods for the typing of wine yeast strains. FEMS Microbiol Lett 231:19–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sherata AM (1960) Yeasts isolated from sugar cane and its juice during the production of aguardente de cana. Appl Microbiol 8:73–75

    Google Scholar 

  14. Silva-Filho EA, Santos SKB, Resende AM, Morais JOF, Morais Jr MA, Simões DA (2005a) Yeast population dynamics of industrial fuel-ethanol fermentation process assessed by PCR-fingerprinting Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 88:13–23

  15. Silva-Filho EA, Melo HF, Antunes DF, dos Santos SKB, Resende MA, Simões DA (2005b) Isolation by genetics and physiological characteristics of a fuel-ethanol fermentative S. cerevisiae strain with potential for genetic manipulation. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 32:481–486

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the Brazilian agencies Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) and by financial support from Genetech Bioproductivity, Ltd. (Recife, Brazil).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. A. de Morais Jr..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Basílio, A.C.M., de Araújo, P.R.L., de Morais, J.O.F. et al. Detection and Identification of Wild Yeast Contaminants of the Industrial Fuel Ethanol Fermentation Process. Curr Microbiol 56, 322–326 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-007-9085-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-007-9085-5

Keywords

Navigation