Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Stochastic population growth in spatially heterogeneous environments

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Classical ecological theory predicts that environmental stochasticity increases extinction risk by reducing the average per-capita growth rate of populations. For sedentary populations in a spatially homogeneous yet temporally variable environment, a simple model of population growth is a stochastic differential equation dZ t μ Z t dtσ Z t dW t , t ≥ 0, where the conditional law of Z tt Z t given Z t z has mean and variance approximately z μΔt and z 2 σ 2Δt when the time increment Δt is small. The long-term stochastic growth rate \({\lim_{t \to \infty} t^{-1}\log Z_t}\) for such a population equals \({\mu -\frac{\sigma^2}{2}}\) . Most populations, however, experience spatial as well as temporal variability. To understand the interactive effects of environmental stochasticity, spatial heterogeneity, and dispersal on population growth, we study an analogous model \({{\bf X}_t = (X_t^1, \ldots, X_t^n)}\) , t ≥ 0, for the population abundances in n patches: the conditional law of X tt given X t x is such that the conditional mean of \({X_{t+\Delta t}^i - X_t^i}\) is approximately \({[x^i \mu_i + \sum_j (x^j D_{ji} - x^i D_{ij})] \Delta t}\) where μ i is the per capita growth rate in the ith patch and D ij is the dispersal rate from the ith patch to the jth patch, and the conditional covariance of \({X_{t+\Delta t}^i - X_t^i}\) and \({X_{t + \Delta t}^j - X_t^j}\) is approximately x i x j σ ij Δt for some covariance matrix Σ = (σ ij ). We show for such a spatially extended population that if \({S_t = X_t^1 + \cdots + X_t^n}\) denotes the total population abundance, then Y t X t /S t , the vector of patch proportions, converges in law to a random vector Y as \({t \to \infty}\) , and the stochastic growth rate \({\lim_{t \to \infty} t^{-1}\log S_t}\) equals the space-time average per-capita growth rate \({\sum_i \mu_i \mathbb{E}[Y_\infty^i]}\) experienced by the population minus half of the space-time average temporal variation \({\mathbb{E}[\sum_{i,j}\sigma_{ij}Y_\infty^i Y_\infty^j]}\) experienced by the population. Using this characterization of the stochastic growth rate, we derive an explicit expression for the stochastic growth rate for populations living in two patches, determine which choices of the dispersal matrix D produce the maximal stochastic growth rate for a freely dispersing population, derive an analytic approximation of the stochastic growth rate for dispersal limited populations, and use group theoretic techniques to approximate the stochastic growth rate for populations living in multi-scale landscapes (e.g. insects on plants in meadows on islands). Our results provide fundamental insights into “ideal free” movement in the face of uncertainty, the persistence of coupled sink populations, the evolution of dispersal rates, and the single large or several small (SLOSS) debate in conservation biology. For example, our analysis implies that even in the absence of density-dependent feedbacks, ideal-free dispersers occupy multiple patches in spatially heterogeneous environments provided environmental fluctuations are sufficiently strong and sufficiently weakly correlated across space. In contrast, for diffusively dispersing populations living in similar environments, intermediate dispersal rates maximize their stochastic growth rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler FR (1992) The effects of averaging on the basic reproduction ratio. Math Biosci 111: 89–98

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bascompte J, Possingham H, Roughgarden J (2002) Patchy populations in stochastic environments: critical number of patches for persistence. Am Nat 159: 128–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benaïm M, Schreiber SJ (2009) Persistence of structured populations in random environments. Theor Popul Biol 76: 19–34

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya RN (1978) Criteria for recurrence and existence of invariant measures for multidimensional diffusions. Ann Probab 6(4):541–553. ISSN 00911798. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2243121

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogachev VI, Röckner M, Stannat W (2002) Uniqueness of solutions of elliptic equations and uniqueness of invariant measures of diffusions. Sbornik: Math 193(7):945. http://stacks.iop.org/1064-5616/193/i=7/a=A01

  • Bogachev Vladimir I, Krylov Nikolai V, Röckner Michael (2009) Elliptic and parabolic equations for measures. Russ Math Surv 64(6):973. http://stacks.iop.org/0036-0279/64/i=6/a=R02

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyce MS, Haridas CV, Lee CT, the NCEAS Stochastic Demography Working Group (2006) Demography in an increasingly variable world. Trends Ecol Evol 21: 141–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantrell RS, Cosner C (1991) The effects of spatial heterogeneity in population dynamics. J Math Biol 29: 315–338

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cantrell RS, Cosner C, Lou Y (2006) Movement toward better environments and the evolution of rapid diffusion. Math Biosci 204(2): 199–214

