Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Improving quality of sugarcane-growing soils by organic amendments under subtropical climatic conditions of India

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biology and Fertility of Soils Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A field trial was conducted on an inceptisol to assess the effect of different bio-manures on sugarcane yield, cane quality, and changes in soil physico-chemical and microbial properties in plant–ratoon system. Seven treatments, viz. control, vermicompost, farmyard manure (FYM), biogas slurry, sulphitation pressmud cake (SPMC), green manuring with intercropped Sesbania, and recommended dose of NPK (150:60:60 kg ha−1), were randomized within a block and replicated three times. Improvement in bulk density and infiltration rates was recorded after the addition of various bio-manures. The highest organic C was recorded in the vermicompost (0.54%) and pressmud (0.50%) treatments. The highest increase in soil microbial biomass C (185.5%) and soil microbial biomass N (220.2%) over its initial value was recorded with the addition of FYM. Dry matter production in plant, as well as ratoon crop, was significantly higher by bio-manure application over the control. Plant N uptake was highest in the pressmud treatment (227.7 kg ha−1), whereas P and K uptake were highest (41.4 and 226.50 kg ha−1) in vermicompost treatment. The highest number of millable canes (95.6 and 101.0 thousand ha−1) in plant and ratoon crop were obtained with the addition of pressmud. The highest yield (76.7 t ha−1) was recorded in planted cane with vermicompost application, whereas ratoon yield was highest (78.16 t ha−1) with pressmud application. In both planted and ratoon crop, organic amendments produced yields statistically similar to those with recommended NPK (76.1 and 78.1 t ha−1 for plant and ratoon cane).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alfoldi T, Mader P, Obersen A, Spiess E, Niggli U, Besson JM (1993) DOK-Versuch: vergleichende Langzeit-Untersuchungen in den drei Anbausystemen biologisch-Dynamesch, Organisch-biologisch and Konventionell. III. Boden: Chemische Untersuchungen, 1. and 2. Fruchtfolgeperiode. Schweiz Land-wirtsch Forsch 32:479–507

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JPE (1982) Soil respiration. In: Page AL (ed) Methods of soil analysis, part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, pp 837–871

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson TH, Domsch KH (1989) Ratios of microbial biomass carbon to total organic carbon in arable soils. Soil Biol Biochem 21:471–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand AR (1965) Rate of water intake in the field. In: Balck CA (ed) Methods of soil analysis, part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods. SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, pp 197–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakemore IC, Searle PL, Daly BK (1972) Methods for the chemical analysis of soils. NZ Soil Bureau report 10A. Government Printer, Wellington

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran WG, Cox GM (1957) Experimental designs. Wiley, NY, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Drinkwater LE, Letourneau DK, Workneh F, van Bruggen AHC, Shennan C (1995) Fundamental differences between conventional and organic tomato agroecosystems in California. Ecol Appl 5:1098–1112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Droogers P, Bouma J (1996) Biodynamic versus conventional farming effects on soil structure expressed by simulated potential productivity. Soil Sci Soc Am J 60:1552–1558

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard V, Chenu C, Recous C, Richard G (1999) Carbon, nitrogen, and microbial gradients induced by plant residues decomposing in soil. Eur J Soil Sci 50:567–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guisquiani PL, Paghai M, Gighoth G, Businelli D, Benetti A (1995) Urban waste compost: effects on physical, chemical, and biochemical soil properties. J Environ Qual 24:175–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson ML (1973) Soil chemical analysis. Prentice-Hall of India, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkinson DS, Ladd JN (1981) Microbial biomass in soil: measurement and turnover. In: Paul EA, Ladd JN (eds) Soil biochemistry, vol. 5. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 415–417

    Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Chen Z (2004) Soil microbial biomass C and N along a climatic transect in the Mongolian steppe. Biol Fertil Soils 39:344–351

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mader P, Fliebach D, Dubois L, Gunst P, Fried Niggli U (2002) Soil fertility and biodiversity in organic farming. Science 296:1694–1697

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meade GP, Chen JCP (1977) Cane sugar handbook, 10th edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Neyra CA, Dobereiner J (1977) Nitrogen fixation in grasses. Adv Agron 29:1–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parham JA, Deng SP, Raun WR, Johnson GV (2002) Long-term cattle manure application in soil. 1. Effect on soil phosphorus levels. Microbial biomass C and dehydrogenase and phosphatase activities. Biol Fertil Soils 35:328–337

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Piper CS (1966) Soil and plant analysis. University of Adelaide, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Saviozzi A, Bufalino P, Levi-Minzi R, Riffaldi R (2002) Biochemical activities in a degraded soil restored by two amendments: a laboratory study. Biol Fertil Soils 35:96–119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sparling GP (1992) Ratio of microbial biomass carbon to soil organic carbon as a sensitive indicator of changes in soil organic matter. Aust J Soil Res 30:195–207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Speir TW, Horswell J, Mclaren RG, Fietje G, Van Schalk AP (2004) Composted biosolids enhance fertility of a sandy loam soil under dairy pasture. Biol Fertil Soils 40:349–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subbiah BV, Asija GL (1956) A rapid procedure for the estimation of available nitrogen in soils. Curr Sci 25:259–260

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vance ED, Brookes PK, Jackson DS (1987) An extraction method for measuring microbial biomass C. Soil Biol Biochem 19:703–707

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walkley A, Black IA (1934) An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37:29–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav RL, Sharma RK (1978) Correlation and regression studies between yield and its attributes in sugarcane varieties. Indian J Sugarcane Technol 1:17–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Yodor RF (1936) A direct method of aggregate analysis of soil and study of physical nature of erosion losses. J Am Soc Agron 28:337–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaller JG, Kopke U (2004) Effects of traditional and biodynamic farmyard manure amendment on yields, soil chemical, biochemical and biological properties in a long-term experiment. Biol Fertil Soils 40:222–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaman M, Cameron KC, Di HJ, Nooman MJ (1998) Nitrogen mineralization rates from soil amended with diary pond waste. Aust J Soil Res 36:217–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. P. Singh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Singh, K.P., Suman, A., Singh, P.N. et al. Improving quality of sugarcane-growing soils by organic amendments under subtropical climatic conditions of India. Biol Fertil Soils 44, 367–376 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-007-0216-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-007-0216-8

Keywords

Navigation