Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal solution for a cancer radiotherapy problem

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 27 December 2012

Abstract

We address the problem of finding the optimal radiotherapy fractionation scheme, representing the response to radiation of tumour and normal tissues by the LQ model including exponential repopulation and sublethal damage due to incomplete repair. We formulate the nonlinear programming problem of maximizing the overall tumour damage, while keeping the damages to the late and early responding normal tissues within a given admissible level. The optimum is searched over a single week of treatment and its possible structures are identified. In the two simpler but important cases of absence of the incomplete repair term or of prevalent late constraint, we prove the uniqueness of the optimal solution and we characterize it in terms of model parameters. The optimal solution is found to be not necessarily uniform over the week. The theoretical results are confirmed by numerical tests and comparisons with literature fractionation schemes are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Astrahan M (2008) Some implications of linear-quadratic-linear radiation dose-response with regard to hypofractionation. Med Phys 35: 4161–4172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertuzzi A, Bruni C, Fasano A, Gandolfi A, Papa F, Sinisgalli C (2010) Response of tumor spheroids to radiation: modeling and parameter identification. Bull Math Biol 72: 1069–1091

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bertuzzi A, Fasano A, Gandolfi A, Sinisgalli C (2008) Reoxygenation and split-dose response to radiation in a tumour model with Krogh-type vascular geometry. Bull Math Biol 70: 992–1012

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (1999) Fractionation and protraction for radiotherapy of prostate carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 43: 1095–1101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner DJ, Hlatky LR, Hahnfeldt PJ, Hall EJ, Sachs RK (1995) A convenient extension of the linear-quadratic model to include redistribution and reoxygenation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 32: 379–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dionysiou DD, Stamatakos GS, Uzunoglu NK, Nikita KS, Marioli A (2004) A four-dimensional simulation model of tumour response to radiotherapy in vivo: parametric validation considering radiosensitivity, genetic profile and fractionation. J Theor Biol 230: 1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Düchting W, Ginsberg T, Ulmer W (1995) Modeling of radiogenic responses induced by fractionated irradiation in malignant and normal tissue. Stem Cells 13(Suppl 1): 301–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Düchting W, Ulmer W, Lehrig R, Ginsberg T, Dedeleit E (1992) Computer simulation and modelling of tumor spheroid growth and their relevance for optimization of fractionated radiotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol 168: 354–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler JF (1989) The linear-quadratic formula and progress in fractionated radiotherapy. Br J Radiol 62: 679–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler JF (2007) Is there an optimum overall time for head and neck radiotherapy? A review, with new modelling. Clin Oncol 19: 8–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler JF (2008) Optimum overall times II: extended modelling for head and neck radiotherapy. Clin Oncol 20: 113–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler JF (2010) 21 years of biologically effective dose. Br J Radiol 83: 554–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler JF, Hararia PM, Leborgne F, Leborgne JH (2003) Acute radiation reactions in oral and pharyngeal mucosa: tolerable levels in altered fractionation schedules. Radiother Oncol 69: 161–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler JF, Ritter MA, Chappel RJ, Brenner DJ (2003) What hypofractionated protocols should be tested for prostate cancer?. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 56: 1093–1104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero M, Li XA (2004) Extending the linear-quadratic model for large fraction doses pertinent to stereotactic radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol 49: 4825–4835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hlatky LR, Hahnfeldt P, Sachs RK (1994) Influence of time-dependent stochastic heterogeneity on the radiation response of a cell population. Math Biosci 122: 201–220

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jones B, Dale RG (1999) Mathematical models of tumour and normal tissue response. Acta Oncol 38: 883–893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee EK, Fox T, Crocker I (2006) Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 64: 301–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu W, Chen M, Chen Q, Ruchala K, Olivera G (2008) Adaptive fractionation therapy: I. Basic concept and strategy. Phys Med Biol 53: 5495–5511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu W, Chen M, Chen Q, Ruchala K, Olivera G (2008) Adaptive fractionation therapy: II. Biological effective dose. Phys Med Biol 53: 5513–5525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Rourke SFC, McAneney H, Hillen T (2009) Linear quadratic and tumour control probability modelling in external beam radiotherapy. J Math Biol 58: 799–817

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Papa F, Sinisgalli C (2011) Optimal solution for a cancer radiotherapy problem with a maximal damage constraint on normal tissues. IASI-CNR Technical Report R, pp 11–20

  • Pierre DA (1969) Optimization theory with applications. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ribba B, Colin T, Schnell S (2006) A multiscale mathematical model of cancer, and its use in analyzing irradiation therapies. Theor Biol Med Model 3: 7. doi:10.1186/1742-4682-3-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thames HD (1985) An ‘incomplete-repair’ model for survival after fractionated and continuous irradiations. Int J Radiat Biol 47: 319–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turesson I, Thames HD (1989) Repair capacity and kinetics of human skin during fractionated radiotherapy: erythema, desquamation, and telangiectasia after 3 and 5 year’s follow-up. Radiother Oncol 15: 169–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams MV, Denekamp J, Fowler JF (1985) A review of α/β ratios for experimental tumors: implications for clinical studies of altered fractionation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 11: 87–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong CS, Hill RP (1998) Experimental radiotherapy. In: Tannock IF, Hill RP (eds) The basic science of oncology. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 322–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y, Xing L (2005) Optimization of radiotherapy dose-time fractionation with consideration of tumor specific biology. Med Phys 32: 3666–3677

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Sinisgalli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bertuzzi, A., Bruni, C., Papa, F. et al. Optimal solution for a cancer radiotherapy problem. J. Math. Biol. 66, 311–349 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-012-0512-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-012-0512-2

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

Navigation