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cantrell RS, Cosner C (1989) Diffusive logistic equations with indefinite weights: population models in disrupted environments. Proc Royal Soc Edinburgh Section A Math 112(3–4): 293–318

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cantrell RS, Cosner C, Deangelis DL, Padron V (2007) The ideal free distribution as an evolutionarily stable strategy. J Biol Dyn 1: 249–271

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chesson PL (2000) General theory of competitive coexistence in spatially-varying environments. Theor Popul Biol 58: 211–237

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Da Prato G, Zabczyk J (1996) Ergodicity for Infinite-Dimensional Systems, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol 229. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • DeAngelis DL, Wolkowicz GSK, Lou Y, Jiang Y, Novak M, Svanbäck R, Araújo MS, Jo YS, Cleary EA (2011) The effect of travel loss on evolutionarily stable distributions of populations in space. Am Nat 178: 15–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delibes M, Gaona P, Ferreras P (2001) Effects of an attractive sink leading into maladaptive habitat selection. Am Nat 158: 277–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis B, Munholland PL, Scott JM (1991) Estimation of growth and extinction parameters for endangered species. Ecol Monogr 61: 115–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diaconis P (1988) Group representations in probability and statistics. Institute of Mathematical Statistics Lecture Notes—Monograph Series, vol 11. Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Hayward

  • Diamond JM (1975) The island dilemma: lessons of modern biogeographic studies for the design of natural reserves. Biol Conserv 7: 129–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dias PC (1996) Sources and sinks in population biology. Trends Ecol Evol 11:326–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Dockery J, Hutson V, Mischaikow K, Pernarowski M (1998) The evolution of slow dispersal rates: a reaction diffusion model. J Math Biol 37: 61–83

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Durrett R, Remenik D (2012) Evolution of the dispersal distance. J Math Biol (in press)

  • Fahrig L (1997) Relative effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on population extinction. J Wildl Manag 61: 603–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L (2002) Effect of habitat fragmentation on the extinction threshold: a synthesis. Ecol Appl 12: 346–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley P (1994) Predicting extinction times from environmental stochasticity and carrying capacity. Conserv Biol 8:124–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Fretwell SD, Lucas HL Jr. (1970) On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. Acta Biotheoretica 19:16–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner CW (2004) Handbook of Stochastic Methods: for Physics, Chemistry and the Natural Sciences, Series in synergetics, vol 13, 4th edn. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiß C, Manthey R (1994) Comparison theorems for stochastic differential equations in finite and infinite dimensions. Stoch Processes Appl 53: 23–35

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin ME (1988) A comment on Quinn and Hastings: extinction in subdivided habitats. Conserv Biol 2: 290–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez A, Holt RD (2002) The inflationary effects of environmental fluctuations in source-sink systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99: 14872–14877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gradshteyn IS, Ryzhik IM (2007) Table of integrals, series, and products. Elsevier/Academic Press, Amsterdam, 7th edn, 2007. Translated from the Russian, Translation edited and with a preface by Alan Jeffrey and Daniel Zwillinger

  • Harper DGC (1982) Competitive foraging in mallards: “ideal free” ducks. Animal Behav 30: 575–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison S, Quinn JF (1989) Correlated environments and the persistence of metapopulations. Oikos 56: 293–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hastings A (1983) Can spatial variation alone lead to selection for dispersal?. Theor Popul Biol 24: 244–251

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Holt RD (1985) Patch dynamics in two-patch environments: some anomalous consequences of an optimal habitat distribtuion. Theor Popul Biol 28: 181–208

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Holt RD (1997) On the evolutionary stability of sink populations. Evol Ecol 11: 723–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt RD, McPeek MA (1996) Chaotic population dynamics favors the evolution of dispersal. Am Nat 148(44): 709–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutson V, Mischaikow K, Poláčik P (2001) The evolution of dispersal rates in a heterogeneous time-periodic environment. J Math Biol 43: 501–533

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ikeda N, Watanabe S (1989) Stochastic differential equations and diffusion processes, North-Holland Mathematical Library, vol 24, 2nd edn. North-Holland Publishing Co, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen VAA, Yoshimura J (1998) Populations can persist in an environment consisting of sink habitats only. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 3696–3698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keagy J, Schreiber SJ, Cristol DA (2005) Replacing sources with sinks: when do populations go down the drain?. Restor Ecol 13: 529–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khas’minskii RZ (1960) Ergodic properties of recurrent diffusion processes and stabilization of the solution to the cauchy problem for parabolic equations. Theory Probab Appl 5(2):179–196, 1960. ISSN 0040585X. doi:10.1137/1105016.

