Abstract
Tree frogs are able to climb smooth, vertical substrates using specialised toe pads which adhere via an area-based wet adhesive mechanism. Although the link between pads and arboreality in frogs is well-established, few studies have investigated the influence of morphology on adhesion. Trinidadian tree frogs from the genus Hyla are geometrically similar. There is a tendency towards comparatively reduced mass in larger species, but toe pad area increases as expected with isometry. As adhesion is area-dependent, forces are affected directly by the increase in mass relative to pad area, and there is a decrease in the ability of larger species to adhere to smooth rotation platforms. However, there is an increase in force per unit area that suggests larger species have more efficient toe pads. Toe pad structure is very similar though there are variations in the details of a number of features. Crucially, although differences in morphology appeared small they had demonstrable effects on adhesive efficiency of the pads. Epithelial cell area correlates positively with frog length and adhesive efficiency, related features of cell density and intercellular channel length correlate negatively. These findings are discussed in relation to the different forces involved in the tree frogs’ wet adhesive system.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- F :
-
force normal to the surface
- F c :
-
capillarity
- F sa :
-
stefan adhesion
- g :
-
the earth’s gravitational acceleration
- h :
-
meniscal height
- IRM:
-
interference reflection microscopy
- m :
-
mass
- r :
-
pad radius
- SEM:
-
scanning electron microscopy
- SVL:
-
snout–vent length
- v :
-
speed of separation
- α detachment :
-
angle at which frogs fall from rotation platform
- γ :
-
surface tension
- η :
-
viscosity
References
Ba-Omar TA, Downie JR, Barnes WJP (2000) Development of adhesive toe-pads in the tree frog (Phyllomedusa trinitatis). J Zool 250:267–282
Barnes WJP (1999) Tree frogs and tire technology. Tire Technology International (March), pp. 42–46
Barnes WJP, Smith J, Oines C, Mundl R (2002) Bionics and wet grip. Tire Technology International (December), pp. 56–60
Denny MW (1993) Air and water: the biology and physics of life’s media. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Duellman W, Trueb L (1994) Biology of amphibians, 2nd edn. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Emerson SB (1978) Allometry and jumping in frogs: helping the twain to meet. Evolution 32:551–564
Emerson SB, Diehl D (1980) Toe pad morphology and mechanisms of sticking in frogs. Biol J Linn Soc 13:199–216
Ernst VV (1973a) The digital pads of the tree frog, Hyla cinerea I: the epidermis. Tissue Cell 5:83–96
Ernst VV (1973b) The digital pads of the tree frog, Hyla cinerea II: the mucous glands. Tissue Cell 5:97–104
Federle W, Barnes WJP, Baumgartner W, Dreschler P, Smith JM (2006) Wet but not slippery: boundary friction in tree frog adhesive toe pads. J R Soc Interface DOI 10.1098/rsif.2006.0135
Green DM (1979) Treefrog toepads: comparative surface morphology using scanning electron microscopy. Can J Zool 57:2033–2046
Green DM (1980) Size differences in adhesive toe-pad cells of tree frogs of the diploid–polyploid Hyla versicolor complex. J Herpetol 14:15–19
Green DM (1981) Adhesion and the toe-pads of tree frogs. Copeia 1981:790–796
Green DM, Carson J (1988) The adhesion of tree frog toe pads to glass: a cryogenic examination of a capillary adhesion system. J Nat Hist 22:131–135
Green DM, Simon P (1986) Digital microstructure in ecologically diverse microhylid frogs genera Cophixalus and Sphenophryne (Amphibia: Anura) from Papua New Guinea. Aust J Zool 34:135–145
Hanna G, Barnes WJP (1991) Adhesion and detachment of the toe pads of tree frogs. J Exp Biol 155:103–125
Hertwig I, Sinsch U (1995) Comparative toe pad morphology in marsupial frogs (genus Gastrotheca): arboreal versus ground-dwelling species. Copeia 1995:38–47
Hora SL (1923) The adhesive apparatus on the toes of certain geckos and treefrogs. J Asiat Soc Bengal 19:137–145
Inger RF (1967) The development of a phylogeny of frogs. Evolution 21:369–384
Kikuyama S, Yamamoto K, Iwata T, Toyoda F (2002) Peptide and protein pheromones in amphibians. Comp Biochem Physiol B 132:69–74
McAllister A, Channing L (1983) Comparisons of toe pads of some Southern African climbing frogs. South Afr J Zool 18:110–114
Mizuhira V (2004) The digital pads of rhacophorid tree-frogs. J Electron Microsc 53:63–78
Murphy JC (1997) Amphibians and reptiles of Trinidad and Tobago. Krieger Publishing, Florida
Noble GK, Jaeckle ME (1928) The digital pads of the tree frogs. A study of the phylogenesis of an adaptive structure. J Morphol Physiol 45:259–292
Öhler A (1995) Digital pad morphology in torrent-living Ranid frogs. Asiat Herpetol Res 6:85–96
Smith JM (2003) Effects of allometric growth and toe pad morphology on adhesion in hylid tree frogs. PhD thesis, University of Glasgow
Smith AM, Morin MC (2002) Biochemical differences between trail mucus and adhesive mucus from marsh periwinkle snails. Biol Bull 203:338–346
Smith AM, Quick TJ, St Peter RL (1999) Differences in the composition of adhesive and non-adhesive mucus from the limpet Lottia limatula. Biol Bull 196:34–44
Welsch U, Storch V, Fuchs W (1974) The fine structure of the digital pads of rhacophorid tree frogs. Cell Tissue Res 148:407–416
Zani PA (2000) The comparative evolution of lizard claw and toe morphology and clinging performance. J Evol Biol 13:316—325
Acknowledgments
JMS thanks Margaret Mullin of Glasgow University SEM Unit and Mathis Riehle for advice. In Trinidad our thanks to the late Professor Peter Bacon, Karen Duhn, Mary Alkins-Koo, Mike Oatham and Grace Sirju-Charran of the University of the West Indies. Thanks also to Nadra Nathai-Gayan and David Boodoo of the Wildlife Division for permits and friendship. At Simla Research Station, thanks to the Asa Wright Nature Centre and Ronnie Hernandez. For frogging above and beyond the call of duty: Glasgow University Expedition members—Andy Barnes, Beccy Johnson, Gary Mason, Jim McVeigh, Carrie-Ann McCulloch, Christine Oines, Dan Thornham; and Leeds University’s Darren Croft, Beth Arrowsmith, Jon Bielby, Kirsten Skinner and Liz White. Funded with assistance from: NERC Grant No.—GT0499TS99 (JMS), Wellcome Trust Showcase Award (WJPB, JRD and Dr Mathis Riehle), The Carnegie Trust for Scotland (JRD and WJPB), The Glasgow Natural History Society’s Blodwen Lloyd Binns Trust (JMS), Continental Tires (WJPB) and the Percy Sladen Trust (WJPB). All experiments comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, J.M., Barnes, W.J.P., Downie, J.R. et al. Structural correlates of increased adhesive efficiency with adult size in the toe pads of hylid tree frogs. J Comp Physiol A 192, 1193–1204 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-006-0151-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-006-0151-4