  • Kirkland S, Li CK, Schreiber SJ (2006) On the evolution of dispersal in patchy landscapes. SIAM J Appl Math 66: 1366–1382

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kreuzer MP, Huntly NJ (2003) Habitat-specific demography: evidence for source-sink population structure in a mammal, the pika. Oecologia 134: 343–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Lande R, Engen S, Sæther BE (2003) Stochastic population dynamics in ecology and conservation: an introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  • Levin SA, Cohen D, Hastings A (1984) Dispersal strategies in patchy environments. Theor Popul Biol 26: 165–191

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Levins R (1969) Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bull ESA 15: 237–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonsdale WM (1993) Rates of spread of an invading species-mimosa pigra in northern Australia. J Ecol 81: 513–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg P, Ranta E, Ripa J, Kaitala V (2000) Population variability in space and time. Trends Ecol Evol 15: 460–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews DP, Gonzalez A (2007) The inflationary effects of environmental fluctuations ensure the persistence of sink metapopulations. Ecology 88: 2848–2856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May RM (1975) Stability and complexity in model ecosystems, 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • McPeek MA, Holt RD (1992) The evolution of dispersal in spatially and temporally varying environments. Am Nat 6: 1010–1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metz JAJ, de Jong TJ, Klinkhamer PGL (1983) What are the advantages of dispersing; a paper by Kuno extended. Oecologia 57: 166–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy MT (2001) Source-sink dynamics of a declining eastern kingbird population and the value of sink habitats. Conserv Biol 15: 737–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen T, Power ME, Oksanen L (1995) Ideal free habitat selection and consumer-resource dynamics. Am Nat 146: 565–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petchey OL, Gonzalez A, Wilson HB (1997) Effects on population persistence: the interaction between environmental noise colour, intraspecific competition and space. Proc Biol Sci 264: 1841–1847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philippi T, Seger J (1989) Hedging one’s evolutionary bets, revisited. Trends Ecol Evol 4: 41–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam HR (1988) Sources, sinks, and population regulation. Am Nat 132: 652–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn JF, Hastings A (1987) Extinction in subdivided habitats. Conserv Biol 1: 198–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remeš V (2000) How can maladaptive habitat choice generate source-sink population dynamics?. Oikos 91: 579–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy M, Holt RD, Barfield M (2005) Temporal autocorrelation can enhance the persistence and abundance of metapopulations comprised of coupled sinks. Am Nat 166: 246–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruelle D (1979) Analycity properties of the characteristic exponents of random matrix products. Adv Math 32: 68–80

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt KA (2004) Site fidelity in temporally correlated environments enhances population persistence. Ecol Lett 7: 176–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber SJ (2010) Interactive effects of temporal correlations, spatial heterogeneity, and dispersal on population persistence. Proc Royal Soc Biol Sci 277: 1907–1914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber SJ, Lloyd-Smith JO (2009) Invasion dynamics in spatially heterogenous environments. Am Nat 174: 490–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber SJ, Saltzman E (2009) Evolution of predator and prey movement into sink habitats. Am Nat 174: 68–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber SJ, Vejdani M (2006) Handling time promotes the coevolution of aggregation in predator–prey systems. Proc Royal Soc Biol Sci 273: 185–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber SJ, Fox LR, Getz WM (2000) Coevolution of contrary choices in host-parasitoid systems. American Naturalist 637–648

  • Serre JP (1977) Linear representations of finite groups. Springer, New York. Translated from the second French edition by Leonard L. Scott, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol 42

  • Slatkin M (1974) Hedging one’s evolutionary bets. Nature 250: 704–705

    Google Scholar 

  • Talay Denis (1991) Approximation of upper Lyapunov exponents of bilinear stochastic differential systems. SIAM J Numer Anal 28(4):1141–1164. ISSN 00361429. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2157791

  • Tuljapurkar S (1990) Population dynamics in variable environments. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Turelli M (1978) Random environments and stochastic calculus. Theor Popul Biol 12: 140–178

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • van Baalen M, Sabelis MW (1999) Nonequilibrium population dynamics of “ideal and free” prey and predators. Am Nat 154: 69–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilbur HM, Rudolf VHW (2006) Life-history evolution in uncertain environments: bet hedging in time. Am Nat 168: 398–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox BA, Murphy DD (1985) Conservation strategy: the effects of fragmentation on extinction. Am Nat 125: 879–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastian J. Schreiber.

Electronic Supplementary Material

The Below is the Electronic Supplementary Material.

ESM 1 (ZIP 104 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Evans, S.N., Ralph, P.L., Schreiber, S.J. et al. Stochastic population growth in spatially heterogeneous environments. J. Math. Biol. 66, 423–476 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-012-0514-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-012-0514-0

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation